U.S., U.K., and Canada Launch Operation Atlantic to Crack Down on Crypto Scams

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-03-17Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-17

Анотація

U.S., U.K., and Canadian law enforcement agencies have launched Operation Atlantic, a coordinated effort to combat crypto-related scams and fraud networks. The operation involves agencies including the U.S. Secret Service, the U.K. National Crime Agency, and Canada’s Ontario Provincial Police, among others. Its primary goals are to disrupt organized fraud, recover stolen funds, protect victims from further losses, and raise public awareness of crypto investment scams. The initiative specifically targets "approval phishing" and "pig butchering" schemes, which have cost victims millions. Operation Atlantic builds on the earlier Project Atlas, expanding cross-border enforcement with more international partners to strengthen accountability in the digital asset sector.

The law enforcement agencies from three countries have started Operation Atlantic, an organized effort to disrupt crypto-related scams, dismantle fraud networks, and boost cross-border operations to target unlawful conduct in the digital asset space.

On March 16, the National Crime Agency (NCA) reported on Operation Atlantic, stating that it was a joint effort by law enforcement agencies from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada.

As per the report, the agencies such as the U.S. Secret Service, the U.K. National Crime Agency, Canada’s Ontario Provincial Police, the Ontario Securities Commission, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, the City of London Police, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, and the U.K.’s Financial Conduct Authority are participating.

The Operation Atlantic’s main objective is to disrupt the organized fraud schemes, reclaim stolen money, help victims protect assets to prevent further loss, and increase public awareness of crypto investment frauds.

The operation also targets people who have lost or are in danger of losing cryptos through a method called “approval phishing,” which is usually connected to online investment scams, also called “pig butchering,” in which victims are gradually tricked into sending large amounts of money to fraudsters over time.

Then, the United States Secret Service agency noted, “Approval phishing and investment scams cost victims millions in financial loss each year,” said Brent Daniels, the Deputy Assistant Director for the U.S. Secret Service’s Office of Field Operations. Further, stating that the primary objective of Operation Atlantic is for the US Secret Service and its international law enforcement partners to quickly detect and stop these scams.

The agency also reported that Operation Atlantic expands upon Project Atlas, a 2024 project to tackle cryptocurrency fraud networks that was started by the United States Secret Service and the Ontario Provincial Police. With that, the latest Operation Atlantic strengthens cross-border enforcement activities by adding more international partners than the previous project

With that, the efforts of three countries indicate a stronger stance against crypto fraud as authorities aim to address legislative gaps and strengthen responsibility in the digital asset sector.

Top Updated Crypto News

Crypto Market Shows Gains as US Diesel and Gasoline Prices Rise

TagsCanadaCryptocurrencyUKUS

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main objective of Operation Atlantic?

AThe main objective of Operation Atlantic is to disrupt organized fraud schemes, reclaim stolen money, help victims protect assets to prevent further loss, and increase public awareness of crypto investment frauds.

QWhich countries are participating in Operation Atlantic?

AThe United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada are the countries participating in Operation Atlantic.

QWhat specific type of crypto scam is Operation Atlantic targeting, as mentioned in the article?

AOperation Atlantic is targeting scams that use a method called 'approval phishing,' which is often connected to online investment scams also known as 'pig butchering.'

QWhich previous project does Operation Atlantic expand upon?

AOperation Atlantic expands upon Project Atlas, a 2024 project that was started by the United States Secret Service and the Ontario Provincial Police to tackle cryptocurrency fraud networks.

QWhich specific law enforcement agencies from the U.S. and U.K. are mentioned as participants in the operation?

AFrom the U.S., the U.S. Secret Service and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia are mentioned. From the U.K., the National Crime Agency (NCA), the City of London Police, and the Financial Conduct Authority are mentioned.

Пов'язані матеріали

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手4 год тому

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手4 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit6 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit6 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手7 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手7 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit8 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit8 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片