U.S. Lawmakers Push to Clarify Crypto Developer Liability Under Federal Law

TheNewsCryptoXuất bản vào 2026-01-13Cập nhật gần nhất vào 2026-01-13

Tóm tắt

U.S. Senators Cynthia Lummis and Ron Wyden have reintroduced the bipartisan Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act to protect cryptocurrency developers from being wrongly classified as financial institutions or money transmitters. The bill clarifies that liability should be based on control of user funds, not merely writing or maintaining code. This addresses growing legal uncertainty and fear among developers, especially following recent Department of Justice cases involving privacy tools. Lawmakers argue that misapplying financial regulations to developers who don’t handle funds is unfair, stifles innovation, and could drive talent overseas. The legislation aims to safeguard open-source development and prevent overreach by ensuring only entities with actual control over assets face strict regulatory obligations.

Two U.S. senators, Cynthia Lummis and Ron Wyden, have reintroduced a bipartisan bill called the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act to protect cryptocurrency developers from being wrongly treated as banks or financial institutions under U.S. law.

This bill can help resolve the issue between U.S. law and cryptocurrency developers. Right now, the law is unclear about who counts and handles the money of the users. Because of this, some developers who only write the code and never handle the users’ money, or don’t even control wallets, are being treated as the money-handling company and being charged. This risk has grown after the recent DOJ cases involving privacy and self-custody tools, and many developers are in fear of building crypto tools.

Control, Not Code: Lawmakers Push to Shield Crypto Developers From Liability

The bill says that control matters a lot, not the code. If you only write or maintain software and you cannot access or control the funds, and you don’t have legal authority over assets, then you should not be treated as a money transmitter. Only companies that actually control funds should follow strict money laws.

The bill was urgently reintroduced because the issue became very serious. Developers have already been criminally charged, and this fear for the developers could push them out of the U.S., thus bringing slow innovations and breaking open-source development. So the lawmakers have realized this is dangerous and unfair, and they want to fix the rule before more damage happens.

Both Lummis and Wyden have played a major role in bringing this bill urgently. Lummis says that there is no use in regulating the developers like banks when they never handle the users’ money. Wyden warns that forcing developers to follow the exchange-level rules is technologically ignorant and harmful to privacy. Both argue that liability should follow actual control of funds.

This law helps to keep the crypto tools open and innovation alive, with developers safe. If the developers are afraid of building the tools, fewer wallets will be built, and there will be fewer innovations and more control by the big companies.

Highlighted Crypto News:

‌Red Candles Stack Up for OFFICIAL TRUMP (TRUMP): Will Sellers Tighten Their Grip?

TagsCryptoSenator

Câu hỏi Liên quan

QWhat is the name of the bipartisan bill reintroduced by Senators Lummis and Wyden?

AThe Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act.

QAccording to the bill, what is the key factor that should determine if someone is treated as a money transmitter?

AActual control over the funds, not just writing or maintaining the code.

QWhy was the bill urgently reintroduced, according to the article?

ABecause developers have already been criminally charged, creating fear that could push innovation out of the U.S. and harm open-source development.

QWhat negative consequence could occur if developers are afraid to build crypto tools?

AFewer wallets and innovations would be built, leading to more control by big companies.

QWhich U.S. government agency's recent cases were mentioned as increasing the risk for developers?

AThe Department of Justice (DOJ).

Nội dung Liên quan

Sentora và Firelight Hợp Tác Mang Lại Bảo Hiểm DeFi Nguyên Bản

Sentora, một nền tảng quản lý rủi ro và trí tuệ DeFi thể chế, đã hợp tác với Firelight Protocol để cung cấp bảo hiểm gốc (native coverage) cho các khoản đầu tư trên nền tảng của mình. Sự hợp tác này nhằm lấp đầy khoảng trống về bảo mật, vốn là rào cản cho sự tham gia của các tổ chức vào DeFi, bằng cách tích hợp một lớp bảo vệ được hỗ trợ bởi vốn trực tiếp vào cơ sở hạ tầng kho tiền (vault). Thông qua quan hệ đối tác, người tham gia vào các vault của Sentora sẽ được bảo vệ bẩm sinh trước các rủi ro như nợ xấu, lỗi Oracle và khai thác hợp đồng thông minh. Firelight, được xây dựng trên Flare Network, sử dụng FXRP (một đại diện 1:1 của XRP) làm cơ chế tài sản thế chấp chính, biến XRP thành một tài sản sinh lời. Giám đốc điều hành Sentora, Anthony DeMartino, nhấn mạnh nhu cầu về một lớp bảo vệ rõ ràng để thúc đẩy áp dụng DeFi rộng rãi hơn. Hugo Philion, đồng sáng lập Flare, cũng đánh giá cao mô hình này như một cơ sở hạ tầng cấp thể chế. Đây được xem là một bước tiến nhằm chuẩn hóa bảo hiểm như một yếu tố cơ bản trong triển khai vốn DeFi, từ đó xây dựng niềm tin và tạo điều kiện cho việc áp dụng trên quy mô lớn.

TheNewsCrypto3 giờ trước

Sentora và Firelight Hợp Tác Mang Lại Bảo Hiểm DeFi Nguyên Bản

TheNewsCrypto3 giờ trước

Giao dịch

Giao ngay
Hợp đồng Tương lai
活动图片