Hundreds of Wallets Drained on EVM Chains With No Root Cause, ZachXBT Warns — $107K Lost So Far and Counting

ccn.comОпубліковано о 2026-01-02Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-02

Анотація

Blockchain investigator ZachXBT warns of a coordinated attack draining hundreds of crypto wallets across multiple Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM)-compatible chains, with no confirmed root cause yet identified. The incident has resulted in approximately $107,000 in losses so far, with the total continuing to rise. Each affected wallet lost relatively small amounts, typically under $2,000, suggesting a broad but low-value attack designed to avoid detection. ZachXBT flagged a suspicious address potentially linked to the activity. This follows a separate security incident over the Christmas holiday involving unauthorized withdrawals from self-custody wallets, which Trust Wallet later confirmed was related to its Browser Extension version 2.68. These incidents highlight ongoing security risks in the EVM ecosystem, despite long-term efforts to strengthen network resilience, such as the Ethereum Foundation's "Lean Ethereum" initiative aimed at improving security and scalability.

Hundreds of crypto wallets across multiple Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM)-compatible chains are being drained in a coordinated attack with no confirmed root cause, according to blockchain investigator ZachXBT.

The wave of attacks has raised renewed concerns over security risks across the Ethereum ecosystem, even as developers continue to explore ways to strengthen the network’s long-term resilience.

Try Our Recommended Crypto Exchanges
Sponsored
Disclosure
We sometimes use affiliate links in our content, when clicking on those we might receive a commission at no extra cost to you. By using this website you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy.
"}' data-trk="68df7fd8872238d510dfbf06" href="https://clicks.pipaffiliates.com/c?c=1104900&l=en&p=1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
XM.com<\/h3>"}' data-trk="68df7fd8872238d510dfbf06" href="https://clicks.pipaffiliates.com/c?c=1104900&l=en&p=1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

XM.com

promotions
Get 100% Bonus up to $100 on your first Deposit.<\/strong>"}' data-trk="68df7fd8872238d510dfbf06" href="https://clicks.pipaffiliates.com/c?c=1104900&l=en&p=1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Get 100% Bonus up to $100 on your first Deposit.
Coins
28
Claim Offer
"}' data-trk="6899b9831836d97539c51aa6" href="https://www.bitunix.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
Bitunix<\/h3>"}' data-trk="6899b9831836d97539c51aa6" href="https://www.bitunix.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

Bitunix

promotions
Receive up to $100,000 worth of exclusive gifts for newcomers upon registration.<\/strong>"}' data-trk="6899b9831836d97539c51aa6" href="https://www.bitunix.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Receive up to $100,000 worth of exclusive gifts for newcomers upon registration.
Coins
151
Claim Offer
"}' data-trk="67adf8d4f12aaec7e4808bf5" href="https://bonus.bitget.com/CCN12" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
Bitget<\/h3>"}' data-trk="67adf8d4f12aaec7e4808bf5" href="https://bonus.bitget.com/CCN12" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

Bitget

promotions
Earn rewards worth up to 5,000 USDT on your first deposit<\/strong>"}' data-trk="67adf8d4f12aaec7e4808bf5" href="https://bonus.bitget.com/CCN12" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Earn rewards worth up to 5,000 USDT on your first deposit
Coins
88
Claim Offer

Unknown Hack on EVM Chains

The incident has so far resulted in losses of about $107,000, with the total still increasing, ZachXBT said on Thursday.

Each affected wallet has lost relatively small amounts — typically less than $2,000 — suggesting a broad but low-value attack that may have been designed to avoid early detection.

“It appears hundreds of wallets are currently being drained on various EVM chains for small amounts per victim, with a root cause not yet identified,” ZachXBT said.

He flagged a suspicious address — 0xAc2e5153170278e24667a580baEa056ad8Bf9bFB — as potentially linked to the activity.

No protocol has publicly acknowledged responsibility for the losses, and affected users span multiple blockchains that share Ethereum’s EVM architecture.

Holiday Hacks

The latest EVM chain wallet drains follow a separate security incident reported over the Christmas holiday, when a growing number of users flagged unauthorized withdrawals from self-custody wallets across multiple blockchains.

The issue was first publicly raised on Christmas Day by ZachXBT, who said he had received multiple independent reports from affected users and issued a community alert.

Within hours, the warning spread across Telegram and X, prompting concern among wallet users and security researchers.

“A number of Trust Wallet users have reported that funds were drained from wallet addresses within the past couple of hours,” ZachXBT wrote on Telegram.

He added that while the root cause had not yet been determined, the reports closely followed a recent update to the Trust Wallet Chrome browser extension.

ZachXBT cautioned that timing alone did not establish causation.

At the time, no immediate official security advisory had been issued.

Trust Wallet later released a statement confirming a security incident affecting Trust Wallet Browser Extension version 2.68.

“We understand how concerning this is and our team is actively working on the issue,” the company said.

Balancer Exploit

In November, decentralized exchange protocol Balancer suffered one of the largest DeFi exploits of the year, losing nearly $117 million after attackers drained multiple liquidity pools in rapid succession.

On-chain data showed the stolen tokens were quickly consolidated into a newly created wallet controlled by the attacker.

The Balancer hack’s stolen assets. Source: Lookonchain

Balancer later confirmed the breach stemmed from a faulty access control check in its V2 smart contracts.

The flaw allowed an attacker to bypass permission checks by supplying a malicious op.sender parameter, enabling unauthorized withdrawals from internal balances.

The exploit primarily affected older Balancer V2 pools, including those holding staked ether derivatives, and may have exposed more than $60 million in downstream protocols that relied on the same code.

Researchers Long-term Security

The latest incidents highlight ongoing security risks across the EVM ecosystem, even as Ethereum researchers outline long-term plans to harden execution.

In August, Ethereum Foundation researcher Justin Drake detailed an initiative known as “Lean Ethereum,” a proposal aimed at making the network faster and more secure.

“Ethereum is unique,” Drake wrote in a series of blog posts, citing the network’s uninterrupted uptime since launch and the scale of economic security secured by staked ether.

“Lean Ethereum is more than a blueprint for hardening and scaling Ethereum,” he wrote.

“More than just doubling down on security, decentralization, and cutting-edge cryptography. It is an aesthetic,” Drake writes.

Drake has argued that while quantum computers cannot yet break blockchain cryptography, advances over the coming decade could pose risks if networks fail to prepare.

His proposal includes new cryptographic techniques designed to make Ethereum quantum-resistant while also improving scalability.

Under the proposal, Ethereum’s main execution layer could eventually handle around 10,000 transactions per second.

Drake has suggested that real-time zero-knowledge virtual machines and advanced data availability techniques could play a central role.

Top Picks for Ethereum
  • Best Exchanges for Ethereum Get A Great Offer When You Join These Exchanges
  • Buy Ethereum Fast & Easy How To Buy Ethereum With a Credit Card Now
  • Best Online Casinos for Ethereum See Our Picks for the Best Crypto Gambling Sites

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the estimated total loss from the coordinated attack on EVM-compatible chains as reported by ZachXBT?

AThe estimated total loss is about $107,000, and the amount is still increasing.

QWhat is the suspected address linked to the wallet draining activity on EVM chains?

AThe suspicious address flagged by ZachXBT is 0xAc2e5153170278e24667a580baEa056ad8Bf9bFB.

QWhich wallet extension was implicated in a separate security incident over the Christmas holiday?

AThe Trust Wallet Browser Extension, specifically version 2.68, was implicated in a security incident over the Christmas holiday.

QWhat was the root cause of the Balancer exploit that occurred in November?

AThe Balancer exploit was caused by a faulty access control check in its V2 smart contracts, allowing an attacker to bypass permission checks with a malicious op.sender parameter.

QWhat is the name of the Ethereum Foundation researcher's initiative aimed at making the network more secure and scalable?

AThe initiative is called 'Lean Ethereum,' proposed by Ethereum Foundation researcher Justin Drake to harden security and improve scalability.

Пов'язані матеріали

Will the Next Crypto Bull Run Start with On-Chain Trading of SpaceX?

This article presents a scenario-based forecast for the crypto industry from 2026 to 2029, arguing that the next major cycle will be driven not by technological narratives but by legal access to real-world assets. The author predicts that by mid-2026, pre-IPO perpetual contracts for top private companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic on platforms like Hyperliquid will become the primary gateway for accessing quality assets, as most crypto-native tokens fail to capture real value. The much-hyped AI x Crypto intersection largely fails except for prediction markets, which thrive on betting on AI model supremacy. By 2027, public blockchain foundations are forced to choose between catering to retail speculation or building compliant infrastructure for institutions, with many opting for the latter. Growth in stablecoins and tokenized private credit/equity hits a "triple ceiling" due to regulatory and political uncertainty rather than market demand. The pivotal shift is forecast for 2028. A major liquidation event in pre-IPO perpetuals exposes the structural flaw of synthetic markets lacking a real underlying asset anchor. In response, regulatory changes finally allow the public solicitation of private securities resales to verified accredited investors. This creates a legitimate secondary market for real company equity, which then becomes the core asset class of the new bull market, relegating synthetic perps to a niche role. By 2029, the industry becomes "boring" but foundational. Tokens without claims on real cash flows or assets cease trading. Stablecoin growth is steady but politically capped. Crypto infrastructure fades from view as it gets absorbed into traditional finance backends. The article's central thesis is that the key bottleneck for crypto's next phase is legal and regulatory channels for real asset ownership, not technology.

marsbit59 хв тому

Will the Next Crypto Bull Run Start with On-Chain Trading of SpaceX?

marsbit59 хв тому

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbit7 год тому

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

marsbit7 год тому

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手7 год тому

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

链捕手7 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片