# Пов'язані статті щодо Proof of Work

Five Low-Cost Cryptos Poised to Outperform the Altcoin Market Average Over the Next Two Years

The article identifies five low-cost cryptocurrencies with strong fundamentals and narratives poised to outperform the altcoin market average over the next two years. Kaspa (KAS) is highlighted as a high-performance Proof-of-Work token with recovery potential, trading at $0.037. The Artificial Superintelligence Alliance (ASI) leverages the AI theme with a market cap of $498 million. Celestia (TIA) offers a modular blockchain design at discounted levels around $0.50. Render (RNDR) represents decentralized GPU computing, trading between $1.35-$1.42. Ozak AI ($OZ) is an early-stage AI infrastructure project in presale at $0.014, integrating AI analytics and DePIN innovation. The conclusion emphasizes that these low-cost, high-conviction tokens with strong utility and narratives are well-positioned for selective capital rotation and potential growth.

TheNewsCrypto03/23 12:14

Is XRP More Sustainable Than Bitcoin? Energy Consumption Difference Sparks Debate

A new report from Bullrunners has reignited the debate between Bitcoin and XRP, focusing on their vastly different energy consumption. The analysis claims that XRP’s entire network consumed only $73,000 worth of electricity in a year, while Bitcoin used over $10 billion during the same period. A single Bitcoin transaction consumes between 1,100 and 1,400 kWh—enough to power an average U.S. household for 38 to 49 days. In contrast, an XRP transaction uses just 0.0079 kWh, comparable to powering a light bulb for a few seconds. The report concludes that XRP uses 99.999% less energy than Bitcoin. This disparity stems from their consensus mechanisms: Bitcoin relies on energy-intensive Proof of Work (PoW) mining, while XRP uses the XRP Ledger Protocol Consensus, where trusted nodes validate transactions without mining. The findings sparked intense community reactions. Bitcoin supporters argue its energy use is essential for security and decentralization, while XRP advocates highlight its superior energy efficiency compared to both Bitcoin and Ethereum, even after Ethereum’s switch to Proof of Stake (PoS).

bitcoinist02/28 01:02

Psy Protocol Achieves 521,000 TPS on a Live Proof-of-Work Network, Offers $100,000 Bounty to Anyone Who Can Prove the Results Invalid

marsbit02/14 10:03

Hot Interaction Collection | Perle Labs Launches New Tasks; Early Test Experience of ambient.xyz (February 3rd)

Hot Interactive Projects Roundup: Perle Labs Launches New Tasks; Early Test Experience for ambient.xyz (Feb 3) Perle Labs, a human expert-driven AI training data platform, has launched new interactive tasks. Users can connect a Solana wallet, complete speech recording and ambiguous instruction identification quests to earn points. All data is recorded on-chain for transparency. The platform has raised $17.5 million. ambient.xyz, an AI model and compute-powered PoW L1 project, is now in early testing. Users can sign up with a Google account, link a wallet, create drop requests, and interact with its AI chat feature. The project completed a $7.2 million seed round led by a16z CSX and Delphi Digital. Project Eleven, a crypto security startup focused on quantum attack protection, allows users to subscribe via email. The company recently raised $20 million at a $120 million valuation to develop quantum-resistant cryptographic solutions.

Odaily星球日报02/03 09:48

After the Wealth Effect Disappears, The Myth or Elegy of Decentralization

The article "After the Wealth Effect Disappears: The Myth or Elegy of Decentralization" examines the evolution of Ethereum and Bitcoin, arguing that both have strayed from their original decentralized ideals. While Ethereum shifted from PoW to PoS to enhance scalability and value capture (ETH), it sacrificed node decentralization and embraced centralized governance, despite retaining smart contracts. Bitcoin maintained minimal governance but failed to support smart contracts, limiting its utility beyond being "digital gold." The author highlights how institutional adoption (e.g., BTC ETFs, DTCC’s blockchain migration) prioritizes long-term, low-risk gains, contrasting with retail’s speculative expectations. As centralized exchanges (CEXs) become less influential, activity migrates on-chain, but this shift may not yield the envisioned decentralized utopia. Stablecoins like USDT/USDC are increasingly replacing ETH as primary assets, further centralizing the ecosystem. Ultimately, the piece critiques the compromise between decentralization and wealth generation, noting that Ethereum’s "middleman" role—embodied by Vitalik Buterin and ETH’s capital-driven model—has eroded its foundational principles. The conclusion suggests that both decentralization and wealth effect narratives are being overshadowed by pragmatic, institution-friendly financial computing.

marsbit12/13 05:45

After the Wealth Effect Disappears, The Myth or Elegy of Decentralization

The article "After the Wealth Effect Disappears: The Myth or Elegy of Decentralization" critically examines the evolution and challenges of decentralization, focusing on Ethereum and Bitcoin. It argues that while institutions benefit from long-term, low-risk strategies, retail investors face increasing pressure as wealth concentration grows. The piece highlights how Ethereum’s shift from PoW to PoS and its embrace of L2 scaling solutions have compromised its decentralized ideals, leading to greater centralization in governance and node operation. Similarly, Bitcoin’s limitations in smart contract functionality and its reliance on a small group of developers underscore the tension between ideological purity and practical demands. The author notes that stablecoins like USDT and USDC are increasingly dominating Ethereum’s ecosystem, further centralizing influence. Despite these shifts, Ethereum remains the most balanced platform between decentralization and capital efficiency, though its original vision of a "world computer" has given way to a more intermediary-driven, financialized model. The conclusion reflects on the inevitable trade-offs between decentralization, trust minimization, and the realities of market dynamics, suggesting that the ideals of crypto-punk movements are being overshadowed by institutional adoption and economic pragmatism.

深潮12/13 05:27