# Пов'язані статті щодо Data Sharing

Центр новин HTX надає останні статті та поглиблений аналіз на тему "Data Sharing", що охоплює ринкові тренди, оновлення проєктів, технологічні розробки та регуляторну політику в криптоіндустрії.

Claude Requires ID Verification and Facial Recognition? The Facial Recognition Requirement is an Old Story from Two Months Ago, and "Sharing Data with Police" is a Misinterpretation

Anthropic's updated privacy policy, effective July 8th, has sparked misinterpretations in Chinese social media, primarily concerning new identity verification and data sharing with law enforcement. A detailed comparison reveals these claims are largely unfounded. First, identity verification (including submitting government ID and a live selfie via third-party provider Persona) is not a new July policy. This mechanism was actually implemented in mid-April 2026 for certain high-use or flagged accounts, particularly Claude Max subscribers. The July update merely formally documents this existing practice in the policy text under a new "Verification Data" section. Second, the widespread claim that the new policy lowers the threshold for sharing user data with law enforcement is incorrect. Comparing the new text with the old version (dated September 28, 2025) shows no substantive tightening. While the new policy more clearly structures the conditions for disclosure—including having a "good-faith belief" it's necessary for legal compliance, preventing harm, fraud detection, or enforcing terms—the old policy already allowed Anthropic to disclose data based on its judgment for similar reasons (e.g., protecting safety, preventing fraud, or complying with law). The term "good-faith belief" acts as a limiting standard, not a lowered barrier. A 2025 court case where Anthropic resisted disclosing user data in a copyright lawsuit further demonstrates the complexity of such standards. The policy's actual substantial changes address data flows for Claude's Agent capabilities. New clauses clarify that when users connect third-party services or instruct Claude to perform multi-step tasks (reading files, sending messages), their inputs, outputs, and instructions are shared with those third parties, governed by the third parties' own policies. This update fills a compliance gap for Claude's evolving functionality beyond simple Q&A. Other additions include a "Research Participation Data" section and refined marketing legal bases. Anthropic reaffirms core commitments: not selling user data, keeping Claude ad-free, and allowing users to control if chats are used for model training. Overall, this update is primarily a compliance catch-up to existing product features, not a significant new privacy tightening. The heightened concern stems from conflating April's verification rollout, standard legal clauses, and the genuine new provisions regarding Agent tasks.

marsbit06/15 08:55

Claude Requires ID Verification and Facial Recognition? The Facial Recognition Requirement is an Old Story from Two Months Ago, and "Sharing Data with Police" is a Misinterpretation

marsbit06/15 08:55

South Korea's Crypto Tax Countdown Begins: Escalating Three-Way Game Between CEXs, Retail Investors, and Regulators

South Korea's National Tax Service has initiated final preparations to implement a virtual asset tax starting January 2027, with reporting for comprehensive income tax due by May 2028. The tax applies a 22% rate on annual profits exceeding 2.5 million KRW from transfers and leasing, affecting an estimated 13.26 million people. To enforce this, authorities plan to collect data from major domestic exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb and launch a comprehensive virtual asset analysis system. This move follows two previous postponements and signifies a shift towards institutionalized management. The plan also involves international data sharing under the OECD's CARF framework from next year to curb capital flight. However, tensions exist between regulators and exchanges over data sharing and new anti-money laundering rules. The industry, represented by DAXA, opposes proposed regulations requiring the reporting of all cross-border transfers over $6,800 as suspicious, arguing it renders AI risk systems useless and creates an impractical administrative burden. Given Korea's market—comprising 30% of global volume with 85% in altcoins and dominated by retail speculation—the tax could reduce short-term speculative trading and stabilize the domestic market by limiting capital outflows. Its implementation may also influence global crypto regulatory and taxation models, serving as a significant case study for other jurisdictions.

marsbit05/08 14:32

South Korea's Crypto Tax Countdown Begins: Escalating Three-Way Game Between CEXs, Retail Investors, and Regulators

marsbit05/08 14:32

活动图片