Secures Over $60 Million in Funding from Dragonfly, Sequoia, and Others. An In-Depth Look at the On-Chain Derivatives Protocol Variational | CryptoSeed

链捕手發佈於 2026-05-22更新於 2026-05-22

文章摘要

Variational, a decentralized derivatives trading platform, has raised over $61.8 million in total funding, including a recent $50 million Series A led by Dragonfly Capital. Investors include Sequoia Capital, Coinbase Ventures, Bain Capital Crypto, and Hack VC. The platform, with over $810 million in Open Interest (ranking 4th among on-chain derivatives protocols), is founded by Lucas Schuermann and Edward Yu. Both are Columbia University graduates and former partners at quant fund Qu Capital. They later held senior roles at Genesis Trading, handling billions in trading volume. The broader team includes talent from Google, Meta, and top trading firms like Jane Street. Operating on Arbitrum, Variational distinguishes itself by aggregating external liquidity from CEXs, DEXs, and traditional market makers using an RFQ (Request-for-Quote) model, positioning itself more as a broker than an exchange like Hyperliquid. Its dual product line features Omni for retail users (offering up to 50x leverage on ~450+ crypto and TradFi pairs) and Pro for institutional OTC trading. Currently in a pre-TGE phase, Variational has launched an "Omni Points" system, with 50% of its upcoming $VAR token supply allocated for community incentives through trading-based rewards and referrals until Q3 2026.

Author: momo, ChainCatcher

Recently, the decentralized derivatives trading platform Variational announced the completion of a $50 million Series A financing round led by Dragonfly. Combined with three previous funding rounds, Variational has raised a cumulative total of $61.8 million. Its investor lineup is quite impressive, including not only Dragonfly but also renowned institutions such as Sequoia Capital, Coinbase Ventures, Bain Capital Crypto, Hack VC, and others.

According to DeFiLlama data, the open interest (OI) on Variational has exceeded $810 million. While there remains a significant gap compared to Hyperliquid's $9.4 billion, its OI currently ranks fourth among on-chain derivatives protocols.

In the fiercely competitive decentralized derivatives sector, why has Variational continued to secure backing from top-tier institutions? What is the team's background? What are its differentiated approaches? This article provides a brief overview.

What is the team's background?

In terms of team background and entrepreneurial experience, Variational and Hyperliquid share several similarities: both teams graduated from prestigious universities, come from quantitative trading backgrounds, founded quantitative funds, and subsequently transitioned to building on-chain derivatives platforms.

However, unlike Hyperliquid's early mystique and anonymous team approach, Variational discloses its founding team's background and entrepreneurial journey in its whitepaper.

Variational was co-founded by Lucas Schuermann and Edward Yu. CEO Lucas graduated from Columbia University and was previously responsible for trading systems engineering architecture; Edward Yu has a Chinese background and was originally a quantitative analyst. The two met while studying and conducting research in the engineering department at Columbia University and co-founded the quantitative hedge fund Qu Capital in 2017.

In 2019, Qu Capital was acquired by Digital Currency Group. Subsequently, both joined Genesis Trading: Lucas served as Vice President of Engineering, and Edward Yu served as Vice President of Quantitative Trading.

According to the whitepaper, before leaving Genesis in 2021, their team had processed trading volumes in the hundreds of billions of dollars. After leaving, they founded their proprietary trading firm, Variational, and secured $10 million in funding.

In the following years, the team operated proprietary trading strategies while integrating with mainstream CEX and DEX trading interfaces. Later, based on their own trading business and system experience, they began developing and operating the Variational Protocol.

Additionally, Variational's development and quantitative team members also hail from technology and quantitative institutions such as Google, Meta, Virtu Financial, IMC Trading, and Jane Street. The whitepaper states that core technical team members generally possess over a decade of experience in software engineering or quantitative research.

What are its product features? How does it differ from Hyperliquid?

Judging from the trading interface, there isn't a significant difference between Variational and Hyperliquid. The platform currently lists approximately 450 trading pairs, mainly covering cryptocurrency and TradFi assets, offering users leverage up to 50x. The TradFi section is currently in Beta testing. According to official disclosures, the TradFi market will list over 100 trading pairs.

However, in its press release, Variational emphasizes a distinctly different positioning from Hyperliquid.

Variational describes its model as more akin to a brokerage rather than another exchange in the style of Hyperliquid. Its target users are not limited to crypto-native traders; it aims to make the on-chain derivatives trading experience closer to traditional markets through zero-fee trading and liquidity aggregation.

Currently operating on Arbitrum, Variational employs a dual-product-line model. The Omni version primarily targets retail users, positioned as a perpetual contracts trading product aggregating liquidity from multiple sources, while the Pro version caters to institutional over-the-counter derivatives trading.

The most significant difference from Hyperliquid lies in order matching and liquidity mechanisms. Hyperliquid relies on its self-built L1 chain and a public central limit order book (CLOB), with market makers or the HLP treasury within the protocol competing to provide quotes, and traders paying maker/taker fees. In contrast, Variational uses an RFQ (Request for Quote) model, with a single liquidity provider as the counterparty. It does not rely on on-chain internal market making but instead aggregates external liquidity in real-time from sources like CEXs, DEXs, OTC channels, and traditional financial market makers, managing risk through hedging.

The rationale for choosing this differentiated path, according to Variational CEO Lucas, is that on-chain liquidity still lags far behind traditional trading venues like the CME, and order book models face a "cold start" problem. Aggregating liquidity from external sources avoids the need to rebuild liquidity from scratch on-chain.

What is the current stage? What participation opportunities are available?

Variational is currently still in the Pre-TGE stage; the $VAR token has not been issued. The project initially planned a TGE in Q1 2025, which has since been postponed. No new definitive TGE date has been officially announced.

In December 2025, Variational launched the Omni Points points system. The official statement indicates that 50% of the $VAR supply will be allocated for community incentives, distributed gradually through mechanisms like Points rather than a one-time airdrop.

Regarding points, 3 million points have been retroactively distributed to early users. Subsequently, points are distributed every Friday based on the previous week's trading snapshot. The points program is scheduled to conclude by Q3 2026 at the latest.

The main current participation opportunity is to engage in perpetual contracts trading on the Omni platform. Trading volume is the core factor for earning points, with additional point bonuses available for holding positions over time and referring others.

相關問答

QWhat is the total funding amount raised by the decentralized derivatives platform Variational, and who led its Series A round?

AVariational has raised a total of $61.8 million. Its Series A round of $50 million was led by Dragonfly.

QWhat are the key differences between Variational and its competitor Hyperliquid in terms of their operational models?

AThe key difference lies in their order matching and liquidity mechanisms. Hyperliquid relies on its own L1 blockchain with a public Central Limit Order Book (CLOB). Variational uses an RFQ (Request for Quote) model, acting as a single liquidity provider counterparty that aggregates external liquidity from CEXs, DEXs, OTC channels, and TradFi market makers, then manages risk through hedging.

QWhat is the professional background of Variational's founding team prior to starting the protocol?

ACo-founders Lucas Schuermann and Edward Yu met at Columbia University. They co-founded the quantitative hedge fund Qu Capital in 2017, which was later acquired by Digital Currency Group. They then joined Genesis Trading, where Lucas served as VP of Engineering and Edward Yu as VP of Quantitative Trading, before leaving in 2021 to found Variational.

QWhat is the current stage of Variational's token ($VAR) launch, and how is the project engaging its community?

AVariational is currently in the Pre-TGE stage, and the $VAR token has not been launched yet. The previously planned TGE for Q1 2025 has been postponed with no new official date announced. The project is engaging its community through an 'Omni Points' loyalty program launched in December 2025, with 50% of the $VAR supply designated for community incentives distributed via points and other mechanisms over time.

QOn which blockchain does Variational primarily operate, and what are its two main product lines?

AVariational primarily operates on the Arbitrum blockchain. It follows a dual-product line model: the 'Omni' version targets retail users as a perpetual contracts trading product aggregating liquidity from multiple sources, while the 'Pro' version is designed for institutional over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives trading.

你可能也喜歡

GSR研究指出以太坊的身份危机正在加深

GSR研究指出,以太坊正面临深刻的身份危机。报告称,以太坊基金会(EF)在2026年已有至少九位高级成员离职,包括多位核心协议负责人,这引发了社区对其战略方向的担忧。内部推行的“CROPS”(抗审查、开源、隐私、安全)框架被部分社区成员视为忽视了增长与采用,而此刻以太坊正面临来自Solana等竞争对手的压力。 人员动荡加剧了一场更广泛的辩论:EF应继续专注于研究和协议开发,还是应更积极地捍卫以太坊的市场地位?前基金会成员Dankrad Feist呼吁建立一个资金超10亿美元的新组织来填补机构空白,而知名ETH支持者David Hoffman则因对领导层失去信心而清仓了ETH。 市场表现加深了危机感。ETH年内下跌约30%,ETH/BTC汇率跌至2025年中期以来最低点,网络收入也被其他公链蚕食。 Vitalik Buterin对此回应,主张EF应保持“小船”定位,聚焦于CROPS,而非成为以太坊的增长部门。他强调以太坊的核心优势在于“可信中立性”,并阐述了三大技术支柱:通过AI实现无漏洞软件的正式验证、独特的“可用链共识”特性,以及通过FOCIL等提案减少对中介的依赖。 报告总结认为,Buterin的愿景虽未出错,但以太坊的执行窗口并非无限。核心问题在于,一个更精简、专注的EF能否在维护以太坊根本优势的同时,让生态系统的其他部分构建起增长引擎。截至发稿时,ETH交易价格为2,097美元。

bitcoinist40 分鐘前

GSR研究指出以太坊的身份危机正在加深

bitcoinist40 分鐘前

从矿池到火星:王纯为何会坐进SpaceX驾驶舱?

当SpaceX宣布比特币矿池F2Pool联合创始人王纯将担任首次商业载人星际飞行任务指挥官时,许多人感到震惊。但深入了解王纯的经历及加密行业与航天领域日益紧密的联系后,便能发现这并非偶然。 王纯是中国最早的比特币布道者与基础设施建设者之一。他创立的F2Pool不仅是早期大型矿池,更为比特币网络奠定了全球算力基础,体现了从数字世界“能源工人”到太空文明建设者的跨越。这种长期主义与技术乌托邦精神,与Elon Musk的航天愿景内核一致。 加密行业与SpaceX的靠近,源于两者同属下一代基础设施竞争的核心。SpaceX旨在大幅降低太空成本,开启太空经济新时代,而加密货币则可能成为跨星球经济中天然的价值流通网络。两者共享高风险、长期主义的基因,共同指向能源、算力、AI与太空设施构成的未来文明体系。 王纯的入选也标志着人类航天史进入新阶段:深空探索的主导力量正从国家行为转向商业公司与科技资本。这类似于大航海时代商业资本推动全球扩张的历史重现。王纯提醒“不该把登陆计划留给下一代”,强调了火星作为多星球文明关键目标的意义,而非止步于更易商业化的月球。 总之,从矿池到火星,王纯的历程预示了未来文明演化的方向:科技公司、AI系统与全球技术资本正成为人类星际扩张的新驱动力量。

marsbit6 小時前

从矿池到火星:王纯为何会坐进SpaceX驾驶舱?

marsbit6 小時前

单价低于0.05美元的顶级加密货币,若实现采用目标,涨幅潜力或超1000%

随着投资者寻找下一轮加密市场爆发增长机会,价格低于0.05美元的低价代币再度成为焦点。这类资产对早期投资者具有吸引力,因为即使采用率小幅提升也可能带来巨大的百分比收益。以下是三个备受关注、价格低于0.05美元的加密货币项目,分析师认为若其采用目标达成,它们可能带来1000%或以上的上涨潜力。 **Ozak AI ($OZ):早期AI项目,势头迅猛** Ozak AI是本周期最受瞩目的低价加密项目之一。目前处于预售第七阶段,价格为0.014美元。该项目起步价为0.001美元,早期参与者已获得1300%的收益,预售已筹集约700万美元,售出超12亿代币。其核心是构建一个AI驱动的市场情报平台,通过其Ozak Stream网络将实时数据输入运行在去中心化物理基础设施(DePIN)上的预测AI模型。用户可使用自定义预测代理、加密数据保险库,并使用$OZ代币访问分析、进行质押、治理和货币化AI生成的洞察。项目已与SINT和Weblume建立战略合作。若上市后采用加速,其预期1美元的交易所上市价格可能带来超过1000%的上涨空间。 **Kaspa (KAS):高速区块链,仍处早期采用阶段** Kaspa常被称为市场上最快的工作量证明区块链之一。它采用区块DAG架构,允许多个区块同时确认,从而在保持去中心化和安全的同时实现高吞吐量。尽管社区不断壮大,其价格长期处于几分钱区间。支持者认为,若在支付、挖矿和可扩展应用方面的采用得以扩大,Kaspa可能经历显著的价值重估。 **VeChain (VET):企业级区块链,处于折价状态** VeChain是市场上最成熟的低价代币之一,专注于供应链管理、物流和企业数据验证,并已建立起许多新项目缺乏的现实世界合作伙伴关系。其价格长期在几分钱徘徊,相对于其采用程度常被提及估值偏低。若下一轮牛市企业区块链应用扩大,其基础设施优先的方法可能推动代币需求复苏,使1000%的上涨成为可讨论的现实目标。 **低价代币吸引早期资本的原因** 低于0.05美元的代币具有心理和数学上的吸引力。例如,以100美元按0.014美元价格可购入约7143个Ozak AI代币,若价格达到1美元,其价值将超过7000美元。然而,高潜在回报也伴随着高风险,项目的执行、采用率及整体市场状况将最终决定成败。 **总结** 低价加密货币并非稳赢保证,但当基本面与时机契合时,它们往往提供实现指数级增长的最清晰路径。Ozak AI因其早期吸引力和AI驱动的实用性脱颖而出,而Kaspa和VeChain则代表了可能从新一轮采用周期中受益的成熟项目。对于愿意超越价格、关注长期潜力的投资者而言,这些低于0.05美元的代币可能在未来几年提供最具吸引力的增长机会。

TheNewsCrypto6 小時前

单价低于0.05美元的顶级加密货币,若实现采用目标,涨幅潜力或超1000%

TheNewsCrypto6 小時前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片