[Featured Research]Fed Braces for Longer Inflation Fight as Hiring Remains Strong

WSJ發佈於 2023-02-08更新於 2023-02-08

文章摘要

Process of lowering inflation to goal of 2% is likely to take ‘quite a bit of time’

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said the labor market’s surprising strength underscores why bringing inflation down will take longer and require higher interest rates than many investors have been anticipating.

A government report Friday that showed hiring accelerated in January was “certainly strong—stronger than anyone I know expected,” Mr. Powell said Tuesday during a moderated discussion before the Economic Club of Washington, D.C. “It kind of shows you why we think this will be a process that takes a significant period of time.”

Mr. Powell didn’t say whether advance knowledge about Friday’s report would have changed the outcome of officials’ decision earlier in the week to slow rate increases for a second time in as many meetings. They approved lifting the benchmark federal-funds rate by a quarter-percentage point to a range between 4.5% and 4.75%. They raised it by a half point in December and 0.75 point in November.

The process of lowering inflation to the Fed’s goal of 2% “is likely to take quite a bit of time. It’s not going to be, we don’t think, smooth,” Mr. Powell said. “It’s probably going to be bumpy.”

The expectation that inflation “will go away quickly and painlessly…is not the base case,” he added. “The base case for me is that…we’ll have to do more rate increases, and then we’ll have to look around and see whether we’ve done enough.”

The central bank is seeking to slow economic growth to restrain inflation, which has eased recently after hitting a 40-year high last year. “Once again, Jay Powell said, ‘We really, really, really mean it,’” said Michael Farr, chief market strategist at Hightower Advisors.

Fed officials have raised rates by 4.5 percentage points over the past 12 months, the fastest pace since the 1980s, and have projected that the unemployment rate would rise to about 4.6% by the end of this year.

The Labor Department said Friday that employers added a robust 517,000 jobs in January, and the unemployment rate fell to 3.4%, the lowest since 1969. Forecasters surveyed by The Wall Street Journal had estimated that payrolls increased by 187,000 jobs last month, which would have extended a cooling trend in the labor market.

The department not only reported unusually large job growth in January but—more important for the Fed—it revised previous months’ reported gains higher, suggesting that the economy had entered the new year with more momentum than previously thought. Potential glimmers of softening in previous reports, such as a decline in temporary hiring or a drop in hours worked, reversed in January or were revised away.

According to projections released after their policy meeting in December, most Fed officials thought they would raise the fed-funds rate to 5.1% this year, which would imply quarter-point rate increases at their next two meetings, in March and May. More than a third of officials anticipated lifting the rate above 5.25%, which would call for another increase in June. No officials projected cuts this year.

Ahead of Mr. Powell’s remarks Tuesday, investors in interest-rate futures markets expected the Fed to raise rates by a quarter-point each at the Fed’s next two meetings, according to CME Group.

On Tuesday, Mr. Powell repeated his view that the central bank was prepared to raise rates higher if data suggested that economic activity was accelerating in ways that officials hadn’t anticipated.

“We’re going to react to the data,” he said. “So if we continue to get, for example, strong labor market reports or higher inflation reports, it may well be the case that we have to do more and raise rates more than has been priced in.”

Still, the remarks appeared to keep the Fed’s options open because Mr. Powell “didn’t exactly tell us when or how much more data he would need to increase his funds-rate target,” said Mr. Farr.

Signs that aggressive rate increases last year haven’t significantly cooled the labor market could fuel more difficult Fed debates over whether it has done enough to corral high inflation. The January job gains could unsettle officials if other coming reports also point to stronger economic growth. They will see one more employment report before their March meeting.

Overall inflation has been slowing largely because prices of energy and other goods are falling. Large increases in housing costs have slowed, but haven’t yet filtered through to official price gauges.

Mr. Powell has for the past three months justified continued interest-rate increases by noting still-tight labor markets, elevated wage pressures and high inflation for labor-intensive services. “We’re not seeing disinflation there yet, and that’s going to take some time,” he said Tuesday. “We’re going to need to be patient.”

Later, he returned to that component of service-sector inflation failing to slow down this year as one of the most concerning developments facing the Fed. “That’s what I worry about,” he said.

The Fed believes its rate rises work through markets by tightening financial conditions, such as by raising borrowing costs or lowering prices of stocks and other assets.

Investors’ optimism that inflation would be brought down more quickly this year than the Fed expects has led financial conditions to ease in recent weeks. The average 30-year mortgage rate, for example, has fallen by about a percentage point to just above 6% in recent weeks, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association.

Last week some investors thought they had detected a shift in Mr. Powell’s views because he declined to push back strongly against investors’ views that the path to bring inflation down this year would be easier than the central bank has signaled is likely. But after Friday’s jobs report, investors began to expect an interest-rate trajectory that is closer to what Fed officials have been suggesting is most likely.

“Late last year Powell and other Fed speakers seemed intent on managing market expectations,” said Michael Feroli, chief U.S. economist at JPMorgan Chase, in a report Tuesday. “More recently, they appear content conveying that they will respond to the data and letting the market take that as fair warning.”

That approach seems sensible given that the Fed is probably closer to its ultimate interest-rate destination compared with last year, he said. “This year, the market shouldn’t expect the same degree of hand holding,” he said.

你可能也喜歡

天主教与执法团体警告CLARITY法案可能削弱打击加密货币犯罪的安全措施

一个由天主教领袖、执法相关团体及反贩卖倡导者组成的联盟警告称,《清晰法案》可能会削弱打击加密货币犯罪的安全措施。批评焦点在于法案中保护非托管软件开发者免受货币传输服务商待遇的条款。 这一争议触及了加密货币监管中最棘手的问题之一:如何区分中性软件与金融中介。加密倡导者认为,发布非托管代码的开发者不应像交易所或支付处理商那样受到监管。批评者则担心,广泛的豁免可能使追踪非法金融活动变得更加困难。 非托管软件是去中心化金融(DeFi)的核心。钱包、智能合约和去中心化协议通常允许用户在没有公司控制资金的情况下进行交易。这种架构是加密货币价值主张的核心部分,但当不法分子使用相同工具时,也带来了执法挑战。 《清晰法案》旨在制定更清晰的市场结构规则,但反对意见表明并非所有政策争论都围绕投资者保护或交易所注册。一些立法者在决定开发者保护应扩展到何种程度时,还会考虑人口贩卖、制裁逃避、欺诈以及执法可见性等因素。 尽管面临阻力,该法案并未夭折,但支持者可能需要回应法案可能为非法金融活动创造漏洞的担忧。这可能导致修正案、更狭窄的安全港规则或额外的报告要求。对加密公司而言,风险很高:更明确的规则可能在美国释放投资和产品开发潜力,但如果法案被定性为削弱犯罪防护,其政治道路将变得更为艰难。

bitcoinist1 小時前

天主教与执法团体警告CLARITY法案可能削弱打击加密货币犯罪的安全措施

bitcoinist1 小時前

加密独角兽 Blockstream 深陷严重欺诈始末

今年以来,比特币先驱Adam Back及其创立的Blockstream频繁引发争议。本月初,调查账号NatInfoSec发布长文,指控Blockstream发行的比特币矿业票据(BMN)可能存在严重问题。 指控核心包括:1. **算力与兑付能力存疑**:根据BMN的兑付义务,Blockstream需运营远超其公开显示的算力(约15 EH/s),但未在公开渠道找到相匹配的矿场、电力或算力证据。票据条款允许其以任意来源的BTC进行兑付,透明度不足。2. **高收益与高风险**:相关票据提供高达20%的固定年化收益,在波动剧烈的挖矿行业中难以持续,资金来源成疑。3. **关键人物前科与披露问题**:Blockstream矿业业务的重要关联方、Exacore CEO Christopher Cook曾被判邮件欺诈罪,但此前未在发行文件中披露,其背景陈述也存在夸大。4. **牵连BSTR上市计划**:质疑者担心BMN的潜在风险可能波及Adam Back关联的、正筹备SPAC上市的Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company(BSTR),尽管其法律独立性尚不明确。 BitMEX Research随后发表评论,承认Cook的前科属实且高收益令人担忧,但认为其他部分指控证据不足或存在误导,例如BMN与BSTR在法律上可能独立。社区争论焦点集中于Blockstream矿场算力的**可验证性**——投资者能否独立核查支撑收益的真实挖矿活动。 目前,围绕BMN仍存在几个关键疑问:实际发行规模与责任边界、矿场算力是否足以支撑兑付、近20%固定收益的具体来源、兑付资金的链上可验证性,以及Cook的实际角色。Blockstream尚未对此作出系统性回应。尽管指控有待最终证实,但BMN产品在透明度、风险披露和收益合理性方面,确实存在需要厘清的空间。

marsbit5 小時前

加密独角兽 Blockstream 深陷严重欺诈始末

marsbit5 小時前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片