Ripple Vs. SEC Battle Update: Lawsuit Officially Over As $125M Receipt Of Payment To Regulator Surfaces

bitcoinist發佈於 2025-09-23更新於 2025-09-23

文章摘要

Former SEC lawyer Marc Fagel has revealed that the $125 million monetary penalty in the Ripple Vs. SEC case has...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Former SEC lawyer Marc Fagel has revealed that the $125 million monetary penalty in the Ripple Vs. SEC case has been paid to the U.S. Treasury. This officially ends the long-running legal battle between the crypto firm and the regulator. 

Ripple Vs. SEC Case Ends As Crypto Firm Pays Monetary Judgment

In an X post, Fagel confirmed that the $125 million penalty in the Ripple vs. SEC case was paid to the U.S. Treasury last month. He shared a letter addressed to Judge Analisa Torres, which stated that both parties had agreed to the release of the funds from escrow for the crypto firm to pay the full court-ordered penalty plus statutory interest. 

Furthermore, the letter revealed that the SEC had provided the appropriate wire transfer instructions after which Ripple directed the bank to make the payment, and the bank confirmed that the agreed amount had been released. Meanwhile, the balance of the fund was returned to the crypto firm, with all these procedures formally ending the Ripple vs. SEC case. 

Ripple
Source: Document from Marc Fagel on X

Notably, this payment follows the Court of Appeals’ approval of both parties’ motion to dismiss their respective appeals in the Ripple vs. SEC case last month. The $125 million had been kept in escrow around the time when Ripple and the SEC filed their appeals. The crypto firm had asked for this as an injunction to prevent having to pay the SEC while the appeal was ongoing, since there was the possibility of the sum being reduced. 

The appeal didn’t proceed as planned, as the emergence of a pro-crypto SEC administration following Trump’s return to the White House led to a settlement between both parties. However, Judge Torres opted against adopting the settlement agreement and ordered that Ripple must still pay the $125 million penalty. Both parties agreed to dismiss their respective appeals in the Ripple vs. SEC and simply adhere to Judge Torres’ judgment.  

Lawsuit No Longer Responsible For Price Action 

In an X post, legal expert Bill Morgan remarked that the Ripple vs. SEC lawsuit excuse has run its course for any further lack of XRP adoption or flat price action. Basically, the lawsuit cannot be held responsible if the XRP price underperforms moving forward. The altcoin had rallied to as high as $3.4 following the joint motion to dismiss the case, but has traded below this level since then. 

The XRP price is currently on a downtrend amid the broader crypto market correction. Morgan pointed out that the current XRP decline is due to the heavy correlation with Bitcoin. This came as he made light of the fact that the altcoin has been down during this period despite several bullish fundamentals that have emerged. 

At the time of writing, the XRP price is trading at around $2.87, down in the last 24 hours, according to data from CoinMarketCap.

XRP
XRP trading at $2.86 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com
Featured image from Getty Images, chart from Tradingview.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Scott Matherson is a leading crypto writer at Bitcoinist, who possesses a sharp analytical mind and a deep understanding of the digital currency landscape. Scott has earned a reputation for delivering thought-provoking and well-researched articles that resonate with both newcomers and seasoned crypto enthusiasts. Outside of his writing, Scott is passionate about promoting crypto literacy and often works to educate the public on the potential of blockchain.

你可能也喜歡

a16z:AI 时代,公司争夺人才先从职位命名开始

本文探讨了在AI时代,公司如何通过重新命名职位来争夺人才和定义新兴能力。文章以Palantir创造的“前沿部署工程师”(FDE)为例,说明这一角色将客户现场的技术落地工作从边缘的售后或实施范畴,提升为一种关键的组织能力。这种策略被称为“职位名称套利”,即当某种能力价值上升而旧有职位名称未能体现时,抢先定义新职位可以吸引人才并占据市场心智。 职位名称是一种组织语言,反映了工作的价值变迁。从“程序员”到“软件工程师”,从“数据录入”到“机器学习工程师”,名称的变化标志着该工作在商业中战略地位的提升。有效的命名不是虚假镀金,而应基于真实涌现的新工作模式,例如“法律工程师”或“增长工程师”,它们对应了AI时代所需的、兼具业务理解和自动化能力的新角色。 对于AI to B创业者而言,思考产品将在客户组织内催生何种新岗位至关重要。为一个新角色命名(如Legal Engineer),能帮助客户内部识别和授权这些高杠杆个体,从而反过来巩固产品的心智定位。文章指出,AI转型的深层挑战往往在于组织缺乏语言来认可那些创造新价值的人。 当前,AI原生公司的产品与服务边界日益模糊,客户现场经验直接塑造产品演进。因此,像FDE这样能准确描述“在客户现场将复杂需求转化为可复制能力”的职位名称,比传统的“售后”或“实施”更贴合实际价值。最终,成功的公司不仅能命名新能力,更能从汇报线、激励机制等方面真正将这些角色置于组织的核心,从而构建竞争壁垒。

marsbit31 分鐘前

a16z:AI 时代,公司争夺人才先从职位命名开始

marsbit31 分鐘前

IOSG创始人:以太坊不需要再来一次技术信仰,它需要一次马斯克式的妥协

IOSG创始人Jocy撰文指出,以太坊当前的核心问题并非缺乏技术信仰或路线图,而是需要一个“马斯克式的妥协”——即创始人Vitalik需要更深入地理解商业现实,并亲自推动以太坊在现实世界中的杀手级应用落地。 文章认为,近期由前EF研究员和大型ETH持有方支持的ETHLabs等新机构的出现,是市场对以太坊基金会“无为而治”模式投下的不信任票。Vitalik与马斯克的根本区别在于,后者善于先吃透商业逻辑再驱动技术,而以太坊则习惯从技术和价值观出发,期待生态自行生长。在当下多链竞争、注意力向AI迁移的时代,这种模式的运气已不可持续。 作者指出,以太坊面临的真正威胁是注意力的流失,而不仅仅是其他区块链的竞争。解决方案在于构建一个清晰的、能吸引顶尖人才的现实世界应用叙事。尽管以太坊基金会正试图通过分散化治理(如多节点独立决策)来应对挑战,但这可能带来方向碎片化、凝聚力不足的新问题。真正的凝聚力不能仅靠共同持有ETH资产,更需要一个所有人都看得懂并愿意押注的共同目标。 文章最后强调,留给以太坊“俯身入局”、专注商业应用的时间窗口可能只有12到18个月,时间是其最无情的对手。创始人需要从仰望星空转向亲自下场,才能让理想之光真正照进现实。

marsbit2 小時前

IOSG创始人:以太坊不需要再来一次技术信仰,它需要一次马斯克式的妥协

marsbit2 小時前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片