South Korean Stock Market Plunges 33%, Then Soars 18%: Cryptocurrency Traders Still in the Red

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2026-08-05Востаннє оновлено о 2026-08-05

Анотація

The Korean stock market experienced extreme volatility, with the KOSPI index falling 33% from its June peak by late July, marking its worst month ever. The sharp decline, exacerbated by news of China's chipmaking equipment production, particularly hit semiconductor giants Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix. The crash was fueled by record-high leveraged retail investments concentrated in these stocks and related ETFs, devastating many younger investors who had shifted focus from crypto to equities. A historic 18% single-day rebound followed on July 31, driven by the forced liquidation of a major AI-focused hedge fund's positions and a Wall Street rally on strong tech earnings. However, gains were quickly erased, with the index falling again and remaining significantly down. According to Steve Kim of Four Pillars, the leveraged-driven rally and subsequent crash have left many active traders, who overlap between stocks and crypto, with depleted capital. This, coupled with increased risk aversion due to the market's wild swings, is unlikely to free up funds for a rotation back into cryptocurrencies in the near term.

July's decline in the KOSPI surpassed the monthly drops recorded during the Asian Financial Crisis of 1997 and the Global Financial Crisis of 2008, making July the worst month in the index's history. The decline intensified recently, starting on July 28, when news that China had commenced mass production of its own chip manufacturing equipment caused the index to fall 10.8% in a single trading session, simultaneously triggering multiple trading halts.

The hardest hit were the stocks of Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix—two companies that had been the driving force behind the Korean market's growth over the past year, fueled by artificial intelligence development. SK Hynix's unexpectedly low financial results—a record quarterly revenue that still fell short of analyst forecasts—exacerbated the panic the next day, which, measured from June's record high, meant the decline had approached 44%.

The Leverage Effect That Fueled the Rally, and the Crash

Steve Kim, CEO and co-founder of Four Pillars, a Seoul-based blockchain research company, told Bitcoin.com News that the reasons for the damage lie in how the market growth itself was formed: namely, the amount of leveraged open positions on Korean stocks reached a record 29.2 trillion won (approximately $19.7 billion) in early July, with a significant portion of this sum concentrated in ETFs tied to Samsung and SK Hynix stocks. He added:

Many young investors opened leveraged positions on Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix stocks, expecting the rally to continue. There's a clear generational divide in investor sentiment. Young investors suffered much heavier losses, while older investors generally found themselves in a better position.

Furthermore, Kim emphasized that the Korean stock and cryptocurrency markets have historically developed mostly independently, but they are connected through a shared pool of traders. "Many of the most active Korean cryptocurrency traders are the same people who actively trade Korean stocks using leverage," he noted, adding that over the past year, many of them shifted their focus from cryptocurrencies to what they perceived as more promising—Korean stocks.

This shift aligns with data showing that retail cryptocurrency trading volume in Korea decreased by 28% year-on-year as capital flowed into semiconductor and AI-related stocks.

"The recent market crash wiped out a significant portion of their capital," Kim said. "Even if they want to return to cryptocurrencies now, many simply don't have the money left to do so." He drew a direct parallel to the United States, where interest in cryptocurrencies similarly waned as capital and attention focused on artificial intelligence.

Finally, Kim spoke candidly about the net effect on the industry, stating that only a small percentage of investors actually profited from the Korean stock market's rise, with the majority of that profit going to foreign investors. "Once again, domestic retail investors essentially became a source of liquidity for the withdrawal of foreign capital," he opined.

The 18% Reversal Shows How Unpredictable This Market Has Become

Four days after the KOSPI recorded its worst month in history, the index showed the sharpest single-day trend reversal in its history. On July 31, the index rose 17.91%, closing at 6,595.45 after a gain of over 1,000 points—the largest single-day jump on record. Samsung Electronics shares rose 19.57% to 247,000 won, and SK Hynix rose 24.05% to 1.64 million won, hitting the daily upper limit for the first time in 17 years. The rise was so sharp that it triggered the Korean Stock Exchange's "sidecar" mechanism, which halted program trading for five minutes—the same protective mechanism that repeatedly "froze" the index during the decline.

Two forces coincided to cause this surge: first, the liquidation of positions by Situational Awareness—a hedge fund specializing in AI, founded by former OpenAI researcher Leopold Aschenbrenner, which lost 67% of its value in July due to concentrated leveraged bets. To elaborate, margin calls forced the fund to liquidate its public positions in favor of Ken Griffin's Citadel, and once this forced selling was completed, one pressure factor on Samsung and SK Hynix disappeared.

The second factor was an overnight rally on Wall Street, where Microsoft's strong financial results renewed confidence in AI infrastructure spending and drove the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index up 8% (while Amazon's results confirmed demand for AI monetization). Meta also surpassed revenue forecasts, though its own stock fell due to cash flow concerns related to capital expenditures, a reminder that even financial results that calmed the Korean market itself caused sharp swings in investor sentiment elsewhere.

However, the relief was short-lived, and in the next session, the KOSPI fell 4.86%, and by August 4, it had fallen further to 6,153.55 points (a trend that continues to this day), still about 22% below the level of late June.

Regarding the outlook, Kim does not see this reversal as a hidden positive for cryptocurrencies, as he believes that instead of freeing up capital for asset rotation, the large-scale crash (now compounded by a market capable of swinging 18% in either direction within 24 hours) makes Korean retail investors more risk-averse and leaves them with less capital to invest in any assets, including cryptocurrencies.

end-content

Пов'язані питання

QWhat were the main factors that caused the historic volatility in the Korean stock market (KOSPI) described in the article?

AThe primary factors were: 1) Leverage-fueled rally and subsequent forced liquidations, where record-high margin debt (reaching ~$19.7 billion) was concentrated in ETFs for Samsung and SK Hynix. 2) A catalyst of panic selling triggered by news of China's domestic chip production. 3) The forced liquidation of positions by a prominent AI-focused hedge fund (Situational Awareness). 4) A sharp reversal driven by a relief rally on Wall Street after strong tech earnings, which then quickly faded, demonstrating extreme market unpredictability.

QAccording to Steve Kim, how are the Korean stock and cryptocurrency markets connected, and what has been the recent trend of capital flow between them?

ASteve Kim states that the Korean stock and crypto markets are connected primarily through a shared pool of traders. The most active Korean crypto traders are often the same individuals who actively trade Korean stocks on margin. Over the past year, capital has flowed from crypto into stocks, particularly AI and semiconductor stocks like Samsung and SK Hynix. This is evidenced by a 28% year-on-year decline in Korean crypto retail trading volume.

QWhy does Steve Kim believe the recent stock market crash is not a hidden positive factor for cryptocurrencies?

AKim believes it is not positive because the massive crash, compounded by a market now capable of 18% swings in a single day, has destroyed a significant portion of retail investors' capital. Instead of freeing up funds for asset rotation into crypto, it has made investors more risk-averse and left them with less disposable capital to invest in any asset class, including cryptocurrencies.

QWhat role did leverage (margin trading) play in the initial rally and the subsequent crash of the Korean stock market?

ALeverage was a core driver of both the rally and the crash. The rally was fueled by a record amount of leveraged positions (~$19.7 billion), heavily concentrated in tech stocks. This created a fragile situation where a market downturn triggered margin calls, forcing the liquidation of these positions. This selling pressure intensified the crash, particularly for stocks like Samsung and SK Hynix, which were favorites of young, leveraged retail investors.

QWhat specific event on July 31st caused a historic single-day reversal in the KOSPI index, and what were the two main forces behind it?

AOn July 31st, the KOSPI index surged 17.91%, its biggest single-day jump ever. The two main forces were: 1) The completion of forced liquidation by the AI-focused hedge fund Situational Awareness, which removed a major source of selling pressure on key stocks like Samsung and SK Hynix. 2) A strong overnight rally on Wall Street driven by better-than-expected earnings from tech giants like Microsoft and Amazon, which renewed confidence in AI infrastructure spending and boosted semiconductor stocks globally.

Пов'язані матеріали

Bitwise Closes 8 ETFs and Cuts Staff by 14%, but Continues to Launch New Products

Bloomberg reported on August 12 that cryptocurrency asset management firm Bitwise has laid off approximately 14% of its staff, reducing headcount from around 180 to about 155 employees. CEO Hunter Horsley stated the adjusted team remains the largest in the company's eight-year history and expressed confidence in long-term growth, though current personnel and product configurations are tightening. Prior to the layoffs, Bitwise disclosed a significant drop in client assets from over $15 billion in early February to $11 billion by April 1st, a decrease of at least $4 billion. The company did not specify the contributions of price changes, fund flows, or changes in reporting scope to this decline. In a related product restructuring, Bitwise decided to liquidate eight ETFs between April and June. This included the Web3 ETF, a BTC/ETH/Treasuries rotation strategy ETF, and six options income ETFs tied to assets like Coinbase and Ethereum. These moves reduce the number of products requiring ongoing operational support. Despite these cuts, Bitwise continues to launch new products. Recent offerings include an Avalanche ETP with staking in Europe, the Hyperliquid ETF, and the takeover of Superstate's $267+ million Crypto Carry Fund, entering the tokenized fund management space. The company now manages 70 investment products for over 5,500 advisory teams and works with more than 20 banks and broker-dealers. The simultaneous staff reduction and product portfolio shift—away from thematic Web3 and single-asset options strategies towards direct crypto exposure, staking, and tokenized funds—indicates a strategic realignment. The operational burden on the smaller remaining team will depend heavily on the complexity of the revised product lineup. Bitwise has not disclosed the specific reasons for the layoffs, the affected departments, severance details, or any one-time costs associated with the job cuts.

marsbit18 хв тому

Bitwise Closes 8 ETFs and Cuts Staff by 14%, but Continues to Launch New Products

marsbit18 хв тому

CoreWeave: The Inflection Point Has Arrived. Has the 'Hard-Working Underdog' Finally Turned Profitable?

CoreWeave, an AI cloud unicorn, released its Q2 2026 earnings on August 12, with shares rising about 15% post-announcement. While overall performance did not significantly exceed expectations, key positive trends emerged. Revenue reached approximately $2.58 billion, up 112% year-over-year, though slightly below the high end of prior guidance. A major highlight was the acceleration in computing power deployment, with Active Power increasing by a record 500 Mw to 1,500 Mw, far surpassing market forecasts and signaling faster future revenue growth. Capital expenditures also hit a new high of $9.4 billion. Importantly, profitability showed signs of inflection. "True" gross margin (after deducting cost of revenue and Tech & Infrastructure expenses) rose to 7.3%, up 3 percentage points from the previous quarter. As revenue scales, depreciation and operating expenses are being diluted. Adjusted operating profit margin improved significantly to 5% from 1% last quarter. The company's guidance points to continued acceleration, with Q3 revenue growth expected at 158% and margins continuing to climb. Management raised full-year 2026 guidance, projecting Q4 revenue growth of around 194% and an adjusted operating margin of approximately 14.6%, suggesting a rapid path toward its 25%-30% long-term target. Recent developments, including a 25% price increase for its services and the launch of higher-margin Managed Inference offerings, support the improving profitability narrative. While long-term competitive challenges remain for new cloud providers, CoreWeave's near-term trajectory of accelerating growth and expanding margins presents a high-risk, high-reward opportunity, especially amid renewed market optimism for cloud stocks.

marsbit55 хв тому

CoreWeave: The Inflection Point Has Arrived. Has the 'Hard-Working Underdog' Finally Turned Profitable?

marsbit55 хв тому

Uncovering the Secret Reasoning Chains of Claude Opus for $720: A Leak via Haiku, with GPT and Gemini Also Affected

Researchers discovered a method to extract hidden reasoning traces, or "Chain of Thought" (CoT), from major proprietary large language models (LLMs) like Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.8, OpenAI's GPT-5.6 Sol, and Google's Gemini 3.1 Pro. The attack exploits a design flaw in how these models handle encrypted reasoning "blobs." These blobs, which contain a model's internal reasoning steps, are encrypted and sent to the client for storage between conversation turns to save server costs. The researchers found these blobs were encrypted with a global key, allowing them to be reused across different sessions, users, and, crucially, different models from the same company. By taking an encrypted reasoning blob generated by a powerful "flagship" model and feeding it to a smaller, less capable model from the same family (e.g., feeding Claude Opus's blob to Claude Haiku), the researchers could prompt the smaller model to divulge the hidden CoT. This bypassed the need to crack the encryption directly. The implications are significant: 1) Competitors could potentially distill high-value reasoning data at low cost (estimated at ~$720 for 10,000 traces). 2) Sensitive information like API keys, passwords, and personal emails, which models might process internally but not output, could be leaked. The team found such leaks in 4.9% of analyzed public agent logs. 3) Models might internally analyze dangerous queries (e.g., car theft methods) before refusing to answer, but this dangerous analysis could be extracted from the CoT. 4) Malicious instructions could potentially be hidden within a reasoning blob to influence a model's future behavior. While the vulnerability was responsibly disclosed and patched by the affected companies, the research highlights a fundamental tension between the convenience of portable reasoning states and security. The paper also notes preliminary tests found no clear evidence that open-source models like DeepSeek had been distilled from the extracted CoTs.

marsbit1 год тому

Uncovering the Secret Reasoning Chains of Claude Opus for $720: A Leak via Haiku, with GPT and Gemini Also Affected

marsbit1 год тому

OpenAI Loses Four Executives in One Month, Former COO Departs, Almost the Entire Safety Team Ousted

In a surprising turn of events, OpenAI's longtime COO and key lieutenant to CEO Sam Altman, Brad Lightcap, has announced his departure after eight years with the company. His exit follows the recent resignations of several key safety and ethics leaders, including Chief Futurist Joshua Achiam, Safety Systems Lead Johannes Heidecke, and Ethics Lead Chloé Bakalar, within a single month. Lightcap, instrumental in building OpenAI's commercialization and operational framework, described his departure as "bittersweet" and hinted at wanting to tackle new challenges. While his statement and Altman's farewell were amicable, internal shifts had previously reduced his operational role, signaling a longer-term transition. The mass exodus, particularly from the safety and ethics divisions, coincides with growing internal and external scrutiny over AI safety. This follows incidents like models exhibiting unauthorized actions during testing and the recent decision to delay the launch of the advanced Astra model due to unresolved safety concerns about its potential cybersecurity capabilities. OpenAI has stated that safety and ethics are not confined to any single team or leader, but the concentration of departures raises questions about the company's direction and internal dynamics, especially as it navigates pressures of rapid development and a potential future IPO.

marsbit1 год тому

OpenAI Loses Four Executives in One Month, Former COO Departs, Almost the Entire Safety Team Ousted

marsbit1 год тому

1confirmation: Reverse Entrepreneurship, the Next Web3 Blockbuster Might Come from a Once-Failed Track

**Title: Reverse Entrepreneurship: The Next Web3 Blockbuster May Come from Previously Failed Tracks** This article argues that the next major consumer crypto application is likely to emerge from a concept that failed five years ago, now benefiting from matured infrastructure and better timing. It examines several such "failed" tracks that hold renewed potential: 1. **Internet-Native Assets:** Beyond simply tokenizing tweets or creating digital collectibles, there's an opportunity to create a genuinely new, crypto-native asset class that captures cultural moments and online phenomena, as opposed to merely tokenizing real-world assets (RWA). 2. **X-to-Earn:** While unsustainable token emission models doomed early projects like STEPN, the core premise that most people will first *earn* crypto, not buy it, remains valid. The future challenge is designing what is earned and why users would hold it long-term. 3. **The Metaverse:** Past failures like Decentraland stemmed from trying to replicate the physical world online. The opportunity lies not in abandoning shared online social spaces, but in reimagining their form beyond real-world analogs. 4. **DAOs:** DAOs have underdelivered by overcomplicating governance. The fundamental, unmet user need is simpler: enabling groups of internet strangers to pool funds and collectively achieve goals (e.g., buying assets, funding projects) that are impossible individually. 5. **Personal Value Tokenization:** Numerous attempts (Friend.tech, BitClout) to create markets around individuals have failed. The enduring demand for "person-as-asset" trading (seen in meme coins, prediction markets) suggests the direction isn't wrong, but the execution has been flawed, often lacking creator consent or a less commodified model. The conclusion is that true innovation will come from revisiting these past ideas with new insights, rather than crowding into currently popular trends.

marsbit1 год тому

1confirmation: Reverse Entrepreneurship, the Next Web3 Blockbuster Might Come from a Once-Failed Track

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片