Flora Growth Corp. Raises $401M to Launch 0G Token Treasury

TheCryptoTimes發佈於 2025-09-20更新於 2025-09-20

Flora Growth Corp., an international pharmaceutical distributor, has announced a $401 million funding initiative, including a $22.88 million strategic investment from DeFi Development Corp., a leading Solana treasury company. This collaboration aims to launch an innovative AI-powered treasury strategy for Zero Gravity (0G) coin.

In its official news blog, Flora said that upon closing the transaction, the company expects to rebrand itself as ZeroStack and retain the “FLGC” ticker symbol. Flora has initiated this investment collaboration to incorporate innovative DeFi solutions into conventional business models and utilize AI technology to enhance treasury management. 

Flora has raised more than $366 million in digital assets and $35 million in cash and is now involved in a private placement transaction (“PIPE transaction”) to buy and sell its common shares at $25.19 per share. In this deal, each 0G token contributed in-kind loans, valued at $3.00. Additionally, certain cash investors and those who fund their purchases with 0G tokens will receive pre-funded warrants that can be exercised once the company receives shareholder approval.

“AI isn’t just transforming what companies do, it’s transforming how they must build infrastructure,” said Daniel Reis-Faria, incoming Flora Growth CEO. “This treasury strategy offers institutional investors equity-based exposure to the foundational infrastructure enabling transparent, verifiable, large-scale, cost-efficient, and privacy-first AI development.” 

The firm also said that 0G has been successful in training a 107 billion parameter model using distributed clusters over low-throughput internet connections. This shows a 357 times better performance than previous research from Google (DiLoCo) and proves that large AI models can be trained well without needing a central system. Additionally, distributed networks can now manage the complex computing tasks that were once believed to need centralized data centers. 

0G’s leap into decentralized AI infrastructures

0G is the first-ever Web3 AI company to vertically integrate its proprietary storage network, compute network, and training marketplace to fully decentralize AI workloads. This infrastructure is bundled into an all-in-one operating system, offering highly performant AI tools for seamless integration by Web2 and Web3 builders.

DeFi Development Corp. is at the forefront of the investment. It is the first Solana-based Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) company, which accumulates and compounds SOL tokens. Other firms participating in the investment are Dao5, Abstract Ventures, Dispersion Capital, Blockchain Builders Fund, and Salt. 

“We’re thrilled to partner with FLGC on this fundraiser and look forward to driving a deep collaboration between 0g and Solana,” said Joseph Onorati, CEO of Defi Development Corp, adding, “DFDV is excited to support AI adoption across Solana.” 

Following the closing of this PIPE transaction, which is expected to be around September 26, subject to customary closing conditions, Flora intends to use the proceeds of the deal to acquire additional 0G token, the native cryptocurrency of the 0G ecosystem.

Also Read: Trust Wallet Token Price Surges 30% to $1.26 Following CZ X Post


Mobile Only Image

你可能也喜歡

您会惊讶地发现,WeChat 和 Telegram 在架构层面竟如此不同

微信与Telegram在架构层面有着根本性的差异,主要体现在数据存储、功能设计和生态开放度上。 **数据存储方式**:Telegram提供无限云端存储,所有消息历史在各设备间自动同步。微信则采用本地存储,消息在服务器交付后不保留,因此更换设备需通过特定功能迁移,且桌面版必须依赖手机在线确认才能登录。 **功能设计差异**:在频道讨论方面,Telegram为帖子自动关联评论区,实现一体化讨论。微信的公众号文章评论需经发布者审核才可显示,缺乏与文章直接关联的讨论系统,用户交流需跳转至聊天或小程序。文件传输上,Telegram支持最大2-4GB的文件,微信则限制为200MB,大文件需借助“文件传输助手”或第三方服务。 **开发与生态**:Telegram的Bot API完全开放免费,开发门槛低。微信小程序生态庞大(活跃数量超480万),但属于封闭系统,需经过审核、认证,甚至提供商业许可才能使用部分API,准入要求更高。 **支付整合**:微信支付深度融入中国日常生活,覆盖绝大多数线下场景及公共服务,替代了现金和银行应用。Telegram没有内置的法定货币支付系统,主要通过第三方机器人实现支付功能,尤其侧重加密货币,这反映了其去中心化理念,但在传统金融基础设施完善的地区,限制了其作为日常金融工具的应用。 **安全考量**:文章未深入讨论加密机制。Telegram提供端到端加密的私密聊天选项,而微信聊天信息不采用端到端加密。值得注意的是,微信将通讯与支付高度集成于单一界面,理论上扩大了潜在的攻击面。有数据显示,仅2025年初新加坡就记录了数百起涉及仿冒微信等支付平台员工的诈骗案件,损失巨大。这引出一个技术问题:当通讯与支付功能在同一个应用内结合得越紧密,聊天安全漏洞可能带来的代价就越高。 总结而言,两者代表了不同的平台哲学:微信构建了一个深度融入现实经济的封闭但高度集成的生态系统;而Telegram则围绕开放协议、灵活数据存储和低开发者门槛进行设计。这种架构选择决定了各自的目标用户和使用场景。

cryptonews.ru2 小時前

您会惊讶地发现,WeChat 和 Telegram 在架构层面竟如此不同

cryptonews.ru2 小時前

交易

現貨
活动图片