Bernstein Analysts Dive Deep Into Ethereum Treasury Companies, Highlight Unique Risks

bitcoinist發佈於 2025-07-31更新於 2025-08-01

文章摘要

Analysts at investment firm Bernstein have discussed in detail the Ethereum treasury companies, which have begun to emerge. The analysts...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Analysts at investment firm Bernstein have discussed in detail the Ethereum treasury companies, which have begun to emerge. The analysts highlighted specific risks around their ETH operations but declared that they remain bullish on the largest altcoin by market cap.

How The Ethereum Treasury Companies Are Unique

The Bernstein report noted how the Ethereum treasury companies are different from the Bitcoin treasury companies since the former are not just holding the asset but using it to generate yield. Companies like SharpLink Gaming, BitMine, and BitDigital have adopted ETH as a reserve asset and expanded their presence in the Ethereum ecosystem by using their holdings for DeFi activities. 

The report further noted that staking returns are currently around 3%, although it has historically surged to as high as 5%. Based on this, the analysts remarked that an Ethereum treasury company that holds $1 billion in ETH, for example, could earn between $30 and $50 million in annual yields.

However, the Bernstein analysts noted that this staking mechanism comes with its risks, especially since these Ethereum treasury companies have to deploy their holdings to earn these yields. As such, these companies face liquidity constraints, unlike Bitcoin treasury companies like Michael Saylor’s Strategy, which hold a 100% reserve at all times. 

Furthermore, these ETH treasury companies also have to deal with the risks involved in unstaking their coins, as it could take days due to the validator queue. There is also an additional risk if these companies choose to restake their coins. Bernstein also highlighted DeFi yield farming and smart contract risks. 

In line with this, the analysts opined that the Ethereum treasury companies that are likely to advance are those that adopt proper risk management with institutional-grade custody. Bernstein warned that these companies must maintain a balance between trying to generate yields while maintaining their good standing.  

Bullish On ETH As Demand Increases

The Bernstein analysts revealed that they remain bullish on ETH even as demand for the altcoin continues to increase through these Ethereum treasury companies and even the Ethereum ETFs. They expect ETH’s price to rally higher in the long run as the network’s usage also grows, thanks to its expanding stablecoin ecosystem and Real World Assets (RWAs) tokenization.  

It is worth noting that Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan recently attributed ETH’s 60% rally in the past month to the Ethereum treasury companies and Ethereum ETFs. He predicted that ETH could still further witness a demand shock, as these entities potentially purchase up to $20 billion of ETH in the next year, equivalent to 5.33 million ETH at today’s prices. 

StrategicEthReserve data shows that these treasury companies currently hold 2.73 million ETH ($10.56 billion). Meanwhile, SoSo Value data shows that the ETH ETFs boast $21.43 billion in net assets. 

At the time of writing, the ETH price is trading at around $3,865, up in the last 24 hours, according to data from CoinMarketCap.

Ethereum
ETH trading at $3,869 on the 1D chart | Source: ETHUSDT on Tradingview.com
Featured image from Getty Images, chart from Tradingview.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Scott Matherson is a leading crypto writer at Bitcoinist, who possesses a sharp analytical mind and a deep understanding of the digital currency landscape. Scott has earned a reputation for delivering thought-provoking and well-researched articles that resonate with both newcomers and seasoned crypto enthusiasts. Outside of his writing, Scott is passionate about promoting crypto literacy and often works to educate the public on the potential of blockchain.

你可能也喜歡

摩根大通认为MicroStrategy的比特币销售政策是‘双向风险’——详解!

摩根大通近日指出,迈克尔·赛勒的微策略公司(Strategy)的比特币销售政策带来了“双向风险”。微策略长期通过发债和增发来筹集资金并购买比特币,其巨额持仓(约84.7万枚BTC)此前实质上锁定了市场供应。然而,公司新的资本结构允许其出售部分比特币以支付优先股股息等财务承诺,同时启动了股票回购计划。 尽管公司持有约25.5亿美元现金,足以覆盖约17个月的股息与利息支出,但摩根大通认为,这笔缓冲资金仍不足以保证未来不会出售比特币。该行分析师团队建议,微策略需要通过增发普通股等方式,将现金覆盖率提升至24-36个月,才能让投资者相信其在可预见的未来无需抛售比特币。 核心问题在于,微策略从此前单一的比特币“净买家”转变为可能根据现金需求在买卖之间切换的角色,这为市场带来了不确定性。虽然公司授权的12.5亿美元出售额度仅占其总持仓的一小部分,但其心理影响可能远超实际抛售规模。当前,美国现货比特币ETF面临资金净流出,比特币价格承压。市场希望《清晰法案》的获批能恢复市场信心与比特币价格,从而改善微策略面临的环境。 简而言之,摩根大通建议微策略需进一步增强现金缓冲以消除市场对其抛售比特币的担忧;尽管近期出售规模有限,但政策转变已引发市场不安。

ambcrypto14 分鐘前

摩根大通认为MicroStrategy的比特币销售政策是‘双向风险’——详解!

ambcrypto14 分鐘前

稳定币是加密世界的“保皇派”:Open USD 让旧货币体系亲自下场

Open USD的推出标志着稳定币竞争进入新阶段,由140多家传统金融、科技和加密机构组成的联盟共同参与,使其从创业公司的产品之争升级为基础设施之争。学者胡翌霖指出,稳定币并非加密革命的温和派,而是旧货币体系内部的“保皇派改革”——它利用区块链提升效率,却依然维护美元和美联储的中心地位。真正的加密革命需挑战更根本的前提:市场是否必须依赖央行作为货币秩序的核心。 Open USD由Visa、万事达、贝莱德、谷歌、Coinbase等巨头联合推出,允许企业零成本铸造赎回,并将储备收益分配给合作伙伴。这直接威胁到USDC等现有稳定币的商业模式。胡翌霖认为,其象征意义在于传统金融体系亲自下场主导稳定币网络,反衬出原生稳定币创业者的尴尬:若其目标仅是提升旧体系效率,那么当旧体系采纳该技术后,其革命性便宣告终结。 胡翌霖将稳定币比作天文学史上的第谷体系:虽吸收新技术,却拒绝“地球动起来”的核心革命。稳定币反对的是低效的支付网络与金融中介,而非美元本位本身。它更像是美元霸权的“区块链升级包”,可能强化而非削弱美元体系。如果链上金融全面以美元稳定币计价,繁荣的链上活动反而可能巩固链下传统金融资产的价值,使加密本币(如ETH)沦为单纯的“燃料”,难以获得货币性溢价。 因此,胡翌霖强调,追求文明级变革的加密项目(如比特币)不应将叙事降格为手续费经济,而必须坚持“去中心化”的核心,无论是通过币本位、抗审查还是开放治理。真正的“哥白尼时刻”在于让人们相信:市场交易与货币价值可以自发形成,无需一个固定的央行作为中心。稳定币可作为过渡工具,但若加密世界最终仍围绕美元旋转,则革命尚未成功。

链捕手3 小時前

稳定币是加密世界的“保皇派”:Open USD 让旧货币体系亲自下场

链捕手3 小時前

交易

現貨
活动图片