# Пов'язані статті щодо Fees

Центр новин HTX надає останні статті та поглиблений аналіз на тему "Fees", що охоплює ринкові тренди, оновлення проєктів, технологічні розробки та регуляторну політику в криптоіндустрії.

Research: Bitcoin Miner Capitulation Has Dragged On for 287 Days

Research indicates that the capitulation phase for Bitcoin miners has extended for 287 consecutive days, marking one of the longest periods of declining network hash rate. This has led to a 19.9% drop in mining difficulty from its peak. Typically, miner stocks are highly correlated with Bitcoin's price, but recently they have diverged. While Bitcoin lost about 46% of its value over the past year, stocks of major public mining companies like Hut 8, Riot Platforms, and HIVE Digital saw significant gains. Analysts attribute this to the industry's pivot towards providing computing infrastructure for artificial intelligence, shifting investor focus away from pure Bitcoin exposure. Miners' revenue is under pressure. The daily block reward revenue has hit a historic low, partly due to the hash rate decline delaying block times. The Puell Multiple indicator shows daily revenues around $30 million, below the yearly average of ~$40 million. Transaction fees remain minimal, contributing only about $200,000 daily. Currently, fees collected over 28 days do not cover the reward for a single block, meaning fees fund only about ten minutes of the network's daily operation. This is a stark contrast to past cycles where fee revenue occasionally spiked to significant levels. The report concludes that the current mining downturn lacks a clear, singular cause like past events, such as China's mining ban.

cryptonews.ru08/01 19:25

Research: Bitcoin Miner Capitulation Has Dragged On for 287 Days

cryptonews.ru08/01 19:25

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit07/22 00:06

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit07/22 00:06

The Most Difficult Thing to Predict on Polymarket Is... When the POLY Airdrop Will Happen

During the recent World Cup, Polymarket saw record-breaking activity, with its "World Cup winner" market reaching $4.32 billion in volume, making it the platform's highest-volume single prediction event ever. Over the six-week tournament, football markets amassed $85 billion in nominal trading volume, cementing sports as a major growth driver. Capitalizing on this surge in traffic, Polymarket quietly increased fees for its sports markets in early July. The taker fee multiplier was raised from 0.03 to 0.05, effectively raising maximum costs per trade by nearly 70% and moving sports out of its lowest fee tier. This follows a broader trend of the platform gradually expanding fee structures across various market categories since the start of the year to boost revenue. However, community focus is increasingly shifting from trading volumes to the long-awaited POLY token airdrop. Despite a senior executive confirming in late 2025 that a token and airdrop were planned for after U.S. market re-entry, no timeline has been provided. Recent actions, like an affiliated account deleting a potentially suggestive tweet and official help pages stating "no airdrop or token generation event has been announced," have fueled speculation and frustration. The community is divided on the reasons for the delay. Some believe Polymarket is waiting for a more favorable regulatory window in the U.S., while others speculate that the platform's strong organic growth and rising fee revenue have reduced the urgency to issue a token, potentially following a path similar to OpenSea. The prolonged uncertainty has led users to question not the *if*, but the *when*, of the POLY airdrop, turning it into one of the platform's most unpredictable events.

Odaily星球日报07/21 02:11

The Most Difficult Thing to Predict on Polymarket Is... When the POLY Airdrop Will Happen

Odaily星球日报07/21 02:11

活动图片