How Blockchain Could Have Saved the Fed and US Agencies From Job Numbers Fiasco

ccn.com發佈於 2025-08-07更新於 2025-08-10

Key Takeaways
  • Following the recent jobs market drama, Chamath Palihapitiya suggested using blockchain for jobs data via payroll uploads, error checks, and a live feed.
  • The BLS initially reported strong job growth in June, but cut gains by 258,000, the steepest two-month drop since 1979.
  • Mark Cuban questioned the practicality and cost of a blockchain-based system, while Biden administration officials defended the integrity of the BLS.

When the U.S. government revealed that June’s strong jobs report had been revised into the red, wiping out hundreds of thousands of positions from the official tally, financial markets reeled.

The fallout led to President Trump dramatically firing the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) commissioner last week, accusing Erika McEntarfer of “rigging” the data.

Meanwhile, billionaire Chamath Palihapitiya entered the conversation with an idea that he felt could have prevented all of the drama: putting America’s jobs data on the blockchain.

Job Number Crisis

The BLS initially reported that the U.S. added approximately 147,000 non-farm jobs in June, massively surpassing expectations.

However, just two months later, that figure was slashed to a mere 14,000 after unprecedented downward revisions totaling approximately 258,000 jobs across May and June, the steepest two-month drop since the non-pandemic era began in 1979.

The revised data revealed only 73,000 new jobs in July, signaling that the labor market’s resilience was perhaps an illusion.

These seismic corrections caught economists and experts off guard and triggered a new feud between Trump and yet another government agency.

“We need accurate Jobs Numbers,” Trump said in a Truth Social post.

“I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY. She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified.”

“Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate; they can’t be manipulated for political purposes.”

Jobs on the Blockchain

As the jobs-data controversy swirled, billionaire venture capitalist Chamath Palihapitiya argued that the U.S. needed a wholesale rebuild of how employment numbers are collected and reported.

Palihapitiya took to X, claiming that the BLS system was “brittle” and “sloppy,” and called for a new “oracle-like data provider” for this critical information.

“Bottom line is that BLS isn’t so much conspiratorial as it is inadequate in its approach,” he wrote on X. “They are all over the place and add little directional signal. They constantly revise and in both directions.”

“The sampling techniques they use are brittle and don’t work for a large and dynamic economy like the U.S.,” he added.

Palihapitiya said Trump was right to fire the head of the BLS because “she ran a critical aspect of the U.S. economic machinery in an unpredictable, haphazard, and sloppy way.”

“There needs to be a new, oracle-like data provider for this critical information,” he added.

However, not everyone was convinced this was the answer. Famed investor and Shark Tank star Mark Cuban fired back at the idea:

“Did you even read what you wrote? Are you suggesting a crypto-like oracle that outputs employment data, every month, on the same day, be required for every business?

“Who is gonna pay for the implementations? And of course there are gov agencies that have to respond as well. What do you have in mind for them?

“Do you really think the implementation, maintenance, and response timing and rates will be better than the current survey?”

Chamath countered Cuban with a three-tier proposal on how he believed taking the jobs market to the blockchain could succeed:

  • Require all payroll providers (known through tax withholding records) to upload a flat file to an endpoint.
  • Run a model against uploads to look for any potential errors.
  • Publish a real-time feed — with the total annual cost split among licensees.

The idea was met with a fairly negative response, with many commenters siding with Cuban and claiming Chamath was “cozying up to Trump.”

Economists also agree on at least part of Cuban’s critique, the biggest problem in the recent debacle wasn’t tampering, it was the shrinking survey response rates and outdated collection methods.

Chamath’s Potential For Blockchain

Under Chamath Palihapitiya’s proposal, payroll providers would automatically upload anonymized employment data in real time, allowing for instant verification and reducing reliance on delayed, sample-based surveys that are prone to large revisions.

Because blockchain records are immutable, any changes to the data would be traceable and would eliminate any suspicion of political manipulation.

A real-time feed could also provide policymakers and the public with up-to-date labor market information, reducing the shock of dramatic revisions seen recently.

Critics, however, warn that implementing this at scale would be expensive and too complex from a system which already works.

One X user wrote: “The entire methodology is publicly available on the BLS website.

“Estimation, Revisions, everything. All you have to do is read. Suddenly it’s garbage because you wanna be cozied up with the President. Vacuous shill behavior.”

White House Defends BLS

The jobs report sent Trump on a tirade of accusations, claiming the commissioner faked jobs numbers “before the Election to try and boost Kamala’s chances of Victory.”

All of Trump’s accusations were presented without any evidence.

Members of the federal government rushed to defend McEntarfer, who has worked in the White House for the past two decades.

Speaking to NBC, Labor Secretary during the Biden administration Julie Su said :

“The work is done largely by expert career staff who do their jobs with care and pride.”

Meanwhile, Labor Department Chief of Staff Daniel Koh took to X to claim:

“Nobody is faking numbers.”

“Downward revisions aren’t scandal — they’re science,” he added.

Koh said the agency worked closely with a Trump-appointed commissioner and “never doubted the data, even with bad news.”

“Respecting the truth isn’t optional. It’s the job,” he said.

Was this Article helpful? Yes No

你可能也喜歡

ZoomEX Space会议回顾:与迪迪·哈曼及世界杯交易专家小组的对话

Zoomex举办了世界杯系列X Space的第二期活动,邀请欧冠冠军迪迪·哈曼及三位交易员参与讨论。话题涵盖世界杯分析、德国队争议、职业哲学以及足球与加密货币交易的类比。作为慈善倡议的一部分,Zoomex每期捐赠1000 USDT,若嘉宾预测正确,捐赠额将增加5000 USDT。哈曼支持日本队击败瑞典,并选择捐助慕尼黑的无家可归者援助机构。 哈曼指出,足球中最难对付的是“无惧失利”的球队,他们因毫无保留而极具威胁。他结合自身中场角色强调,无论比分领先或落后,都应保持相同打法:稳固结构,将球交给更具创造力的队友。2005年伊斯坦布尔奇迹正是这种坚持的例证。 关于攻防平衡,哈曼认为仅靠进攻无法赢得冠军,稳固的防守和球队结构至关重要。他区分了技术失误与心理失误,后者更令人懊恼。交易员们将此类比于交易纪律:止损如同最后一道防线,资本管理如同组织后防,情绪化是最大敌人。 哈曼预测巴西将赢得世界杯,因为其攻防俱佳,且安切洛蒂擅长管理漫长赛程中的球队事务。他亦称赞日本、南非等队的表现,并特别提到一位18岁的摩洛哥中场,其成熟度令人惊叹。 在交易讨论中,嘉宾们一致强调杜绝情绪化交易、严格执行计划的重要性。克拉克提出核心问题:“你想成为正确的人,还是想成为富有的人?” 他们将主流加密货币与国家队类比:比特币如巴西或阿根廷,以太坊如法国,Solana如葡萄牙。 整场对话的核心启示是:无论在足球还是交易中,当形势偏离计划时,保持既定流程和纪律比被动反应更为重要。成功依赖于在危机中维持结构,等待机会出现。Zoomex的世界杯慈善倡议将继续进行后续活动。

TheNewsCrypto23 分鐘前

ZoomEX Space会议回顾:与迪迪·哈曼及世界杯交易专家小组的对话

TheNewsCrypto23 分鐘前

Solana 启动链上治理以扩大验证者权力

Solana正式推出其备受期待的链上治理系统,为代币持有者和验证者提供了一个更开放、去中心化的方式来影响重要协议决策。治理辩论和投票现已完全在链上进行,并得到质押权重投票和加密验证的支持,通过新实施的Solana治理提案(SGP)机制实现。 根据新规则,任何拥有至少10万枚SOL委托质押的验证者都可以提交SGP。为确保只有获得广泛支持的提案进入正式投票,每个提案必须先获得网络总质押SOL至少15%的支持。 SGP与专注于技术协议变更的Solana改进文档(SIMD)有所区分。SIMD由核心开发者进行技术审查,关注“如何”实施升级;而SGP则通过链上质押权重投票,决定整个生态系统“是否”应该推进某项提案,将重大生态影响的决策权保留给社区投票。这种区分使得开发者能继续高效建设。 一个重要新增功能是委托者可以覆盖其验证者的治理投票。如果验证者的投票违背委托者意愿或选择不投票,委托者可以通过Solana治理门户直接使用自己的质押权重进行投票。投票过程通过Merkle证明确保安全,该证明根据链上记录的共识快照验证每个参与者的质押情况。专门的治理算法会在实际投票前为利益相关者提供可验证的权重。 随着链上治理的实施,Solana能够在不影响开发进程的前提下,让更多社区成员参与治理。验证者提交提案,利益相关者用质押投票,委托者享有完全自主权,Solana正在应用一种结合去中心化与协议开发效率的独特治理模式。

TheNewsCrypto23 分鐘前

Solana 启动链上治理以扩大验证者权力

TheNewsCrypto23 分鐘前

万亿豪赌半导体,韩国这次真的慌了?

韩国政府联合三星、SK集团宣布了一项总额达1461万亿韩元(约合人民币6.4万亿元)的巨额半导体投资计划,其中大部分投向半导体生产。此举一反韩国半导体产业以往“逆周期投资”的常态,在行业顺周期时进行大规模扩张,引发关注。 回望历史,半导体产业的王座更迭常伴随“举国体制+产业资本”模式的高效运作。日本曾借此在1980年代击败美国,占据全球DRAM市场80%份额。然而,随着个人电脑时代来临,市场转向追求成本与规模,执着于极致品质的日本企业优势不再。韩国抓住机遇,通过同样的模式并利用“逆周期投资”策略,在行业低谷期扩张产能,最终在1990年代反超日本,三星登顶全球DRAM市场第一。曾为对抗韩国而成立的日本尔必达公司,也在2012年破产,存储市场形成三星、SK海力士、美光三足鼎立格局。 如今,中国存储企业正以相似的路径崛起。长江存储和长鑫存储分别攻克NAND闪存和DRAM内存。长江存储通过自研的Xtacking架构,实现技术快速迭代,从32层到128层仅用3年,2025年全球NAND份额一度达13%。长鑫存储则通过收购破产的德国奇梦达公司获得技术基础,并冒险“跳代”研发,在合肥市长期资本支持下,2025年底拿下全球7.67%的DRAM份额,位列全球第四。特别是在2023年行业低谷期,两家中国企业逆势扩产、降价抢份额,实现了市场份额的翻倍增长。 韩国此次在顺周期豪赌,深层原因在于对中国追赶的焦虑。中国拥有完整的产业链和庞大的下游市场,一旦技术代差被追平,规模优势将迅速显现。韩国试图以超前投资拉开差距,守住王座。历史仿佛循环,当年韩国用以击败日本的策略,正被中国玩家运用。这场存储产业的权力角逐,远未结束。

marsbit33 分鐘前

万亿豪赌半导体,韩国这次真的慌了?

marsbit33 分鐘前

交易

現貨
活动图片