Regulators concerned about retail investors’ involvement with “complex crypto products”

cryptoslate發佈於 2022-03-30更新於 2022-03-30

文章摘要

Retail investors’ involvement in crypto and traditional finance within the past few years has grown to new heights, which is now giving regulators a cause for concern.

Retail investors’ involvement in crypto and traditional finance within the past few years has grown to new heights, which is now giving regulators a cause for concern.

FINRA urges members to educate retail investors

According to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), the majority of retail investors don’t understand the many complex investment products that are on the market and their associated risks.

This has forced the brokerage firm regulator to issue a notice to all of its members about acting in the best interests of their clients.

The regulator has compelled its members to comply with the Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) act which requires brokers to act in the clients’ best interest.

In essence, brokerage firms might have to start explaining the nature of some of their products to their customers alongside their potential rewards and risks.

Beyond that, the regulator is also considering broader rules for these investment products. It is currently seeking stakeholders’ opinions on whether the current regulatory framework is sufficient to protect investors — a move that many predicts is preceding a new set of rules that would be guiding “complex products.”

Crypto investment products are being targeted

One area that could be affected is crypto with its complex offerings. In the warning note, FINRA describes a complex product as

“A product with features that may make it difficult for a retail investor to understand the essential characteristics of the product and its risks (including the payout structure and how the product may perform in different market and economic conditions).”

This definition covers several investment vehicles, including defined outcome ETFs, volatility-linked ETPs, structured products. In addition, mutual funds and ETFs that offer strategies employing cryptocurrency futures are also on the list. Thus, those offering crypto ETFs may have to operate under stricter rules.

According to FINRA,

“The features of these products are such that they may be difficult for a retail investor to understand the essential characteristics of the products and their risks and, therefore, are complex.”

It added that the risk becomes much higher when a retail investor accesses these products without the assistance of a professional.

Notably, FINRA isn’t the only government agency concerned with the various financial products on the market, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has, at different times, been critical of these products and urging investors to carry out their research before investing.

你可能也喜歡

a16z 深度分享:别再抓 AI 味了,这是一份与AI写作共舞的实操指南

a16z 深度分享:别再纠结于识别“AI味”,而应学习如何与AI协作进行有效写作。本文认为,单纯识别AI写作的“破绽”并不可靠,且这些特征在人类写作中也长期存在。文章从四个维度分析了AI辅助写作的常见特征,并提供了实用的编辑与协作指南: 1. **修辞特征**:警惕“洞察形状”的写作,如语义空洞的“公司腔”、过度对仗、总结式短语等。这些表达听着好听但缺乏实质,应通过“转述测试”进行编辑,追求具体和直白。 2. **嗓音特征**:避免千篇一律的“Alexa嗓音”,如泛泛的温情、可循环套用的句式、抽象名词和低摩擦词汇。写作应保留个人特色和具体表达,仅在需要标准化沟通(如支持文档)时使用中性语调。 3. **结构特征**:注意“结构过剩”问题,如过度使用子标题、清单、路标和套路化开头。结构应为内容服务,根据不同体裁(如叙事、指南、评论)选择合适格式,避免生硬套用模板。 4. **标点特征**:无需过度回避破折号等所谓“AI标点”,关键在于使用得当、不影响阅读流畅。应避免标点使用过于密集或单一,并通过朗读来检验其自然度。 核心建议是:利用AI辅助构思、组织和初稿撰写,但务必注入个人思考与风格。重点不应是“是否由AI生成”,而是最终内容能否清晰、有效地达成沟通目的。好的写作是工具与创作者意图的共同成果。

marsbit32 分鐘前

a16z 深度分享:别再抓 AI 味了,这是一份与AI写作共舞的实操指南

marsbit32 分鐘前

交易

現貨
活动图片