When the Spreads Reach 50%: The Rise of Pre-Market Crypto-Stock Arbitrage

比推Опубліковано о 2026-03-16Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-16

Анотація

In the context of the crypto bear market, a new arbitrage opportunity is gaining traction: pre-IPO stock tokenization trading across different platforms. The article highlights significant price discrepancies—sometimes exceeding 50%—for high-profile companies like Kalshi, Polymarket, and SpaceX (xAI) on platforms such as PreStocks, Jarsy, and Tessera. These gaps, driven by varying trading mechanisms and liquidity conditions, reveal a strong market demand for a unified platform that bridges traditional and crypto pre-market trading. The piece argues that building such an intermediary could capitalize on these arbitrage opportunities, especially with a wave of major IPOs expected in 2026, while generating revenue through trading fees and liquidity provision.

Author: Wenser, Odaily Planet Daily

Editor: Hao Fangzhou

Original Title: Spreads Exceeding 50%, The Pre-Market Crypto-Stock Arbitrage Market to Become a New Business in the Crypto Bear Market

Not long ago, Mysten Labs CEO evan.sui shared his views on the "bear market." He mentioned that he does not agree with the so-called "the bear market is great, keep building" argument. In fact, the bear market is not "great"; packaging it as good for everyone overlooks the real costs (such as discouraging builders and users). Many retail investors and excellent teams will face cash flow breaks and have to exit, ultimately harming the long-term development of the crypto industry.

However, data evidence is inconsistent with this view. A report released by Lattice VC in October 2024 showed that at that time, over 80% of crypto startups that announced seed round financing during the 2022 bear market were still building. In other words, if project parties can ensure relative stability in personnel and funds, the bear market is indeed more conducive to project construction and development. As for the reasons, perhaps it's because project parties focus more on product development and experience optimization during a bear market; or perhaps the bear market trains project parties in various abilities to survive. In short, being in a crypto bear market, project parties determined to start a business might instead find a way out of desperation and carve their own path of development.

In view of this, we will explore the potential employment tracks and project directions in this cycle through a series of articles titled "Crypto Bear Market Startup Guide." If crypto projects are born and grow rapidly in the future as a result, Odaily Planet Daily also welcomes project parties to discuss cooperation.

Today, let's first talk about the hottest potential entrepreneurial direction at the moment besides prediction markets—the pre-market price difference market for crypto and stocks.

The Real Demand of the Pre-Market Crypto-Stock Market: Platform Differentiation and Liquidity Bridge

As an intermediate bridge connecting the crypto market and the traditional financial market, crypto-stock trading platforms have not only received high attention and active participation from crypto project parties, but global leading securities platforms including Nasdaq and the New York Stock Exchange have also ventured into it, aiming to capture the incremental market while further activating liquidity in the traditional financial market.

Furthermore, not only have listed cryptocurrency concept stocks undergone tokenization and on-chain contract transformation, but many hot concept stocks that have not yet IPOed have also been highly sought after by both the crypto market and the traditional financial market, thus giving rise to several pre-market stock tokenization trading platforms.

Considering that the capital market is about to welcome a wave of US listings this year, including OpenAI, Anthropic, SpaceX (xAI), Kalshi, Polymarket, OKX, Kraken, and a series of AI model companies, commercial aerospace companies, prediction market platforms, and crypto exchanges, 2026 is undoubtedly a "big year for IPOs."

Against the backdrop of the crypto market falling intermittently with occasional rebounds and the stock market rising everywhere节节攀升, the heat of the pre-market stock trading market further corroborates the above view—there is strong demand for pre-market trading of hot concept stocks in both the crypto market and the traditional financial market.

This is the main reason for the emergence of pre-market stock trading platforms such as PreStocks, Jarsy, and Tessera. Additionally, compared to pre-market stock trading markets in the traditional financial market such as Hiive and Nasdaq Private Market, the trading methods, purchase quotas, and entry barriers of the crypto pre-market trading market are more flexible, and the premiums are relatively higher, so many users participate enthusiastically.

But just as the same token can have different degrees of price differences on different exchanges, before the pre-market stock market temporarily introduces a mechanism similar to an oracle, whatever the reason, we can clearly see that the pricing of the same underlying stock on the different platforms mentioned above has certain price differences.

Based on the above information, we can make a judgment—the crypto market still lacks one or more "bridge platforms between pre-market stock trading markets."

This is probably a necessary step to push stock tokenization and pre-market stock tokenization further forward—a unified comprehensive platform covering pre-market trading in both traditional financial markets and crypto markets.

Below, we will take the 2 leading prediction market platforms Kalshi and Polymarket, which are recently seeking $20 billion in financing, and SpaceX (xAI), valued at $1.25 trillion, as examples to discuss the feasibility and real demand of this "entrepreneurial direction."

Comparing Pre-Market Spreads of PreStocks, Jarsy, Tessera 3 Major Platforms: Maximum Spread Rate Exceeds 50%, Price Difference Up to Nearly $150

Kalshi Pre-Market Spread: Up to $148, Spread Rate About 37%

Taking the Kalshi pre-market trading market as an example, its prices on different platforms are as follows—

PreStocks platform, the pre-market price of the stock token is about $397; (Compared to the $369 we mentioned one month ago in the article "Kalshi Trading Volume Continues to Break New Highs, What is a Reasonable Pre-Market Stock Price?" (https://www.odaily.news/zh-CN/post/5209330), it has increased by nearly $30, a increase of 7.6%)

Jarsy platform, the pre-market stock price is quoted at about $545. (Compared to the $504 we mentioned one month ago in the article "Kalshi Trading Volume Continues to Break New Highs, What is a Reasonable Pre-Market Stock Price?" (https://www.odaily.news/zh-CN/post/5209330), it has increased by over $40, a increase of 8.1%)

In other words, the pre-market stock price of Kalshi has a spread of up to $148 between the two major trading platforms (Odaily Planet Daily Note: Considering that the two platforms adopt an order book trading mechanism and an on-chain liquidity token trading mechanism respectively, we are only making an abstract comparison here, temporarily not involving specific asset delivery forms, the same below). If calculated based on the $360 price of the traditional financial market pre-market trading platform Hiive, the pre-market spread is even as high as $185.

Polymarket Pre-Market Spread: Up to $94, Spread Rate Over 50%

Taking the Polymarket pre-market trading market as an example, its prices on different platforms are as follows—

PreStocks platform, the pre-market price of the stock token is about $186 (Odaily Planet Daily Note: up 23% in the past 30 days);

Jarsy platform, the pre-market stock price is quoted at about $280.

In other words, the pre-market stock price of Polymarket has a spread of about $94 between the 2 major platforms, with a spread rate of about 50.5%.

SpaceX(xAI) Pre-Market Spread: About $75, Spread Rate 12.7%

Taking SpaceX(xAI) as an example, its prices on different platforms are as follows—

PreStocks platform, the pre-market price of the stock token is about $666 (Odaily Planet Daily Note: up 4.1% in the past 30 days);

Tessera platform, the pre-market price of the stock token is temporarily reported at about $591 (Odaily Planet Daily Note: up about 14.5% in the past 30 days).

In other words, the pre-market stock price of SpaceX has a spread of about $75 between the 2 major platforms, with a spread rate of about 12.7%.

In summary, based on existing pre-market trading platforms, it might be possible to build a crypto-stock pre-market spread market to meet the trading demand and speculation demand of the market after having sufficient pre-market tokens or pre-market equity capital.

Of course, considering that the current market liquidity remains within the million-dollar level, the main business model of this platform may lie in transaction fees or LP fees, as well as the realization of price differences from the platform's own investment quotas.

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Communication Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7619997

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main topic of the article regarding the crypto bear market?

AThe article discusses the emergence of a new potential business opportunity in the crypto bear market: the pre-market price arbitrage market for tokenized stocks, where significant price differences (spreads) exist across different trading platforms.

QWhich companies are mentioned as examples to illustrate the price differences in the pre-market stock trading platforms?

AThe article mentions Kalshi, Polymarket, and SpaceX (xAI) as examples to illustrate the price differences on platforms like PreStocks, Jarsy, and Tessera.

QWhat was the largest price difference (spread) mentioned for Polymarket's pre-market stock, and what was the spread rate?

AFor Polymarket, the largest price difference mentioned was $94, with a spread rate of approximately 50.5%.

QAccording to the article, what is the proposed solution to address the price differences across various pre-market trading platforms?

AThe article suggests building a bridge platform or a unified comprehensive platform that connects pre-market trading in both traditional financial markets and crypto markets to arbitrage the price differences.

QWhat reason does the article give for the emergence of platforms like PreStocks, Jarsy, and Tessera?

AThese platforms emerged due to the high demand from both crypto and traditional financial markets for pre-market trading of hot concept stocks, especially with the upcoming IPO boom in 2026 involving companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, SpaceX, and others.

Пов'язані матеріали

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

The pre-IPO stock token market is experiencing significant turmoil following strong statements from AI giants Anthropic and OpenAI. Both companies have updated their official policies, declaring that any transfer of their company shares—including sales, transfers, or assignments of share interests—without prior board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized in their corporate records. This means buyers in such unauthorized transactions would not be recognized as shareholders and would have no shareholder rights. A major point of contention is the use of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), which are legal entities commonly used by pre-IPO token platforms to pool investor funds and indirectly acquire shares from employees or early investors. The companies explicitly state they do not permit SPVs to acquire their shares, and any such transfer violates their restrictions. They warn that third parties selling shares through SPVs, direct sales, forward contracts, or stock tokens are likely engaged in fraud or are offering worthless investments due to these transfer limits. This stance directly threatens the core model of many pre-IPO token platforms, which rely on SPV structures. The announcement revealed additional risks within this model, such as complex "SPV-within-SPV" layering that obscures legal transparency, increases management fees, and creates a chain reaction risk of invalidation. Following the news, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). The market reaction highlights a divergence: while asset-backed pre-IPO tokens plummeted, purely speculative pre-IPO futures contracts, which are bilateral bets on future IPO prices with no claim to actual shares, remained relatively stable as they are unaffected by the transfer restrictions. The industry is split on the implications. Some believe the fundamental logic of pre-IPO token trading is broken if leading companies reject SPV-held shares, potentially causing a domino effect. Others, like Rivet founder Nick Abouzeid, argue that buyers of such unofficial tokens always knowingly accepted the risk of non-recognition by the company. The statements serve as a stark risk warning and a corrective measure for a market where valuations for some AI-related pre-IPO tokens had soared to irrational levels, far exceeding recent funding round valuations.

marsbit40 хв тому

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

marsbit40 хв тому

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

The pre-IPO token market has been rocked by strong statements from Anthropic and OpenAI. Both AI giants have updated official warnings, declaring that any sale or transfer of their company shares without explicit board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized on their corporate records. This directly targets Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), the common legal structure used by pre-IPO token platforms. These platforms typically use an SPV to acquire shares from employees or early investors, then issue blockchain-based tokens representing a claim on the SPV's economic benefits. Anthropic and OpenAI's position means that if an SPV's share purchase lacked authorization, the underlying asset could be deemed worthless, nullifying the token's value. Anthropic explicitly warned that any third party selling its shares—via direct sales, forwards, or tokens—is likely fraudulent or offering a valueless investment. The crackdown highlights risks in the popular SPV model, including complex multi-layered "Russian doll" SPV structures that obscure legal ownership, add fees, and concentrate risk. If one layer is invalidated, the entire chain could collapse. Following the announcements, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). In contrast, purely speculative pre-IPO prediction contracts remained stable, as they involve no actual share ownership. The move is seen as a corrective measure amid a market frenzy where some pre-IPO token valuations (e.g., Anthropic's token hitting a $1.4 trillion implied valuation) far exceeded recent official funding rounds. Opinions are split: some believe this undermines the core logic of pre-IPO token trading if top companies reject SPVs, while others argue buyers always assumed this legal risk when accessing unofficial channels. The statements serve as a stark warning and a potential catalyst for market de-leveraging and clearer boundaries.

Odaily星球日报43 хв тому

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

Odaily星球日报43 хв тому

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

"AI Membership: The Hidden Cost Pushing Workers Toward 'Poverty'" The widespread corporate push for AI adoption is creating a hidden financial burden for employees. Companies, from giants like Alibaba to small firms, are mandating AI use, often tying token consumption to KPIs, but frequently refuse to cover the costs. Workers are forced to pay for subscriptions out of pocket to stay competitive and avoid being replaced. Front-end developer Long Shen spends up to 2000 RMB monthly on tools like Cursor and ChatGPT Plus, seeing it as a necessary 3% salary investment to handle 90% of his coding tasks. While it boosted his performance and led to promotions, he now faces idle time at work, pretending to be busy. Designer Peng Peng navigates strict company firewalls by using personal devices and accounts for AI image generation tools like Midjourney, spending hundreds monthly without reimbursement, while her boss demands faster, more numerous revisions. The pressure creates workplace anxiety and suspicion. Programmer Li Huahua, after a friend's experience of raised KPIs following AI success, fears being branded a "traitor" for using it yet worries about falling behind if she doesn't. The dynamic allows management to demand results without understanding the tools or covering expenses, treating employees like AI "agents." While some, like entrepreneur Jin Tu, find high value in paid AI, building entire systems and winning competitions, for most, it's a trap. Free tools like Kimi and Doubao are introducing fees, closing off alternatives. The initial efficiency gains individual advantage, but as AI becomes ubiquitous, the personal edge disappears, workloads increase, and a cycle of dependency begins. Workers like Long Shen realize they cannot maintain AI-generated code without AI, making stopping harder than continuing to pay. The tool promising liberation is instead becoming a compulsory, costly chain in the modern workplace.

marsbit1 год тому

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

marsbit1 год тому

Strategy Says Its Software Business Is Quietly Powering Its Bitcoin Machine

Strategy CEO Phong Le emphasizes that the company's legacy software business is integral to its Bitcoin Treasury Company model, creating unique operational, financial, and cultural synergies. He argues that the software division, which recently reported its strongest quarter in a decade with 12% revenue growth and 27% margin expansion, funds Bitcoin-related expenses and provides a critical institutional foundation. This includes a 35-year operating history, public company infrastructure, and extensive compliance standards that most digital asset firms lack. Conversely, Le states the Bitcoin strategy has energized employees and engaged customers. Looking ahead, Strategy is leveraging its "Mosaic" AI data platform to automate internal systems and drive its software evolution, aiming for more autonomous and adaptive operations.

bitcoinist1 год тому

Strategy Says Its Software Business Is Quietly Powering Its Bitcoin Machine

bitcoinist1 год тому

SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire: The Successors

"SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire and Its Heirs" explores the unconventional succession narrative within SK Group, South Korea's second-largest conglomerate, following SK Hynix's dramatic market rise. Unlike traditional chaebol scripts prioritizing the eldest son, ownership, and political marriages, Chairman Choi Tae-won's three children from his first marriage are charting distinct paths. The eldest daughter, Choi Yun-jeong, is considered the most visible candidate. With a background in biology, consulting, and a PhD, she holds executive roles at SK Bioscience and SK Inc.'s growth strategy unit, focusing on biopharma and new businesses. Her marriage is to an AI infrastructure entrepreneur, not a traditional chaebol heir. The second daughter, Choi Min-jeong, took a unique route by voluntarily serving as a South Korean naval officer, including a tour in the Gulf of Aden. She later worked on policy and strategy for SK Hynix in Washington D.C. before co-founding an AI-driven healthcare startup in San Francisco. She married a former U.S. Marine Corps officer, connecting the family to U.S. defense and policy networks. The son, Choi In-geun, who has Type 1 diabetes, followed a more classic preparatory path with a physics degree and a stint at SK E&S but left to join McKinsey's Seoul office. He remains publicly silent and holds no SK shares, defying the traditional "crown prince" archetype. Their paths unfold against the backdrop of their parents' high-profile, contentious divorce and a record-setting asset division lawsuit. The article argues that as SK Hynix becomes a geopolitical asset in the AI era, the conventional rules of chaebol inheritance are changing. The heirs are being groomed not simply to take over, but to navigate a complex global landscape defined by AI, biotech, geopolitics, and policy, forging legitimacy through their own expertise and networks rather than birth order alone.

marsbit1 год тому

SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire: The Successors

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси