Hyperliquid price prediction – HYPE eyes $38, but watch THIS golden pocket first

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-03-01Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-01

Анотація

Hyperliquid (HYPE) has shown bullish strength, rallying 19.73% after hitting a low of $25.63. The token's market structure is bullish, with key support holding at the $25 demand zone. A break below $23.4 or $20 would signal a bearish shift. The daily chart indicates a bullish structure since late January, with a retracement to the 61.8% Fibonacci level providing a buying opportunity. Although volume and momentum indicators appear neutral or slightly bearish, price action remains the leading signal. Traders are advised to watch for a retest of the golden pocket zone between $27.27 and $28.17 for an optimal long entry. Key upside targets are $38 and $42. A drop below $26.1 would invalidate the short-term bullish outlook. Overall, HYPE exhibits bullish bias, and a pullback to the $28 region may present a buying opportunity.

Hyperliquid [HYPE] exhibited bullish strength in recent trading days. Last week, HYPE dropped to a low of $25.63 on Monday, the 23rd of February. Since then, the DEX token has rallied by 19.73%.

AMBCrypto had reported that the pullback to the $25 demand zone was a buying opportunity.

A move below $23.4 and $20 would be the warning signs to exit long positions. These levels remain untouched by the bears, showing HYPE strength.

The underlying market fundamentals were strong, and the longer-term Hyperliquid price action had a bullish bias. Here’s what traders can expect the following week.

Mapping the HYPE short-term price trends

The 1-day chart saw a bullish swing structure shift (orange) toward the end of January. The subsequent retracement reached the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement level. From this support, the internal structure break (green) occurred.

The price action was aligning with the bulls. It was the time to buy, though the daily timeframe indicators reflected a neutral bias or even bearishness.

The CMF was at 0 (zero), while the A/D indicator was unable to reach new highs. Together, the volume indicators signaled a lack of buying strength. Meanwhile, the Awesome Oscillator was moving below the zero line.

Yet, traders should remember that the price action leads while most indicators follow, or lag.

Traders’ call to action – Buy!

Though maybe not immediately. The H1 swing structure was bullish, and the price was receding from the $31 local highs.

The golden pocket from $27.27 to $28.17 was mapped using the lower timeframe’s swing move.

A retest of this region would present an ideal buying opportunity. The next price targets were $38 and $42.

For the upcoming week, a retracement into the Fibonacci golden pocket and a bullish price reaction are expected for HYPE. On the other hand, a drop below $26.1 would invalidate the short-term bullish setup.

Final Summary

Hyperliquid has a bullish market structure across the higher and lower timeframe price charts.
A pullback below $28 over the next week could present a buying opportunity for traders.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion.

Трендові криптовалюти

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

PancakeSwapCAKE

JUSTJST

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the low price of Hyperliquid (HYPE) on Monday, February 23rd, and what was the subsequent rally percentage?

AThe low price was $25.63, and the subsequent rally was 19.73%.

QAccording to the article, what are the two key warning levels that would signal a need to exit long positions?

AA move below $23.4 and $20 would be the warning signs to exit long positions.

QWhat specific price zone is identified as the 'golden pocket' and a potential buying opportunity?

AThe golden pocket, identified as a potential buying opportunity, is the price region from $27.27 to $28.17.

QWhat are the two next price targets mentioned for HYPE if the bullish setup remains valid?

AThe next price targets mentioned are $38 and $42.

QWhat price level would invalidate the short-term bullish setup for HYPE?

AA drop below $26.1 would invalidate the short-term bullish setup.

Пов'язані матеріали

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

South Korean cryptocurrency exchange Upbit moved a total of 864 billion SHIB (worth approximately $4 million) between its internal wallet addresses. The activity, involving transfers of 384 billion SHIB outbound and 480 billion SHIB inbound, occurred following a 36% SHIB price rally. On-chain data indicates this was a routine internal wallet rebalancing operation by the exchange, not a sell-off or liquidation event. The article cautions that while large on-chain transfers are highly visible, they require proper context and wallet labeling to interpret correctly. In this case, the movement between known Upbit addresses does not inherently signal a change in market supply or selling pressure for SHIB.

bitcoinist47 хв тому

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

bitcoinist47 хв тому

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

This article introduces a novel training paradigm for generative models called Explorative Modeling (XM), which enables true end-to-end training. Traditionally, powerful generative models like autoregressive and diffusion models are not trained end-to-end. They are trained to predict a single small step but require iterative multi-step sampling for inference. This "exposure bias" leads to error accumulation and limits performance. The core challenge XM addresses is "mode blurring." In generative tasks, a single input (e.g., "generate a dog") corresponds to many valid outputs (multiple modes). Standard training objectives like reconstruction loss force the model to average these modes, producing unrealistic, blurry outputs. To avoid this, existing models break generation into many small, almost deterministic steps, sacrificing end-to-end training. XM tackles this by restructuring the training loop itself. Its key insight is to amplify "generative expressivity." For each training input, instead of generating one sample, the model generates K candidate outputs. Only the candidate closest to the real data is used for computing the loss and updating the model via backpropagation. This simple "best-of-K" mechanism is implemented as a short for-loop. By exploring multiple possibilities, the model learns to distribute its guesses across different modes rather than collapsing to their uninformative average. The paper demonstrates that "exploration" acts as a new, powerful scaling axis. Gains from XM increase with model size, data scale, and compute. Experiments show improvements in FID scores for image generation and significant efficiency gains, sometimes outperforming larger models without exploration. When pushed to the limit, XM enables fully single-step, end-to-end generative models. In robotics tasks, an "Explorative Policy" matched the performance of a 100-step Diffusion Policy with a single forward pass, drastically improving inference speed. While the best-of-K concept is not entirely new, the authors' contribution lies in formally understanding it as a direct method to boost generative expressivity without fragmenting the generation process. This work suggests that as models scale, enhancing exploration during training may become crucial for overcoming fundamental performance bottlenecks.

marsbit47 хв тому

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

marsbit47 хв тому

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) 2027 has introduced a new submission rule limiting authors to a maximum of 20 papers per conference. This policy, announced due to a 68% surge in submissions for ICLR 2026 that strained the review system, aims to ensure fair and informative peer review. Google DeepMind researcher Dan Roy responded with a sarcastic petition on X, calling the 20-paper cap "absurd" and claiming it would slow AI progress. His post mockingly argued that AI agents can now produce incremental research and that large language models (LLMs) already handle all reviewing, so output should be maximized. This satire critiques the broader trend of AI's role in academia, referencing a 2025 study that found about 21% of ICLR 2026 reviews were likely fully AI-generated. Roy's underlying point questions whether simply capping submissions addresses the systemic issue of AI potentially flooding conferences with agent-written papers and AI-assisted reviews. The debate highlights tensions between managing submission volume and maintaining research quality as AI tools become pervasive.

marsbit52 хв тому

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

marsbit52 хв тому

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

A security vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets led to the theft of 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $89 million) from 4,585 addresses, according to Galaxy Research. The flaw, caused by insufficient randomness in seed phrase generation for specific firmware versions, triggered a massive migration of funds as users moved assets to new, secure wallets. This event caused the largest on-chain movement of small Bitcoin transactions since the FTX collapse, distorting key market indicators like active addresses and exchange deposits, and significantly dampening market sentiment. The incident also highlighted challenges in cybersecurity investigations, as researchers reported that safety guardrails on mainstream U.S. AI models hindered the analysis of attack patterns, forcing them to use an open-source Chinese AI model for forensic work. This underscores a dilemma in balancing AI security restrictions with the need for rapid response in tracing stolen crypto assets.

marsbit1 год тому

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

marsbit1 год тому

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbit2 год тому

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School