SEC reaffirms tokenized stocks must follow existing securities laws

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-30Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-30

Анотація

The U.S. SEC reaffirmed that tokenized stocks must comply with existing federal securities laws, regardless of whether they are issued on-chain or off-chain. The regulator emphasized that all securities must be registered unless an exemption applies. Tokenized stocks fall into two categories: issuer-sponsored and third-party sponsored, each offering different rights and protections. Wall Street firms, including Citadel and JPMorgan, opposed broad exemptions for DeFi platforms handling tokenized securities, warning that such exemptions could undermine investor protection and cause market disruptions. They called for DeFi platforms to be regulated similarly to traditional financial institutions. Despite opposition from traditional finance, the DeFi sector has seen significant growth, with nearly 300,000 holders and total traded value approaching $1 billion. The industry continues to advocate for certain exemptions, and the final regulatory framework may reflect a compromise between these opposing views.

The U.S. regulator, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), has reiterated that tokenized securities are still securities and fall under federal securities law.

In a recent statement, the regulator clarified that whether a stock is issued off-chain or on-chain, it must still comply with the relevant laws.

“Regardless of its format, the Securities Act requires that every offer and sale of a security must be registered with the Commission unless an exemption from registration is available.”

The guidance further reiterated,

“Similarly, stock is an ‘equity security’ under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act regardless of its format.”

According to the watchdog, tokenized stocks fall into two categories. The first is issuer-sponsored, which transfers rights and protections to the holder, while the second is third-party sponsored on-chain stocks that offer varied ownership rights and protections.

Securitize, one of the issuers of tokenized securities, welcomed the move, stating that it is crucial for ‘scaling’ the sector.

“Clear frameworks like this are key to responsibly scaling tokenization.”

Wall Street opposes DeFi exemptions

The statement followed the recent meeting between the regulator and Wall Street firms on how to treat tokenized securities under the current legal regime.

According to an SEC memo, representatives from Citadel, JPMorgan Chase & Co., Cahill Gordon & Reindel, Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA), pressed against broad exemptions for on-chain stocks.

Referencing the October flash crash and Stream Finance collapse, the TradFi group warned,

“Broad exemptions for tokenized trading activities could undermine investor protection and lead to market disruptions.”

In fact, in a December letter, Citadel Securities called for similar regulation of DeFi platforms handling tokenized securities like their traditional counterparts.

The DeFi complex has been pushing for legal exemptions, claiming their platforms are disintermediated to warrant the legal responsibility.

In a recent meeting, SIFMA and its TradFi members pushed for a new classification of tokenized securities to enable more effective regulation.

The latest SEC statement reflects some of the concerns they raised. However, it does not address broader DeFi operations. This omission may be because issues related to tokenized securities are still under discussion within the CLARITY Act.

Tokenized stocks eye $1 billion

Even so, the collective DeFi players called Citadel Securities’ push and argument ‘bassless’ and ‘flawed.’

The industry may likely advocate for DeFi exemptions of some sort in the bill. It remains to be seen whether the final framework for tokenized securities will be a compromise between these two camps.

The sector has gained strong traction, with tokenized securities holders edging close to 300K users, representing a 100% growth in January alone. Additionally, the total value of traded on-chain stocks is teetering toward the $1 billion mark.


Final Thoughts

  • The U.S. SEC clarified that tokenized securities still fall under the current federal securities law
  • Wall Street pressed against a broad DeFi exemption in tokenized securities trading.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat did the SEC reaffirm regarding tokenized stocks and existing securities laws?

AThe SEC reaffirmed that tokenized securities are still securities and must comply with existing federal securities laws, regardless of whether they are issued off-chain or on-chain.

QWhat are the two categories of tokenized stocks mentioned by the SEC?

AThe two categories are issuer-sponsored tokenized stocks, which transfer rights and protections to the holder, and third-party sponsored on-chain stocks, which offer varied ownership rights and protections.

QWhy did Wall Street firms oppose broad exemptions for tokenized securities trading?

AWall Street firms opposed broad exemptions because they believe it could undermine investor protection and lead to market disruptions, as evidenced by events like the October flash crash and Stream Finance collapse.

QWhat was the DeFi industry's response to Citadel Securities' call for similar regulation?

AThe DeFi industry called Citadel Securities' push and argument 'baseless' and 'flawed,' and they are likely to advocate for some form of DeFi exemptions in the bill.

QWhat growth metrics were highlighted for the tokenized securities sector in January?

AIn January alone, the number of tokenized securities holders grew by 100%, reaching nearly 300,000 users, and the total value of traded on-chain stocks is approaching the $1 billion mark.

Пов'язані матеріали

In-Depth Report on the On-Chain Lending Market: When Off-Chain Credit Meets On-Chain Liquidation

The on-chain lending market has evolved from a peripheral DeFi niche into core financial infrastructure. As of early 2026, total value locked (TVL) in on-chain lending protocols has reached $64.3 billion, accounting for 53.54% of total DeFi TVL, making it the largest and most mature vertical within decentralized finance. Aave dominates the sector with approximately $32.9 billion in TVL, commanding nearly half of the market—a leadership position that is unlikely to be challenged in the foreseeable future. However, the path of on-chain lending forward is not without risk. Liquidation cascades, credit defaults, and cross-chain vulnerabilities remain systemic threats hanging over the industry. At the same time, a deeper structural transformation is underway: on-chain lending is shifting from a “leverage tool for crypto-native users” to a “compliant gateway for institutional capital”. The scale of RWA (Real World Asset) lending has surpassed $18.5 billion, with U.S. Treasuries and government securities increasingly serving as core collateral. Institutional capital inflows are reshaping both the user base and risk appetite of the sector. This report systematically analyzes the evolution of on-chain lending definitions, competitive dynamics, core risks, and future trends, providing a comprehensive industry outlook for investors and trade practitioners. Key findings suggest that the “one dominant player with several strong challengers” structure will persist in the short term, while fixed-rate lending, compliant collateral, and institutional credit underwriting will define the next phase of competition. For investors focused on DeFi infrastructure, three key opportunity tracks stand out, namely, the Aave ecosystem (Morpho, Spark), RWA lending protocols (Ondo, Maple) and fixed-rate innovation (Notional, Pendle).

HTX Learn1 год тому

In-Depth Report on the On-Chain Lending Market: When Off-Chain Credit Meets On-Chain Liquidation

HTX Learn1 год тому

Fu Peng's First Public Speech in 2026: What Exactly Are Crypto Assets? Why Did I Join the Crypto Asset Industry?

Fu Peng, a renowned macroeconomist and now Chief Economist at New火 Group, delivered his first public speech of 2026 at the Hong Kong Web3 Festival. He explained his perspective on crypto assets and why he joined the industry, framing it within the context of macroeconomic trends and financial evolution. Fu emphasized that crypto assets are transitioning from an early, belief-driven phase to a mature, institutionally integrated asset class. He drew parallels to the 1970s-80s, when technological advances (like computing) revolutionized traditional finance, leading to the rise of FICC (Fixed Income, Currencies, and Commodities). Similarly, current advancements in AI, data, and blockchain are reshaping finance, with crypto assets becoming part of a new "FICC + C" (C for Crypto) framework. He noted that institutional capital, including traditional hedge funds, avoided early crypto due to its speculative nature but are now engaging as regulatory clarity emerges (e.g., stablecoin laws, CFTC classifying crypto as a commodity). Fu predicted that 2025-2026 marks a turning point where crypto becomes a standardized, financially viable asset for diversified portfolios, akin to commodities or derivatives in traditional finance. Fu defined Bitcoin not as "digital gold" in a simplistic sense but as a value-preserving, financially tradable asset. He highlighted that crypto's future lies in regulated, institutional adoption, moving away from retail-dominated trading. His entry into crypto signals this maturation, where traditional finance integrates crypto into mainstream asset management.

marsbit2 год тому

Fu Peng's First Public Speech in 2026: What Exactly Are Crypto Assets? Why Did I Join the Crypto Asset Industry?

marsbit2 год тому

Justin Sun Sues Trump Family: What $75 Million Bought Was Only a Blacklist

Justin Sun, founder of Tron, has filed a lawsuit in federal court against World Liberty Financial (WLF), alleging he was made the "primary target of a fraudulent scheme" after investing $75 million. Sun claims the investment secured him an advisor title and WLFI tokens, which were later frozen by WLF, causing "hundreds of millions in losses." The dispute began in late 2024 when Sun's investment helped revive WLF's struggling token sale, which ultimately raised $550 million. Shortly after, the SEC dropped its lawsuit against Sun following Donald Trump's inauguration. However, relations soured when Sun refused WLF's demands for additional funding. In August 2025, WLF added a "blacklist" function to its smart contract, allowing it to unilaterally freeze tokens. Sun's holdings, worth approximately $107 million, were frozen, and he was threatened with token destruction. The lawsuit highlights WLF's structure, which directs 75% of token sale profits to the Trump family, who had earned $1 billion by December 2025. WLF's CEO is Zach Witkoff, son of U.S. Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff. The project faces scrutiny for opaque operations, including a controversial loan arrangement on the Dolomite platform, co-founded by a WLF advisor. Despite Sun's history with the SEC, the case underscores centralization risks within DeFi, as WLF controls governance and holds powers to freeze assets arbitrarily. Sun's tokens remain frozen as legal proceedings begin.

marsbit2 год тому

Justin Sun Sues Trump Family: What $75 Million Bought Was Only a Blacklist

marsbit2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片