Is altseason finally brewing? Only if THESE 2 indicators flip first

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-02-03Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-03

Анотація

Hopes for an altcoin season in 2026 are building as investors look beyond Bitcoin, but conditions for a full altcoin rally are not yet firmly in place. Two key indicators need to flip first. The latest ISM Manufacturing PMI reached 52.6%, its highest in nearly 40 months, pushing U.S. manufacturing into expansion territory. Historically, altcoin rallies followed periods when ISM moved decisively higher, particularly above the 55 mark, as seen in 2017 and 2021. While current levels are below that threshold, a potential turning point may be emerging. However, Ethereum (ETH), a known harbinger of altseason, has closed in the red for 12 of the last 15 months, showing a prolonged stretch of weakness with uneven gains and frequent drawdowns. Sustained altseasons have almost always followed a clear and consistent uptrend in Ethereum. Furthermore, the Altcoin Season Index from CoinGlass was at 39, below the level that usually indicates a rotation away from Bitcoin. At the same time, Bitcoin dominance (BTC.D) remained high near 60% on the daily chart. Altseasons typically begin with a clear decline in BTC dominance as investors move down the risk curve, a shift that has not yet occurred. Overall, while altseason expectations are growing, they may be premature. Early macro signals are improving, but the market lacks a trigger for a true altseason, and capital remains firmly in Bitcoin.

Hopes for an altcoin season in 2026 are starting to build, with investors beginning to look beyond Bitcoin.

That said, it may still be too soon to call it. While expectations are rising, the conditions needed for a full altcoin rally are not firmly in place yet.

Altseason within sight?

The latest ISM Manufacturing PMI came in at 52.6%, its highest reading in nearly 40 months. This pushed U.S. manufacturing back into expansion territory.

Source: X

Past altcoin rallies have tended to follow periods when ISM moved decisively higher. In both 2017 and 2021, altseasons took shape only after PMI readings climbed above the 55 mark.

While current levels remain below that threshold, it looks like a potential turning point may be in order.

But that’s not all…

Ethereum [ETH] – famously known as a harbinger of altseason – has closed in the red in 12 of the last 15 months with a prolonged stretch of weakness.

Source: X

The monthly returns chart makes this slowdown obvious, showing uneven gains with frequent drawdowns across 2024 and into early 2026. Even during brief comebacks, follow-through has been limited.

This is important. Sustained altseasons have almost always followed a clear and consistent uptrend in Ethereum.

Altcoin signs look weak

Source: CoinGlass

CoinGlass’ Altcoin Season Index was at 39 at the time of writing, below the level that usually indicates a rotation away from Bitcoin [BTC]. Despite growing macro optimism, capital has yet to flow into altcoins on a larger scale.

Source: TradingView

At the same time, BTC.D was close to 60% on the daily chart.

Altseasons usually started with a clear decline in BTC dominance, with investors moving down the risk curve. For now, that shift has not yet happened.

Overall, while altseason expectations are beginning to fire up, they may very well be premature. Only time will tell.

Final Thoughts

Early macro signals are improving, but the market lacks a trigger for a true altseason.
With altcoin season index at 39, capital is still firmly in Bitcoin.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat are the two key indicators that need to flip for an altseason to begin according to the article?

AThe two key indicators are the ISM Manufacturing PMI rising above the 55 mark and a clear decline in Bitcoin dominance (BTC.D) as capital flows into altcoins.

QWhat was the current reading of the Altcoin Season Index mentioned in the article, and what does it indicate?

AThe Altcoin Season Index was at 39 at the time of writing, indicating that capital is still firmly in Bitcoin and below the level that usually signals a rotation into altcoins.

QHow has Ethereum's performance been described in relation to predicting altseasons?

AEthereum has closed in the red in 12 of the last 15 months with prolonged weakness, and sustained altseasons have almost always followed a clear and consistent uptrend in Ethereum's price.

QWhat significant level did the latest ISM Manufacturing PMI reach, and why is this important for altcoins?

AThe latest ISM Manufacturing PMI came in at 52.6%, its highest reading in nearly 40 months, pushing U.S. manufacturing into expansion territory. Past altcoin rallies have followed periods when ISM moved decisively higher, particularly above 55.

QWhat is the current state of Bitcoin dominance (BTC.D) and its implication for an altseason?

ABTC.D was close to 60% on the daily chart, indicating that the shift of investors moving down the risk curve into altcoins has not yet happened, which is necessary for an altseason to start.

Пов'язані матеріали

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

"The Inevitable Cycle: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup – What is Ethereum's Endgame?" For years, the Ethereum community grappled with concerns that L2s were fragmenting the ecosystem and eroding L1's value. While L2s provided cheaper execution, they also splintered liquidity and the unified user experience of a single chain. This has prompted a fundamental reassessment of the relationship between L1 and L2. Ethereum's roadmap is evolving. The "Scale" initiative merges L1 and L2 expansion into a holistic framework. L1 itself is advancing with higher gas limits, statelessness, and zkEVM verification, no longer content to be just a low-throughput settlement layer. Consequently, the primary value proposition of L2s is shifting from merely providing cheap blockspace to offering L1 cannot easily provide: application-specific optimizations, privacy features, and flexible governance models. L2s are becoming a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum. A critical challenge in this multi-chain future is interoperability. The vision is to make Ethereum "feel like one chain again." This relies on advancements in native account abstraction (like EIP-7702) and intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), where users declare desired outcomes, and solvers handle the complex cross-chain execution. Furthermore, shortening Ethereum's finality time from minutes to seconds is crucial, as it underpins trust between chains for bridges, stablecoins, and cross-chain applications. Perhaps the most provocative idea is that Ethereum L1 itself could become a form of "its own Rollup." As zkEVM and proof systems mature, high-performance nodes could execute transactions and generate validity proofs. Regular validators would then verify these proofs instead of re-executing all transactions. This blurs the traditional L1/L2 hierarchy, making "Rollup" more of a general execution-verification architecture. Native Rollup aims to integrate L2 validation more directly into the Ethereum protocol, allowing L2s to inherit L1's security more fully and move away from reliance on security councils. In the end, L2s are not destined to replace L1 or be made obsolete by it. The likely future is a unified system where diverse execution environments—each optimized for specific use cases like DeFi, gaming, or privacy—coexist. They will share a common foundation of security, liquidity, and verifiable state, seamlessly connected to restore a cohesive user experience. The next phase for Ethereum is not just about scaling through separation, but about intelligently reintegrating what was separated back into a coherent whole.

链捕手9 хв тому

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

链捕手9 хв тому

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit36 хв тому

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit36 хв тому

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit51 хв тому

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit51 хв тому

United Stables Crosses $1B As Chainlink Data Feeds Secure U Token Collateral

United Stables' U token has surpassed $1 billion in market capitalization, with Chainlink Data Feeds providing the critical pricing and collateral data infrastructure across its deployment chains. This milestone highlights that robust oracle infrastructure is essential for stablecoin credibility, as DeFi protocols require reliable data for integration. Chainlink's role is foundational, enabling automated collateral auditing and pricing verification, which helps make the U token safer for the broader market to evaluate and use. While this strengthens Chainlink's position in the stablecoin infrastructure narrative, it does not directly guarantee increased fees or value for LINK token holders. The growth of U indicates both widening competition in the stablecoin sector and the increasing dependence of scalable stablecoins on dependable external data services.

bitcoinist2 год тому

United Stables Crosses $1B As Chainlink Data Feeds Secure U Token Collateral

bitcoinist2 год тому

BonkDAO Treasury Drain Shows Solana Governance Risk Is Real

The BonkDAO treasury suffered an approximately $20 million drain due to a malicious governance proposal passed through the Realms platform on Solana. This incident highlights governance as a critical attack surface for DAOs, distinct from smart contract exploits. The attack leveraged the DAO's own voting mechanics to move funds, demonstrating that flawed governance design—such as weak proposal rules or voter weight calculations—can be exploited even when the underlying blockchain functions correctly. The event serves as a warning for Solana DAOs to rigorously review and strengthen their governance safeguards, including quorum thresholds, timelocks, and execution permissions. While damaging to community trust, especially for the prominent BONK meme ecosystem, the issue is not a failure of the Solana base layer but a widespread application-level risk common across blockchain ecosystems.

bitcoinist2 год тому

BonkDAO Treasury Drain Shows Solana Governance Risk Is Real

bitcoinist2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот