On-Chain Stock Trading, Yet Retaining Reset Rights: Robinhood's Experiment in Progress and Retreat

比推Опубліковано о 2026-02-12Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-12

Анотація

Robinhood has launched the public testnet of Robinhood Chain, an Ethereum Layer 2 built on Arbitrum Orbit, aiming to tokenize real-world assets (RWA) like stocks, ETFs, and private equities. This move follows the company’s earlier experiments in Europe, where it offered tokenized stock derivatives—not actual equity ownership—with features like 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and dividend pass-through. The chain leverages Arbitrum for EVM compatibility and Ethereum for security, while allowing Robinhood to enforce compliance controls. Despite its vision for global accessibility and DeFi composability, challenges remain: the assets are legally structured as derivatives, Robinhood Europe acts as the sole counterparty, and the platform retains centralized control, including the ability to reset or restrict wallet access. The initiative represents Robinhood’s broader push to bridge traditional finance and crypto, though its success depends on navigating regulatory and operational hurdles.

Author: KarenZ, Foresight News

Original Title: Robinhood Ventures into L2, Focusing on RWA Tokenization

At the end of January 2026, Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev revisited the "GameStop short squeeze" that shocked Wall Street five years ago on social media, stating bluntly: if blockchain technology's real-time settlement capability had been available at that time, the "pulling the plug" moment that angered countless retail investors could have been avoided.

Just two weeks later, Robinhood officially announced the launch of the Robinhood Chain public testnet based on Arbitrum, which will support tokenized real-world assets, including stocks, ETFs, private assets, and other financial instruments.

Architectural Choice: Why Arbitrum?

In terms of architectural choice, Robinhood chose to build the Ethereum Layer 2 network Robinhood Chain based on Arbitrum Orbit, using Ethereum Blobs to ensure data availability and ETH as the native Gas token.

Robinhood is well aware that it doesn't need to reinvent the wheel. Arbitrum provides EVM compatibility, allowing existing DeFi protocols and wallet infrastructure to migrate at near-zero cost. More importantly, Arbitrum Orbit allows Robinhood to build a "dedicated chain" that has both independent governance and custom logic (such as compliance review) while sharing the unbreakable security consensus of the Ethereum mainnet.

This is crucial for Robinhood, which needs to meet financial regulatory requirements. It can implement compliance rules on-chain, restrict access permissions for specific wallet addresses, all without leaving Ethereum, the largest pool of capital.

More critically, as early as mid-2025, Robinhood had already been trialing its tokenized stock business on Arbitrum. Launching its own chain on Arbitrum now is a natural progression.

Robinhood's Tokenized Stock Pilot

Prior to the Robinhood Chain testnet launch, Robinhood had been conducting an 8-month "tokenized stock" experiment in the European market.

At the Consensus 2026 conference, Robinhood Crypto General Manager Johann Kerbrat stated that Robinhood had launched about 2,000 tokenized stock and ETF products in the European market, covering mainstream U.S. stocks and ETF products. Future plans include tokenizing private equity, real estate, and artwork to enable 7*24 hour trading and instant settlement.

According to Dune data, as of February 9th, the total value of Robinhood's tokenized stocks is currently $15.1 million, with a cumulative trading volume of $74.43 million. Of course, this scale appears relatively small.

Operational Truth: How Does Robinhood's Tokenized Stock "Put" U.S. Stocks On-Chain?

  • Underlying Architecture: These tokenized stocks were initially issued on Arbitrum and will be fully migrated to Robinhood Chain in the future.

  • Essential Nature: These tokenized stocks are not actual ownership certificates but rather derivative contracts pegged to the price of the underlying stock or ETP. This means the tokens held by users track the performance of the U.S. stock, but the users do not have ownership of the corresponding shares.

  • Issuance and Destruction Mechanism: When a user buys a stock derivative contract on Robinhood, the platform immediately generates a corresponding fungible token on the blockchain. This token represents ownership of this contract, but this token cannot be transferred to others. Once the user closes this contract position, the platform will directly burn the corresponding token on the blockchain. The blockchain is updated immediately, and the token becomes completely invalid.

  • Dividend Pass-Through: Although users do not own the stock, Robinhood achieves dividend pass-through. When the underlying stock pays a dividend, the system automatically distributes the dividend in cash to the investor's account.

  • Compliance Armor: Robinhood's ability to legally launch tokenized stocks in Europe is thanks to its thorough regulatory preparation:

  • In June 2025, Robinhood acquired Bitstamp for $200 million in cash. The core value of this acquisition lies in Bitstamp's Slovenian MiFID Multilateral Trading Facility (MTF) license.

  • In mid-2025, Robinhood obtained the EU MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation) license and a Lithuanian MiFID brokerage license.

Because of this, Robinhood's tokenized stocks are custodied by Bitstamp.

In terms of trading门槛 and fees, the barrier to entry for such tokenized stocks is extremely low, starting from just 1 euro; trading hours cover 5*24 (weekdays 24/5). Users can place advance orders during non-trading hours, which are automatically executed when the market opens. Regarding fees, Robinhood implements a policy of zero trading commissions and zero spreads, charging only a 0.1% foreign exchange fee during transactions, minimizing user trading costs.

The "Second Half" of Financial Democratization

If Robinhood's first half was famous for "zero commission," then the second half is about "eliminating the barriers of time and space."

The core narrative of Robinhood Chain lies in the comprehensive on-chain representation of RWA (Real World Assets). Its significance is reflected in three dimensions:

  • 24/7 Market: Robinhood Chain brings U.S. stocks into Crypto's time dimension, allowing capital flow to no longer be restricted by Wall Street's schedule.

  • Instant Settlement: Faster trade confirmation speeds.

  • Asset Composability: This is the biggest area of imagination. Imagine, in the future, you could not only hold Tesla stock but also deposit it into Aave or Compound protocols as collateral to borrow USDC to buy coffee. The properties of assets are彻底释放 (thoroughly released). Of course, at this stage, stock tokens on Robinhood cannot be transferred to other digital wallets or trading platforms.

  • Permissionless: Robinhood Chain is designed to be permissionless and developer-friendly. Anyone can interact with the network, build applications, and deploy smart contracts.

  • Erosion of Global Investment Barriers: An investor in Southeast Asia can participate in the growth红利 (dividends) of top global companies through Robinhood Chain with extremely low friction costs.

Unavoidable Challenges and Variables

However, the voyage to the new world still faces several "high walls":

  • Legal Ambiguity of Asset Definition: It currently exists in the form of "derivatives" rather than direct tokenization of the underlying securities, leaving a layer of legal opacity.

  • Single Counterparty is Robinhood Europe: Robinhood Europe is the sole counterparty for this financial derivative, and counterparty concentration could pose potential liquidity and credit risks. However, Robinhood's official documents indicate that Robinhood will hedge the risk of its issued U.S. stock derivatives by purchasing U.S. stocks or ETFs on a 1:1 basis.

  • Ecosystem Closedness: Robinhood Chain currently exhibits strong centralized control attributes. Its terms of service clearly state that the platform can随时重置 (reset at any time), restrict, or revoke access permissions for specific wallets. While this design is necessary to meet compliance requirements, it also conflicts with the core spirit of Web3 decentralization, drawing it into the controversy of "imbalance between compliance and decentralization." However, decentralization and compliance are somewhat conflicting, which is understandable. Over the past few months, Robinhood's open-minded approach to tokenized stocks has also been continuously expanding.

  • Resistance from Third-Party Companies: OpenAI previously publicly stated that it "does not recognize" the legality of certain tokenized equities. This exposes the core矛盾 (contradiction) of RWA: the recognition of rights between third-party companies and the asset tokenizer (Robinhood).

Summary

The launch of the Robinhood Chain testnet did not trigger狂欢 (jubilation) in the Crypto industry, but this might also be a revolution of "still waters run deep."

When a giant like Robinhood, deeply entrenched in traditional retail finance, begins to seriously布局 (layout) blockchain and promote the on-chain representation and trading of real-world assets, the clear boundary between traditional finance and crypto finance is gradually being blurred and dissolved.

Whether Robinhood Chain will become a super gateway connecting traditional finance and Web3, or fall into a closed "island" due to excessive focus on compliance, still requires time to tell.

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original article link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7611482

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main reason Robinhood chose Arbitrum as the infrastructure for its new blockchain, Robinhood Chain?

ARobinhood chose Arbitrum because it provides EVM compatibility, allowing for easy migration of existing DeFi protocols and wallet infrastructure. More importantly, Arbitrum Orbit enables Robinhood to build a 'dedicated chain' with independent governance and custom logic (like compliance checks) while still leveraging Ethereum's robust security consensus, which is crucial for meeting financial regulatory requirements.

QWhat is the nature of the tokenized stocks Robinhood has been testing in Europe?

AThe tokenized stocks are not actual ownership certificates of the underlying stocks. Instead, they are derivative contracts whose prices are pegged to the value of the target stocks or ETFs. This means users hold tokens that track the performance of the stocks but do not confer ownership rights.

QHow does Robinhood handle dividends for holders of its tokenized stocks?

ADespite users not owning the actual stocks, Robinhood implements a dividend pass-through mechanism. When the underlying stock pays a dividend, the system automatically distributes the cash equivalent of the dividend to the investor's account.

QWhat regulatory preparations did Robinhood make to legally offer tokenized stocks in Europe?

ARobinhood acquired Bitstamp, which held a Slovenian MiFID Multilateral Trading Facility (MTF) license. Additionally, it secured an EU MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) license and a Lithuanian MiFID brokerage license in mid-2025, enabling it to offer these products compliantly.

QWhat is one of the major criticisms or challenges facing Robinhood Chain regarding its design philosophy?

AA major criticism is its centralized control attributes. The platform's terms of service allow it to reset, restrict, or revoke access to specific wallets at any time. This design, while necessary for compliance, conflicts with the core Web3 principle of decentralization, leading to debates about an imbalance between compliance and decentralization.

Пов'язані матеріали

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit3 хв тому

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit3 хв тому

Unlocking $100 Million in Liquidity? Pump.fun's New Policy Tests the 5-Minute Pump Technique

Foresight News, July 21 – Pump.fun has launched its new "BOOST" mode as the standard launch mechanism for new tokens. The core of BOOST is to address the issue of "dead liquidity." Historically, when a token migrates from its bonding curve to a liquidity pool, roughly 20% of its liquidity becomes permanently locked and unusable, a problem the platform estimates costs over $100 million annually. The new mechanism redirects this 20% of funds, which would have been locked, to instead be used for a 5-minute Time-Weighted Average Price (TWAP) buyback of the token immediately after migration. The purchased tokens are then permanently burned. For example, this means reserving 17.6 SOL for SOL pairs or about $2516 for USDC pairs at migration. This creates a short-term buying pressure and reduces the token's supply. The goal is to improve the immediate post-launch performance of memecoins, potentially increasing trader retention and transaction volume on the platform. However, critics warn this could lower the bar for token launches, encouraging low-quality projects, and that the brief 5-minute buy pressure might lead to sharper price crashes once it ends if followed by large sell-offs.

Foresight News13 хв тому

Unlocking $100 Million in Liquidity? Pump.fun's New Policy Tests the 5-Minute Pump Technique

Foresight News13 хв тому

What Signals Can Be Read from the Trading Data of India's Largest Asset Manager SBI's IPO?

India's largest asset manager, SBI Funds Management, successfully listed on July 21 with a nearly $10 billion IPO, attracting approximately 42 times subscription. However, the first-day closing price rose only about 6.3%, falling short of the 16% premium anticipated in the grey market. This signals robust demand for core Indian financial assets but also disciplined pricing, indicating the IPO market is selectively open for strong brands with clear growth narratives. The low reported underwriting fees, which led some global banks to reduce participation, highlight a shift in pricing power towards powerful issuers like SBI. Its strong brand, banking parent, and stable cash flows reduced reliance on traditional investment banking sales channels, with local brokers playing a larger role. This fee dynamic may not be replicable for weaker issuers. SBI's performance is seen as a key test for India's IPO pipeline, including potential future large listings like Reliance Jio and NSE. Its success with tempered gains sets a new price anchor: high-quality assets can launch, but excessive valuation premiums are constrained. The true measure of a sustained market reopening will be whether subsequent major offerings can proceed smoothly at reasonable valuations.

marsbit31 хв тому

What Signals Can Be Read from the Trading Data of India's Largest Asset Manager SBI's IPO?

marsbit31 хв тому

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

Japan's cabinet has introduced the 2026 Basic Policy on Economic and Fiscal Management and Reform, shifting its primary fiscal target. The new framework moves away from the traditional annual primary balance goal and instead prioritizes a stable reduction of the debt-to-GDP ratio. This change is tied to a strategy of increased "responsible proactive fiscal" spending, aiming to boost long-term growth through investments in strategic sectors like AI, semiconductors, energy, and robotics. The government estimates total public and private investment in 62 key technologies could exceed 370 trillion yen by 2040. The market reaction has been mixed and cautious. While equity markets may respond to policy signals, bond markets are focused on fiscal credibility. Concerns center on whether the weakening of the clear primary balance anchor could lead to looser fiscal discipline. If investors doubt that these strategic investments will generate sufficient productivity gains, tax revenue, and nominal growth to outpace rising interest costs, they may demand higher yields on Japanese Government Bonds (JGBs). Recent volatility in the yen and JGB yields, with the 10-year yield briefly reaching 2.9%, reflects this skepticism. The success of this new framework hinges on two factors: whether Japan can achieve a nominal growth rate consistently higher than its long-term interest rates, and whether future budgets demonstrate disciplined control over bond issuance. The government's narrative is that strategic investment is essential to break Japan's cycle of low growth, aging, and labor shortages. However, the bond market will continuously assess the credibility of this plan, pricing the risk that it may represent fiscal expansion rather than a viable growth strategy.

marsbit40 хв тому

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

marsbit40 хв тому

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit1 год тому

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片