# Пов'язані статті щодо AMM

Центр новин HTX надає останні статті та поглиблений аналіз на тему "AMM", що охоплює ринкові тренди, оновлення проєктів, технологічні розробки та регуляторну політику в криптоіндустрії.

The 800x Golden Dog, "Gacha" Saves NFT Trading

Title: 800x Golden Dog: How 'Gacha' Mechanics Are Rescuing NFT Trading In the past month, the on-chain TCG (Trading Card Game) narrative, centered around "gacha" or loot box mechanics, has emerged as a major crypto-native revenue generator, second only to platforms like Hyperliquid and pump.fun. Recently, this trend hit Ethereum with Fake World Assets (FWA). Within just over a week, FWA generated approximately $1.3 million in revenue, ranking 15th in the past week's crypto app earnings. Its token, $FWA, surged from an initial market cap of ~$47,550 to a peak of ~$38.8 million—an 800x gain. Meanwhile, Collector Cards' token $CARDS declined significantly from its previous highs. FWA, developed by the team behind "PunkStrategy," operates as an NFT gacha system with a built-in token flywheel. Users deposit NFTs paired with ETH as liquidity into pools. Each deposit creates a personal pool; more ETH deposited lowers the chance of the NFT being "won" in a draw. Players spend ETH to "draw" (gacha). If they get an undesirable NFT, they can instantly sell it back to the original depositor at an 85% discount, generating income for the depositor. A 1% fee is taken on each draw and on depositor earnings when an NFT is kept. The key to FWA's momentum is its token $FWA. It cannot be bought directly externally. The primary way to acquire it is by playing the gacha and choosing to receive $FWA (instead of ETH) when selling back an unwanted NFT. This mechanism creates constant buy pressure for $FWA as players engage, especially during its price ascent. Early participants who held $FWA benefited massively from subsequent inflows. This contrasts with projects like Collector Cards, which, despite strong revenues, suffer from perceived low token utility beyond buybacks. In conclusion, while FWA's flywheel design—linking speculative token gains directly to NFT trading activity—has driven rapid growth, its sustainability is questionable. The model relies heavily on continuous $FWA price appreciation to offset the inherent negative expectancy of each draw. When price momentum stalls, activity will likely decline. The case highlights that in crypto markets, pure profitability narratives can be fleeting; understanding the relationship between attention, token buy pressure, and sustainable mechanics is crucial to avoid speculative pitfalls.

marsbit07/28 01:56

The 800x Golden Dog, "Gacha" Saves NFT Trading

marsbit07/28 01:56

NFTs That Can Earn Stock Tokens? What Exactly is StonkBrokers?

Title: How StonkBrokers Connects NFTs to Stock Token Earnings StonkBrokers is an NFT project from the Web3 development team Clutch Labs (CLUTCH) built on Robinhood Chain. It consists of 4,444 "pixel broker" NFTs. Unlike typical NFTs, each one is linked to an ERC-6551 token-bound account, meaning it functions as its own wallet capable of holding assets like stock tokens. The project's ecosystem includes: 1. **STONKBROKER (ERC-20 Token)**: The fungible token connected to the NFTs via the Anvil AMM. Users can trade tokens for NFTs at a base rate of 666,666 STONKBROKER (plus ETH fees). 2. **NFT Activation & Rewards**: NFT holders must spend STONKBROKER tokens to "activate" their NFT into one of five tiers, which determines their weight in receiving stock token rewards. These rewards are funded by 70% of the ETH trading fees generated on the Anvil AMM. 3. **Lending**: NFTs can be used as collateral to borrow STONKBROKER tokens. 4. **Future Products**: The roadmap includes the Stonk Launcher (a token launchpad) and the Stonk Exchange (a "vote-directed DEX" based on Uniswap V3), scheduled for late July and August 2026, respectively. The project aims to provide NFTs with ongoing utility as active financial agents rather than static collectibles. Its token (STONKBROKER) and NFT collection have seen significant price increases recently. However, the project's long-term viability depends on successful product delivery, sustainable protocol revenue, and navigating risks like market volatility, smart contract security, and the nascent Robinhood Chain ecosystem.

Foresight News07/21 02:21

NFTs That Can Earn Stock Tokens? What Exactly is StonkBrokers?

Foresight News07/21 02:21

Top 8 DEXs of July 2026

This article presents the top 8 decentralized exchanges (DEXs) for July 2026, highlighting their key features and evolution within the DeFi space. DEXs, which enable peer-to-peer cryptocurrency trading via smart contracts without intermediaries, are praised for offering users greater control, privacy, transparency, and global access compared to centralized platforms. The listed DEXs are: 1. **Shadow Exchange**: A Sonic-native DEX specializing in concentrated liquidity for efficient trading and reduced slippage. 2. **Uniswap**: A leading protocol using an Automated Market Maker (AMM) model across multiple blockchains. 3. **SushiSwap**: An evolved platform offering token swaps, yield farming, and governance via its SUSHI token across 40+ networks. 4. **Orca**: A user-friendly AMM on Solana featuring capital-efficient "Whirlpools" for concentrated liquidity. 5. **Meteora**: A Solana-based DEX focusing on dynamic liquidity infrastructure and vaults for advanced strategies. 6. **Raydium**: A hybrid exchange on Solana combining AMM pools with a central limit order book for deep liquidity. 7. **Hyperliquid**: A Layer 1 blockchain hosting a non-custodial perpetual futures exchange using an on-chain order book. 8. **PancakeSwap**: A multi-chain AMM hub originating on BNB Chain, now supporting thousands of trading pairs across several networks. The article concludes by noting the significant role of DEXs in crypto, their expansion beyond simple swaps into areas like derivatives and cross-chain interoperability, and advises users to conduct their own research before engaging with any platform.

ambcrypto07/10 06:27

Top 8 DEXs of July 2026

ambcrypto07/10 06:27

Uniswap v4 Hook Analysis: Architecture Design, Common Vulnerabilities, and Protection Practices

Uniswap v4's Hook mechanism is a major innovation, enabling custom logic injection into liquidity pool lifecycle events like swaps and liquidity provisioning. This transforms the AMM into programmable infrastructure, shifting the security model from protocol-level to pool-level, as each pool's safety now depends on its bound Hook contract. The core architecture revolves around the singleton PoolManager contract, which manages all pools via a flash accounting system. State changes are tracked in transient storage and must be settled by the end of a transaction. Hook contracts are permanently bound to pools via a PoolKey, with their permissions encoded directly into their address via specific low-order bits. This design introduces unique security considerations and challenges for future upgrades. Key vulnerabilities and best practices identified include: - **Access Control Gaps:** Early versions of the BaseHook abstract contract only protect `unlockCallback()`, leaving other lifecycle functions (`beforeSwap`, `afterSwap`, etc.) exposed unless explicitly secured by developers. - **Unrestricted Pool Binding:** The `initialize()` function does not validate if a Hook "consents" to a new pool. Hooks must implement their own whitelisting in `beforeInitialize` to prevent unauthorized pool creation. - **Async/Custom Curve Hooks:** These high-risk Hooks can completely replace Uniswap's swap logic. Their security depends entirely on their own implementation, as they operate outside the native protocol's pricing safeguards. - **Delta Accounting Risks:** The system ensures final balance (NonzeroDeltaCount == 0) but cannot guarantee the *correctness* of intermediate delta states, which attackers could manipulate. - **Token Confusion:** Protocols must implement semantic validation for tokens in user-created markets, not just interface checks, to prevent cross-market confusion attacks. The article emphasizes that Hook auditing requires a "sub-protocol" approach due to extended interaction chains, highlighting a significant shift in security methodology for the v4 ecosystem.

marsbit06/22 08:05

Uniswap v4 Hook Analysis: Architecture Design, Common Vulnerabilities, and Protection Practices

marsbit06/22 08:05

活动图片