Ali Martinez Predicts Dogecoin Breakout of Resistance at $0.177

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2026-08-16Востаннє оновлено о 2026-08-16

Анотація

Crypto analyst Ali Martinez suggests Dogecoin (DOGE) might be poised for a significant rally. He highlights that a buy signal from the Tom DeMark Sequential indicator on the monthly chart indicates a potential trend reversal. The current setup, featuring an inverted hammer and a forming Doji candlestick, is very similar to the pattern seen in August 2022, which preceded a 145% monthly surge. Martinez notes a key resistance level at $0.0813, where over 30 billion DOGE were previously traded. A sustained break and close above this level could signal the start of an upward move. Wealthy investors have accumulated over 430 million DOGE in the past week, showing bullish sentiment. If the pattern repeats, the next major resistance and potential target for the rally is $0.177. Currently, DOGE is trading sideways between $0.068 and $0.08, priced around $0.069.

Recently, cryptocurrency analyst Ali Martinez wrote that Dogecoin may be preparing for a significant rise. Several indicators point to the likelihood of upward movement. Under favorable circumstances, the growth could reach the $0.177 mark, especially if an important resistance level is breached, where deals involving 30 billion $DOGE were previously executed.

Martinez highlighted key reasons that, in his opinion, could ensure parabolic growth for Dogecoin.

According to the analyst, last month the well-known Tom DeMark Sequential indicator gave a buy signal on Dogecoin's monthly chart, indicating a potential trend reversal.

Ali Martinez believes that the current situation with Dogecoin is very similar to August 2022, when the cryptocurrency formed an inverted hammer, accompanied by a buy signal from the Tom DeMark Sequential, followed by a doji candlestick. This was followed by a 145% monthly increase.

Currently, $DOGE is showing a similar picture: an inverted hammer, a buy signal from TD, and a forming candlestick. If history repeats, the next monthly candlestick could trigger a serious surge.

The current technical situation remains positive, and it appears that large holders are preparing for a rise. Over the past week, wealthy investors have accumulated over 430 million $DOGE.

Since June 25, Dogecoin has been trading sideways between $0.068 and $0.08. The current price of the meme cryptocurrency is $0.069, and a "death cross" recently appeared on the hourly chart.

If Dogecoin encounters a trend reversal, the key resistance level will be the $0.0813 mark, where deals involving more than 30 billion $DOGE were previously executed.

On June 23, Dogecoin faced a sharp rejection from this key level, and it should be monitored in anticipation of the next Dogecoin rally. A sustained close above $0.0813 could signal further growth, with the next resistance being at $0.177, according to Ali Martinez.

end-content

Пов'язані питання

QWho is the cryptocurrency analyst mentioned in the article, and what is his prediction for Dogecoin?

AThe cryptocurrency analyst is Ali Martinez. He predicts that Dogecoin could break through the resistance level at $0.177, especially if it overcomes a key resistance level.

QWhat technical indicator gave a buy signal for Dogecoin according to Ali Martinez?

AAccording to Ali Martinez, the Tom DeMark Sequential indicator gave a buy signal on the monthly Dogecoin chart last month.

QWhat historical pattern from August 2022 does the current Dogecoin situation resemble, and what happened after that pattern?

AThe current situation resembles August 2022, when Dogecoin formed an inverted hammer, followed by a Tom DeMark Sequential buy signal and a Doji candlestick. This was followed by a monthly increase of 145%.

QWhat is the current key resistance level for Dogecoin, and why is it significant?

AThe current key resistance level is $0.0813. This level is significant because deals involving more than 30 billion $DOGE were previously made there, making it a major barrier for price movement.

QWhat recent technical pattern appeared on Dogecoin's hourly chart, and what is its typical implication?

AA 'death cross' recently appeared on Dogecoin's hourly chart. This pattern typically implies a potential bearish trend reversal or continuation of a downtrend in the short term.

Пов'язані матеріали

Google and Meta Called Out for Benchmark Gaming

Recently, analysis firm SemiAnalysis accused tech giants Google and Meta of "benchmark gaming" with their AI models Gemini 3.8 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3. The accusation stems from a dramatic performance drop between two versions of the Terminal-Bench evaluation for AI agents. On the older, public Terminal-Bench 2.1, Gemini 3.8 Flash scored 89.4, ranking second and beating GPT-6 Astra, while Muse Spark 1.3 scored 88.8. However, on the newly released, more secure Terminal-Bench 4.0, their scores plummeted to 19.1 and approximately 33.3 respectively, far behind competitors. SemiAnalysis argues this indicates "benchmark contamination," where companies train models not on the public test questions themselves, but on expensive, privately purchased training data specifically designed to mimic the benchmark's style. This has evolved into a lucrative industry, with specialized firms selling tailored training tasks for thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars. The article specifically points to Datacurve, a company that both sells expert coding data and runs its own benchmark (DeepSWE), where the accused models also performed well. Meta's Chief AI Officer, Alexandr Wang, dismissed the claims as a "silly argument," pointing out similar performance drops for other models like GPT-5.6 Sol. He stated Meta never claimed Muse Spark 1.3 was as powerful as top-tier models, only that it offered better value. The report concludes that this is the inevitable fate of all high-quality public benchmarks—they become "gamed" over time. The proposed solution of private, high-quality benchmarks comes with a significant downside: it would erode public transparency, turning open rankings into marketing tools and leaving developers without a common, fair measure to compare AI models.

marsbit3 год тому

Google and Meta Called Out for Benchmark Gaming

marsbit3 год тому

Crypto's Nouveau Riche Strikes Gold in the Real World: Coinbase Co-founder's Venezuelan Oil Field Adventure

Coinbase co-founder Fred Ehrsam is venturing into the oil fields of Venezuela, a surprising shift for a prominent figure in the digital asset space. Through his company Primavera Infinita, he recently secured a production contract for the Budare-Elotes block with Venezuela's state oil firm PDVSA. This move into a politically volatile, sanction-scarred country highlights a bet on high returns from its reopening under new leadership and shifting U.S. foreign policy. Ehrsam’s investment reflects a venture capital-style appetite for risk, targeting assets deeply discounted by political uncertainty. He is not alone; smaller, politically connected U.S. firms like Aspect Holdings and Hunt Oil are also entering, while established giants like ExxonMobil remain cautious due to past expropriations. To manage the complex, capital-intensive nature of oil, Ehrsam is assembling a professional team. This trend extends beyond Ehrsam. Other crypto wealth, like BitMEX's Arthur Hayes and Tether, is diversifying into traditional hard assets—energy, metals, and agriculture—seeking physical scarcity as a long-term anchor. Tether, for instance, took a controlling stake in agricultural giant Adecoagro. These moves signify crypto capital's evolving interest: not just tokenizing real-world assets (RWA), but directly acquiring and operating them. Ultimately, Ehrsam's gamble is less on oil geology and more on the duration of Venezuela's current political window. It underscores a broader narrative where digital-era wealth seeks stability and scale in the physical world's most traditional, immovable resources.

marsbit3 год тому

Crypto's Nouveau Riche Strikes Gold in the Real World: Coinbase Co-founder's Venezuelan Oil Field Adventure

marsbit3 год тому

Refuting the Ethereum 'Abandoning' ETH Narrative: What Does It Really Mean to Pay Gas Without ETH?

Title: Refuting the "Ethereum Abandoning ETH" Argument: What Does Paying Gas Without ETH Really Mean? The debate sparked by Vitalik Buterin's discussion of EIP-8141 (Frame Transactions), which suggests users could pay transaction fees without holding ETH, has led to extreme claims that ETH will lose its value. However, this perspective misunderstands the proposal. Currently, an Ethereum user initiating a transaction must also pay the network's Gas fee in ETH. EIP-8141 aims to decouple these actions. It allows a transaction to be split into separate "frames." A user could sign a transaction to, for example, send USDC, while a separate Paymaster account pays the required ETH Gas fee on their behalf. The user would then settle the cost with the Paymaster using USDC or another token. From the user's perspective, they pay in a stablecoin without interacting with ETH. Crucially, from the Ethereum protocol's perspective, the Gas is still paid in ETH; only the settlement layer between the user and Paymaster changes. This concept isn't entirely new; ERC-4337's Account Abstraction already allows similar Gas sponsorship. EIP-8141 seeks to integrate this capability more natively. The core goal is to drastically improve user experience by abstracting away the complexity of Gas, similar to how one pays with a credit card abroad without handling the local currency. It also enables atomic operations, like bundling token approval with a swap, which would revert together if the swap fails. Regarding ETH's value, the argument that "no ETH is needed" is incorrect. While users may not hold ETH, Paymasters and services must still acquire and spend ETH to pay network fees on the backend. The demand for ETH shifts from being distributed across millions of user wallets to being concentrated in the balances of these service providers. The key variable is whether this improved usability attracts significant new users and increases overall network activity. If it does, total ETH burned in fees could rise substantially. If it doesn't, the change merely reshuffles who holds the ETH needed for Gas. In summary, EIP-8141 aims to lower the entry barrier by hiding Gas complexity, betting that this will drive broader adoption and increase the fundamental utility—and thus demand—for the Ethereum network and ETH itself.

marsbit3 год тому

Refuting the Ethereum 'Abandoning' ETH Narrative: What Does It Really Mean to Pay Gas Without ETH?

marsbit3 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片