Ridiculous, Show Your Claude Unsubscribe Screenshot and Get $200: Cursor is Going Wild Snatching Customers

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-08-19Востаннє оновлено о 2026-08-19

Анотація

A Cursor engineer's bold offer on X sparked a frenzy: send a screenshot of your canceled Claude subscription, get $200 in credits. This personal initiative by engineer Lauren (@poteto) promised a free month of Cursor's top-tier "Ultra" plan ($200/month, including Grok 4.6) to users switching from competitors like Claude Code. The post went viral, with users flooding her DMs. While some, like @notjazii, successfully received credits, many others faced radio silence or encountered barriers like X's premium membership requirement for messaging. Criticism arose over the chaotic, non-official handling, with some calling it a scam. The move is seen as an aggressive user-acquisition play following SpaceX's recent $60B acquisition of Cursor, directly targeting Claude Code's developer base. It highlights the intensifying subsidy wars in the AI coding tool space, putting a public price tag—$200—on developer loyalty.

One screenshot, $200.

Just yesterday, user @notjazii woke up to find $200 added to his Cursor account. All he did was send his Claude cancellation screenshot to someone at Cursor.

He posted: I didn't do anything, submitted a cancellation screenshot, $200 credited.

That $200 allows him to almost freely use Grok 4.6.

A Claude cancellation screenshot became hard currency overnight.

A Post That "Might Get Me Hated"

It all started the day before. On August 17th, Cursor engineer Lauren (@poteto) publicly posted on X. The post was extremely straightforward:

"I might get hate for this post, but if you're thinking of switching to Cursor with Grok Bot, DM me your email and a screenshot of you canceling your other subscriptions, and I'll give you a free month of Ultra."

Ultra is the most expensive tier in Cursor's personal plan, $200 per month, including large allowances for Grok 4.6, Composer, and other proprietary models, plus $400 worth of third-party model usage.

In other words, they're giving away the top-tier plan.

The result: the comments section exploded. A huge number of users immediately started taking action.

Soon, another developer, @spcxGOD, also shared a screenshot of receiving credits: about $180, for the same reason of canceling a Claude subscription.

Thousands of DMs Gone Unanswered

Don't get too excited yet, though.

Large numbers of people sent their emails and screenshots, and then... nothing.

User @alexkelerman said he DMed but was ignored. Many others replied "same."

Some advised everyone to be patient, saying the person was just processing them one by one. Others put it out there: If I really get a free Ultra, I'll promote Cursor like crazy.

Queueing was just the first hurdle. Something even more disheartening came up: some discovered that only X Premium members were eligible to send her a private message. Those without verification couldn't even find the entry point, and some couldn't even reply to the original post.

User @play_loh directly called it out: Not getting the free Ultra? That's called a scam.

Because there were simply too many DMs, Lauren later set up a bot specifically to handle them in bulk.

The most pointed comment came from user mishka. He said: An army of bots couldn't finish processing a few thousand DMs in 16 hours. That's not a great advertisement for Grok Bot.

This isn't surprising, though. This wasn't an official Cursor-organized campaign, just the personal action of an employee, Lauren.

But the money was indeed sent out, and quite a few people received it.

Why a Screenshot is Worth $200

On August 14th, SpaceX completed the acquisition of Cursor for $60 billion. Cursor officially became a wholly-owned subsidiary of SpaceX, merged into the SpaceX AI team.

Musk stated in an internal meeting: Before September, AI revenue will exceed the revenue of all other SpaceX businesses combined.

But the problem is, Musk hasn't been able to surpass Claude Code in the AI coding track.

The successful acquisition of Cursor gave Musk a chance to overtake. Millions of developers open this window every day.

Now, Cursor is leveraging this momentum to continue its offensive against Claude Code.

That $200-worth cancellation screenshot is more like a voucher to lure you into migrating. You move your projects, shortcuts, and workflow habits over today; they're betting you'll pay for the second month yourself.

The script of internet platforms fighting subsidy wars has finally made its way to the AI coding tools circle.

And that's probably the most important takeaway from this. For the first time, developer loyalty has a public price tag: $200, redeemable with a screenshot.

References:

https://x.com/notjazii/status/2089636713413128233

https://x.com/poteto/status/2089369732554404153

https://x.com/Daniel_Farinax/status/2089390969900990541

https://cursor.com/help/account-and-billing/pricing

https://cursor.com/docs/models-and-pricing

This article is from the WeChat public account "New Zhiyuan", author: ASI启示录

Трендові криптовалюти

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Пов'язані питання

QWhat did a user receive from Cursor after sharing a screenshot of canceling their Claude subscription?

AThe user received 200 USD (one month of Cursor's Ultra plan) credited to their Cursor account.

QWho initiated the offer of a free Ultra plan in exchange for a cancellation screenshot, and was it an official company campaign?

AThe offer was initiated by Cursor engineer Lauren (@poteto) on X. It was a personal initiative, not an official company-organized campaign.

QWhat were some of the challenges or criticisms users faced when trying to claim the free Ultra plan offer?

AChallenges included not receiving a response after sending the required information, the high volume of DMs causing delays, and the requirement of having an X Premium subscription to send a direct message to the initiator. Some users criticized the process as misleading or a scam.

QWhy is Cursor, according to the article, willing to pay $200 for a screenshot of a user canceling a Claude subscription?

AThe article suggests this is a competitive strategy to attract developers from Claude Code. The screenshot acts as a 'migration voucher.' Cursor bets that once users switch their projects and workflow habits, they will likely continue with a paid subscription in subsequent months.

QWhat recent corporate development involving Cursor provides context for this aggressive user acquisition move?

ACursor was recently acquired by SpaceX for 60 billion USD and became a fully-owned subsidiary under SpaceX's AI team. Elon Musk reportedly stated that AI revenue is expected to surpass all other SpaceX business revenues by September, highlighting the strategic importance of this market.

Пов'язані матеріали

Panic Over $1.8 Trillion Deficit Heats Up, Bond Yield Surge Could Trigger 30% Bitcoin Volatility

The article discusses Bitcoin's current stagnation within a narrow trading range despite positive signals like BlackRock's ETF holdings and net inflows into U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs. Market anxiety is growing due to conflicting macro forces. On one hand, the soaring U.S. budget deficit—projected at $1.8 trillion—fuels expectations of monetary expansion, which long-term proponents believe will benefit assets like Bitcoin. On the other hand, a sharp surge in global bond yields, with U.S. 30-year yields hitting multi-decade highs, poses a significant risk to high-valuation assets by raising real financing costs. Analysts note Bitcoin's 30-day realized volatility is at historic lows. Historical patterns suggest such periods are typically followed by a median absolute price swing of around 30% within 60 days, though the direction is uncertain. This could push Bitcoin to roughly $83,200 or down to about $44,800 from its current ~$64,000 level. The market's focus has shifted from Fed policy to the trajectory of long-term Treasury yields and geopolitical risks. While the fiscal deficit narrative supports long-term bullishness, the immediate threat of rising yields creates a precarious balance. Traders are warned to prepare for significant volatility and potential deep corrections, with some experts suggesting a washout of leveraged positions may be needed before a sustainable bottom forms.

marsbit5 хв тому

Panic Over $1.8 Trillion Deficit Heats Up, Bond Yield Surge Could Trigger 30% Bitcoin Volatility

marsbit5 хв тому

US Wants to Ban Issuance and Sale of Stablecoins Without a License

A bill in the U.S. Congress proposes mandatory licensing for cryptocurrency companies. If passed, starting January 18, 2027, all stablecoin issuers would be required to obtain a federal or state license. Crypto platforms could offer customers stablecoins from foreign issuers, but only if those issuers comply with U.S. law and relevant intergovernmental agreements. Even stricter restrictions are proposed for July 18, 2028, with the Treasury Department seeking to prevent U.S. crypto exchanges and services from offering Americans stablecoins issued by entities without an official U.S. Treasury license. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated these measures aim to "secure the dollar's status as the leading global reserve currency." The draft amendments are currently in a 60-day public comment period before moving to Congress. Meanwhile, another crypto market bill, CLARITY, is stalled in the Senate due to protracted negotiations, particularly over an "ethical provision" that would ban high-ranking officials, including the U.S. President, from participating in the crypto business. To prevent a potential veto, supporters have proposed adding an amendment allowing the President a deferral on federal capital gains tax from crypto asset sales.

cryptonews.ru10 хв тому

US Wants to Ban Issuance and Sale of Stablecoins Without a License

cryptonews.ru10 хв тому

"AI Burning Books" Is Actually a Misunderstanding

"AI Book-Burning" Is Actually a Misunderstanding Recent reports about AI companies purchasing used books, scanning them, and then destroying the physical copies have sparked widespread outrage. Terms like "AI is devouring human knowledge" have become common, fueled by dramatic visuals of books being cut and shredded. However, the actual facts reveal a more nuanced story. While companies like Anthropic have indeed spent millions to buy and "destructively scan" several million books for AI training, this volume is a small fraction of the global second-hand book market. The core act—digitizing content and then discarding the physical object—is the opposite of historical book-burning, which aimed to erase knowledge. A key point of contention is the purchase of rare or out-of-print books. Yet, if these books were legally for sale on the open market, the buyer (whether an AI firm or an individual) has the right to do with them as they wish. The real question is whether society has adequate systems to protect books of genuine cultural heritage *before* they are sold. Expecting profit-driven companies to self-regulate on this is unreliable; the solution lies in establishing public rules, such as protected lists for rare editions or granting libraries priority purchase rights. Much of the intense public reaction stems not from the scale of actual harm, but from the powerful symbolism. The image of books being fed into machines taps into deeper anxieties about AI: fears of job displacement, mistrust of tech giants, and the unsettling feeling that humanity is feeding its own cultural past to the systems that might replace it. The outrage over "AI book-burning" is thus less about the physical books and more a proxy for broader societal tensions surrounding artificial intelligence.

marsbit15 хв тому

"AI Burning Books" Is Actually a Misunderstanding

marsbit15 хв тому

Robinhood CEO named three benefits of tokenized stocks for American investors

Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev advocates for the U.S. to allow trading of tokenized stocks domestically. He argues this model could modernize the financial system through three key benefits: **faster, near real-time settlements** reducing counterparty risk and broker capital requirements; **24/7 trading** enabling reaction to market events anytime; and **greater asset portability**, allowing tokens to be moved between platforms and held in self-custody wallets, increasing competition among services. Tenev emphasized tokenization is about rebuilding asset ownership infrastructure for freer movement, similar to information online. He highlighted potential integration with DeFi, where tokenized stocks could be used for lending or as collateral. Currently, Robinhood's stock tokens are not direct ownership of the underlying securities but are backed by them and provide access to economic value like dividends; their structure may evolve with future regulations. Tenev identified outdated securities laws and market infrastructure, developed over a century, as the main U.S. obstacle, urging regulators to adapt rules for blockchain while preserving investor protections. He warned it would be strange if the rest of the world could build the future of ownership around U.S. assets while Americans are left behind, suggesting tokenization could later expand to private company shares and other illiquid assets.

cryptonews.ru36 хв тому

Robinhood CEO named three benefits of tokenized stocks for American investors

cryptonews.ru36 хв тому

OpenAI Publishes 4+10 Lifesaving Guidelines Specifically to Prevent AI Automated Attacks

OpenAI President Greg Brockman warns that advanced AI agents can now autonomously discover security vulnerabilities and execute real-world cyberattacks, as demonstrated in a recent Hugging Face security incident. In response, OpenAI is implementing a four-pronged defense strategy: using Codex to secure code entry points, employing AI for initial security alert triage, proactively identifying potential attack paths, and reinforcing foundational security practices. Brockman urges defenders to act swiftly by integrating cutting-edge AI into their security workflows. He outlines a three-step approach: first, equip security teams with AI agent tools tailored to their systems; second, embed AI into the development pipeline for automated code review and patch generation; and third, gradually build a comprehensive autonomous security operations system. The blog emphasizes that no single organization can withstand these evolving AI-powered threats alone. Brockman calls for industry-wide collaboration, advocating for sharing proven vulnerability discoveries, fixes, and operational playbooks to transform isolated defenses into a collective security ecosystem. The goal is to ensure AI becomes a shield for defenders, not just a weapon for attackers, by accelerating defensive capabilities to match the pace of technological advancement.

marsbit40 хв тому

OpenAI Publishes 4+10 Lifesaving Guidelines Specifically to Prevent AI Automated Attacks