Hong Kong Prepares To Grant Limited Batch Of Stablecoin Licenses In March – Report

bitcoinistОпубліковано о 2026-02-03Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-03

Анотація

Hong Kong's financial authorities, led by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), are preparing to issue the first limited batch of stablecoin issuer licenses in March. Chief Executive Eddie Yue confirmed that a "very small number" of licenses will be granted after the review process for applications nears completion. Over 30 companies, including Ant Group's overseas arm, have applied since the Stablecoins Ordinance was enacted in August, requiring any issuer of fiat-referenced stablecoins in Hong Kong to be licensed. The HKMA is focusing on use cases, risk management, AML measures, and asset backing. This move is part of Hong Kong's broader strategy to become a regulated global crypto hub, despite potential challenges from mainland China's strict stance against stablecoins.

Hong Kong financial authorities have announced that they will soon grant the first, limited batch of stablecoin provider licenses as the review process for applications is almost completed.

HKMA To Grant Limited Stablecoin Licenses Soon

On Monday, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA)’s Chief Executive, Eddie Yue, announced that the regulatory agency is preparing to grant the first batch of the highly anticipated stablecoin licenses next month.

At a Legislative Council meeting, Yue affirmed that the financial authority expects to issue a “very small number” of stablecoin issuer licenses in March, according to a Reuters report.

In August, the HKMA enacted the Stablecoins Ordinance, which directs any individual or entity seeking to issue any fiat-referenced stablecoin (FRS) in Hong Kong, or any Hong Kong Dollar (HKD)-denominated token, to obtain a license from the regulator.

Local news outlets have reported that more than 30 companies have applied for the license, including the overseas arm of Chinese mainland financial technology giant Ant Group and logistics technology firm Reitar Logtech.

In December, legal experts suggested that Hong Kong’s ambitions to become a key regulated hub for stablecoins could be clouded by the People’s Bank of China’s explicit crackdown on the sector.

As reported by Bitcoinist, top financial regulators affirmed that stablecoins don’t qualify as legal tender in the mainland, which could delay the original early 2026 schedule and affect the HKMA’s approval of projects involving the yuan or mainland Chinese institutions.

Nonetheless, Hong Kong’s Financial Secretary, Paul Chan Mo-po, recently confirmed the regulators’ plan to grant stablecoin issuers licenses in the first quarter of the year at the World Economic Forum in Davos.

During a Monday media briefing, HKMA’s Chief Executive reportedly noted that their application review process is near its completion. Yue also highlighted that the regulator is focusing on use cases, risk management, anti-money laundering (AML) measures, and asset backing.

Moreover, he asserted that licensed issuers must comply with local regulations for cross-border activities, but added that “mutual recognition arrangements with other jurisdictions could be explored in the future.”

Hong Kong Continues Crypto Regulation Efforts

Hong Kong has been actively developing a comprehensive framework to support the expansion of the digital assets industry as part of its long-term strategy to become a global crypto hub.

Notably, financial authorities have been exploring rules to enable insurance companies to invest in cryptocurrencies and the infrastructure sector. In addition, the jurisdiction is among the 76 markets committed to implementing the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (OECD) new global standard for exchanging tax information related to crypto assets.

The upcoming crypto reporting framework, the Crypto Asset Reporting Framework (CARF), is intended to bring crypto users across borders under global tax transparency rules, thereby preventing tax evasion. Hong Kong is set to begin its first cross-border exchanges of crypto reporting data in 2028.

However, the Hong Kong Securities & Futures Professionals Association (HKSFPA) has expressed its concerns about the implementation of the OECD’s CARF and the related amendments made to Hong Kong’s Common Reporting Standard (CRS).

The group noted that it mostly supports the proposals, but urged regulators to ease the record-keeping requirements for dissolved entities and the uncapped per-account penalties for minor technical errors. The Professionals Association warned that these elements of the CARF and CRS amendments could create operational and liability risks for market participants.

Bitcoin (BTC) trades at $78,055 in the one-week chart. Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView

Пов'язані питання

QWhen is the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) preparing to grant the first batch of stablecoin licenses?

AThe HKMA is preparing to grant the first batch of stablecoin licenses in March.

QWhat is the name of the ordinance that requires a license to issue fiat-referenced stablecoins in Hong Kong?

AThe ordinance is called the Stablecoins Ordinance.

QWhich two companies were mentioned as having applied for a stablecoin license in Hong Kong?

AThe overseas arm of Ant Group and the logistics technology firm Reitar Logtech were mentioned as applicants.

QWhat potential challenge to Hong Kong's stablecoin hub ambitions was raised by legal experts in December?

ALegal experts suggested that the People's Bank of China's explicit crackdown on the stablecoin sector could cloud Hong Kong's ambitions.

QWhat new global standard for crypto tax information is Hong Kong committed to implementing?

AHong Kong is committed to implementing the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (OECD) Crypto Asset Reporting Framework (CARF).

Пов'язані матеріали

Will the Next Crypto Bull Run Start with On-Chain Trading of SpaceX?

This article presents a scenario-based forecast for the crypto industry from 2026 to 2029, arguing that the next major cycle will be driven not by technological narratives but by legal access to real-world assets. The author predicts that by mid-2026, pre-IPO perpetual contracts for top private companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic on platforms like Hyperliquid will become the primary gateway for accessing quality assets, as most crypto-native tokens fail to capture real value. The much-hyped AI x Crypto intersection largely fails except for prediction markets, which thrive on betting on AI model supremacy. By 2027, public blockchain foundations are forced to choose between catering to retail speculation or building compliant infrastructure for institutions, with many opting for the latter. Growth in stablecoins and tokenized private credit/equity hits a "triple ceiling" due to regulatory and political uncertainty rather than market demand. The pivotal shift is forecast for 2028. A major liquidation event in pre-IPO perpetuals exposes the structural flaw of synthetic markets lacking a real underlying asset anchor. In response, regulatory changes finally allow the public solicitation of private securities resales to verified accredited investors. This creates a legitimate secondary market for real company equity, which then becomes the core asset class of the new bull market, relegating synthetic perps to a niche role. By 2029, the industry becomes "boring" but foundational. Tokens without claims on real cash flows or assets cease trading. Stablecoin growth is steady but politically capped. Crypto infrastructure fades from view as it gets absorbed into traditional finance backends. The article's central thesis is that the key bottleneck for crypto's next phase is legal and regulatory channels for real asset ownership, not technology.

marsbit8 хв тому

Will the Next Crypto Bull Run Start with On-Chain Trading of SpaceX?

marsbit8 хв тому

Kalshi-CFTC Fight In New Mexico Could Shape Prediction Market Rules

A jurisdictional battle between the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the state of New Mexico over the regulation of prediction markets could set national rules for the industry. At issue is who polices platforms like Kalshi, with the CFTC asserting federal oversight and New Mexico arguing state gaming and consumer protection laws apply, especially for contracts resembling wagers on events like elections or sports. The outcome will determine if prediction markets can scale nationally under a clear federal framework or face a fragmented, state-by-state regulatory landscape. This dispute is significant for the crypto-adjacent trading community, which often engages with these speculative event markets. A clearer rulebook could boost mainstream adoption, liquidity, and integration with crypto infrastructure, while a state-led challenge could stifle growth. The case is particularly sensitive for sports-related contracts, where the line between financial markets and gambling blurs. Ultimately, this legal fight will shape whether prediction markets become a scalable national product or remain constrained by jurisdictional conflicts.

bitcoinist1 год тому

Kalshi-CFTC Fight In New Mexico Could Shape Prediction Market Rules

bitcoinist1 год тому

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbit6 год тому

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手6 год тому

Why Is Nvidia Borrowing $20 Billion When It's Not Short of Cash?

Nvidia's recent announcement to issue at least $20 billion in senior notes, despite holding a strong cash position with over $48.6 billion in free cash flow last quarter, is not a sign of financial need. Instead, it represents a strategic move to leverage its high credit rating (recently upgraded to AA by S&P) to secure low-cost, long-term debt. This capital will support long-term AI infrastructure investments, data centers, R&D, supply chain prepayments, and strategic investments, while allowing the company to continue aggressive shareholder returns through stock buybacks and dividends. The decision reflects a mature capital management strategy: using debt to finance long-term growth assets is more efficient and less dilutive to shareholders than equity financing. It signals that Nvidia, like other tech giants (Alphabet, Meta, Amazon), is entering a new phase of heavy AI capital expenditure, shifting from a pure growth story to a story about capital allocation, credit strength, and long-term ecosystem positioning. The key question for investors is whether Nvidia can maintain its high cash flow generation and ensure that returns from these AI investments justify the cost of capital over the long term. The bond issuance amplifies its expansion capabilities but also ties its valuation more closely to the broader AI investment cycle's sustainability and profitability.

marsbit7 год тому

Why Is Nvidia Borrowing $20 Billion When It's Not Short of Cash?

marsbit7 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси