EU Warns Of Cyber And Crypto Risks As Digital Finance Expands

TheCryptoTimes發佈於 2025-09-19更新於 2025-09-19

European regulators are warning that the financial system is facing an increase in cyberattacks and growing exposure to crypto-assets. The assessment, outlined in the latest risk report from the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs), highlights the need for a more resilient system as digital markets become more integrated with traditional finance.

The message is clear: build resilience or risk being blindsided as digital markets bleed further into traditional finance.

Cyber threats in focus

The EU Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) has flagged a sharp growth in attacks, with banks and market infrastructure hammered by ransomware and DDoS campaigns often fueled by geopolitical tensions.

To reinforce defenses, the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), which became applicable as of January 17, 2025, now compels banks and market operators to harden defenses, tighten reporting, and confront risks linked to critical ICT suppliers. It’s a legislative warning shot: patch the cracks fast, or cybercriminals and hostile states will happily exploit them.

Crypto’s rise tests regulators and banks alike

Regulators admit contagion risks from decentralized finance (DeFi) remain limited for now, but the links between banks and digital assets are tightening fast.  The ESMA report shows that pro-crypto moves under President Trump ignited a surge that drove total crypto market capitalization to a record €3.3 trillion by the end of 2024.

Eu Warns Of Cyber And Crypto Risks As Digital Finance Expands
EBA and EIOPA Cyber Risk. Source: ESMA Report

That momentum didn’t last. By April 2025, valuations had plunged 18% to €2.7T as macroeconomic headwinds set in. Despite the slide, banks have continued to expand their exposure to the digital sector by rolling out new services that blur the line between crypto and traditional finance.

For regulators, the concern has shifted: not whether crypto grows, but whether the system can absorb the shock when its volatility spills over into the mainstream. The report’s EBA and EIOPA cyber risk data shows a continued upward trend in digital threats to the financial sector, with risks remaining at a high to very high level in the second half of 2025.

Regulators say the message is clear: as blockchain adoption deepens and Wall Street–style engagement accelerates, firms must reinforce cyber defenses and prepare for a future where crypto is fully woven into traditional finance. For investors, the opportunity is real, but so are the risks now firmly on the radar.

Also read: Malta resists France’s push to centralize EU crypto rules


Mobile Only Image

你可能也喜歡

您会惊讶地发现,WeChat 和 Telegram 在架构层面竟如此不同

微信与Telegram在架构层面有着根本性的差异,主要体现在数据存储、功能设计和生态开放度上。 **数据存储方式**:Telegram提供无限云端存储,所有消息历史在各设备间自动同步。微信则采用本地存储,消息在服务器交付后不保留,因此更换设备需通过特定功能迁移,且桌面版必须依赖手机在线确认才能登录。 **功能设计差异**:在频道讨论方面,Telegram为帖子自动关联评论区,实现一体化讨论。微信的公众号文章评论需经发布者审核才可显示,缺乏与文章直接关联的讨论系统,用户交流需跳转至聊天或小程序。文件传输上,Telegram支持最大2-4GB的文件,微信则限制为200MB,大文件需借助“文件传输助手”或第三方服务。 **开发与生态**:Telegram的Bot API完全开放免费,开发门槛低。微信小程序生态庞大(活跃数量超480万),但属于封闭系统,需经过审核、认证,甚至提供商业许可才能使用部分API,准入要求更高。 **支付整合**:微信支付深度融入中国日常生活,覆盖绝大多数线下场景及公共服务,替代了现金和银行应用。Telegram没有内置的法定货币支付系统,主要通过第三方机器人实现支付功能,尤其侧重加密货币,这反映了其去中心化理念,但在传统金融基础设施完善的地区,限制了其作为日常金融工具的应用。 **安全考量**:文章未深入讨论加密机制。Telegram提供端到端加密的私密聊天选项,而微信聊天信息不采用端到端加密。值得注意的是,微信将通讯与支付高度集成于单一界面,理论上扩大了潜在的攻击面。有数据显示,仅2025年初新加坡就记录了数百起涉及仿冒微信等支付平台员工的诈骗案件,损失巨大。这引出一个技术问题:当通讯与支付功能在同一个应用内结合得越紧密,聊天安全漏洞可能带来的代价就越高。 总结而言,两者代表了不同的平台哲学:微信构建了一个深度融入现实经济的封闭但高度集成的生态系统;而Telegram则围绕开放协议、灵活数据存储和低开发者门槛进行设计。这种架构选择决定了各自的目标用户和使用场景。

cryptonews.ru4 小時前

您会惊讶地发现,WeChat 和 Telegram 在架构层面竟如此不同

cryptonews.ru4 小時前

交易

現貨
活动图片