Data: 75% of Traders on Hyperliquid Are Losing Money. What Are the Profitable Ones Using?

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-05-20Востаннє оновлено о 2026-05-20

Анотація

On Hyperliquid, approximately 75% of addresses are losing money, indicating that manual traders are increasingly competing against automated systems. Profitable traders primarily employ one of three approaches: 1) Running systematic, high-frequency strategies (e.g., one address executed 261k trades with a 64.75% win rate), 2) Placing high-conviction, asymmetric bets with large positions (e.g., 50 trades yielding $4.48M at a 28% win rate), or 3) Using algorithms for execution while making manual macro judgments. The article argues that traditional methods like chart patterns or reacting to social media news are often already priced in by bots, making such traders the "exit liquidity" for systematic players. Success now depends on unique narrative timing, structural insights, or conviction during market capitulation.

Author: Stacy Muur

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Guide: Three-quarters of addresses on Hyperliquid are losing money. It's not bad luck; the rules of the game have changed. While you're still looking at candlestick patterns for formations, arbitrage bots have already made their profit. Data shows that truly profitable traders either use algorithmic systematic execution or place large bets on asymmetric opportunities with high conviction. Manual retail traders watching screens are becoming the exit liquidity for others.

About 75% of addresses on Hyperliquid are in a loss-making position.

The reality is that people trading manually on Hyperliquid are competing against systems that never rest. The trading opportunity you just discovered has likely already been priced in by the system.

When you see a certain pattern, chances are it has already been arbitraged.

Extreme funding rates are balanced in an instant.

Technical patterns have already appeared across more than 50 order books.

News headlines are priced in as soon as they appear.

What the most profitable traders are doing:

→1. Running systematic strategies (the second most profitable address executed 261,000 trades this month with a 64.75% win rate)

→ 2. Holding high-conviction positions, betting on asymmetric returns (a wallet made $4.48 million with just 50 trades and a 28% win rate)

→ 3. Using algorithms as execution tools while making macro judgments manually

If you have timing in narratives, structural insight, or conviction when everyone else capitulates, you can still make profitable trades.

But if your trades are based on chart patterns or news you saw on X, you are likely just exit liquidity.

Пов'язані питання

QAccording to the article, what percentage of addresses on Hyperliquid are losing money, and what is presented as the primary reason?

AApproximately 75% of addresses on Hyperliquid are losing money. The primary reason is that manual traders are competing against automated, systemized strategies that execute trades faster and more efficiently, often pricing in opportunities before a human trader can act.

QWhat are the two main strategies used by the most profitable traders on Hyperliquid, as described in the article?

AThe two main strategies are: 1. Running systematic, automated strategies (one example executed 261,000 trades with a 64.75% win rate). 2. Holding high-conviction positions to bet on asymmetric opportunities (one wallet made $4.48M with only 50 trades, despite a 28% win rate).

QThe article suggests that several common trading signals are often ineffective. Name at least three of these signals.

AThree common but often ineffective signals mentioned are: 1. Technical chart patterns (which appear across many order books). 2. Extreme funding rates (which get arbitraged instantly). 3. News headlines (which are priced in immediately upon release).

QWhat role does the article suggest algorithms can play for a trader who still wants to make manual, high-level decisions?

AThe article suggests using algorithms as an execution tool. A trader can make macro or high-level directional judgments manually, and then use an algorithm to handle the rapid, systematic execution of trades based on that judgment.

QAccording to the article's conclusion, what kind of manual trader is most likely to succeed, and what kind is most likely to fail?

AA manual trader who succeeds is likely one acting on deep narrative timing, unique structural insights, or having strong conviction when others are capitulating. A manual trader who fails is likely one whose decisions are based on commonly seen chart patterns or news headlines found on social media (like X), as they become 'exit liquidity' for others.

Пов'язані матеріали

Can Alibaba Cloud Rewrite Itself?

Over the past five months, Alibaba Cloud's MaaS (Model as a Service) revenue has surged 15x, marking a strategic overhaul where the company is shifting its 17-year-old system designed for "humans using cloud" to a new paradigm centered on "Agents consuming Tokens." At its recent summit, Alibaba Cloud announced a full-stack upgrade encompassing "chip-cloud-model-inference," all optimized for AI Agents. Key launches include the new AI product portal "QianWen Cloud," hyper-node servers powered by the in-house AI chip Zhenwu M890, and the latest flagship model, Qwen3.7-Max. Senior VP Liu Weiguang described this as building "China's largest AI factory," where chips are raw materials, the cloud is the workshop, models are machines, and the inference platform is the assembly line, with Tokens as the final product. The company is now emphasizing its chip strategy, unveiling the Zhenwu M890 and a two-year roadmap for future chips. With over 560,000 chips deployed across 400+ clients, Alibaba Cloud aims to control the marginal cost per Token, mirroring Google's integration of TPU and Gemini for optimal cost-performance. The cloud infrastructure itself is being rewritten. Traditional cloud interfaces are being transformed into standardized, Agent-callable Skills. A new scheduling logic focuses on "task scheduling" over "resource scheduling" to handle the unpredictable, elastic workloads of Agents. Liu noted that AI applications now automatically provision cloud resources, with one customer's daily automated provisioning equaling two weeks of manual work. For models, the focus has shifted from conversational prowess to execution capability. Qwen3.7-Max demonstrated this by autonomously writing and optimizing a production-grade AI compute kernel for the new Zhenwu M890 chip over 35 hours, achieving a 10x performance improvement. The underlying Bailian platform was upgraded for efficiency, and it maintains an open ecosystem, hosting third-party models. This restructuring extends beyond technology to sales, organization, and metrics. Alibaba Cloud has established dedicated MaaS sales teams, separated from traditional IaaS, with new KPIs focusing on high-quality Tokens that solve real problems, the number of core business systems integrated with models, and the efficiency of Agent task completion. The underlying bet is clear: AI represents an opportunity orders of magnitude larger than before. Despite the uncertainty, Alibaba Cloud is aggressively rebuilding its entire system, betting on an AI-driven future where Tokens could become its largest product line.

marsbit47 хв тому

Can Alibaba Cloud Rewrite Itself?

marsbit47 хв тому

Warsh's First Conundrum: Rate Cuts, Inflation, and a Fractured Fed

Walsh's First Dilemma: Rate Cuts, Inflation, and a Divided Fed Kevin Warsh officially assumed the Fed Chairmanship on May 15th, inheriting a central bank deeply divided over inflation. Contrary to market expectations of a dovish stance due to his appointment by President Trump, Warsh's historical record shows early and consistent hawkish concerns about inflation. The Fed he leads is fractured, with three FOMC members recently dissenting against even hinting at future rate cuts. The immediate challenge is surging inflation. While the Iran-related oil shock is a temporary factor, core CPI and services inflation are accelerating, showing signs of becoming entrenched—echoing the Fed's 2022 "transitory" misstep. Warsh faces the task of building consensus within a committee where several members believe policy may not be restrictive enough, especially if the neutral interest rate (r-star) is higher than currently estimated. Politically, Warsh is caught between Trump's desire for rate cuts and the economic reality of persistent price pressures. Any move perceived as bowing to political pressure could undermine Fed independence. Market implications are significant. Long-term Treasury yields (e.g., 30-year at 5.19%) could rise further, especially if the June FOMC statement hints at possible tightening. Tech stocks face continued valuation pressure from higher rates. The key variable is progress in Iran negotiations; a breakthrough before the June meeting could temporarily ease oil-driven inflation, but stubborn services inflation would remain. All eyes are on Warsh's first post-FOMC press conference on June 17th. His wording on inflation and policy will reveal how much the market has mispriced his stance and the Fed's likely path forward.

marsbit1 год тому

Warsh's First Conundrum: Rate Cuts, Inflation, and a Fractured Fed

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片