Canton Network price surges on usage – Yet dip below $0.12 possible IF…

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2025-12-30Востаннє оновлено о 2025-12-30

Анотація

Canton Network's token (CC) surged 84% in under three weeks, reaching $0.126, driven by increased network usage and demand for its real-world asset (RWA) focus. Despite bullish longer-term structure and key support at $0.122, a deeper retracement toward $0.105 is anticipated due to a bearish descending triangle pattern and concentrated long liquidations. Traders are advised to wait for a dip before buying, unless CC breaks above the $0.133 resistance. Growing on-chain adoption supports long-term confidence, but short-term downward pressure is likely.

Canton Network was catching the attention of traders and investors. The utility token of the Layer 1 focused on RWAs has rallied 84% in under three weeks, from $0.068 to $0.126.

The network boasted of increasing user activity.

Network usage and genuine demand during a time of market-wide uncertainty are achievements that can drive further adoption and boost investor confidence.

At the time of writing, the token CC had retested the $0.122 level as support. Is this a buying opportunity, or will the retracement go deeper?

Longer-term CC structure remains bullish

The 1-day chart showed that the structure and trend were firmly bullish. Moreover, the token’s trading volume was not as high as it had been in November, when the token was newly launched.

It was reflected in the seemingly lackluster OBV.

CC’s OBV was climbing higher over the past three weeks, showing that buying pressure has been steady. The drop-off in trading volume was a slight concern, but not enough to upturn the bullish bias on the daily timeframe.

Additionally, the $0.122 and $0.110 levels were key support levels, which had been a resistance level earlier this month. A retest of either level would be interesting to Canton Network [CC] bulls.

The case for a bullish breakout

On the hourly timeframe, the OBV was rising higher as CC prices remained defiantly above the $0.124 support level. This suggested there was potential for a bullish breakout from here, if demand increases over the next 24-48 hours.

This scenario is unlikely, based on the evidence at hand.

Traders’ call to action – Wait for a deeper retracement

The descending triangle chart on the 1-hour chart is typically a bearish continuation pattern. A breakdown below the $0.124 support would confirm a deeper retracement.

The concentration of long liquidations from $0.12-$0.105 meant CC prices would likely fall toward this area before reversing the losses. Hence, traders can wait for a deeper price dip before buying.

A breakout past the $0.132-$0.133 local resistance zone would invalidate this idea.


Final Thoughts

  • The Canton Network saw growing adoption onchain, which could drive demand and investor confidence in the long term.
  • In the coming days, CC is expected to retrace toward $0.105 due to the long liquidation levels clustered beneath the price.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the Canton Network's utility token and how much has it rallied in under three weeks?

AThe Canton Network's utility token is CC, and it has rallied 84% in under three weeks, from $0.068 to $0.126.

QAccording to the article, what are the two key support levels for the CC token?

AThe two key support levels for the CC token are $0.122 and $0.110.

QWhat on-chain achievement is the Canton Network boasting about that could drive further adoption?

AThe Canton Network is boasting about increasing user activity and genuine demand during a time of market-wide uncertainty.

QWhat pattern on the 1-hour chart suggests a potential for a deeper price retracement?

AA descending triangle pattern on the 1-hour chart, which is typically a bearish continuation pattern, suggests a potential for a deeper retracement.

QWhat price level would invalidate the idea of a deeper retracement and waiting to buy?

AA breakout past the $0.132-$0.133 local resistance zone would invalidate the idea of a deeper retracement.

Пов'язані матеріали

The Largest IPO in History Ignites Heated Debate: Is SpaceX Worth $1.77 Trillion?

SpaceX's potential IPO is priced at $135 per share, aiming to raise $75 billion and valuing the company at approximately $1.77 trillion, which would make it the largest IPO in history. This valuation has sparked intense debate among investors. Bullish analysts, including major underwriters Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, argue the valuation is justified by SpaceX's long-term potential. They see it not just as a rocket company but as a future leader in space infrastructure, with key growth drivers being Starlink satellite internet, low-cost rocket launches, and future AI-related ventures. They project revenues reaching hundreds of billions to trillions of dollars by 2030-2040. ARK Invest's model suggests a 2030 enterprise value could reach $2.5 trillion. Bearish analysts from independent research firms like Morningstar, PitchBook, and New Constructs contend the IPO price is excessively high, already pricing in unrealistic future growth. Using DCF and sum-of-the-parts models, they estimate fair value between $780 billion and $1.7 trillion, significantly below the IPO target. They highlight risks such as the speculative nature of AI projections, over-dependence on Elon Musk, high growth expectations, and corporate governance concerns. Trefis set a target price of just $79 per share. While both sides acknowledge SpaceX's unique position in commercial space, the core disagreement centers on whether the $135 share price offers a reasonable margin of safety or is overly optimistic. Despite the valuation controversy, reported strong demand for the IPO indicates significant market interest.

marsbit45 хв тому

The Largest IPO in History Ignites Heated Debate: Is SpaceX Worth $1.77 Trillion?

marsbit45 хв тому

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

The article discusses the evolution of on-chain credit, distinguishing three markets: overcollateralized crypto lending, unsecured lending (largely unsuccessful), and asset-backed credit (ABC). ABC, backed by identifiable real-world collateral with legal recourse, is identified as the fastest-growing category and the only one credibly addressing adverse selection—the core problem in credit where the riskiest borrowers self-select. Current growth in on-chain Real World Assets (RWAs), particularly tokenized private credit funds (e.g., Maple Finance, Centrifuge), is substantial but often merely "wraps" existing fund structures, inheriting their risks rather than solving adverse selection at the protocol level. The regulatory landscape is a key driver, with the US GENIUS Act (prohibiting stablecoin issuers from paying yield) and the proposed CLARITY Act (closing loopholes on indirect yield) set to redefine permissible yield-bearing products. This makes vaults (like ERC-4626) the critical architecture—they become the primary compliant vehicle for delivering yield, functioning as issuance, disclosure, distribution, and recovery mechanisms. The author's thesis is that the correct post-GENIUS/CLARITY architecture involves building ABC solutions where credit assessment, structure, and recovery are encoded directly into the smart contract vault layer, moving beyond mere tokenized fund wrappers to solve adverse selection fundamentally and ensure regulatory compliance.

Foresight News1 год тому

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

Foresight News1 год тому

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Anthropic's New Model Fable Sparks Controversy by Restricting Biosafety Research, US CPI Soars to 4.2%, a Three-Year High

**Summary of TechFlow Intelligence Report:** The newsletter covers several key tech and finance developments. In AI, Anthropic's new Fable model faced backlash for secretly limiting biomedical research capabilities and enforcing a 30-day data retention policy, prompting the company to promise more transparent adjustments. In a related story, Anthropic's founder revealed his departure from OpenAI was due to dishonesty from Sam Altman, not safety concerns. Meanwhile, OpenAI is considering significant price cuts to compete with Anthropic, potentially sparking a price war. In crypto/Web3, BlackRock filed a new amendment for a yield-generating Bitcoin ETF, while Bank of America's CEO warned that stablecoin yields could drain trillions from traditional banks. U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis advocated for the U.S. to officially accumulate Bitcoin reserves. In hardware, Nvidia released the DiffusionGemma-2-6B image model optimized for efficient inference, and AMD promoted its unified memory architecture to challenge Nvidia's dominance. TSMC's CFO hinted at possible price increases due to soaring AI chip demand. A major legal ruling in Germany held Google legally responsible for inaccurate information generated by its AI Overviews feature. Google Chrome also moved to fully block ad-blocker workarounds like uBlock Origin. Macroeconomic headlines included U.S. CPI rising to 4.2% (a 3-year high) and Iran's complete closure of the Strait of Hormuz, raising oil price and inflation fears. South Korean markets saw continued volatility with massive foreign capital outflow. Other notable stories: Microsoft expanded its Copilot AI assistant "Mico" globally; a study found r/wallstreetbets users' stock picks outperformed Wall Street; a fully autonomous drone killed a human soldier for the first time, raising AI ethics concerns; and a Chinese hospital used brain-computer interface technology to help a blind person "see." The overarching theme connects debates over AI boundaries and responsibility (Anthropic's restrictions, Google's liability, lethal autonomous drones) with real-world economic and geopolitical turmoil (inflation, Strait of Hormuz closure, market instability), highlighting the tense interplay between technological advancement and global chaos.

marsbit1 год тому

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Anthropic's New Model Fable Sparks Controversy by Restricting Biosafety Research, US CPI Soars to 4.2%, a Three-Year High

marsbit1 год тому

Alibaba's Yet Another New Business Division: What Signal Does It Send?

Alibaba has established a new "Token Foundry" business unit, merging its Tongyi large model division and Future Life Lab. Led directly by Group CEO Wu Yongming, this marks the company's third significant AI organizational reshuffle in 2026, following the creation of the Alibaba Token Hub (ATH) and a Group Technology Committee. The move signals a strategic shift from consolidating AI resources to accelerating productization and commercialization. The "Token Foundry" name reflects Alibaba's ambition to become a foundational supplier in the AI era, focusing on model development and commercial application. Key teams, including those behind the high-performing HappyHorse video generation model, have been integrated into the new unit. Concurrently, Zhou Jingren, architect of the Qwen model series, has been appointed Group Chief Scientist to lead a new AI Future Research Institute, focusing on long-term technological breakthroughs like Agent capabilities. This restructuring creates a clear four-layer AI architecture within Alibaba: the research institute for frontier exploration, Token Foundry for core models and commercialization, MaaS for platform services, and business units like Qianwen (C端) and Wukong (B端) for end-user applications. The adjustments align with a global trend among tech giants like Google and Microsoft to centralize AI leadership under the CEO and deeply integrate research with business units. The urgency is driven by a narrowing competitive window. Alibaba has announced its AI business is now entering a commercialization phase, with AI-related revenue seeing triple-digit growth for eleven consecutive quarters. The company faces intense competition in the MaaS (Model-as-a-Service) sector from rivals like ByteDance and Tencent. The Token Foundry initiative represents Alibaba's effort to streamline execution and enhance competitiveness in this critical, fast-evolving landscape.

marsbit2 год тому

Alibaba's Yet Another New Business Division: What Signal Does It Send?

marsbit2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片