Why ONDO price stays weak even as TVL hits $1.93B record

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2025-12-22Востаннє оновлено о 2025-12-22

Анотація

Despite reaching a new all-time high in Total Value Locked (TVL) of $1.93 billion following its announcement to launch tokenized U.S. stocks and ETFs on Solana in 2026, ONDO's price remained weak, trading between $0.36–$0.39. Technical indicators showed bearish momentum, with RSI near 34 and MACD below zero, suggesting continued downside pressure. Solana also experienced mixed reactions, briefly dipping below $122 but seeing significant ETF inflows of $35.20 million. The divergence between rising TVL and price weakness indicates potential long-term accumulation by investors, though short-term momentum remains uncertain.

Ondo Finance recorded a new all-time high in Total Value Locked after its announcement on the 15th of December. The firm said it would launch tokenized U.S. stocks and ETFs on Solana in early 2026.

The move extended Ondo’s Global Markets platform beyond Ethereum and BNB Chain. It positioned Solana as the next settlement layer for Ondo’s tokenized finance push.

However, market reaction across Ondo [ONDO] and Solana remained mixed in subsequent sessions. Both assets pulled back shortly after the announcement, diverging from improving protocol metrics.

TVL surged as the price stalled

ONDO’s TVL continued rising to an ATH of $1.93 billion even as the price slipped back into the $0.36–$0.39 trading range. The steady increase suggested capital remained deployed at the protocol level during consolidation.

Liquidity did not immediately exit following the high-profile announcement.

However, technical indicators failed to confirm bullish price momentum. ONDO’s RSI hovered near 34 on the daily chart. The reading reflected persistent bearish momentum following the pullback.

Did rising TVL signal accumulation, or was the market still pricing broader bearish risk?

Momentum stayed under pressure

ONDO dropped below the $0.40 level, briefly reaching $0.36 during the post-announcement decline.

RSI showed tentative stabilization but lacked confirmation of a sustained reversal.

ONDO’s MACD remained below the zero line, signaling continued downside pressure. Local resistance stood near $0.50, while downside risk extended toward $0.25 in a worst-case scenario.

That left price action disconnected from improving fundamentals.

Solana held key support

On the 15th of December, the same day as Ondo’s announcement, Solana [SOL] briefly broke below $122, dipping to around $117 before buyers stepped in, keeping the price within the $122–$145 range.

On the four-hour chart, RSI was near 52, and weak MACD reflected neutral momentum and consolidation, consistent with accumulation rather than a breakout.

During the same session, Solana recorded $35.20 million in ETF inflows. That figure marked the highest inflow of the week and the second-highest daily total in December.

Capital entered despite price weakness, suggesting accumulation during heightened volatility.

Is ONDO consolidating or repricing lower?

ONDO’s rising TVL contrasted sharply with bearish RSI and MACD readings. The setup suggested accumulation without immediate price confirmation. Market participants appeared cautious.

Whether the price stabilized or was repriced lower remained uncertain. Gaining the local resistance level could signal improving momentum, while failure could extend the ongoing consolidation.

Final Thoughts

Ondo’s TVL growth showed capital conviction even as price momentum lagged behind.
That disconnect suggested investors favored long-term positioning over immediate upside.

Трендові криптовалюти

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

PancakeSwapCAKE

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the key announcement made by Ondo Finance on December 15th that led to a new TVL record?

AOndo Finance announced it would launch tokenized U.S. stocks and ETFs on Solana in early 2026.

QDespite the record TVL, what was the price range ONDO fell back into and what was the RSI level indicating?

AONDO's price fell back into the $0.36–$0.39 trading range, and its RSI hovered near 34, reflecting persistent bearish momentum.

QWhat did the MACD indicator signal about ONDO's price momentum after the announcement?

AONDO’s MACD remained below the zero line, signaling continued downside pressure.

QHow did Solana's market activity, specifically regarding ETF inflows, contrast with its price action on December 15th?

ASolana recorded $35.20 million in ETF inflows, the highest of the week, despite its price briefly breaking below $122, suggesting accumulation during price weakness.

QWhat does the article suggest is the main reason for the disconnect between ONDO's rising TVL and its weak price?

AThe disconnect suggested that investors were favoring long-term positioning and accumulation over seeking immediate price upside, indicating caution.

Пов'язані матеріали

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbit10 год тому

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbit10 год тому

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手10 год тому

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手10 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit12 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit12 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手13 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手13 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit14 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'