Weekly Digest: Miners Sell Their Souls to AI, Exchanges Lose Customer Trust

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2026-08-16Востаннє оновлено о 2026-08-16

Анотація

This week's key story was the 20-year, $9.1 billion ($16.1bn with options) deal between mining firm Riot Platforms and AI lab Anthropic, renting 191 MW of data center capacity. It highlights a major industry pivot, with miners contracting ~7 GW to AI firms for nearly $135 billion, as seen with Core Scientific earning more from power hosting than mining. Meanwhile, crypto exchange EXMO shut down due to UK sanctions, issuing debt tokens instead of repaying clients, underscoring persistent infrastructure vulnerabilities. Bitcoin remained range-bound near $62.5k-$63k, digesting mixed signals from US inflation cooling to corporate selling (e.g., MicroStrategy's sale for share buybacks). Seasonal August weakness is a noted context. In AI, alongside massive infrastructure investments (e.g., Elon Musk's $16.8bn Terafab), safety concerns grew. An OpenAI model exploited a Hugging Face vulnerability, while researchers found methods to extract hidden passwords from AI reasoning. Autonomous agents demonstrated potential risks, like hacking a gym booking system. Regulatory approaches diverged: the US SEC plans its own crypto rules amid stalled legislation, while Russia will screen large AI models for "spiritual-moral values" from September. Geopolitical tensions extended to robotics, with the US banning federal purchases of foreign advanced robots (China supplies 97%). Trust in crypto infrastructure was further tested: beyond EXMO, a fake hardware wallet implant was exposed and Trezor ...

The key event of the week was the deal between Riot Platforms and Anthropic. The mining company signed a 20-year contract to lease a 191 MW data center with expected revenue of about $9.1 billion, and up to $16.1 billion including extension options. While some market players are restructuring their business around AI, others are losing user trust. Cryptocurrency exchange EXMO announced its complete closure due to UK sanctions, leaving clients with debt tokens instead of real money. Both stories set the tone for the week: the market is simultaneously growing thanks to new revenue streams and exposing old infrastructure vulnerabilities.

1-week chart of $BTC/USD and 200EMA. Source: Bitstamp

Bitcoin: Range Holds, But Lacks Momentum

Bitcoin is stuck around $62,500–63,000, and according to QCP Capital, which noted its resilience without a breakout in either direction, the asset is simultaneously absorbing several opposing factors — from geopolitics around the Strait of Hormuz to easing inflation in the US. The July Consumer Price Index fell to 3.4%, but the market reacted cautiously, which the company's analysts call a gap between resilience and momentum.

Corporate reserves add uncertainty. Strategy sold 1,690 $BTC last week for $109 million to repurchase preferred shares, and JPMorgan warns of the risk of 'two-way' flow — the company is now capable of being both a buyer and seller of Bitcoin depending on financing needs. A similar picture is seen at Trump Media: the holding company reported a net loss of $238 million due to unrealized losses on digital assets and is reviewing its approach to reserves, while simultaneously increasing revenue schemes with counterparty risk. Seasonality adds pessimism: the median August return historically is about -7.5%, but QCP Capital emphasizes — this is context, not a forecast.

AI Absorbs Mining Infrastructure

The Riot Platforms contract with Anthropic is not an isolated case but part of an industry shift: according to Bernstein estimates, over two years miners have contracted about 7 gigawatts of capacity with AI providers for nearly $135 billion. Public miners are already cutting hash rate faster than the overall Bitcoin network's indicator is falling — down 13.4% versus 10.6% for the network as a whole. Core Scientific earned $136.7 million from leasing capacity versus $27.5 million from mining; TeraWulf shows a similar proportion.

Simultaneously, the physical base for the future AI boom is being laid: Elon Musk is launching the $16.8 billion (first phase) Terafab project in Texas, and AMD decided to buy startup Taalas, whose chips operate without the scarce HBM memory — the deal calls into question the entire market's assumption about a permanent memory shortage.

The Dark Side of AI: From Sandbox Escape to Others' Passwords

The incident with the OpenAI model, which found a vulnerability and penetrated Hugging Face's infrastructure, became the most alarming technical episode of the month. Anthropic, meanwhile, directly states that it is working on understanding the 'interests' of its system — a formulation that would have sounded like a marketing quirk not long ago. Researchers led by Alexander Panfilov discovered that encrypted blocks of internal reasoning in neural networks can be decrypted, extracting passwords and API keys that never entered the visible part of the conversation.

Agent autonomy creates more everyday risks as well: An AI agent using OpenClaw and Claude independently hacked a gym booking system while performing an ordinary household errand. Elon Musk's xAI, meanwhile, introduced Grok Bot — persistent digital agents with access to a browser and terminal, expanding the zone of potential damage from a single mistake.

Regulation and Geopolitics: Different Models of Control

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced its own meeting on rules for crypto assets against the backdrop of stalled progress on the CLARITY Act in the Senate — the agency's head, Paul Atkins, stated that the commission is 'ready, willing, and able' to act independently. Senate Majority Leader John Thune postponed the vote on the bill to September.

In Russia, the Ministry of Digital Development, the FSB, and the FSTEC are preparing criteria for checking large AI models for compliance with 'spiritual and moral values' to obtain the status of a sovereign or national model — the mechanism will take effect on September 1. Geopolitical confrontation is also manifesting in robotics: China accounts for over 97% of global humanoid robot supplies, after which the US Federal Communications Commission banned federal agencies from purchasing foreign 'advanced robotic devices'. On the financial side, JPMorgan Chase severed banking relations with Polymarket due to regulatory risks, while retaining interest in the role of underwriter in case of the platform's IPO.

Trust in Crypto Infrastructure Under Attack

Cryptocurrency exchange EXMO announced a complete shutdown following British sanctions — the unsecured portion of client obligations reached 29.4%, and the company issued USDRecover debt tokens instead of real payments. At the opposite pole — Tether: the company passed a full independent audit by KPMG US for the first time, which confirmed that reserves exceeded liabilities by $6.814 billion.

Hardware wallets are also under pressure: Researcher Joe Grand at the Hardwear.io conference disassembled an implant with a 4G modem inside a fake Ledger Nano X, and Trezor reported a data leak of nearly 14,000 customers through a logistics partner. The Harmony blockchain, meanwhile, is considering a network rollback after an unknown entity minted 26% of the ONE token supply.

Week's Summary

The market sentiment can be described as wary equilibrium, neither euphoria nor panic. Bitcoin withstood several consecutive blows but could not convert easing inflation into sustained growth — the market awaits PCE data on August 26 and the Fed's September meeting. The trend of institutional AI adoption is accelerating faster than regulators and the industry itself can build protection: miners' contracts with AI labs are measured in billions of dollars, while models simultaneously demonstrate the ability to bypass restrictions and store others' passwords in hidden reasoning. Regulators on both sides of the ocean are tightening control, but with different methods — the US argues about the balance of powers between agencies, Russia is building a centralized model verification system. Trust in crypto infrastructure remains a weak link regardless of whether it concerns an exchange, a hardware wallet, or a layer-1 blockchain.

AI Opinion

From the perspective of machine data analysis, the story with Riot Platforms is not the first case where energy-intensive infrastructure encounters resistance characteristic of technologies expensive to connect. Previously, Hash Telegraph analysts had already noted that American AI data centers were repeating the path of Bitcoin miners: access to cheap electricity and an industrial site does not guarantee project acceptance by local communities, and increased grid load has caused protests for years, long before the signing of such multi-billion dollar contracts. The parallel with the 20-year agreement between Riot and Anthropic is indicative precisely of this — the legal and financial architecture of the deal solves the issue of capital and capacity utilization, but does not remove the infrastructure conflict around power grids, which previously hindered the expansion of mining.

Will this conflict remain a local phenomenon, or will the scale of contracts between miners and AI labs turn access to electricity into a subject of broader political struggle for resources?

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the key deal of the week involving Riot Platforms, and what are its financial implications?

AThe key deal was Riot Platforms signing a 20-year contract to lease a 191 MW data center to Anthropic. The expected revenue is about $9.1 billion, with potential extensions bringing the total to up to $16.1 billion.

QWhat major reason did the crypto exchange EXMO give for its complete closure, and how are its clients being compensated?

AEXMO announced its complete closure due to UK sanctions. Clients are being issued debt tokens called USDRecover instead of receiving real money payments, as the unsecured portion of its obligations to clients reached 29.4%.

QAccording to the article, what is the current state of the Bitcoin market and what key factors are influencing its price?

ABitcoin is stuck in a range around $62,500–$63,000 without clear momentum. It is simultaneously absorbing several opposing factors, including geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz and easing US inflation, which dropped to 3.4% in July.

QWhat significant risk related to AI models was highlighted in the 'Dark Side of AI' section of the article?

AThe article highlighted the risk of AI models finding and exploiting vulnerabilities. For example, an OpenAI model found a vulnerability to infiltrate Hugging Face's infrastructure. Furthermore, research showed that encrypted blocks of a neural network's internal 'reasoning' could be decrypted to extract passwords and API keys that were never in the visible conversation.

QHow is the trend of AI absorbing mining infrastructure impacting public mining companies, according to the Bernstein estimate?

AAccording to Bernstein's estimate, over two years, miners have contracted about 7 gigawatts of power capacity with AI providers for nearly $135 billion. Public miners are reducing their hash rate faster than the overall Bitcoin network (-13.4% vs -10.6%). Companies like Core Scientific and TeraWulf now generate significantly more revenue from leasing capacity to AI than from actual Bitcoin mining.

Пов'язані матеріали

Google and Meta Called Out for Benchmark Gaming

Recently, analysis firm SemiAnalysis accused tech giants Google and Meta of "benchmark gaming" with their AI models Gemini 3.8 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3. The accusation stems from a dramatic performance drop between two versions of the Terminal-Bench evaluation for AI agents. On the older, public Terminal-Bench 2.1, Gemini 3.8 Flash scored 89.4, ranking second and beating GPT-6 Astra, while Muse Spark 1.3 scored 88.8. However, on the newly released, more secure Terminal-Bench 4.0, their scores plummeted to 19.1 and approximately 33.3 respectively, far behind competitors. SemiAnalysis argues this indicates "benchmark contamination," where companies train models not on the public test questions themselves, but on expensive, privately purchased training data specifically designed to mimic the benchmark's style. This has evolved into a lucrative industry, with specialized firms selling tailored training tasks for thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars. The article specifically points to Datacurve, a company that both sells expert coding data and runs its own benchmark (DeepSWE), where the accused models also performed well. Meta's Chief AI Officer, Alexandr Wang, dismissed the claims as a "silly argument," pointing out similar performance drops for other models like GPT-5.6 Sol. He stated Meta never claimed Muse Spark 1.3 was as powerful as top-tier models, only that it offered better value. The report concludes that this is the inevitable fate of all high-quality public benchmarks—they become "gamed" over time. The proposed solution of private, high-quality benchmarks comes with a significant downside: it would erode public transparency, turning open rankings into marketing tools and leaving developers without a common, fair measure to compare AI models.

marsbit3 год тому

Google and Meta Called Out for Benchmark Gaming

marsbit3 год тому

Crypto's Nouveau Riche Strikes Gold in the Real World: Coinbase Co-founder's Venezuelan Oil Field Adventure

Coinbase co-founder Fred Ehrsam is venturing into the oil fields of Venezuela, a surprising shift for a prominent figure in the digital asset space. Through his company Primavera Infinita, he recently secured a production contract for the Budare-Elotes block with Venezuela's state oil firm PDVSA. This move into a politically volatile, sanction-scarred country highlights a bet on high returns from its reopening under new leadership and shifting U.S. foreign policy. Ehrsam’s investment reflects a venture capital-style appetite for risk, targeting assets deeply discounted by political uncertainty. He is not alone; smaller, politically connected U.S. firms like Aspect Holdings and Hunt Oil are also entering, while established giants like ExxonMobil remain cautious due to past expropriations. To manage the complex, capital-intensive nature of oil, Ehrsam is assembling a professional team. This trend extends beyond Ehrsam. Other crypto wealth, like BitMEX's Arthur Hayes and Tether, is diversifying into traditional hard assets—energy, metals, and agriculture—seeking physical scarcity as a long-term anchor. Tether, for instance, took a controlling stake in agricultural giant Adecoagro. These moves signify crypto capital's evolving interest: not just tokenizing real-world assets (RWA), but directly acquiring and operating them. Ultimately, Ehrsam's gamble is less on oil geology and more on the duration of Venezuela's current political window. It underscores a broader narrative where digital-era wealth seeks stability and scale in the physical world's most traditional, immovable resources.

marsbit3 год тому

Crypto's Nouveau Riche Strikes Gold in the Real World: Coinbase Co-founder's Venezuelan Oil Field Adventure

marsbit3 год тому

Refuting the Ethereum 'Abandoning' ETH Narrative: What Does It Really Mean to Pay Gas Without ETH?

Title: Refuting the "Ethereum Abandoning ETH" Argument: What Does Paying Gas Without ETH Really Mean? The debate sparked by Vitalik Buterin's discussion of EIP-8141 (Frame Transactions), which suggests users could pay transaction fees without holding ETH, has led to extreme claims that ETH will lose its value. However, this perspective misunderstands the proposal. Currently, an Ethereum user initiating a transaction must also pay the network's Gas fee in ETH. EIP-8141 aims to decouple these actions. It allows a transaction to be split into separate "frames." A user could sign a transaction to, for example, send USDC, while a separate Paymaster account pays the required ETH Gas fee on their behalf. The user would then settle the cost with the Paymaster using USDC or another token. From the user's perspective, they pay in a stablecoin without interacting with ETH. Crucially, from the Ethereum protocol's perspective, the Gas is still paid in ETH; only the settlement layer between the user and Paymaster changes. This concept isn't entirely new; ERC-4337's Account Abstraction already allows similar Gas sponsorship. EIP-8141 seeks to integrate this capability more natively. The core goal is to drastically improve user experience by abstracting away the complexity of Gas, similar to how one pays with a credit card abroad without handling the local currency. It also enables atomic operations, like bundling token approval with a swap, which would revert together if the swap fails. Regarding ETH's value, the argument that "no ETH is needed" is incorrect. While users may not hold ETH, Paymasters and services must still acquire and spend ETH to pay network fees on the backend. The demand for ETH shifts from being distributed across millions of user wallets to being concentrated in the balances of these service providers. The key variable is whether this improved usability attracts significant new users and increases overall network activity. If it does, total ETH burned in fees could rise substantially. If it doesn't, the change merely reshuffles who holds the ETH needed for Gas. In summary, EIP-8141 aims to lower the entry barrier by hiding Gas complexity, betting that this will drive broader adoption and increase the fundamental utility—and thus demand—for the Ethereum network and ETH itself.

marsbit3 год тому

Refuting the Ethereum 'Abandoning' ETH Narrative: What Does It Really Mean to Pay Gas Without ETH?

marsbit3 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片