CoinGecko NFT Survey 2022

CoinGecko發佈於 2022-05-06更新於 2022-05-06

文章摘要

Non-fungible Tokens (NFTs) is Collins Dictionary’s Word of Year for 2021, and is not without a good reason.

Non-fungible Tokens (NFTs) is Collins Dictionary’s Word of Year for 2021, and is not without a good reason. NFTs saw a meteoric rise in mid-2021 that ushered in a storm of interest, even from outside the cryptoverse. Total trading volume of NFTs hit over $5 BILLION at its height in August 2022, kickstarting what is now known as “NFT Summer”. Since then, the market has tapered off slightly but NFT is still one of the hottest buzzwords in town, and continues to grace headlines, both within and outside of the cryptoverse.

NFT are polarizing – there's a small group of people pledging beliefs in the underlying technology, a good deal more opportunists attempting to capitalize on its financial upside, while others cry foul at this new age digital “skem”. So, how do people really feel about NFTs?

Here at CoinGecko, we conducted a poll on Twitter to take a deeper look at the demographic of NFT owners, their behavior, motivation, tendencies, preferences, knowledge , and perception related to NFTs.

Disclaimer: We acknowledge that the Twitter poll is not optimal to conduct the survey. Hence, kindly treat the survey results as a proxy to the crypto Twitter community usage and attitude towards NFTs.

Here are our 5 key findings:

Majority of the respondents are from the APAC region, aged 18-30 and 30-50. 72% of these own NFTs, with more than half of them having 5 or more NFTs

Metaverse / gaming NFTs are the most common type of NFTs owned, with half of the respondents having participated in metaverse(s) before

Flippers top NFT ownership at 42%, majority of crypto portfolios (70%) assign only 0-25% to NFTs and less than half of the respondents have profited from trading

PC is the preferred choice for trading and minting NFTs, while most of the respondents hunt for new projects on Discord/Twitter and track their portfolio via marketplace wallet UI

Most respondents are interested in floor price when trading NFTs, with over half motivated by current & future utility to HODL

Majority of the respondents are from the APAC region, aged 18-30 and 30-50. 72% of these own NFTs, with more than half of them having 5 or more NFTs.

Out of the 871 respondents, ~72% of them are owners of NFT(s), with more than half of them having 5 or more NFTs.

There’s a relatively even split for age brackets 18-30 and 30-50, with most of the respondents belonging to the latter group (45.2%), followed closely by 43.6% in the former.

Interestingly, the APAC region leads NFT adoption among survey respondents at 38.8%, similar to the findings from our previous Axie Infinity survey. Another independent survey corroborates this, which also found Philippines, Thailand and Malaysia as the 3 leading countries for NFT adoption.

Europe followed closely as the second largest region (31.7%) of respondents, with North/South America a distant third (18.3%).

Metaverse / gaming NFTs are the most common type of NFTs owned, with half of the respondents having participated in metaverse(s) before

NFT ownership congregates around metaverse/gaming type NFTs (35.8%), followed by a relatively even split between PFPs (27.4%) and Art (25.3%). With most of our respondents/NFT owners residing in the APAC region, the outcome is unsurprising considering the dominance of GameFi NFTs in Asia.

When it comes to ownership of metaverse lands or items, the results (30.5%) mirror the numbers from metaverse/gaming NFT ownership (35.8%) – highlighting the common overlap between GameFi and Metaverse NFTs/projects, and how the former frequently incorporates elements from the latter, vice versa.

Only about half of the respondents had participated in metaverse(s) before, with only 20% of them being classified as “regulars”.

Metaverse is projected to be an $800B market in the next 2 years, and games look like the most likely NFT-point-of-entry for most people, particularly crypto folks.

Flippers top NFT ownership at 42%, majority of crypto portfolios (70%) assign only 0-25% to NFTs and less than half of the respondents have profited from trading

“Buy low, sell high” tops as the driving force behind NFT purchase at 42.2%.

On the other hand, the HODL mentality of “to collect” and “for their utility” feature a combined dominance of around 50%. This is consistent with the question “have you sold any NFTs” where only half of them responded “Yes”.

Less than half of the respondents (43%) have profited from NFT trading, while 23% are HODLers by choice with no regard for profiteering off NFTs.

Suppose we only consider the ratio between “Yes” and “No”, roughly 57% of the non-HODLing traders turned a profit in NFTs, possibly a sign of trading proficiency among respondents, who are most NFT veterans.

Interestingly, NFTs constitute only a small portion of most crypto portfolios, with close to 70% of them only featuring 0-25% of NFTs.

PC is the preferred choice for trading and minting NFTs, while most of the respondents hunt for new projects on Discord/Twitter and track their portfolio via marketplace wallet UI

60% of NFT owners prefer to mint / trade NFTs solely on PC, with only 21% using mobile devices. The dominance of PC could be owed to its superiority in manoeuvring the time-sensitive nature of NFT mints / trades, especially when wallet mobile apps are still largely unwieldy compared to their PC counterpart.

Over 60% of users track new, upcoming NFT projects via Discord and Twitter, where information is fragmented and often scattered among other noises. That said, they still seem to be the best option to stumble across fresh-out-of-the-oven projects. Aggregator platforms such as Rarity Tools exist but usage is low (4.1%), perhaps due to the lag time in updates (which could be the difference for early access whitelists), or imperfect coverage.

Over half of the users track NFT portfolio via marketplaces as opposed to more structured approaches (e.g. portfolio managers, Excel)

Close to 40% of respondents are mostly interested in floor price when trading NFTs, with half of them citing current/future utility as the primary reason to HODL.

When questioned about the attribute that drives their NFT trades/purchases, 38.5% respondents cite “Floor Price” as the most important. Again, this is in line with our earlier question about the motivation for trading NFTs which saw ~40% selecting “flip & earn”. The floor price is a common metric used to gauge affordability and potential upside of a collection/piece.

Rarity score and hype/influencer endorsement on the other hand sit at ~30% and ~18% respectively.

Outside of flipping for profit, half of the respondents (50.9%) think that current or future utility of NFTs is the main incentive for them to HODL, with only 23% and 21.8% selecting “strong community” and “artistic value/attachment”. Based on our survey, it seems that NFT owners value NFTs that are perceived to deliver the most ‘practical’ value, rather than intangible qualities such as its aesthetics. Recent NFT projects are also trending towards having some form of utility (e.g. exclusive access, future airdrops), instead of being just “onchain JPEGs”.

Conclusion

It’s been interesting to peek behind the curtains of NFTs and see what makes the owners tick. Gaming and metaverse NFTs, propelled into the spotlight by Axie Infinity the hooha surrounding Metaverses, tops the spot as the most popular type of NFT to be owned. Most respondents self-identified as flippers who are in to make a quick buck out of NFTs but at the same time, the combined majority (51%) still expressed interest in hodling either to collect, or for the underlying utility. All in all, it’s not exactly a pure speculation market as perpetrated by common beliefs.

NFT trading volume has dipped over the course of Q1 2022, but at the same time, it’s also made leaps and bounds evident in the mega-partnerships struck up by RTFKT and Bored Ape Yacht Club. Where NFTs will ultimately be is still anyone’s guess at this point. But the fact is, just as crypto in general, the world of NFTs is still rife with scams and volatile prices. For those who are considering dipping your toes into NFTs, we urge that you always, always DYOR.

你可能也喜歡

SBF提出新代币偿还FTX受害者,但这可能实现吗?

摘要:据报道,正在服刑的FTX创始人萨姆·班克曼-弗里德(SBF)近期表达了通过发起一个新的代币项目来偿还FTX受害者的个人愿望。这一说法因极具话题性而引发关注,但其与法律现实存在巨大差距。 核心信息点: * 这只是SBF的个人希望,并非一个积极的、可行的计划。 * 背景是,美国上诉法院已于2026年6月12日维持了对SBF的25年刑期判决。 * 目前没有任何经过验证的、在法律上可行的代币项目存在。 文章分析指出,作为一名正在服长期刑期的重罪犯,SBF在运营公司、筹集资金、发行证券或管理代币项目方面面临显而易见的法律障碍。即使他个人相信新方案能偿还受害者,法院、监管机构、债权人或破产管理人也不太可能允许。 该言论之所以仍受关注,是因为FTX倒闭是加密货币历史上的标志性事件,任何关于偿还受害者或新计划的提及都会触动市场记忆。这同时也引出了一个更广泛的行业问题:失败的平台能否利用代币来弥补损失?在FTX的案例中,法律和声誉障碍远高于普通的重组故事。 因此,本文的立论点不应是SBF将推出代币,而应强调他个人幻想与法律现实之间的张力:即便司法系统已做出严厉判决,他仍 reportedly 设想一条基于代币的偿还路径。任何实际的偿还过程,仍将严格遵循法律程序、破产结构和债权人追偿机制,而非一个来自监狱牢房的想法。

bitcoinist2 小時前

SBF提出新代币偿还FTX受害者,但这可能实现吗?

bitcoinist2 小時前

贝莱德以BITA为代码推出备兑看涨比特币ETF

贝莱德推出了一款新的比特币ETF产品——iShares Bitcoin Premium Income ETF,交易代码为BITA。与单纯的现货比特币基金不同,该产品采用备兑看涨期权策略,旨在通过出售期权获得权利金收入,并向投资者提供每月派息,为寻求加密相关收益但不愿直接使用DeFi或离岸借贷产品的投资者提供了新选择。 这种策略意味着产品在比特币横盘或震荡市场中可能表现更佳,但在比特币价格快速上涨时,其收益可能会落后于单纯的现货持有。这并非产品缺陷,而是其设计核心:贝莱德将比特币波动性打包成一种收入策略,为更保守或注重收益的投资者提供了更接近传统期权ETF的产品形式。 BITA的推出表明比特币ETF市场正迅速超越单纯的现货产品,进入策略多样化阶段,如赚取溢价收入、对冲和结构化敞口等。这标志着比特币正逐渐被视作可整合进更广泛基金架构的市场要素,而不仅仅是孤立资产。 该产品主要吸引那些已接受比特币投资逻辑,但希望在经纪账户内获得更平滑、以收益为导向产品的投资者,以及寻求在不单纯依赖价格升值的情况下讨论比特币敞口的投资顾问。它并非现货比特币或IBIT的替代品,而是一种不同的工具。关键在于投资者是否理解其收益与上涨潜力之间的权衡。

bitcoinist4 小時前

贝莱德以BITA为代码推出备兑看涨比特币ETF

bitcoinist4 小時前

日本加息,为什么全世界都在紧张?

日本央行在2026年6月将政策利率提升至1%,这是自1995年来的首次。尽管1%的利率在主要经济体中并不高,但由于日本长期充当全球最低成本融资中心的特殊角色,此次加息引发了全球市场的广泛关注。 过去二十余年,日本近乎零的利率环境催生了大规模的日元套利交易。国际资本以极低成本借入日元,转而投资于全球高收益资产,如美国科技股和新兴市场债券,这为全球资产价格上涨提供了重要的流动性基础。日本加息意味着这一廉价资金源头开始收紧,可能引发全球资本的去杠杆化调整。 日本长期维持超低利率,源于其人口老龄化、长期通缩和高额政府债务等结构性约束。然而,疫情后全球通胀传导、国内工资持续增长(近年春斗涨薪均超5%)以及日元贬值压力,共同推动其货币政策转向。 市场担忧的核心并非当前1%的利率水平,而是日本持续三十年的超宽松货币政策框架发生根本性转变的趋势。这种变化将重塑全球套利交易的逻辑和风险资产的定价基础。不过,决定全球资本最终流向的关键,仍在于美日之间的利差变化。如果未来美联储进入降息周期而日本继续加息,两者货币政策差异的收窄可能对国际资本市场产生更深远的影响。 简言之,日本加息标志着全球最重要的低成本融资来源进入正常化进程,这可能引发建立在廉价日元资金之上的全球资本配置体系进行深度重估。

marsbit6 小時前

日本加息,为什么全世界都在紧张?

marsbit6 小時前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片