White House Mediates Bank–Crypto Clash Over CLARITY Act

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-03-11Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-11

Анотація

The White House is mediating between banks and crypto industry representatives over the stalled CLARITY Act in the Senate. White House crypto adviser Patrick Witt emphasized the need to keep the legislation pro-innovation and criticized attempts to turn it into an anti-competition bill. Coinbase officials, including Paul Grewal, accused banks of causing unnecessary delays and attempting to divert benefits from retail consumers to themselves. Banks, represented by groups like the Bank Policy Institute, express concerns over deposit flight risks and are considering legal action against the OCC for granting banking charters to crypto firms. Previously, former President Trump warned that failure to pass the bill could drive the crypto industry to competing countries like China.

While the CLARITY Act is repeatedly delayed in the Senate, the White House is attempting to talk to resolve the standoff between banks and the crypto industry representatives. The adviser of the White House with officials of Coinbase, including Paul Grewal, slams banks over unnecessary delays like deposit flight risks.

The White House crypto adviser Patrick Witt posted on X that the CLARITY Act must stay a pro-innovation piece of legislation. He slammed the trials to hijack the legislative process and change it into an anti-competition bill, referring to it as shameful.

Before this, President Donald Trump criticised banks and warned that failing to pass the crypto bill could push the industry to competing countries, including China. The Trump administration is meeting with banking and crypto officials to solve the issues, with Patrick Witt being the mediator regarding the CLARITY Act.

The Compromise

Senators and White House crypto advisers are seeking a compromise on concerns like deposit flight risk from stablecoin yields. Angela Alsobrooks, a member of the Banking Committee, mentioned banks may have to make some compromise on the CLARITY Act.

The officials of Coinbase, comprising Brian Armstrong, Paul Grewal, and Faryar Shirzad, reproached banking groups for avoiding President Trump and changed the bipartisan GENIUS Act as a condition for the passage of the crypto market structure bill.

The CLO of Coinbase, Paul Grewal, accused banks of trying to take rewards out of retail consumers’ pockets and keep them in the big pockets of banks. The officials of banking, like JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, have concerns regarding deposit flight “risk” and short evidence.

Banks are also looking for lawsuits associated with banking charters for crypto companies. The Bank Policy Institute, which shows Wall Street giants comprising JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, and Citigroup, is pondering a lawsuit against the US OCC over its push to provide banking charters to crypto companies.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Arthur Hayes Urges Caution as Federal Reserve Maintains Tight Policy

Трендові криптовалюти

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

PancakeSwapCAKE

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main role of the White House in the current situation regarding the CLARITY Act?

AThe White House is attempting to mediate and resolve the standoff between banks and the crypto industry representatives, with its crypto adviser Patrick Witt acting as a mediator.

QWho is Patrick Witt and what did he post on social media regarding the CLARITY Act?

APatrick Witt is the White House crypto adviser. He posted on X that the CLARITY Act must remain a pro-innovation piece of legislation and slammed attempts to hijack the legislative process and turn it into an anti-competition bill, calling it shameful.

QWhat specific concern do banks, like JPMorgan Chase, have regarding stablecoins and crypto companies?

ABanks, such as JPMorgan Chase, have concerns about deposit flight risk from stablecoin yields. They are also looking into lawsuits related to banking charters for crypto companies.

QWhich Coinbase officials were mentioned as reproaching banking groups, and what did they accuse them of?

ACoinbase officials Brian Armstrong, Paul Grewal, and Faryar Shirzad reproached banking groups for avoiding President Trump and for changing the bipartisan GENIUS Act as a condition for the passage of the crypto market structure bill. Grewal specifically accused banks of trying to take rewards from retail consumers and keep them in the big pockets of banks.

QWhat broader consequence did former President Donald Trump warn about if the crypto bill fails to pass?

AFormer President Donald Trump warned that failing to pass the crypto bill could push the industry to competing countries, including China.

Пов'язані матеріали

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit17 хв тому

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit17 хв тому

Unlocking $100 Million in Liquidity? Pump.fun's New Policy Tests the 5-Minute Pump Technique

Foresight News, July 21 – Pump.fun has launched its new "BOOST" mode as the standard launch mechanism for new tokens. The core of BOOST is to address the issue of "dead liquidity." Historically, when a token migrates from its bonding curve to a liquidity pool, roughly 20% of its liquidity becomes permanently locked and unusable, a problem the platform estimates costs over $100 million annually. The new mechanism redirects this 20% of funds, which would have been locked, to instead be used for a 5-minute Time-Weighted Average Price (TWAP) buyback of the token immediately after migration. The purchased tokens are then permanently burned. For example, this means reserving 17.6 SOL for SOL pairs or about $2516 for USDC pairs at migration. This creates a short-term buying pressure and reduces the token's supply. The goal is to improve the immediate post-launch performance of memecoins, potentially increasing trader retention and transaction volume on the platform. However, critics warn this could lower the bar for token launches, encouraging low-quality projects, and that the brief 5-minute buy pressure might lead to sharper price crashes once it ends if followed by large sell-offs.

Foresight News26 хв тому

Unlocking $100 Million in Liquidity? Pump.fun's New Policy Tests the 5-Minute Pump Technique

Foresight News26 хв тому

What Signals Can Be Read from the Trading Data of India's Largest Asset Manager SBI's IPO?

India's largest asset manager, SBI Funds Management, successfully listed on July 21 with a nearly $10 billion IPO, attracting approximately 42 times subscription. However, the first-day closing price rose only about 6.3%, falling short of the 16% premium anticipated in the grey market. This signals robust demand for core Indian financial assets but also disciplined pricing, indicating the IPO market is selectively open for strong brands with clear growth narratives. The low reported underwriting fees, which led some global banks to reduce participation, highlight a shift in pricing power towards powerful issuers like SBI. Its strong brand, banking parent, and stable cash flows reduced reliance on traditional investment banking sales channels, with local brokers playing a larger role. This fee dynamic may not be replicable for weaker issuers. SBI's performance is seen as a key test for India's IPO pipeline, including potential future large listings like Reliance Jio and NSE. Its success with tempered gains sets a new price anchor: high-quality assets can launch, but excessive valuation premiums are constrained. The true measure of a sustained market reopening will be whether subsequent major offerings can proceed smoothly at reasonable valuations.

marsbit45 хв тому

What Signals Can Be Read from the Trading Data of India's Largest Asset Manager SBI's IPO?

marsbit45 хв тому

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

Japan's cabinet has introduced the 2026 Basic Policy on Economic and Fiscal Management and Reform, shifting its primary fiscal target. The new framework moves away from the traditional annual primary balance goal and instead prioritizes a stable reduction of the debt-to-GDP ratio. This change is tied to a strategy of increased "responsible proactive fiscal" spending, aiming to boost long-term growth through investments in strategic sectors like AI, semiconductors, energy, and robotics. The government estimates total public and private investment in 62 key technologies could exceed 370 trillion yen by 2040. The market reaction has been mixed and cautious. While equity markets may respond to policy signals, bond markets are focused on fiscal credibility. Concerns center on whether the weakening of the clear primary balance anchor could lead to looser fiscal discipline. If investors doubt that these strategic investments will generate sufficient productivity gains, tax revenue, and nominal growth to outpace rising interest costs, they may demand higher yields on Japanese Government Bonds (JGBs). Recent volatility in the yen and JGB yields, with the 10-year yield briefly reaching 2.9%, reflects this skepticism. The success of this new framework hinges on two factors: whether Japan can achieve a nominal growth rate consistently higher than its long-term interest rates, and whether future budgets demonstrate disciplined control over bond issuance. The government's narrative is that strategic investment is essential to break Japan's cycle of low growth, aging, and labor shortages. However, the bond market will continuously assess the credibility of this plan, pricing the risk that it may represent fiscal expansion rather than a viable growth strategy.

marsbit54 хв тому

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

marsbit54 хв тому

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit1 год тому

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence