U.S. Judge Enters Default Ruling Against Ex-Coinbase Insider, Says Secondary Market Sales are Securities Transactions

CoinDeskPolicy發佈於 2024-03-03更新於 2024-03-04

文章摘要

In May 2023, the SEC settled charges with Ishan Wahi and Nikhil Wahi in what it has called the "first-ever insider trading case involving cryptocurrency markets."

  • Trading of certain crypto assets on a secondary market, such as Coinbase, are securities transactions, a U.S. court ruled on Friday.
  • The court took this critical position in a default judgment against Sameer Ramani, one of three accused in the insider trading case.

In an insider trading case involving Coinbase’s former product manager Ishan Wahi, his brother Nikhil Wahi, and their friend Sameer Ramani, a U.S. court ruled on March 1, that the trading of certain crypto assets on a secondary market, which Coinbase is, are securities transactions.

“The court’s analysis remains the same even to the extent Ramani traded tokens on the secondary market,” the ruling said. “... Each issuer continued to make such representation regarding the profitability of their tokens even as the tokens were traded on secondary markets. Thus, under Howey, all of the crypto assets that Ramani purchased and traded were investment contracts.”

The court took this critical position in a default judgment against Ramani. A default judgment is given when the defendant fails to respond to a court summons or does not appear in court.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“Ramani appears to have fled the country to avoid criminal prosecution for the actions alleged in this case,” the filing said.

In May 2023, the SEC settled charges with Ishan Wahi and Nikhil Wahi in what it has called the first-ever insider trading case involving cryptocurrency markets.

However, while this or some action against Ramani was expected, the judgment assumes extra significance because the crypto industry and Coinbase (COIN) have been arguing that cryptocurrencies are not securities and hence, do not fall under the SEC. The SEC Chair Gary Gensler has often argued that most cryptocurrencies fit the definition of securities and that crypto exchanges need to register with the SEC.

This is also not the first time a U.S. court has adjudicated whether sales of certain cryptocurrencies are unregistered securities, whether on secondary platforms like exchanges or not.

In July, Federal District Judge Analisa Torres ruled that while Ripple violated federal securities laws in selling XRP to institutional investors directly, it had not done so by making XRP available to retail customers through programmatic sales to exchanges.

Advertisement
Advertisement

However, in Dec. 2023, Judge Jed Rakoff disagreed with Judge Torres in the Terraform Labs case.

The court ruled to prohibit Ramani from future violations, a civil penalty of twice the amount of proceeds Ramani is calculated to have gained, which was a total of $1,635,204, and disgorgement of the identified proceeds amounting to $817,602. However, the court denied the SEC’s request to impose prejudgment interest.

Edited by Parikshit Mishra.


你可能也喜歡

灰度抄底指南:利用现金流评估加密货币价值

本文探讨了在加密货币市场下跌背景下,如何利用现金流评估加密资产价值,并以去中心化借贷协议Aave为例进行深入分析。 核心观点认为,并非所有加密资产都适用相同估值方法。像比特币这类“类商品资产”依赖稀缺性和共识,而许多DeFi代币等“现金流资产”则与协议业务活动绑定,可通过分析协议收入、利润及代币价值捕获机制来估值。 报告指出,DeFi已成为能产生持续真实收入的赛道。Aave作为头部借贷协议,财务数据透明,拥有多元收入来源和雄厚国库。通过现金流折现(DCF)分析和与传统金融科技公司(市盈率约20-25倍)对比,灰度研究部认为AAVE代币当前合理估值区间为80-100美元(现价约75美元)。报告还预测,在监管明确化等利好情景下,其一年内价值可能升至约175美元。 文章强调,代币价值捕获机制至关重要,即协议如何将利润回馈给代币持有者(如回购、分红)。Aave通过治理演进,正加强协议经济与代币价值的绑定。同时,DAO的法律地位与监管政策(如《CLARITY法案》)仍是影响估值的关键不确定因素。 最后,报告认为市场正趋于成熟,资金从炒作项目流向具备实质收入、清晰商业模式和基本面的资产。投资者应关注如Aave、Uniswap等真正创造现金流的协议,运用基本面分析发现投资机会。

marsbit19 分鐘前

灰度抄底指南:利用现金流评估加密货币价值

marsbit19 分鐘前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片