CoinDeskPolicy發佈於 2024-04-17更新於 2024-04-18

文章摘要

Members of the industry have said the regulator takes too long to approve crypto applications.

  • The U.K.'s FCA says it will prioritize trust over speed when it comes to crypto registrations.
  • The industry have said the FCA takes too long to approve crypto applications. The regulator has only approved 45 firms in four years.

The U.K.'s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) won't compromise a focus on trust just to more quickly register crypto companies, an executive from the national regulator said Thursday.

"A simple focus on numbers could undermine trust and reputation," said Sarah Pritchard, the FCA's executive director for markets and international at TheCityUK conference, in response to industry complaints that the regulator takes far too long to register crypto companies.

The FCA, which is the country's main crypto regulator, has been processing registrations for crypto firms wishing to operate in the country and comply with its money laundering rules since 2020. Over 300 firms have tried to win approval by the regulator since the regime opened, of which only 45 firms have succeeded.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Companies like crypto exchange Gemini, payments platform Revolut and asset manager Fidelity Digital Assets have landed on the register. But the process can take a while.

Participants in the crypto industry told CoinDesk last year that it took over a year for the FCA to get back to them regarding their registration application. In her remarks Thursday, Pritchard said speeding up its process may look better, but could ultimately harm consumers.

"Lower standards could leave open our market to abuse by those who seek to launder criminally made cash, damaging market integrity and confidence in financial markets," Pritchard said. "Instead, we take a longer view. Crypto’s success – and the success of any base for crypto firms – relies on trust being built and maintained."

Edited by Nikhilesh De.

你可能也喜歡

20 岁创始人,招 18 岁员工,被 19 岁的人投资

这篇文章探讨了当前人工智能(AI)领域出现的“年轻化”现象。随着大模型技术的快速发展,行业对AI人才的争夺异常激烈,并出现了明显的年龄偏好。许多顶尖高校的应届生或在校实习生能够获得高达数百万人民币的年薪或数千元的日薪,其薪酬水平远超传统互联网行业的资深从业者。 文章指出,这种现象背后是“AI Native”概念的兴起。企业认为,更年轻、从小接触AI的从业者(多为00后)在思维模式、学习速度和创新能力上更具优势,能更快适应技术的快速迭代。相比之下,拥有多年工作经验但转型较慢的从业者可能面临被淘汰的风险。因此,大厂和初创公司都竞相提前锁定优秀学生,通过高薪、重要项目主导权、灵活扁平的管理模式以及密集的社交活动来吸引他们。 这种趋势形成了一个围绕“年轻”的利益循环:年轻研究员凭借成果获得高薪或创业机会;年轻的创业者更容易获得年轻投资人的青睐和融资;而成功的年轻团队又倾向于雇佣和信任更年轻的成员。这在一定程度上冲击了传统的、基于资历和经验的行业规则,但也加剧了人才竞争和行业内部分化。文章最后也反思了这种狂热背后的隐忧,即技术革命在厚赏“非凡”年轻人的同时,也可能对无法快速适应的“平凡”从业者施以严厉的惩罚。

marsbit32 分鐘前

20 岁创始人,招 18 岁员工,被 19 岁的人投资

marsbit32 分鐘前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片