DOJ Task Force Confiscates $580 Million In Crypto From Chinese Fraud Ring

bitcoinistОпубліковано о 2026-02-28Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-28

Анотація

US Federal authorities, through the D.C. Scam Center Strike Force, have seized or frozen over $580 million in cryptocurrency linked to Chinese transnational criminal organizations. These groups are accused of operating large-scale investment scams, including "pig butchering" schemes, which defraud Americans of nearly $10 billion annually. The operation, a coordinated effort by the DOJ, FBI, and US Attorney’s Office, targets sophisticated fraud networks based in Southeast Asia. Authorities are pursuing forfeiture to return funds to victims and are focusing on senior figures within these criminal organizations. The scams often start with unsolicited messages and fake investment platforms that lure victims into transferring their crypto holdings.

US Federal authorities announced Thursday that more than $580 million in crypto tied to Chinese transnational criminal organizations has been seized or frozen as part of an aggressive crackdown on large-scale investment and confidence scams targeting Americans.

The action was carried out by the D.C. Scam Center Strike Force, a joint initiative involving the US Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Criminal Division, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).

DOJ, FBI Dismantle Major Crypto Fraud Pipeline

According to a statement released by the DOJ, the digital assets were allegedly stolen by Chinese transnational criminal organizations that operate sophisticated crypto investment fraud schemes and other confidence scams designed to drain victims of their life savings.

Prosecutors said these criminal networks rely heavily on US-based internet services and social media platforms to identify and contact victims. Recent estimates suggest that the broader scam industry is siphoning nearly $10 billion each year from Americans.

US Attorney Jeanine Pirro said the strike force was formed in November specifically to coordinate efforts against these operations. In just three months, she said, authorities have made substantial progress.

“Freezing, seizing, and forfeiting cryptocurrency worth more than $578 million from these criminals” represents a major step forward, Pirro stated. She emphasized that the organizations behind the schemes are motivated solely by profit and are willing to exploit anyone.

“These criminals don’t care who you are, what you believe in, or what you ate for breakfast — all they want is to steal from good and honest Americans to line the pockets of Chinese organized crime,” she said.

Pirro added that recovering crypto is only one element of the broader strategy. Her office intends to pursue forfeiture proceedings through the courts in an effort to return as much of the recovered funds to victims as possible.

Addressing those who have been defrauded, she said authorities are committed to fighting to reclaim stolen savings from what she described as Chinese organized crime groups.

How Overseas Fraud Networks Trap American Victims

The strike force is focusing much of its attention on large scam compounds operating in Southeast Asia. Investigators say Chinese criminal networks run many of the most notorious facilities, often located in countries such as Burma, Cambodia and Laos.

Teams are working to identify and pursue senior figures within these organizations, including affiliates of Chinese organized crime groups believed to be directing operations from within those countries.

Many of the scams fall under the category of Cryptocurrency Investment Fraud, commonly referred to by fraudsters as “pig butchering.” The term reflects the method used: perpetrators spend weeks or months building relationships with victims — “fattening” them up — before persuading them to invest increasing sums of money.

Victims are typically encouraged to buy legitimate cryptocurrency through established platforms. Once trust is secured, they are directed to transfer their holdings into fraudulent investment websites or mobile applications controlled by the scammers.

Law enforcement officials say these schemes frequently begin with unsolicited messages on social media or text messages sent to US-based phone numbers.

After initiating contact, scammers cultivate personal relationships and present fabricated investment opportunities promising high returns. By the time victims realize the platforms are fake, their funds have already been moved beyond reach.

The 1D chart shows the total crypto market cap at $2.25 trillion. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Пов'язані матеріали

Following US Ban on Fable 5, Zhipu AI's Stock Soars 47%

On June 15th, shares of Zhipu AI surged dramatically on the Hong Kong stock market, peaking at a 47.6% gain before closing 32.82% higher. This sharp increase was directly triggered by two recent industry events. On June 12th, Anthropic announced it was suspending global access to its latest flagship models, Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5, to comply with a U.S. government export control order. The next day, Zhipu AI announced it would open access to its latest open-source flagship model, GLM-5.2, under the permissive MIT license. The Anthropic incident highlighted a critical issue beyond raw model capability: the risk of sudden, unpredictable loss of access to advanced AI models, especially for developers and enterprises deeply integrated with them. This has shifted industry and market focus toward factors like stability, sustainable access, and controllability. Zhipu's move, promoting "frontier intelligence for all," positions its openly available model as a reliable and accessible alternative. The GLM-5.2 model emphasizes "Long Horizon Task" capabilities with a 1M context window, targeting complex, multi-step coding and engineering workflows where maintaining context is crucial. Analysts note this event exposes the risk of dependency on closed-source models subject to single jurisdictional controls, potentially accelerating a shift toward domestic base models and localized deployments. The market's reaction signals a new valuation dimension in AI: providers who can offer stable, long-term, and sustainably accessible AI capabilities are gaining strategic importance.

marsbit5 хв тому

Following US Ban on Fable 5, Zhipu AI's Stock Soars 47%

marsbit5 хв тому

Fully Entering the AI Era: Alipay Bets on Conversation, WeChat Holds Fast to Social

In May 2026, Alipay announced over 300 million AI payment transactions. Shortly after, WeChat opened its mini-programs for AI integration, sparking controversy by requiring developer source code access. This highlights their diverging approaches to AI integration. Alipay is testing "Project Treasure," an optional AI-native interface replacing traditional app grids with a conversational window. Users can command complex tasks (e.g., "book a ride and order coffee") handled end-to-end by AI. This shift follows an abandoned standalone AI app, focusing instead on enhancing its existing user base. For unmodified mini-programs, Alipay's AI uses "screen-reading" to simulate user interactions, bypassing the need for developer overhaul. It also introduced "Token Pay" for micro-transactions and "AI Wallets" for autonomous agent spending. WeChat, prioritizing its core social function, is taking an embedded approach. Its AI agent will operate within existing contexts like group chats and official accounts, assisting without a separate interface. To enable this, WeChat offers developers two paths: granting source code access for direct AI control ("Automatic Mode") or manually encapsulating services into standardized "Skills." Both place significant burden on developers. Key differences emerge in handling legacy services: WeChat demands developer cooperation (code or labor), while Alipay's screen-reading offers immediate, if potentially less stable, compatibility. Alipay's 3 billion AI transactions demonstrate user acceptance of AI-driven commercial actions. The divergent strategies may reshape mini-program ecosystems—Alipay passively "AI-fying" services, WeChat potentially favoring resource-rich developers—and set competing technical standards. Ultimately, the competition centers on where users entrust the command to "help me get things done."

marsbit6 хв тому

Fully Entering the AI Era: Alipay Bets on Conversation, WeChat Holds Fast to Social

marsbit6 хв тому

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

Apple Pays Rent Too: The Two-Way Flow of "Traffic Tax" and "AI Capability Rent" Between Tech Giants For over two decades, Google has paid Apple an estimated $20 billion annually to remain the default search engine on Safari, a "traffic tax" for a critical user entry point. However, in 2026, the direction of this cash flow partially reversed. Apple agreed to pay Google roughly $1 billion per year to license its Gemini AI models, as Apple's own models reportedly struggled with complex tasks. This creates a unique dynamic: Apple acts as the "landlord" in the established search ecosystem, collecting rent from Google for access. Simultaneously, in the emerging AI arena, Apple becomes the "tenant," paying Google for access to cutting-edge AI capabilities it cannot currently match internally. While Apple claims its new models are "distilled" from Gemini outputs and contain "not a drop" of Google's original code, core dependencies remain. Its knowledge base is refined using Gemini's outputs, and its most powerful cloud model runs on Google's infrastructure. Apple has structured the deal as non-exclusive, allowing it to theoretically switch AI suppliers—a hedge against over-reliance. The future hinges on whether advanced AI models become a commodity (cheap and abundant) or remain a concentrated, scarce resource (expensive and controlled by few). Apple is betting on the former, leveraging its massive device ecosystem to be a powerful, choosy customer. If the latter proves true, its bargaining power could erode. This power dynamic is extending to developers. Apple, Google, and WeChat are all pushing for apps to expose their core functions as standardized "actions" or "intents" that their respective AI assistants (Siri, Gemini, WeChat AI) can directly call. The new scarce resource is no longer just app store visibility, but "being selected by the AI." The currency of "rent" has changed from a 30% revenue share to ceding control over how users interact with an app's functions.

marsbit1 год тому

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片