Matrixport Market Watch: Crypto Market Repair Window Opens, Structure and Sentiment Warm Up Simultaneously

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-01-07Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-07

Анотація

Matrixport Market Watch: Crypto Market Enters Recovery Phase with Improving Structure and Sentiment The crypto market has begun 2026 with a positive recovery, as BTC and ETH posted significant gains in the first week. This rebound follows the fading of year-end 2025 selling pressure, particularly from U.S. tax-loss harvesting. Key drivers include the return of normal trading activity post-holidays, the dissipation of concentrated selling, and fresh capital inflows, especially from Asian markets. Macro conditions remain supportive, with the Federal Reserve continuing its rate cut path and lowering the federal funds rate to 3.50%-3.75% by end-2025. Softer inflation and a cooling labor market suggest further monetary easing is possible in 2026. While geopolitical events caused brief risk-off sentiment, they were quickly absorbed as short-term noise. On-chain data indicates strengthening fundamentals: BTC and ETH are experiencing net outflows from exchanges, reducing immediate sell-side pressure; stablecoin market cap is rising again, providing more on-chain liquidity for crypto purchases; and network activity, measured by daily active addresses, is recovering. Derivatives markets signal a clear shift in sentiment from defensive to cautiously optimistic. Implied volatility (IV) has dropped to near two-year lows, indicating lower expectations for extreme near-term price swings. The 25-delta skew for BTC options has turned positive, showing reduced demand for downside protectio...

As the market disturbances of late 2025 gradually recede, the crypto market has welcomed a positive recovery trend in the first week of 2026. Both BTC and ETH recorded considerable gains, with market sentiment and on-chain structure showing signs of recovery from the year-end pressure. This article will analyze the current market phase by combining the macro background, on-chain data, and derivatives market structure.

On the macro level, the core logic of market trading remains the shift in global liquidity expectations. The Federal Reserve continued its interest rate cut path in 2025, lowering the federal funds rate target range to 3.50% - 3.75% by year-end. The sustained cooling of inflation and the job market provides room for further monetary policy easing in 2026.

Although geopolitical events (such as the situation in Venezuela) triggered brief risk-off sentiment at the beginning of the year, the market quickly digested them as short-term emotional disturbances and did not constitute a driver for a trend reversal. Overall, the relatively mild macro policy outlook has created favorable external conditions for the crypto market's recovery.

Market Performance: Tax-Loss Selling Pressure Subsides, Capital Inflow Drives Price Recovery

In the first week of the year, BTC and ETH showed a clear recovery-driven upward trend. BTC rebounded from around 88,000 USDT to above 92,000 USDT, with a year-to-date return of approximately +5%; ETH rose by about +6% over the same period. This movement is the result of the superposition of three forces:

  • End of Holidays: Trading activity returns to normal, and market liquidity recovers.

  • Tax-Loss Selling Pressure Subsides: The concentrated year-end selling pressure from U.S. investors realizing capital gains tax losses, which was released in December, significantly weakened at the beginning of the new year. Historical data shows that the market often rebounds after such selling pressure ends.

  • Capital Inflow: New allocation funds and buying interest from the Asian time zone actively entered the market, absorbing the year-end selling pressure and driving prices upward from the post-pullback consolidation range.

On-Chain Insights: Signs of Supply Tightening and Capital Inflow

Changes in on-chain data provide micro-level evidence for the market's stabilization and recovery: Continued Decline in Exchange Balances: BTC and ETH continue to experience net outflows from centralized exchanges, tightening the supply of chips available for immediate trading in circulation and reducing potential concentrated selling pressure; Stablecoin Supply Rebounds: The total market capitalization of major stablecoins has resumed an upward trajectory, indicating that the "ammunition" available on the market for purchasing crypto assets is more sufficient, providing liquidity support for the market; On-Chain Activity Warms Up: The daily active address count on the Bitcoin and Ethereum networks has rebounded at the beginning of the year, reflecting a gradual recovery in user participation and market sentiment.

Derivatives Signals: Sentiment Shifts from Defense to Tentative Offense

Changes in the derivatives market structure clearly reveal the shift in market sentiment: Implied Volatility (IV) at Low Levels: Short-term option IV has fallen to near two-year lows, indicating low market expectations for extreme volatility in the near term and a trend towards stable sentiment; Skew Structure Significantly Repaired: The 25Δ skew in the options market has rapidly converged, with BTC's skew turning from negative to positive. This means that the demand for downside protection (put option premium) has weakened, while the demand for chasing upside (call option premium) has begun to heat up, shifting market sentiment from defensive to bullish; Open Interest (OI) Concentrated Distribution: A large number of option open interest positions are concentrated around key price levels near the current spot price (such as the $90,000 and $100,000 regions for BTC), which will become important psychological and technical battle axes in the short term.

Product Strategy: Adapting to the Market Phase, Optimizing Risk and Return

Combined with the current market characteristics of "recovery consolidation, direction pending," investors can choose suitable structured product tools based on their own views.

  • Expecting Consolidation: If expecting the market to continue range-bound consolidation, consider strategies like FCN/Dual Currency, which "sell volatility" to obtain fixed coupons within a specific price range, suitable for phases where volatility is falling from highs.

  • Bullish on Buying Dips: If long-term bullish but unwilling to chase highs, discounted Accumulator allows for automatic分批 buying at preset lower levels, with knock-out conditions to control upside risk, suitable for分批布局.

  • Bullish or Hedging: Holding spot and希望 to take profit in batches above, or needing to hedge short-term risks, consider Decumulator/covered call writing, the former can automatically sell in batches, the latter can enhance spot returns and partially lock in the selling price.

  • Need Liquidity: If financing is needed but unwilling to bear margin call risk, non-recourse financing can provide low-interest liquidity without margin call risk, suitable for long-term holders.

In summary, the current market is in a recovery phase following the year-end pullback. Improved macro liquidity expectations, tightening micro on-chain supply, and warming derivatives market sentiment together constitute a偏多 market structure. However, prices have rebounded near key resistance areas. Whether the market can start a new trend仍需观察 the effective breakthrough of the important resistance levels above.

The above content is all from Daniel Yu, Head of Asset Management. This article only represents the author's personal views.

Disclaimer: The market is risky, and investment requires caution. This article does not constitute investment advice. Digital asset trading can be extremely risky and volatile. Investment decisions should be made after careful consideration of personal circumstances and consultation with financial professionals. Matrixport is not responsible for any investment decisions based on the information provided in this content.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat are the three key factors driving the recovery of BTC and ETH in the first week of 2026 according to the article?

AThe three key factors are: 1) The end of the holiday season leading to a return to normal trading activity and liquidity, 2) The significant weakening of tax-loss selling pressure from US investors after its release in December, and 3) The influx of new allocation funds and buying interest from the Asian time zone, pushing prices upward.

QHow does the article describe the change in market sentiment as reflected in the derivatives market?

AThe article states that derivatives market signals show a clear shift from defensive to tentatively bullish sentiment. This is evidenced by low implied volatility (IV), the convergence and positive turn of the 25Δ Skew for BTC (indicating reduced demand for downside protection and increased demand for upside calls), and a concentration of open interest (OI) around key price levels.

QWhat specific on-chain data points are provided as evidence for market stabilization and recovery?

AThe on-chain evidence includes: 1) A continuous net outflow of BTC and ETH from centralized exchanges, making the available supply for immediate trading tighter. 2) A rebound in the total market capitalization of major stablecoins, indicating more 'ammunition' is available to buy crypto assets. 3) A recovery in the daily active address count on the Bitcoin and Ethereum networks, reflecting improved user participation and market sentiment.

QWhat core macro logic is the market trading on, and what is the Fed's policy stance as of the end of 2025?

AThe core macro logic is the shift in global liquidity expectations. The Federal Reserve continued its interest rate cut path in 2025, lowering the federal funds rate target range to 3.50% - 3.75% by the end of the year, with the potential for further monetary policy easing in 2026 due to cooling inflation and the job market.

QFor an investor who is 'Bullish but wants to buy on dips', which structured product strategy does the article suggest?

AThe article suggests the 'Discounted Accumulator' strategy for investors who are long-term bullish but unwilling to buy at high prices. It allows for automatic分批 (batch) buying at pre-set lower price levels and includes a knock-out condition to control upside risk, making it suitable for布局 (position building) in batches.

Пов'язані матеріали

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

Vitalik Buterin's recent algorithmic stablecoin proposal envisions using an option-like mechanism to create a stablecoin without the liquidation risks inherent in traditional collateralized debt position (CDP) models. The design splits one unit of ETH into two components: a 'stable' leg (P) that maintains value up to a certain strike price, and an 'upside' leg (N) that captures any appreciation above that price. Together, they always sum to one ETH, eliminating the need for debt or liquidation mechanisms. From an options perspective, the stable leg essentially functions as a synthetic, covered call position. However, significant challenges exist. For the stable asset to maintain its peg, it must continuously roll deep in-the-money call options, leading to potential rollover slippage, predictable trading paths vulnerable to front-running, and liquidity issues. Crucially, the system's scalability depends on a constant demand for the upside leg—a form of leveraged ETH long position without funding rates or liquidation risk. It's unclear if such persistent, specific demand will materialize from speculators or market makers who have simpler alternatives like perpetual swaps. The author, drawing from experience with Rysk, argues that DeFi options have struggled as standalone trading products due to complexity and fragmented liquidity. Their potential lies instead as foundational infrastructure underpinning more complex financial primitives like stablecoins, structured yields, or index products—transforming from a direct product into a core pricing and risk distribution engine for the next generation of on-chain finance.

marsbit19 хв тому

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

marsbit19 хв тому

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit3 год тому

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit3 год тому

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit3 год тому

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit3 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片