World Cup Upsets Keep Coming, the 'Dumb Money' in Prediction Markets Got Me Laughing

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2026-07-02Востаннє оновлено о 2026-07-02

Анотація

The 2026 FIFA World Cup has been marked by frequent upsets, turning prediction markets into a high-stakes game of chance. Odaily Planet Daily examines several high-profile cases where "smart money" bets went disastrously wrong, questioning if these losses offer any contrarian insights. A major upset occurred when underdog Cape Verde held football powerhouse Spain to a 0-0 draw. A trader, betting $1 million on a Spanish victory at 0.92 odds to earn $85,000, instead lost their entire principal. This match set a precedent for underdogs stifling favorites. Similarly, Portugal, despite featuring star Cristiano Ronaldo, was held to a 1-1 draw by debutants DR Congo. A trader with a 49% win rate lost over $243,000 predicting a Portuguese win. The article highlights the case of a notorious "anti-indicator" address, @Zzzz87. After initially losing over $620,000 (with a sub-40% win rate) by betting on underdog upsets, the address switched strategy. It began backing favorites in the knockout stages, reportedly turning a $269,000 profit in a week, despite being down $255,000 over the past month. This exemplifies the market's volatility and the difficulty of establishing a consistent strategy. The core conclusion is that football's inherent unpredictability defies simple logic based on player valuations or national rankings. Whether following "smart money" or betting against "dumb money," the only certainty is uncertainty. The article advises enthusiasts to enjoy the games while remain...

Original|Odaily Planet Daily(@OdailyChina)

Author|Wenser(@wenser2010 )

The World Cup, 20 days in.

Prediction market trading volume keeps climbing, with huge wins and losses happening in turn. Previously, Odaily Planet Daily summarized cases of "big wins & terrible losses" since the World Cup started, and also detailed how to set up strategies and tools for following smart money.

Today, besides laughing at the "big smart money," we want to discuss whether classic losing cases have contrarian reference value.

Spain - Cape Verde Draw: Goalkeeper's 7 Amazing Saves, Whale Loses $1M Trying to Make $85K

40-year-old Cape Verde goalkeeper Vozinha panted as he watched his opponents on the field, body slightly hunched, ready to save any ball kicked his way.

For this goalkeeper valued at only €50k, many didn't fancy him or the Cape Verde island nation team before the match; after all, their opponent was World Cup top-tier powerhouse — Spain, whose star player Lamine Yamal alone is valued at €200M, ranking first on the World Cup player value list, 4000 times Vozinha's value; the total value of Spanish players is as high as €1.2B, also a pre-tournament favorite. La Liga includes a series of top clubs like Real Madrid, Barcelona, Atlético Madrid, with countless local stars.

But football isn't merely a game of value comparison; it's a sport of on-field competition.

For Cape Verde national team players, being on the World Cup stage, enjoying the fun of football and the adrenaline rush from competition is enough.(Odaily Planet Daily note: According to commentator Guan Zeyuan, Cape Verde, an Atlantic island nation with a total area of about 4000 sq km, holds football matches on each island to decide the winning team, eventually selecting the final squad for the World Cup, similar to domestic "Village BA" or "Super League" regional tournaments.)

During the match, Spain had 27 shots, 7 on target, but ultimately, all attacks were successfully neutralized by Vozinha and his teammates. With the referee's final whistle, the Spain vs Cape Verde match ended in a "0-0" draw. This upset result instantly wiped out many prediction market players.

Before kickoff, @betoor619 invested $1M to buy "Spain beats Cape Verde" at a 92-cent rate, considered by many a "prediction market easy money play," with some even expecting the match to be a "one-sided massacre ending with a big scoreline."

But the Cape Verde team, especially goalkeeper Vozinha, didn't accept that outcome. They were well-organized, compact in defense, aggressive in challenges, executing their defensive counter-attack strategy exceptionally well.

In the end, @betoor619 didn't make the expected $85K from the "easy money play," but instead lost his $1M principal.

This match might have been the start of frequent upsets and strong teams being held to draws by weaker teams in this World Cup, with many subsequent pre-tournament favorites drawing with little-known small or weak nations in group stages, making buying the draw the best choice in prediction markets.

Recommended reading: No Matter If You Understand Football, Buying the Draw Is the Best Strategy for This World Cup?

Portugal - DR Congo Draw: 41-year-old Ronaldo Past His Prime, Smart Money Loses Over $240K for a Lesson

June 18th, World Cup Group K, pre-match favorite Portugal faced DR Congo, making their World Cup debut.

According to FIFA data, as of June 10, 2026, Portugal's men's team ranks 7th, behind the Netherlands, with relatively prominent overall strength, especially with Cristiano Ronaldo—"5-time Champions League winner, 5-time Ballon d'Or winner, 6-time World Cup participant, all-time top scorer"—making many fans confident in Portugal's performance before the match. Many hoped Ronaldo would score, becoming the "first player in history to score in 6 consecutive World Cups," outdoing Messi.

On the other side, DR Congo ranks only 45th in FIFA rankings. This participation marks DR Congo's return to the World Cup stage after 52 years.

In player value comparison, Portugal's total value exceeds €1B, including 2 "€100M+ valued players" and 8 players valued over €40M. DR Congo's total value is about €150M, only one-seventh of Portugal's. Before the match, DR Congo expressed hope to "rewrite the history of humiliation, at least reach the knockout stage, advance to the round of 32."

Back to the match, on match day, Ronaldo started for Portugal, but ultimately had 3 shots, 0 on target; Portugal had 7 shots total, 1 on target, showing obvious lack of firepower in attack.

Although Portugal took the lead in under 7 minutes with a lightning goal from 19-year-old João Neves, in first-half stoppage time, when Portugal was most prone to negligence and letting guard down, DR Congo equalized at the death.

Similar to Cape Verde, DR Congo's defensive counter-attack was excellent, with tight marking; and three center-backs averaging over 185cm further limited Ronaldo's impact, putting immense pressure on Portugal's midfield and defense, ultimately missing a winning start.

In prediction markets, a certain smart money with a 49% win rate pre-match spent over $243K predicting "Portugal beats DR Congo", opening at an average of 76 cents, ending in a loss.

In today's concluded England vs DR Congo knockout match, DR Congo once took the lead with a defensive counter-attack goal, with England narrowly winning 2-1 thanks to Kane's brace, barely avoiding a second act of the "weak team drawing or even beating strong team" upset script.

Saudi Arabia vs Cape Verde Draw: Dumb Money Bets on Cape Verde Win, Ultimately Loses $80K

In World Cup match predictions, whenever you try to apply last time's experience, the trend reverses.

In earlier group stages, Cape Verde, relying on goalkeeper Vozinha and the team's strict defensive counter-attack strategy, successively defeated opponents and later drew with Uruguay.

Based on this, the "big smart" ones in prediction markets boldly predicted Cape Verde would win against Saudi Arabia before the match.

But ultimately, Cape Verde still relied on extremely resilient defensive style and unified strategy execution, drawing "0-0" with Saudi Arabia.

According to PPP prediction market tool monitoring, World Cup top contrarian address @Zzzz87 predicted wrong again, this address predicting Cape Verde beats Saudi Arabia lost another $80K. Previously, this address had lost $620K since the World Cup started, win rate dropping below 40%, typically with larger positions having lower win rates.

In the past week, @Zzzz87 reflected and changed approach, no longer obsessing over weak team upsets, instead switching to betting on strong teams to win outright. Indeed, as knockouts began, strong teams being overturned decreased. @Zzzz87 's "buy strong strategy" quickly worked, with profit ratios ranging from nearly 30% to close to 120%.

Therefore, although this address lost about $255K in the past month, profit in the past week reached about $269K.

Currently, this address holds multiple prediction events for matches like "Switzerland VS Algeria", "Spain VS Austria", "Portugal VS Croatia", "Argentina VS Cape Verde", with buy amounts ranging from a few thousand dollars to $36K. Results will be clear tomorrow.

The Ball is Round, Anything is Possible

Seeing many cases, is it the former "dumb contrarian" learning lessons to become "smart money," or the "top contrarian curse" striking again?

Hard to conclude, because some delete accounts and run, refusing to be observed by "survivorship bias," while others have mixed wins and losses, or hedge with multiple accounts.

Whether playing or predicting matches, the only certainty is "uncertainty."

The World Cup outcome isn't a team value contest, nor a comparison of national strength or training systems, and doesn't shift with the will or财力 of外围 participants. Whether following smart money or contrarian following dumb money, you need to watch the matches, adjusting flexibly while enjoying.

Пов'язані питання

QAccording to the article, what was the result of the Spain vs. Cape Verde match in the World Cup, and what significant financial loss did the user @betoor619 suffer because of it?

AThe match between Spain and Cape Verde ended in a 0-0 draw. The user @betoor619 lost $1 million by betting $1 million at a rate of $0.92 on a Spanish victory, failing to win the expected $85,000 profit.

QIn the Portugal vs. DR Congo match, why was Portugal widely favored to win before the game, and what was the final outcome?

APortugal was favored due to its high FIFA ranking (7th), a star-studded squad including Cristiano Ronaldo, and a total player value exceeding €1 billion. However, the match ended in a 1-1 draw after DR Congo scored an equalizer just before halftime, despite Portugal's early lead.

QWhat betting pattern did the 'anti-indicator' address @Zzzz87 follow during the group stage, and how did they change their strategy during the knockout stage?

ADuring the group stage, @Zzzz87 often bet on underdog teams causing upsets, leading to significant losses with a win rate below 40%. During the knockout stage, they changed strategy to betting on strong/favorite teams to win, which proved successful and led to a period of profitability.

QWhat common defensive strategy did teams like Cape Verde and DR Congo use to achieve draws against stronger opponents, as mentioned in the article?

ATeams like Cape Verde and DR Congo used a tight defensive and counter-attacking strategy. They focused on compact organization, disciplined defending, and capitalizing on counter-attacking opportunities to neutralize stronger opponents.

QWhat is the main lesson or theme the article suggests about World Cup betting and football outcomes in general?

AThe main theme is the inherent uncertainty of football. Outcomes are not determined by team value, national strength, or bettors' opinions and capital. The article advises flexibility and cautions against blindly following either 'smart money' or 'dumb money' trends, emphasizing that in football, anything is possible.

Пов'язані матеріали

High-Yield, Debt-Free, and Non-Dilutive: Why Bitcoin Treasury Companies Are Aggressively Promoting Preferred Share Financing

Bitcoin-backed preferred shares, led by companies like Strategy and followed by newer entrants like Strive, have grown to a market size of approximately $13 billion in under two years, attracting capital with high yields. A 2026 report from BitcoinTreasuries.net and Apyx projects this segment could grow from nearly 1% to 3-5% of the global $1.3 trillion preferred share market by 2030, with long-term potential reaching 10%. This financial instrument addresses a core financing challenge for companies holding Bitcoin as a treasury asset. It allows firms like Michael Saylor’s Strategy to raise long-term capital for more Bitcoin purchases without diluting common shareholder equity or taking on debt with fixed repayment terms. Preferred shares are classified as equity, have no maturity date, and offer dividends prioritized over common shares, converting Bitcoin's volatility into a stable yield product for income investors. Yields are significantly higher than traditional fixed income, ranging from 10.8% to 15.2% for top issuers. Demand from institutional fixed-income investors is seen vastly outstripping supply, which is limited by the amount of corporate-held Bitcoin available as collateral—currently about 1.26 million BTC ($83 billion), with Strategy holding 67%. A key safety feature is the high collateral coverage ratio of 3.8x to 4.5x, meaning each dollar of preferred equity is backed by $3.8-$4.5 in Bitcoin. Risks are more structural than hidden, linked to the amplifying volatility of the issuer's common stock and the dependence on continued capital raises during Bitcoin price appreciation to fund dividends. Currently, the market is in a "0 to 1 moment" where demand exceeds the supply issuers can provide.

Foresight News19 хв тому

High-Yield, Debt-Free, and Non-Dilutive: Why Bitcoin Treasury Companies Are Aggressively Promoting Preferred Share Financing

Foresight News19 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片