Fireblocks claims 99% of EU companies support cryptocurrency regulations amid accelerated funding

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2026-08-04Востаннє оновлено о 2026-08-04

Анотація

Fireblocks' "Financial Grid 2026" survey of over 600 senior executives reveals that 99% of EU and 100% of UK financial institutions believe regulation will boost digital asset adoption. The key difference lies in implementation. The EU's clear MiCA framework has led 53% of continental institutions to already allocate funds, compared to 36% in the UK where regulations are still developing. Regulatory clarity shapes priorities. EU firms see operational hurdles like fiat connectivity as the main barrier, while UK firms are more concerned about legacy technology limitations (71%). Both markets prioritize real-time, 24/7 payments and settlements. Europe is advancing faster in tokenized investment products, while the UK leads in plans for proprietary stablecoin issuance. Despite these differences, both regions demand integrated security, custody, and resilience from technology partners. The findings indicate Europe is building within established rules, giving it a shorter path to mainstream adoption than the UK, which is building ahead of finalized regulations.

European and British financial institutions are moving towards the same digital asset economy, but their starting points differ.

The Fireblocks 'Financial Grid 2026' survey, based on responses from over 600 senior executives, revealed near-unanimous confidence in regulatory prospects. Approximately 99% of institutions in continental Europe and all respondents from the UK expect policy to facilitate the adoption of digital assets.

The difference lies in implementation.

The European Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation has provided companies with a clearly defined framework. As a result, 53% of continental institutions have allocated funds until 2026, whereas the global average is 42%.

In the UK, where the regulatory framework is still under development, 36% have already approved budgets. Another 59% plan to allocate funds within 2026.

Regulation defines each market's priorities

European institutions currently view practical infrastructure as the main obstacle to faster adoption. 55% of respondents pointed to robust connections between digital assets and fiat currencies. Proven production use cases came second at 49%, and 40% chose institutional-grade infrastructure.

Source: Fireblocks

Their internal challenges are predominantly operational. Nearly half cited operational model readiness as the primary obstacle. Governance and limited experience also ranked high, while only 29% pointed to legacy core technology.

In the UK, the picture is almost the opposite. Legacy system limitations were an obstacle for 71% of British institutions. They also placed greater emphasis on infrastructure support, fiat currency connectivity, and regulatory clarity.

This uncertainty affects how UK companies choose vendors. About 60% cited reputation and long-term financial stability as critical factors, compared to 33% in continental Europe.

Settlements - a priority when building institutional infrastructure

Both markets are primarily focused on the 'communications' of the financial system.

24/7 real-time settlement and payments emerged as the top use case for 86% of European respondents and 82% of UK respondents. Cross-border payments and settlement of tokenized securities were also key priorities.

However, Europe is progressing faster towards tokenized investment products. About 62% plan to utilize tokenized money market funds, compared to 45% in the UK. European institutions also lead in tokenized securities and deposits.

The UK stands out in one area: 50% of institutions plan to issue their own stablecoins, outpacing continental Europe at 40%.

Source: Fireblocks

Despite these differences, both regions expect the same from technology partners. Security, custody, integration, and resilience must be provided as part of a single package.

The survey results indicate that Europe is evolving under established rules, while the UK is doing so anticipating their final version. Both sides expect digital assets to become part of the core financial infrastructure, but Europe currently has a shorter path to adoption.

Пов'язані питання

QAccording to the Fireblocks survey, what percentage of EU and UK institutions respectively are confident that policy will drive digital asset adoption?

AApproximately 99% of institutions in continental Europe and 100% of respondents in the UK are confident that policy will drive digital asset adoption.

QWhat is the main difference in the current regulatory landscape between continental Europe and the UK, as highlighted in the article?

AThe main difference is that continental Europe has the clearly defined MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) regulation in place, while the UK's regulatory framework is still being developed and is not yet finalized.

QWhat is the top operational obstacle for UK financial institutions regarding digital asset adoption, according to the survey?

AFor 71% of UK institutions, limitations of core legacy technology are the main operational obstacle.

QWhich use case is the top priority for both European and UK institutions when building financial infrastructure for digital assets?

A24/7, real-time settlement and payments is the top priority use case for both regions, cited by 86% of European and 82% of UK respondents.

QIn which specific area of tokenized assets does the UK lead compared to continental Europe, according to the survey findings?

AThe UK leads in plans for issuing proprietary stablecoins, with 50% of institutions planning to do so, compared to 40% in continental Europe.

Пов'язані матеріали

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片