Genesis’ New Liquidation Plan Is a Material Swerve, U.S. Government Says

CoinDeskPolicy發佈於 2023-11-01更新於 2023-11-02

文章摘要

The bankrupt crypto lender appears to be no longer seeking to reorganize, after a lawsuit from the New York Attorney General dimmed hopes of a deal with parent company DCG.

  • Genesis is now focused on liquidation after making material changes to its bankruptcy plans last week, the U.S. government has said.
  • The change threatens to delay bankruptcy proceedings further.

An updated bankruptcy plan filed by crypto lender Genesis last week represents a significant change of plans, the U.S. government said in a filing on Wednesday. The lender is now seeking to liquidate its assets rather than reorganize them.

The apparent U-turn by Genesis – made after the crypto lender and its parent company Digital Currency Group (DCG) were sued by the New York Attorney General (NYAG) – could add extra delays to the wind-up process, the filing by U.S Trustee William Harrington said. DCG is also CoinDesk’s parent company.

“The prior plan provided for the sale of assets of the debtors and a non-debtor affiliate, a discharge of the debtors, and the reorganization of any unsold assets for the benefit of the claim holders,” said Harrington, a Department of Justice official with responsibility for bankruptcy cases. “The liquidating plan provides for the liquidation of all three debtors … the debtors have substantially and materially modified the sale plan.”

A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Harrington argued creditors will need more time to digest the impact of the significant changes made on Oct. 24 before deciding whether to approve them in a vote.

The bankruptcy, which commenced in January, has stumbled over how to treat over $1.65 billion Genesis is owed by DCG. In a filing made last week, Genesis said a DCG deal is now “not a viable route” after NYAG Letitia James accused DCG, Genesis and business partner Gemini of defrauding investors.

The three companies have all denied James’ charges. A spokesperson for Genesis did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the latest filing.

Edited by Parikshit Mishra.

你可能也喜歡

a16z 深度分享:别再抓 AI 味了,这是一份与AI写作共舞的实操指南

a16z 深度分享:别再纠结于识别“AI味”,而应学习如何与AI协作进行有效写作。本文认为,单纯识别AI写作的“破绽”并不可靠,且这些特征在人类写作中也长期存在。文章从四个维度分析了AI辅助写作的常见特征,并提供了实用的编辑与协作指南: 1. **修辞特征**:警惕“洞察形状”的写作,如语义空洞的“公司腔”、过度对仗、总结式短语等。这些表达听着好听但缺乏实质,应通过“转述测试”进行编辑,追求具体和直白。 2. **嗓音特征**:避免千篇一律的“Alexa嗓音”,如泛泛的温情、可循环套用的句式、抽象名词和低摩擦词汇。写作应保留个人特色和具体表达,仅在需要标准化沟通(如支持文档)时使用中性语调。 3. **结构特征**:注意“结构过剩”问题,如过度使用子标题、清单、路标和套路化开头。结构应为内容服务,根据不同体裁(如叙事、指南、评论)选择合适格式,避免生硬套用模板。 4. **标点特征**:无需过度回避破折号等所谓“AI标点”,关键在于使用得当、不影响阅读流畅。应避免标点使用过于密集或单一,并通过朗读来检验其自然度。 核心建议是:利用AI辅助构思、组织和初稿撰写,但务必注入个人思考与风格。重点不应是“是否由AI生成”,而是最终内容能否清晰、有效地达成沟通目的。好的写作是工具与创作者意图的共同成果。

marsbit13 分鐘前

a16z 深度分享:别再抓 AI 味了,这是一份与AI写作共舞的实操指南

marsbit13 分鐘前

交易

現貨
活动图片