# Пов'язані статті щодо Risk

Центр новин HTX надає останні статті та поглиблений аналіз на тему "Risk", що охоплює ринкові тренди, оновлення проєктів, технологічні розробки та регуляторну політику в криптоіндустрії.

"Crypto Retirement Plan" Heavily Criticized by Democrats: Trump Is "Harvesting" American Workers' Pensions

Democratic senators Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), along with Representative Bobby Scott (D-VA), are urging the Labor Department to repeal a proposed rule that would open U.S. retirement savings accounts, such as 401(k)s, to investments in cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and other alternative assets. The rule, stemming from an August executive order by President Trump, would provide a legal safe harbor for plan fiduciaries offering these volatile assets if they follow a prescribed process. The lawmakers argue in a 14-page letter that the rule dangerously weakens long-standing "prudent man" standards under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), potentially exposing the $14.2 trillion in 401(k) savings to high-risk, minimally regulated investments. They cite warnings from FINRA about crypto's high volatility and from the FBI about massive cryptocurrency scam losses. The letter also alleges a conflict of interest, noting that President Trump's adult children manage the family's crypto business, which has reportedly raised billions from digital token sales. They contend the rule change could enrich the Trump family at the expense of workers' retirement security. In defense, the Trump administration frames the rule as expanding worker choice. Acting Labor Secretary Keith Sonderling stated it ends the department "picking winners and losers," requiring fiduciaries to follow a prudent process. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent supported it as a step toward the president's "Golden Age."

marsbit19 год тому

"Crypto Retirement Plan" Heavily Criticized by Democrats: Trump Is "Harvesting" American Workers' Pensions

marsbit19 год тому

Why Not Short Even When Bearish? Munger Did the Math on a 'Losing Trade'

Why Not Short Even When Bearish? Charlie Munger's Calculated "Loss-Making Account" Many traders, drawn to speculative tools like futures contracts, often face repeated failures. As the article notes, unless one is a genius, such instruments should be avoided for long-term profit-seeking. Similarly, the practice of short selling is viewed with caution. The author firmly states a policy of not shorting, even when bearish, preferring to simply wait. The core reason? Successful short selling requires exceptionally difficult conditions to profit. Legendary investors Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger have themselves reflected on painful short-selling experiences. Munger highlights two critical flaws in the mathematical logic of shorting: 1. Asymmetrical Risk/Reward: A long position has a maximum loss of 100% but unlimited upside. A short position caps profit at 100% (if a stock falls to zero) but carries theoretically unlimited loss potential. 2. The "Promoter" Problem: Fraudulent or struggling companies can prolong their decline. As Munger said, "You can run out of money before the promoter runs out of ideas," meaning short sellers may be forced to cover positions at a loss before the company's true fate unfolds. The article cites Stanley Druckenmiller, a famed hedge fund manager. He once shorted 12 companies that all eventually went bankrupt. However, intense market rallies forced him to cover his positions within three weeks, resulting in massive losses—$200 million of his capital plus an additional $600 million. He concluded he likely never made money shorting in his career. His experience perfectly illustrates Munger's points: facing unlimited losses and being wiped out before being proven right. The conclusion is clear: for most investors, complex instruments like short selling and derivatives are not viable paths to stable, long-term gains. Self-reflection is advised before repeatedly wasting time and capital on such speculative strategies.

marsbitВчора 02:35

Why Not Short Even When Bearish? Munger Did the Math on a 'Losing Trade'

marsbitВчора 02:35

24/7 Unstoppable Derivatives Wave: Cryptocurrency Is Forcing Traditional Finance to 'Change Time Zones'

The article discusses how the 24/7 nature of the cryptocurrency market is compelling traditional finance to adapt its operating hours and infrastructure. The key catalyst is the CME Group's planned launch of nearly round-the-clock trading for regulated crypto derivatives, a move driven by strong institutional demand for continuous risk management. This shift highlights a fundamental change: derivatives, not spot trading, now dominate crypto market activity and price discovery. However, integrating continuous trading into traditional finance reveals structural tensions. While execution times can be extended, settlement, clearing, and regulatory reporting largely remain bound to traditional business-day cycles. This creates a lag where weekend price movements can impact risk exposures before traditional control systems are fully active. Furthermore, the article explores new challenges arising from this always-on environment. The inherent transparency of public blockchains, while ensuring auditable settlement, also exposes sensitive corporate information like treasury flows to competitors in real-time. This has elevated privacy from a feature to a core requirement for institutional adoption. The next phase hinges on building systems that balance this necessary privacy with regulatory accountability and compliance. In conclusion, the move towards 24/7 trading signifies more than crypto becoming institutionalized. It represents traditional finance beginning to adopt the temporal structure of crypto-native markets. The future will be defined by how successfully traditional risk, identity, privacy, and settlement frameworks can operate at the continuous speed cryptocurrency markets demand.

marsbit2 дні тому 10:36

24/7 Unstoppable Derivatives Wave: Cryptocurrency Is Forcing Traditional Finance to 'Change Time Zones'

marsbit2 дні тому 10:36

Are Rising U.S. Stocks Getting More Dangerous? Goldman Sachs: Downside Protection Mechanisms Have Almost Failed

The US stock market rally is showing signs of becoming increasingly precarious as key downside protection mechanisms fail, according to Goldman Sachs. Derivatives strategist Brian Garrett notes that the S&P 500 options volatility skew has plunged to an 18-month low, indicating the market now prices an 8% probability for both a 10% drop and a 10% rise—a sign of "skew failure." Concurrently, Goldman's Panic Index hit a two-year low, reflecting minimal demand for tail-risk hedging. This complacency emerges amid a relentless market surge, with the S&P 500 setting new records frequently in 2024. Garrett highlights three major concerns: extreme concentration in the top ten stocks (40% of index weight), heavy reliance on AI-themed performance, and a price pattern eerily similar to the 1998-1999 period. Despite pervasive media pessimism, this fear is absent in options pricing. Downside hedge costs are historically low. Goldman suggests tactical trades: buying RSP outperformance options versus the SPX for a broadening rally, purchasing VIX calls for protection, and going long on Bitcoin ETF volatility. Hedge funds have been net buyers for two weeks, with sector rotation into financials and out of industrials. Notably, the global single-stock leveraged/ inverse ETF AUM has doubled to over $60 billion in two months, underscoring growing speculative activity.

marsbit2 дні тому 09:45

Are Rising U.S. Stocks Getting More Dangerous? Goldman Sachs: Downside Protection Mechanisms Have Almost Failed

marsbit2 дні тому 09:45

Comics Illustration: Helping You Understand China's New Regulations on Outbound Investment

Summary: Understanding China's New Regulations on Overseas Investment The State Council has announced new regulations on overseas investment, effective July 1, 2026. The core message is not a prohibition on international investment, but a call for both companies and individuals to operate with strong regulatory awareness. Here are the key points: 1. **Scope is Broad:** The rules apply not only to companies but also to other organizations and individual residents. 2. **Definition of Investment is Wide:** It encompasses not just capital transfers but also asset contributions, obtaining equity or rights, financing, providing guarantees, and direct or indirect acquisition of rights related to overseas entities or assets. 3. **Companies Must Plan Comprehensively:** Beyond simple ownership charts, firms need clear plans covering the investing entity, required approvals or filings, fund transfer paths, and compliance with technology, data, and security reviews. 4. **Individuals Should Prioritize Compliance:** Before focusing on returns, individuals must first assess their eligibility, understand legal channels for capital outflow, know what they are acquiring, and identify responsible parties in case of issues. 5. **Penalties are Significant:** Violations can result in fines and potentially restrictions on future overseas investment activities. In essence, overseas investment remains possible, but it must be approached with regulatory compliance as a fundamental priority, not solely based on commercial opportunity. *Note: This is a general informational summary and does not constitute legal advice or investment recommendations.*

marsbit2 дні тому 09:06

Comics Illustration: Helping You Understand China's New Regulations on Outbound Investment

marsbit2 дні тому 09:06

Wang Chuan: When the Neighbor Old Wang Made 30x on Memory Stocks, How to Avoid Anxiety (Part Six) - The Trap of Commoditized Goods

Wang Chuan: When the Neighbor Lao Wang Made 30x on Storage Stocks, How to Stay Anxiety-Free (Part 6) - The Trap of Commoditized Goods. This essay uses historical and current examples to analyze the cyclical and high-risk nature of the data storage industry. It begins with the 1990s rise and dramatic fall of Iomega, whose stock soared over 160x in 18 months before collapsing 97% from its peak, illustrating the fleeting success of storage "meme stocks." The core problem is that storage products, like DRAM and flash memory, are highly commoditized. This leads to extreme volatility: prices have plummeted over 80% multiple times, and company stocks often crash 95% or go bankrupt. The industry's dynamic is defined by "elastic demand facing heavy-asset, long-cycle, rigid supply." When demand spikes and supply is fixed, prices skyrocket, as seen recently with AI-driven demand for High Bandwidth Memory (HBM). Companies like Sandisk and Micron have reported massive revenue and gross margin jumps (e.g., Sandisk's gross margin rising from 22.5% to 78.3%) despite minimal increases in production volume. However, these high margins are self-defeating. They incentivize massive new capacity investments (hundreds of billions planned from 2026), with supply expected to surge by late 2027. Once new supply meets demand, prices and profits will crash, potentially leading to a scenario where "selling more results in earning less." The article debunks the safety of long-term supply agreements, comparing them to fragile non-aggression pacts easily broken when market conditions shift. It warns that when an industry is highly profitable but trades at low P/E ratios, the risk is greatest, as plummeting prices quickly erase those earnings. Multiple asymmetric risks loom, including economic recession, reduced AI spending, faster-than-expected capacity expansion (especially from Chinese firms), and technological innovations that reduce memory requirements. In conclusion, the storage sector is a cyclical trap where periods of euphoric profits are often precursors to devastating downturns, luring unprepared investors into a "wealth incinerator."

marsbit2 дні тому 07:13

Wang Chuan: When the Neighbor Old Wang Made 30x on Memory Stocks, How to Avoid Anxiety (Part Six) - The Trap of Commoditized Goods

marsbit2 дні тому 07:13

Bitcoin's Weak Rebound Fails to Mask Adjustment Trend, HYPE's Top Signal Warns of Short-Term Risks | Invited Analysis

**Title:** Bitcoin's Weak Rebound Fails to Mask Downtrend; HYPE Top Signal Alerts of Short-Term Risks | Exclusive Analysis **Abstract:** This weekly market analysis examines the current technical structures of Bitcoin and HYPE, outlining key trading strategies. Bitcoin's daily chart shows it has broken below the median line of its primary ascending channel, indicating structural weakness. It is currently experiencing a weak rebound within a short-term descending channel, targeting resistance at $75,000-$76,000. Failure to break above this zone could lead to a resumption of the downtrend, testing support at $69,500-$70,500. Trading strategies include positioning for a rebound rejection (Plan A) or a breakdown below key support (Plan B) with controlled short positions. For HYPE, the 4-hour chart reveals a potential seven-wave advance from the May 14 low, now showing signs of exhaustion. A bearish divergence (momentum weakening) has been observed, coupled with a top signal from the proprietary "Spread Trading Model" at potential endpoint 47. The key this week is to monitor if a confirmed top forms here, especially upon a breach of the $62.5-$64.57 support area. If broken, a larger corrective move towards $54-$56.30 is anticipated. The short-term strategy for HYPE focuses on cautious long entries only upon confirmed stabilization within the support zone. The report also details a successful short BTC trade from the previous week, yielding a ~5.07% profit, executed based on model signals and price action. Strict risk management rules, including dynamic stop-loss adjustments, are emphasized.

marsbit2 дні тому 05:53

Bitcoin's Weak Rebound Fails to Mask Adjustment Trend, HYPE's Top Signal Warns of Short-Term Risks | Invited Analysis

marsbit2 дні тому 05:53

AI Bubble Warning: AI Investments Are Negative Returns for Most Tech Giants

The article issues a stark warning about a potential AI investment bubble. It notes that while the AI boom shares similarities with the TMT bubble of the late 1990s, its scale is vastly larger, currently driving 93% of U.S. GDP growth. Major hyperscale cloud providers like Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Oracle are planning to invest trillions in AI data centers over the coming years. However, calculations based on analyst projections for 2025-2030 reveal a concerning math problem: expected capital expenditure growth far outpaces projected revenue growth. Even under an extremely optimistic scenario of zero costs, the implied return on investment for most of these tech giants (except Amazon) is deeply negative. This suggests that the current trajectory could lead to one of history's largest shareholder value destruction events. The piece outlines two potential escapes: AI generating vastly more revenue than currently anticipated—a near-impossible task—or a significant cutback in the planned investment splurge. The latter scenario could trigger a domino effect, severely impacting the entire tech supply chain (from Nvidia to TSMC), potentially pushing the U.S. economy into recession, and causing a major stock market downturn. The author suggests upcoming high-profile IPOs by companies like OpenAI and Anthropic might represent a transfer of risk from early investors to public market participants. While the peak of the hype cycle might sustain investment through 2026, the fundamental financial dilemma remains unresolved, setting the stage for a potential market correction in 2027 or 2028, similar to the years following Alan Greenspan's "irrational exuberance" warning.

marsbit05/31 12:43

AI Bubble Warning: AI Investments Are Negative Returns for Most Tech Giants

marsbit05/31 12:43

活动图片