FUD – Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt – Is Relief Rally Near?

Huobi ResearchXuất bản vào 2022-06-23Cập nhật gần nhất vào 2022-06-23

Tóm tắt

Such levels of Fear, Uncertainly and Doubt provide an undervalued opportunity for crypto natives.

Abstract

Readers will be able to formulate a live market indicator to quantify crypto market sentiments using Glassnode’s calculator to generate their own strategies after reading this market report. The following pain level indicator, market participation rate, dormancy flow, net capital loss including potential and realization of all market players, and whale accumulation momentum could become a key part their strategies.

On-chain liquidation price is also a key level to when watching out for the bottom. When the liquidation price of ETH ranged between US$1014 and US$1080, ETH bottomed and rebounded on June 15, 2022.

The institutional capitulation including 3 Arrows Capital, Celsius and the Ether Fund also drove the market down. Liquidation price of the institutions were lowered to avoid liquidation. Outstanding units of ETF funds were also lowered to reduce risk exposure for longs.

Such levels of Fear, Uncertainly and Doubt provide an undervalued opportunity for crypto natives.

1. Current state of the market

Meet our new friend. Mr Margin.

In the aftermath of the CPI announcement, the crypto market checked all the boxes for FUDs – fear, uncertainty and doubt with pain, in addition to the prospect of liquidation prices and institutional insolvency.

The following sections will analyze the market with quantitative emotional indicators as well as quant on-chain metrics to analyze market intervals. On-chain liquidation data also triggered institutions to mass panic to sell at a loss. These institutions include MicroStrategy and The Ether Fund (QETH.U).

2. Market indicator

The following three indicators suggest the market is nearing a bottom. This report, however, should not be utilized as a source for financial and investment advice.

Pain indicator:

The purpose of the indicator is to find the bottom through the measurement of pain level. Pain level is estimated by the number and intensity of market players feeling depressed by watching current prices. Finding the pain level in a quantitative model would attempt to estimate the ultimate market pain. Markets usually have a tendency to bottom when the pain level hits maximum tolerance.

Figure 1: Pain level indicator

Source: Data Built by Huobi Research

Brief market analysis: By viewing the pain level indicator, the market is experiencing a very high level of pain. This level of pain only existed 3 times during the market bottoms of 2019, 2015 and 2012. This indicator is highly suggesting that the market is close to its bottom as most market players are already in depression, in pain or have exited.

Pain Level = ($Top_marketcap - $price * circ_supply)

* btc_amount_in_loss/ circ_supply

* (address balance>0.1 BTC / address balance>0.01 BTC)

* (1/Entity-Adjusted Dormancy Flow)

($Top_marketcap - $price * circ_supply) measures price difference between near ATH price and price now, to measure the sentiment of those who sold at a loss and those who are watching the price level from its all-time high (ATH)

btc_amount_in_loss/ circ_supply measures the market participation in loss as a factor per circulating supply which is more frequently traded compared to illiquid non-circulating supply

This is calculated as the market participation in pain:

Figure 2: Quantified market participants in pain

Source: Data Built by Huobi Research

address balance>0.1 BTC / address balance>0.01 BTC measures the participation of serious market players out of participants who are willing to holding more than 0.01 BTC.

(1/Entity-Adjusted Dormancy Flow)= average of destroyed marketcap / (marketcap * volume)

The destroyed marketcap is referred to dormancy. Dormancy is the average number of days destroyed per coin transacted in any given day. A high level of dormancy refers to old coins that are destroyed for either market making or to force the market to panic sell when the whales are holding a large amount of coins. Factoring in the enforcement of panic sell behaviour into account, 1/dormancy flow is multiplied into the pain level indicator as a panic factor. It measures the tendency of panic sold marketcap as a proportion of the whole current marketcap to estimate the percentage of capital that was panic sold. Panic sold behaviour is thus analysed quantitatively.

Readers may have a glimpse of dormancy below:

Figure 3: Formula of bitcoin dormancy and dormancyflow with supply = bitcoin’s total supply

Figure 4: Inverse Dormancy Flow in red

Source: Data Built by Huobi Research

Figure 5: Pain level indicator

Source: Data Built by Huobi Research

Figure 6: Magnified pain level indicator hitting near ATH

Source: Data Built by Huobi Research

This indicator nearly hits ATH, higher than many of the bottoms like the 2020 and 2012 bear market bottoms as well as the bottom from last year. It means most of the market players are in deep pain. The pain level that crypto market players is currently experiencing has only occurred 3 times across the entire lifetime of the crypto market. It also serves as an inverse indicator to signal market bottoms across the 5 market bottoms. We are now ahead of possible final capitulations.

Net Capital Loss Indicator:

The net loss indicator calculates all realized and unrealized capital loss, adjusted by the multiple of current market capitalization. When all capital loss indicators indicate losses with active market players, it signifies market bottoms. The net capital loss per active market player and net capital loss per all addresses is achieved by dividing net capital loss per active market player and sum of all addresses. This balances off the proportion of capital loss with the growth of addresses. The balance is vital in indicating market sentiments. If only net loss is counted, we could see a 2x increase of the capital loss from the previous bottoms. This is not rational as net loss grows bigger owing to a growing marketcap. That is why the grown market capital loss is offset by the increase in wallet address growth. As both have grown, we can measure average loss per active market player and per bitcoin address.

Figure 7: Net capital loss, net capital loss per all addresses and net capital loss per active market players are inversely proportional to market price movement.

Source: Data Built by Huobi Research

Figure 8: Net profit and loss chart is proportional to market price actions

Source: Data Built by Huobi Research

Big Whale Accumulation Indicator:

Here is the wallet accumulation chart of wallet addresses that have more than US$10,000 worth of BTC. An inversely proportional relationship began when the price of BTC rocketed and broke out at about US$20,000 since the bottoms observed during 2020. When the accumulation started, the market price action negatively correlated with the accumulation flow. This indicator signals a relative bottom due to the accumulation of BTC at lower prices.

Figure 9: Whale accumulation is negatively correlated with market price

Source: Data Built by Huobi Research

3. On-Chain Liquidation and Institutional Panic

Eth liquidation price on AAVE, FUSE and Maker:

Eth fell to the price of US$1,015 at its low, and now its price has come across with the closed liquidation price of US$1,212 and a liquidation volume of around US$450 million. When Ethereum’s price fell, the stETH price also dropped in tandem which triggered a cascade of meltdowns for ETH’s derivative products. If stETH heads to the ratio of 0.8:1 of stETH:ETH, a liquidation volume close to US$350 million will be triggered.

Figure 10: Key liquidation level is updated as ETH $1212 on June 16 at a liquidation volume of close to $450M

Source: app.parsec.finance

Figure 11: Key liquidation level is updated as ETH $977 on June 16 at a liquidation volume of close to $230M

Source: app.parsec.finance

Figure 12: Key liquidation level started from 0.81 Steth:ETH on 15th June

Source: app.parsec.finance

Eth liquidation price with 3AC (3 Arrows Capital):

A liquidation price range of between US$1,080 and US$1,014 for Ethereum will trigger a collateral meltdown. According to Wu blockchain, the liquidation price of Ethereum of Three Arrows Capital is about US$1,014.

Figure 13: Key liquidation level ranged from US$1,080 - US$1,014, which is less than 10% from the ETH price of US$1,150

Source: app.parsec.finance

Figure 14: WuBlockchain’s analysis on 3AC’s collateral and liquidation price

Source: https://twitter.com/WuBlockchain

Celsius meltdown:

The liquidation price of US$20,272 of WBTC has caught the eye of market players. On June 13, the liquidation price of WBTC might have triggered a potential meltdown of US$478 million worth of collateral for Celsius.

Figure 15: Fear of potential liquidation of US$478 m triggering cascade effect on 13 June, 2022

Source: oasis.app

Since Celsius is actively paying back its debt, on early June 14, the liquidation price lowered to US$16,852.

Figure 16: Celsius’ active loan paying behavioral lowered liquidation price

Source: oasis.app

Figure 17: Celsius’ current liquidation price lowered $14,000

Source: oasis.app

Institutional Capitulations:

Institutions’ unrealized capital loss is reflected across social media.

Figure 18: All mainstream large cap and political party loss

Source: twitter.com/fx_margin_call

Figure 18: MicroStrategy logo improvised

Source: Twitter

The Ether Fund (QETH.U) Outstanding Units were also reduced to be sold as a loss. According to Glassnode, the holdings of QETH.U were reduced during the market crash, and a part of the holdings was sold as a loss.

Figure 19: QETH.U) Outstanding Units were decreased to reduce risk exposure

Source: Glassnode

4. Conclusion

Major market FUDs and pain level have been reflected by indicators. Behavioral traits of retail investors are against whales, meaning that they are inversely correlated. On-chain liquidations have triggered a cascade of draw-downs. The Market is experiencing a moment of capitulations. Investors are reminded to manage portfolio risks and acknowledge maximum drawdown.

About Huobi Research Institute

Huobi Blockchain Application Research Institute (referred to as "Huobi Research Institute") was established in April 2016. Since March 2018, it has been committed to comprehensively expanding the research and exploration of various fields of blockchain. As the research object, the research goal is to accelerate the research and development of blockchain technology, promote the application of blockchain industry, and promote the ecological optimization of the blockchain industry. The main research content includes industry trends, technology paths, application innovations in the blockchain field, Model exploration, etc. Based on the principles of public welfare, rigor and innovation, Huobi Research Institute will carry out extensive and in-depth cooperation with governments, enterprises, universities and other institutions through various forms to build a research platform covering the complete industrial chain of the blockchain. Industry professionals provide a solid theoretical basis and trend judgments to promote the healthy and sustainable development of the entire blockchain industry.

Official website:

https://research.huobi.com/

Consulting email:

[email protected]

Twitter: @Huobi_Research

https://twitter.com/Huobi_Research

Medium: Huobi Research

https://medium.com/huobi-research

Disclaimer

1. The author of this report and his organization do not have any relationship that affects the objectivity, independence, and fairness of the report with other third parties involved in this report.

2. The information and data cited in this report are from compliance channels. The sources of the information and data are considered reliable by the author, and necessary verifications have been made for their authenticity, accuracy and completeness, but the author makes no guarantee for their authenticity, accuracy or completeness.

3. The content of the report is for reference only, and the facts and opinions in the report do not constitute business, investment and other related recommendations. The author does not assume any responsibility for the losses caused by the use of the contents of this report, unless clearly stipulated by laws and regulations. Readers should not only make business and investment decisions based on this report, nor should they lose their ability to make independent judgments based on this report.

4. The information, opinions and inferences contained in this report only reflect the judgments of the researchers on the date of finalizing this report. In the future, based on industry changes and data and information updates, there is the possibility of updates of opinions and judgments.

5. The copyright of this report is only owned by Huobi Blockchain Research Institute. If you need to quote the content of this report, please indicate the source. If you need a large amount of reference, please inform in advance (see "About Huobi Blockchain Research Institute" for contact information) and use it within the allowed scope. Under no circumstances shall this report be quoted, deleted or modified contrary to the original intent.

Nội dung Liên quan

Quay lại bàn chơi AI, động thái đầu tiên của Mark Zuckerberg là sa thải nhân viên?

Meta dự kiến bắt đầu đợt sa thải nhân sự lớn vào ngày 20/5, với khoảng 8.000 việc làm (10% lực lượng lao động toàn cầu) bị cắt giảm, và có thể tiếp tục sa thải trong nửa cuối năm. Động thái này diễn ra chỉ 10 ngày sau khi Meta ra mắt Muse Spark - mô hình AI đa phương thức mạnh nhất của họng, được kỳ vọng giúp công ty trở lại cuộc đua AI với các gã khổng lồ như OpenAI hay Google. Dù tình hình tài chính ổn định, Meta đang thúc đẩy cấu trúc tổ chức tinh gọn hơn với sự hỗ trợ của AI. Công ty đặt mục tiêu đến giữa 2026, 65% kỹ sư phải có trên 75% code được viết với sự tham gia của AI. Việc sử dụng AI thậm chí đã trở thành chỉ số đánh giá hiệu suất nhân viên. Xu hướng dùng AI để tái cấu trúc lực lượng lao động không chỉ riêng Meta. Amazon, Block (của Jack Dorsey) và Snap cũng đã thực hiện các đợt sa thải tương tự, viện dẫn lý do AI giúp nâng cao hiệu quả và giảm công việc lặp đi lặp lại. Tuy nhiên, việc Block sau đó mời một số nhân viên sa thải quay lại làm việc cho thấy các công ty có thể đang vội vàng trong việc này.

Odaily星球日报1 giờ trước

Quay lại bàn chơi AI, động thái đầu tiên của Mark Zuckerberg là sa thải nhân viên?

Odaily星球日报1 giờ trước

Giao dịch

Giao ngay
Hợp đồng Tương lai
活动图片