Craig Wright Accuses Critics of Bugging His House, Spoofing Emails to Bring Him Back to Court

CoinDeskPolicy發佈於 2024-02-29更新於 2024-03-01

文章摘要

Wright returned to the stand in the U.K. COPA trial to defend accusations of forging doctoring emails he’d sent his former lawyers.

  • Craig Wright denied forging emails between him and his former lawyers on Friday during his last cross-examination in the COPA trial.
  • The trial will resume on March 12 for closing statements.

Craig Wright accused critics of bugging his home and spoofing an email he’s been accused of doctoring during a Friday cross-examination in the U.K. trial probing his claims of having invented Bitcoin.

Spoofing involves changing the metadata of an email to – among other things – make it look like it was sent from a different address.

When asked by presiding Judge James Mellor if he could specify who did the spoofing, Wright said, “Unfortunately not. I suspect a number of people, My Lord.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Australian computer scientist has long maintained he’s Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous author of Bitcoin’s foundational document known as the whitepaper. A group of industry participants called the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA) and several Bitcoin developers filed suit against Wright, alleging he’d committed forgeries of an “industrial scale” in trying to prove he’s Satoshi.

On Friday, Wright vehemently denied accusations made by COPA of backdating the email in question to support a statement he’d made in court the previous week concerning his former legal representatives at Ontier.

Wright instead blamed the timestamp and other discrepancies on email spoofing, spam folders, domain migrations, surveillance and hacking.

Judge Mellor asked why someone seeking Wright’s downfall would doctor an email to support something he’d said, to which Wright replied, “Oh, no. It doesn’t support.”

He said that the email was doctored by a malicious actor to fabricate an excuse to bring him back to court.

After Wright, COPA’s expert witness Patrick Madden returned to the stand to defend his new analysis of the Ontier emails. Wright’s counsel sought to establish spoofing was an easy thing to do.

When asked by Wright’s lawyer Craig Orr if the email could have been spoofed, Madden said he didn’t think it was.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“I do not think it’s practical to consider that,” Madden said.

Friday was the last day for discussing evidence. The trial will resume on March 12 for closing statements from both sides.

Camomile Shumba contributed reporting.

Edited by Nikhilesh De.

你可能也喜歡

AI 成绩单背后,藏着一位华人“出题人”

AI领域重要的基准评测MMLU-Pro、MMMU、MMMU-Pro背后,都站着同一位“出题人”——加拿大滑铁卢大学助理教授陈文虎。 随着大语言模型能力快速提升,旧的评测基准如MMLU逐渐“失灵”,顶尖模型得分趋近满分,难以区分高下。为此,陈文虎团队于2024年推出MMLU-Pro。它通过将选项扩至10个、增加推理题比例、剔除简单题等方式,使模型准确率相较旧基准显著下降16%-33%,成绩波动更小,有效拉开了模型间的真实差距。 在多模态评测方面,陈文虎团队推出的MMMU基准包含1.15万道需结合图像与专业知识的复杂题目,即便是当时最强的GPT-4V和Gemini Ultra准确率也未超过60%。后续的MMMU-Pro则进一步堵住模型仅凭文本猜答案的漏洞,强制其进行真正的多模态理解。 陈文虎的研究方向长期聚焦于复杂信息理解与推理。他曾于谷歌DeepMind参与Gemini多模态模型的研发与评估工作,这让他深谙模型能力增长路径与评估盲区。他创立的“老虎实验室”不仅做评测,也研发视频理解与生成等模型,这种“既做题也出题”的经历,使其能更精准地设计出触及模型能力边界的评估体系。 如今,陈文虎已加入Meta超级智能实验室,继续专注于多模态预训练与评估工作。他的故事反映了在AI浪潮中,众多华人研究者正深度参与并塑造着行业发展的核心基础工作。

marsbit1 小時前

AI 成绩单背后,藏着一位华人“出题人”

marsbit1 小時前

Alliance 联创致创业者的一封信:写在 Cursor 卖出 600 亿美元之际

作者Imran以Cursor以600亿美元被收购为引,致信创业者,探讨如何发现并抓住创业机遇。 文章指出,许多创业者在看到成功案例后,因感觉市场饱和而放弃。真正的机会在于识别长期的技术趋势转变,并基于对未来的非共识信念,在市场成熟前默默构建。Cursor、Stripe、Figma、Shopify等公司均遵循此模式:在现有解决方案(如PayPal、Adobe、亚马逊)验证市场后,围绕新洞察、新技术或变化的用户需求进行重构。 创业者应首先找准自己在技术周期中的位置:早期入场者(如Coinbase、Cursor)应致力于让新技术对重度用户更易用;后期入场者则需寻找先行者忽视的“阴面”机会。 积累独特见解至关重要。创业者需深度沉浸于目标市场,体验所有竞品,与用户深入交流,从而发现未被满足的“火烧眉毛”般的痛点或能带来十倍提升的机会。产品MVP应极其聚焦,提供用户无法拒绝的转换理由,并尽可能降低用户的转换成本。 分发渠道常被低估,却是关键护城河。创业者需打造自己的分发引擎,通过无法规模化的“笨功夫”手动获取早期用户,实现渠道与市场的契合。 最后,成功离不开坚韧与适应力。伟大公司的创始人并非更聪明,而是能在漫长而艰难的过程中坚持足够久,让洞察产生复利。文章总结框架为:寻找技术周期更迭、培养独特洞察、痴迷市场、与客户交流、找到核心痛点、打造简单切入点、赢得分发渠道,并在困难时永不放弃。

链捕手2 小時前

Alliance 联创致创业者的一封信:写在 Cursor 卖出 600 亿美元之际

链捕手2 小時前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片