‘Attempts to hijack the CLARITY Act are shameful’: Trump advisor slams banks

ambcrypto發佈於 2026-03-11更新於 2026-03-11

文章摘要

White House advisor Patrick Witt criticizes the banking lobby for opposing the pro-innovation CLARITY Act, calling attempts to turn it into an anti-competition bill "shameful." The dispute centers on stablecoin rewards, which banks argue create an uneven playing field and risk deposit flight, potentially reducing bank lending. Stablecoin issuers view restrictions as a threat to their business model and cite competition with China's digital yuan. Lawmakers propose limiting types of stablecoin reward activities as a compromise, but the bill's future remains uncertain without resolution.

The White House continues to express disappointment with the banking lobby’s hardline against the crypto market structure bill, the CLARITY Act.

The two industries, the crypto and banking sectors, have failed to reach an amicable agreement on stablecoin rewards. The stablecoin rewards issue has stalled the bill’s progress since early this year.

At a recent bankers’ summit in Washington, the industry maintained a hardline stance against any compromise on the bill, prompting criticism from the White House.

In response, Trump’s crypto advisor, Patrick Witt, said,

“The CLARITY Act must remain a pro-innovation piece of legislation. Attempts to hijack the legislative process and turn it into an anti-competition bill are shameful.”

Bankers’ plea

Witt’s statement followed Rob Nichols, president of the American Bankers Association, an advocacy group, who framed the current dispute as ‘anti-competitive.’

During the Washington summit, Nichols cautioned,

“Our industry welcomes competition and innovation...what we don’t support is an uneven playing field.”

Since last year, the traditional banking sector has maintained that stablecoin rewards will lead to deposit flight and harm the financial system.

The industry argues that the U.S. stablecoin law, the GENIUS Act, created a loophole that allows intermediaries to share yield with users, thereby bypassing the direct reward ban imposed on issuers.

To mitigate this, banks want the ban extended to intermediaries as well. This would mean amending the GENIUS Act or imposing the ban in the CLARITY Act.

However, stablecoin issuers view this as a threat to their business model. In fact, beyond disrupting their model, supporters view stablecoin yield as a national security issue, citing China’s push in the sector with rewards for digital yuan.

Proposed CLARITY Act compromise

Senators have tried to bring the two sides into a compromise on the issue.

During the banks’ summit, Democrat Senator for Maryland, Angela Alsobrooks, stressed that each faction will be ‘just a little bit unhappy’ but will help push for clear rules for the sector.

“We absolutely have to have these protections to prevent the deposit flight, but we’re going to probably have to make some compromises.”

Congressional Research Service (CRS) estimates that the stablecoin yield could reduce bank lending by $65 billion to $1.26 trillion, because the GENIUS Act prohibits lending of stablecoin reserves. The CRS urged banks to offer higher interest rates to depositors to remain competitive.

The compromise lawmakers have been pushing for is to narrow the types of stablecoin activity crypto platforms can allow to receive stablecoin rewards.

However, the banks’ opposition has faced a series of criticisms from the White House for the past few days. As such, the path forward for the CLARITY Act remains uncertain unless the concerned stakeholders resolve the stablecoin yield issue.


Final Summary

  • White House slammed banks for framing the CLARITY Act as an ‘anti-competition’ bill.
  • The banking industry reiterated its concerns about stablecoin yields during a recent meeting.

相關問答

QWhat is the main criticism expressed by Trump's crypto advisor, Patrick Witt, regarding the CLARITY Act?

APatrick Witt criticized attempts to hijack the legislative process and turn the CLARITY Act into an anti-competition bill, stating that such attempts are shameful and that the act must remain a pro-innovation piece of legislation.

QWhy does the banking industry oppose stablecoin rewards according to the article?

AThe banking industry opposes stablecoin rewards because they believe it will lead to deposit flight and harm the financial system, arguing that the GENIUS Act created a loophole allowing intermediaries to share yield with users, bypassing the direct reward ban on issuers.

QWhat compromise have lawmakers proposed regarding stablecoin rewards in the CLARITY Act?

ALawmakers have proposed narrowing the types of stablecoin activity that crypto platforms can allow to receive stablecoin rewards as a compromise to address concerns from both the banking and crypto sectors.

QWhat did the American Bankers Association president, Rob Nichols, say about competition during the Washington summit?

ARob Nichols stated that the banking industry welcomes competition and innovation but does not support an uneven playing field, framing the current dispute over the CLARITY Act as 'anti-competitive'.

QAccording to the Congressional Research Service (CRS), what impact could stablecoin yield have on bank lending?

AThe Congressional Research Service estimates that stablecoin yield could reduce bank lending by $65 billion to $1.26 trillion because the GENIUS Act prohibits lending of stablecoin reserves, and they urged banks to offer higher interest rates to depositors to remain competitive.

你可能也喜歡

印度最大资管 SBI 上市,交易数据能看出什么信号?

印度最大资管公司SBI Funds Management于7月21日上市,完成约10亿美元发行,获得约42倍认购,但首日收盘价仅较发行价上涨约6.3%。这组交易数据释放出复杂信号:一方面,强劲的认购倍数验证了印度市场对大体量优质资产的需求依然存在;另一方面,温和的首日涨幅(远低于上市前灰市约16%的溢价预期)表明,市场虽有买盘,但拒绝无条件追高,定价趋于理性。 此次IPO被视为印度IPO市场的一个关键“价格锚”和风向标。其成功意味着IPO窗口正在重新打开,但窗口优先面向那些品牌力强、现金流稳定、能清晰阐述长期增长逻辑的公司(如后续可能推进的NSE、Reliance Jio等项目)。SBI的案例显示,强资产可以发行,大资金愿意承接,但估值不能仅依赖稀缺性和故事。 另一个值得关注的变量是极低的承销费率(据报道约0.01%),这导致部分国际大行退出。这并非“华尔街看空印度”,而是反映了如SBI这类强势发行人议价能力的提升。它们倚重自身品牌、母行渠道和本土分销网络,降低了对外部投行销售的依赖。本土券商则更愿意以较低费用换取项目资源。但这种低费率模式若被弱势发行人复制,可能带来定价质量下降等风险。 SBI的高认购得益于印度资管行业渗透率提升的长期叙事,但其温和涨幅也提醒市场,行业增长虽稳定(年复合增长率预计16%-18%),但仍受股市表现、利率环境等多因素影响,投资者不愿提前支付过高溢价。 总之,SBI的上市标志着印度IPO市场有条件重启。其真正意义将在后续大型项目(如Jio、NSE)的推进中得到检验:它们能否在合理估值下成功发行,将决定当前市场信心的成色,以及发行人议价权上升是否是结构性趋势。

marsbit45 分鐘前

印度最大资管 SBI 上市,交易数据能看出什么信号?

marsbit45 分鐘前

交易

現貨
活动图片