Bridgewater Founder Ray Dalio: The Concept and Mechanism of the All Weather Portfolio

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-03-24Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-24

Анотація

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, shares the core principles behind the All Weather Portfolio—a strategy designed to perform well across all economic environments with minimal need for market timing. The goal is to achieve returns significantly higher than cash or low-risk assets, with lower risk than traditional portfolios like the 60/40 stock-bond mix. Dalio emphasizes that cash, while safe from default, often yields the worst long-term real returns, especially during high inflation. The All Weather Portfolio is built on the concept of risk parity, balancing asset classes based on their risk contributions rather than capital allocation. By understanding how different assets (such as bonds, gold, inflation-linked securities, and commodities) react to changes in growth and inflation, the portfolio is structured to maintain stability. It aims to be passively held, avoiding market timing, which Dalio argues most investors—even professionals—cannot execute successfully. Originally developed for his family, the strategy has been refined over 30 years. Dalio encourages investors to understand and apply these principles to build confidence and resilience, particularly in volatile markets. He plans to release a detailed “recipe” for constructing such a portfolio in the future.

Author :@RayDalio

Compiled by: He Tongxue

Bridgewater Founder I am at a stage in my life where my primary goal is to pass on the principles I have learned over the past 60 years—principles that have helped me and that I believe can also help others. I believe one of the most important investment principles I can convey is about what the "All Weather Portfolio" is and how to construct such a portfolio. I believe these principles are particularly valuable in risky times like the present.

For me, the most important thing for most investors is to have a portfolio that: a) is well-diversified/designed to achieve the highest possible return with minimal risk; b) does not require market timing. The reasons are: a) Although most people believe the safest investment is cash (such as short-term Treasury bills, or interest-bearing deposits like high-quality money market funds with near-zero default risk), because it does not default, these cash investments inevitably yield the lowest after-tax returns over the long term and perform particularly poorly during periods of high inflation—meaning they lose significant purchasing power. It is also true that b) almost all investors (including most seasoned professional investors) cannot effectively time the market, even if they think they can. Therefore, I believe that for most investors managing their own portfolios, investment should involve as little or even no market timing as possible.

The All Weather Portfolio is a passively held portfolio with expected returns significantly higher than low-risk assets like cash, but with risk much lower than high-risk assets like stocks and bonds, and this holds true in any environment. This differs from most portfolios—such as the classic 60/40 stock-bond portfolio, or those that perform well in good times and poorly in bad times. So to be clear, the All Weather Portfolio is a type of portfolio designed to achieve the above goals, not a specific investment product. It is more like a financial engineering challenge aimed at achieving this balance, from which investment products can be derived. My All Weather Portfolio is constructed in my own way, which I will briefly describe here and elaborate on later. Naturally, my approach has evolved and improved over time, and I have some ideas to make it even better. But anyone can implement it in their own way—perhaps I should hold a competition to see who can build the best method.

I will start by explaining how I developed my method and how it works.

About 30 years ago, I tried to create an investment strategy for my family so they could invest without my guidance after I passed away. I believed I needed a portfolio that could:

a) Provide returns significantly higher than cash (i.e., equal to or exceeding the classic 60/40 stock-bond portfolio);

b) Have lower risk than the 60/40 portfolio;

c) Not perform poorly in any specific type of economic environment;

d) Not require market timing.

In my view, the only way to achieve such an All Weather Portfolio was to hold a variety of diversified, higher-return but higher-risk investments, so that when combined, due to the mutual diversification effects among these asset classes, the overall portfolio would achieve the same high returns as individual assets but with lower risk. To achieve better diversification, I developed the concept of "Risk Parity"—that is, adjusting investments with different risk levels (i.e., different volatilities) by increasing the risk/volatility of low-risk/low-volatility investments and reducing the risk/volatility of high-risk/high-volatility investments, so that their risk levels become more balanced. Then I balanced my exposure to each asset class based on the most fundamental factors driving their returns. In other words, by understanding how each asset class responds to changing economic conditions (such as inflation and growth—for example, bonds perform poorly when inflation and growth rise, while inflation-hedging assets like gold, inflation-linked bonds, and commodities perform well), and by allocating equal risk in environments where inflation and growth rise and fall, I could create a passive strategic allocation portfolio that remains well-balanced across all economic scenarios. Thirty years later, I still firmly believe that having this core strategic portfolio is crucial. My All Weather Portfolio is my ideal, continuously held strategic asset allocation—i.e., the "beta" (asset class) portfolio. Although I also make many tactical bets based on my judgments about market trends to create "alpha," these are achieved by creating a well-diversified alpha portfolio, which I call the"Pure Alpha" strategy. (I won’t explain this method in detail now, as it would digress too far.)

I developed this All Weather method together with my excellent Bridgewater team, especially Bob Prince and Greg Jensen, who have been at Bridgewater for 40 and 30 years respectively and remain co-chief investment officers there. After building it, I found the method simple and straightforward enough that almost anyone could implement it, and I couldn’t imagine we would be paid for managing money for others using it. So I showed almost everyone I knew how to do it (and I still want to do this today), but to my surprise, many clients asked us to manage their money using this strategy. We launched it as a product, and naturally, it has evolved and improved since then. Bridgewater is now operating and optimizing it in their own way, and I am operating and optimizing it in my own way. The difference between us is: they manage All Weather accounts for others, while I only do it for my family and family foundation, while showing others how to do it.

Whether investors build their own All Weather Portfolio or have someone else do it, what I most hope is to help people understand how it works and give them the opportunity to apply it, so they can have confidence in achieving good returns without suffering unacceptable losses in market/economic environments that most people consider bad. I have written a lot about how to build my All Weather Portfolio and distributed it widely. (For example, if you want to systematically learn my investment principles, you can access them through the online course I collaborated on with the Singapore Wealth Management Institute:). In any case, I will soon write out my "recipe" to more clearly explain how you can build your own All Weather Portfolio, and I will share it once it is ready.

Трендові криптовалюти

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the primary goal of Ray Dalio's All Weather Portfolio?

AThe primary goal is to create a portfolio that is well-diversified and engineered to provide returns significantly higher than cash with much lower risk than stocks and bonds, without the need for market timing, and to perform reasonably well in all economic environments.

QAccording to Dalio, why is cash not the safest long-term investment?

ABecause while it carries minimal default risk, cash investments (like short-term Treasuries) provide the lowest after-tax returns over the long term and perform particularly poorly during periods of high inflation, leading to a significant loss of purchasing power.

QWhat is the core concept of 'Risk Parity' as described in the article?

ARisk Parity is the concept of adjusting investments with different risk/volatility levels so that their risk levels are equalized. This is done by increasing the risk/volatility of low-risk investments and decreasing the risk/volatility of high-risk investments, allowing them to better balance each other.

QHow does the All Weather Portfolio achieve balance across different economic conditions?

AIt achieves balance by understanding how different asset classes perform under varying economic conditions (like rising/falling inflation and growth) and then allocating an equal amount of risk to environments where inflation and growth are rising versus environments where they are falling.

QWhat is the key difference between the 'All Weather' (Beta) portfolio and the 'Pure Alpha' strategy mentioned by Dalio?

AThe All Weather portfolio is the core strategic, passive asset allocation (Beta) designed to perform in all environments. The Pure Alpha strategy consists of additional tactical bets based on market views to generate excess returns, and it is implemented through a separate, well-diversified alpha portfolio.

Пов'язані матеріали

Crypto Miners' Big AI Gamble: Valuations Enter Differentiation Stage, Comeback Fight Proves Tough

Crypto Mining Firms' AI Bet: Valuation Divergence and a Challenging Transformation Facing declining profitability in crypto mining, mining companies are pivoting to AI infrastructure, capitalizing on their existing power resources, land, and data center expertise to offer GPU compute power. This transition narrative has boosted their stock prices significantly, with firms like Hut 8 and Bitfarms seeing gains over 100% year-to-date, far outpacing Bitcoin. This has led to a market valuation split, with pioneers like CoreWeave reaching a $62.8B market cap, while others remain below $5B. The market currently prioritizes growth potential over short-term profits, which remain under pressure due to heavy capital expenditures for AI build-outs and crypto asset volatility. However, the transformation is a high-stakes gamble. Bitcoin mining profitability is shrinking, with the average production cost around $63,707 and miner margins contracting. While AI offers a more lucrative long-term path, it requires massive investment—estimated at a $500B near-term funding gap. Success now hinges on execution: delivering on contracted power capacity, securing quality tenants like major cloud providers, and managing the immense financial burden. The valuation focus is shifting from mere power capacity to project delivery, future cash flows, and tenant quality, making this a difficult but critical turnaround attempt.

链捕手4 хв тому

Crypto Miners' Big AI Gamble: Valuations Enter Differentiation Stage, Comeback Fight Proves Tough

链捕手4 хв тому

Analysis of the Latest Portfolio Adjustment by the "Top Player" in the U.S. Stock Market: $9 Billion Short on NVIDIA, Shifting Focus to Power and Memory Sectors

AI investor Leopold Aschenbrenner has made a significant portfolio shift, taking a $9 billion nominal short position against top AI infrastructure stocks like NVIDIA, ASML, and Oracle. Simultaneously, he is redirecting capital towards what he sees as the next critical bottlenecks in the AI boom: power, memory, and data center networking, alongside private investments in AI model companies like Anthropic. This move is interpreted not as a call that the AI bubble has burst, but as a rotation within the infrastructure stack. The analysis highlights NVIDIA's recent $25 billion bond issuance as a potential signal, questioning why a cash-rich company would seek external debt despite high profits and increased dividends/buybacks. The core investment thesis is that the initial, crowded "picks and shovels" trade in semiconductors is maturing. The next wave of capital is expected to flow into the physical and logistical constraints of AI expansion: electricity supply, memory chip capacity, data center construction, and enabling technologies like optical networking (fiber) for high-bandwidth communication, where copper remains crucial for short distances. Aschenbrenner's substantial (approx. 20% of fund) private stake in Anthropic is noted as a key part of his strategy—investing directly in the "mine" (AI models) rather than just the "shovels." The discussion concludes that while certain segments may be overvalued, the overarching AI infrastructure demand driven by real product usage remains robust. The most promising long-term investments are seen in essential, non-sexy infrastructure—particularly energy and power companies—whose demand is viewed as a global constant irrespective of AI's cyclicality.

marsbit25 хв тому

Analysis of the Latest Portfolio Adjustment by the "Top Player" in the U.S. Stock Market: $9 Billion Short on NVIDIA, Shifting Focus to Power and Memory Sectors

marsbit25 хв тому

BIT Research: Liquidity is Disappearing, Will Bitcoin Replay the Bottoming Pattern of 2022?

The crypto market is currently in an adjustment phase driven by policy expectations and liquidity shifts. Despite a brief rebound fueled by geopolitical easing and SpaceX's strong IPO performance, unexpectedly hawkish signals from new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh have removed anticipated easing support. Concurrently, stablecoin liquidity is shrinking, with insufficient new capital inflows, pushing the market into a typically quiet summer period. Pricing lacks catalysts for a sustained rally. Daily trading volume has significantly contracted, stablecoin growth has slowed markedly, and the supportive effect of Strategy's (formerly MicroStrategy) STRC preferred stock-financed Bitcoin purchases is fading. Amid policy uncertainty, seasonal weakness, and liquidity contraction, Bitcoin faces near-term downward pressure. Warsh's hawkish pivot and refusal to provide a clear policy outlook have increased risk premiums, historically unfavorable for Bitcoin. Technically, the trend remains bearish below $73,700, with $62,446 as critical support. A break below could accelerate declines, though a prolonged consolidation phase, similar to 2022's bottoming process, is possible. Liquidity is a core constraint. Current daily volume is around $500 billion, roughly 25% of the peak during the July-Oct 2025 rally. The 12-month growth rates for USDT and USDC have fallen to ~20%, with 6-month growth near zero, indicating weak new inflows. Bitcoin ETF and Strategy-driven inflows have also weakened, with a 30-day rolling net outflow. With inflation at 4.2% above the Fed's target, combined hawkish policy, seasonal factors, and liquidity shortages challenge Bitcoin's ability to hold above $60,000. However, this adjustment phase may be forming a cyclical low this summer, potentially setting the stage for the next bull cycle.

marsbit53 хв тому

BIT Research: Liquidity is Disappearing, Will Bitcoin Replay the Bottoming Pattern of 2022?

marsbit53 хв тому

Who Makes the Best Use of Claude Code? The Answer Might Not Be Programmers

Claude Code Usage Report Summary (Based on ~400k sessions) Core Finding: In agentic programming with Claude Code, a clear division of labor has emerged: humans primarily decide *what* to build (planning decisions), while Claude decides *how* to build it (execution decisions). Key Insights: 1. **Effectiveness is not limited to programmers.** In code-generation tasks, success rates for users in non-technical fields (law, finance, management, research) are nearing those of software engineers. What matters most is the user's domain expertise and understanding of the problem to be solved. 2. **Domain expertise drives success and efficiency.** Sessions where users exhibited "expert" proficiency in the task's domain saw verified success rates double compared to "novice" sessions. Experts also delegated more work per instruction, with Claude executing more actions and producing more output. 3. **AI is amplifying, not replacing, domain knowledge.** Claude Code lowers the *implementation* barrier, not the *judgment* barrier. The value of knowing the "what" and "why" is increasing relative to just knowing the "how" to code. 4. **Usage is evolving.** Over a 7-month period (Oct '25 - Apr '26), the share of sessions for debugging halved, while use for software operations, data analysis, and non-code writing roughly doubled. The estimated economic value of typical tasks increased by ~25%. Conclusion: The data suggests coding agents are making programming background less critical for completing technical tasks. However, they reward and amplify deep domain understanding. The ability to successfully direct an AI agent stems more from mastery of a specific field than from coding skill itself. The primary gains come from being competent in a domain; deep specialization adds only marginal additional advantage. This may signal a shift where software creation becomes integrated into various professions.

marsbit1 год тому

Who Makes the Best Use of Claude Code? The Answer Might Not Be Programmers

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси

Популярні статті

Як купити RAY

Ласкаво просимо до HTX.com! Ми зробили покупку Raydium (RAY) простою та зручною. Дотримуйтесь нашої покрокової інструкції, щоб розпочати свою криптовалютну подорож.Крок 1: Створіть обліковий запис на HTXВикористовуйте свою електронну пошту або номер телефону, щоб зареєструвати обліковий запис на HTX безплатно. Пройдіть безпроблемну реєстрацію й отримайте доступ до всіх функцій.ЗареєструватисьКрок 2: Перейдіть до розділу Купити крипту і виберіть спосіб оплатиКредитна/дебетова картка: використовуйте вашу картку Visa або Mastercard, щоб миттєво купити Raydium (RAY).Баланс: використовуйте кошти з балансу вашого рахунку HTX для безперешкодної торгівлі.Треті особи: ми додали популярні способи оплати, такі як Google Pay та Apple Pay, щоб підвищити зручність.P2P: Торгуйте безпосередньо з іншими користувачами на HTX.Позабіржова торгівля (OTC): ми пропонуємо індивідуальні послуги та конкурентні обмінні курси для трейдерів.Крок 3: Зберігайте свої Raydium (RAY)Після придбання Raydium (RAY) збережіть його у своєму обліковому записі на HTX. Крім того, ви можете відправити його в інше місце за допомогою блокчейн-переказу або використовувати його для торгівлі іншими криптовалютами.Крок 4: Торгівля Raydium (RAY)Легко торгуйте Raydium (RAY) на спотовому ринку HTX. Просто увійдіть до свого облікового запису, виберіть торгову пару, укладайте угоди та спостерігайте за ними в режимі реального часу. Ми пропонуємо зручний досвід як для початківців, так і для досвідчених трейдерів.

272 переглядів усьогоОпубліковано 2024.12.10Оновлено 2026.06.02

Як купити RAY

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни RAY (RAY).

活动图片