Key Metrics to Measure Blockchain Network Performance

Bitcoinist發佈於 2022-07-05更新於 2022-07-05

文章摘要

Everything out there has a particular set of characteristics against which its performance can be measured. Be it something as...

Everything out there has a particular set of characteristics against which its performance can be measured. Be it something as simple as a car or as intricately intertwined as the blockchain. These factors also help draw a comparison between two or multiple blockchains in order to find out the one that’s best for developing projects, trading coins, or minting NFTs.
So, let’s find out the key metrics employed to measure the blockchain network performance. You could also use these to compare Zenith, a hybrid chain, with other blockchains and find out how it outperforms them all by a massive margin.
Transactions Per Second
One of the key metrics that anyone fairly acquainted with the blockchain industry would look into is Transactions per Second (TPS). It is basically the number of transactions that can be processed in a second. TPS is used to identify the scalability requirements of a blockchain and the volume of data it can process. Here the number of transactions submitted to the blockchain and those that were stored in the ledger are separately measured for higher clarity and better results.
Also, remember that a blockchain with a high TPS necessarily does not make it superior to other available options since there are a lot of other factors to be considered as well. Bitcoin, for instance, has a low TPS, something in the range of 5-10, but has thousands of nodes worldwide at any given moment, which makes it one of the most sought-after blockchains.
Transaction Latency
Transaction Latency is the amount of time that passes between a particular transaction being submitted to a blockchain and it being approved or rejected. Once a transaction is approved, its effects are visible across the blockchain and can be brought into use.
This key metric helps compare blockchains based on their ability to quickly reflect transactions and is a critical aspect in every sense.
Transaction Throughput
Transaction Throughput is the time required for valid records to be added to blocks. The calculation of elapsed time starts only after the record has been approved and the ones rejected by the blockchain are not taken into consideration.
To calculate the Transaction Throughput, just divide the total number of records added to the blocks by the total time taken in seconds.
Energy Efficiency
Though not directly a network performance indicator, Energy Efficiency plays a critical role considering the scarcity of energy across the globe and how consensus around saving it is rising worldwide. A blockchain requires a certain amount of energy to function, basically to validate, process, and store transactions. The amount of energy consumed here depends, to a great extent, on the consensus mechanism employed.
While most major blockchains use Proof of Work (PoW), a high-energy consuming model, various newer blockchains rely on more advanced and low-energy consuming Proof of Stake (PoS) or Proof of Authority (PoA) models. So, before you choose a blockchain the next time to develop a project, make sure to check which consensus mechanism is employed.
Number of Validators
Validators are those who verify transactions on the blockchain in exchange for rewards. These validators generally dedicate a computer to the blockchain to maintain its integrity. Once a transaction is verified, it is added to the ledger of the blockchain.
Whenever a transaction is initiated on the blockchain, validators add it to a block for verification. Once the block is completed, it is then stored on the blockchain and cannot be modified anymore. All this work is done by validators. So, the more the number of validators, the better the performance of the blockchain!
Block Time
Block time is the amount of time required by validators or miners to verify the transactions stored in a block, and once it is complete, create another one. The total time elapsed between these steps comes out to be the block time. Also, miners or validators receive rewards for their participation in the form of cryptocurrency.
Conclusion
Remember that every new block created on the blockchain stores a reference of the block preceding it. So, it is not possible to alter the blocks or remove any from the blockchain since it would easily be noticed.
Based on these six key metrics to measure the blockchain network performance, you can easily compare and choose a blockchain from hundreds of available options. But if you were to develop a project, for instance, a Decentralized App (dApp) or create NFTs, Zenith Chain would be the best choice given its support for EVM-compatible tools, along with being a lot faster with 300,000 Transactions per Second (TPS) and cheaper than other available options.
Zenith Chain ensures programmability and interoperability. relies on 83 validators to process and store transactions on the blockchain, using the Proof of Authority (POA) consensus that can support short block time and lower fees.
Zenith Chain also has a thriving hybrid trading ecosystem, built to meet all Web 3 needs. FuzionX is a cutting-edge, versatile crypto exchange that will bring together a decentralized wallet, DApp browser, futures, margin, NFT wallet and marketplace, 600+ tokens and coins, credit and debit card funding options, fiat to crypto conversion, P2P trading, ETF, staking, move to earn, metaverse gateway, and so much more.

你可能也喜歡

SBF提出新代币偿还FTX受害者,但这可能实现吗?

摘要:据报道,正在服刑的FTX创始人萨姆·班克曼-弗里德(SBF)近期表达了通过发起一个新的代币项目来偿还FTX受害者的个人愿望。这一说法因极具话题性而引发关注,但其与法律现实存在巨大差距。 核心信息点: * 这只是SBF的个人希望,并非一个积极的、可行的计划。 * 背景是,美国上诉法院已于2026年6月12日维持了对SBF的25年刑期判决。 * 目前没有任何经过验证的、在法律上可行的代币项目存在。 文章分析指出,作为一名正在服长期刑期的重罪犯,SBF在运营公司、筹集资金、发行证券或管理代币项目方面面临显而易见的法律障碍。即使他个人相信新方案能偿还受害者,法院、监管机构、债权人或破产管理人也不太可能允许。 该言论之所以仍受关注,是因为FTX倒闭是加密货币历史上的标志性事件,任何关于偿还受害者或新计划的提及都会触动市场记忆。这同时也引出了一个更广泛的行业问题:失败的平台能否利用代币来弥补损失?在FTX的案例中,法律和声誉障碍远高于普通的重组故事。 因此,本文的立论点不应是SBF将推出代币,而应强调他个人幻想与法律现实之间的张力:即便司法系统已做出严厉判决,他仍 reportedly 设想一条基于代币的偿还路径。任何实际的偿还过程,仍将严格遵循法律程序、破产结构和债权人追偿机制,而非一个来自监狱牢房的想法。

bitcoinist3 小時前

SBF提出新代币偿还FTX受害者,但这可能实现吗?

bitcoinist3 小時前

贝莱德以BITA为代码推出备兑看涨比特币ETF

贝莱德推出了一款新的比特币ETF产品——iShares Bitcoin Premium Income ETF,交易代码为BITA。与单纯的现货比特币基金不同,该产品采用备兑看涨期权策略,旨在通过出售期权获得权利金收入,并向投资者提供每月派息,为寻求加密相关收益但不愿直接使用DeFi或离岸借贷产品的投资者提供了新选择。 这种策略意味着产品在比特币横盘或震荡市场中可能表现更佳,但在比特币价格快速上涨时,其收益可能会落后于单纯的现货持有。这并非产品缺陷,而是其设计核心:贝莱德将比特币波动性打包成一种收入策略,为更保守或注重收益的投资者提供了更接近传统期权ETF的产品形式。 BITA的推出表明比特币ETF市场正迅速超越单纯的现货产品,进入策略多样化阶段,如赚取溢价收入、对冲和结构化敞口等。这标志着比特币正逐渐被视作可整合进更广泛基金架构的市场要素,而不仅仅是孤立资产。 该产品主要吸引那些已接受比特币投资逻辑,但希望在经纪账户内获得更平滑、以收益为导向产品的投资者,以及寻求在不单纯依赖价格升值的情况下讨论比特币敞口的投资顾问。它并非现货比特币或IBIT的替代品,而是一种不同的工具。关键在于投资者是否理解其收益与上涨潜力之间的权衡。

bitcoinist5 小時前

贝莱德以BITA为代码推出备兑看涨比特币ETF

bitcoinist5 小時前

日本加息,为什么全世界都在紧张?

日本央行在2026年6月将政策利率提升至1%,这是自1995年来的首次。尽管1%的利率在主要经济体中并不高,但由于日本长期充当全球最低成本融资中心的特殊角色,此次加息引发了全球市场的广泛关注。 过去二十余年,日本近乎零的利率环境催生了大规模的日元套利交易。国际资本以极低成本借入日元,转而投资于全球高收益资产,如美国科技股和新兴市场债券,这为全球资产价格上涨提供了重要的流动性基础。日本加息意味着这一廉价资金源头开始收紧,可能引发全球资本的去杠杆化调整。 日本长期维持超低利率,源于其人口老龄化、长期通缩和高额政府债务等结构性约束。然而,疫情后全球通胀传导、国内工资持续增长(近年春斗涨薪均超5%)以及日元贬值压力,共同推动其货币政策转向。 市场担忧的核心并非当前1%的利率水平,而是日本持续三十年的超宽松货币政策框架发生根本性转变的趋势。这种变化将重塑全球套利交易的逻辑和风险资产的定价基础。不过,决定全球资本最终流向的关键,仍在于美日之间的利差变化。如果未来美联储进入降息周期而日本继续加息,两者货币政策差异的收窄可能对国际资本市场产生更深远的影响。 简言之,日本加息标志着全球最重要的低成本融资来源进入正常化进程,这可能引发建立在廉价日元资金之上的全球资本配置体系进行深度重估。

marsbit7 小時前

日本加息,为什么全世界都在紧张?

marsbit7 小時前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片