FTX To Release $1.6 Billion In Creditor Repayments Sept. 30 – Details

bitcoinist發佈於 2025-09-21更新於 2025-09-21

文章摘要

Reports have disclosed that the FTX Recovery Trust is preparing to release another $1.6 billion to its creditors by September...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Reports have disclosed that the FTX Recovery Trust is preparing to release another $1.6 billion to its creditors by September 30. The payout marks the third distribution since the exchange collapsed in late 2022, and payments are expected to reach verified claimants within three business days once they are processed through BitGo, Kraken, or Payoneer.

FTX: Breakdown Of Payout Classes

The upcoming release will be divided among several groups. US customer claims will get an additional 40% this round, pushing their total recovery to about 95%.

International customers under the dotcom entity will receive another 6%, bringing them closer to 78% overall. General unsecured creditors, along with those holding digital asset loan claims, will see 24% more, which raises their cumulative recovery to nearly 85%.

Convenience claims are also being settled in full, with reports stating they will receive 120% compared to their original claims. These are usually smaller cases that are handled quickly to reduce costs and speed up the overall process.

Verification And Distribution

Creditors who want to access the payout must have completed all required verification steps. The trust has already urged claimants to confirm their chosen payment channel before the deadline, as unverified accounts risk delays.

Total crypto market cap currently at $3.98 trillion. Chart: TradingView

Once released, the funds are expected to clear into accounts within days, giving long-awaited relief to thousands who lost money in the collapse.

The payment in September is part of a larger FTX recovery process that has earmarked as much as $16.5 billion in assets to be returned to creditors.

While progress has been steady, many customers have still complained about the freezing of valuations at their November 2022 prices. At that time, digital currencies like Bitcoin and Ether traded far below the levels that would occur in 2025.

FTX: Questions On Fairness Remain

The question of fairness remains. Smaller convenience claims receive more than what they lost, while large creditors argue theirs should be weighed against the stagnant valuations of their assets.

This was intended under the company’s legal documents to facilitate administration and avoid extensive litigation, but it raised the ire of foreign creditors that have greater impediments than creditors situated in the US.

For now, the $1.6 billion payment is yet another milestone to the FTX rescue process, but it does not solve all the complaints.

With billions already paid out in previous rounds, the trust is still under pressure to continue disbursing and to finally bring closure to one of the largest cryptocurrency bankruptcies in history.

Featured image from Andrey Rudakov/Getty Images, chart from TradingView

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Christian, a journalist and editor with leadership roles in Philippine and Canadian media, is fueled by his love for writing and cryptocurrency. Off-screen, he's a cook and cinephile who's constantly intrigued by the size of the universe.

你可能也喜歡

您会惊讶地发现,WeChat 和 Telegram 在架构层面竟如此不同

微信与Telegram在架构层面有着根本性的差异,主要体现在数据存储、功能设计和生态开放度上。 **数据存储方式**:Telegram提供无限云端存储,所有消息历史在各设备间自动同步。微信则采用本地存储,消息在服务器交付后不保留,因此更换设备需通过特定功能迁移,且桌面版必须依赖手机在线确认才能登录。 **功能设计差异**:在频道讨论方面,Telegram为帖子自动关联评论区,实现一体化讨论。微信的公众号文章评论需经发布者审核才可显示,缺乏与文章直接关联的讨论系统,用户交流需跳转至聊天或小程序。文件传输上,Telegram支持最大2-4GB的文件,微信则限制为200MB,大文件需借助“文件传输助手”或第三方服务。 **开发与生态**:Telegram的Bot API完全开放免费,开发门槛低。微信小程序生态庞大(活跃数量超480万),但属于封闭系统,需经过审核、认证,甚至提供商业许可才能使用部分API,准入要求更高。 **支付整合**:微信支付深度融入中国日常生活,覆盖绝大多数线下场景及公共服务,替代了现金和银行应用。Telegram没有内置的法定货币支付系统,主要通过第三方机器人实现支付功能,尤其侧重加密货币,这反映了其去中心化理念,但在传统金融基础设施完善的地区,限制了其作为日常金融工具的应用。 **安全考量**:文章未深入讨论加密机制。Telegram提供端到端加密的私密聊天选项,而微信聊天信息不采用端到端加密。值得注意的是,微信将通讯与支付高度集成于单一界面,理论上扩大了潜在的攻击面。有数据显示,仅2025年初新加坡就记录了数百起涉及仿冒微信等支付平台员工的诈骗案件,损失巨大。这引出一个技术问题:当通讯与支付功能在同一个应用内结合得越紧密,聊天安全漏洞可能带来的代价就越高。 总结而言,两者代表了不同的平台哲学:微信构建了一个深度融入现实经济的封闭但高度集成的生态系统;而Telegram则围绕开放协议、灵活数据存储和低开发者门槛进行设计。这种架构选择决定了各自的目标用户和使用场景。

cryptonews.ru1 小時前

您会惊讶地发现,WeChat 和 Telegram 在架构层面竟如此不同

cryptonews.ru1 小時前

交易

現貨
活动图片