BounceBit Blockchain Ceases Operations After $3 Million Exploit

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2026-08-23Востаннє оновлено о 2026-08-23

Анотація

The BounceBit team announced that an attack occurred between August 19th and 20th, resulting in the theft of 286 million BB tokens worth $3.1 million from nine BounceBit Chain addresses. The exploit was due to an authorization flaw in the vesting and account locking module of the Evmos stack, on which BounceBit Chain was built. Part of the stolen tokens were sent to cryptocurrency exchanges, while 18.5 million BB remain on a single address. The team has contacted exchanges to request freezing specific addresses. Developers have decided to permanently shut down BounceBit Chain instead of restoring it, as it was built on the now non-functional Evmos infrastructure. BB tokens will be reissued as BEP-20 tokens on the BNB Chain. The distribution will use a snapshot from before the attack, and users do not need to take any action to receive the new tokens. The stolen 286.5 million BB will not be included in the new issuance. This incident follows other recent hacks, including a $1.7 million attack on Maya Protocol last week.

The BounceBit team reported that the attack lasted from August 19 to 20. The attackers managed to move 286 million BB tokens worth $3.1 million from nine BounceBit Chain addresses. The hackers exploited an authorization flaw in the vesting and account staking module of Evmos, the stack on which the BounceBit Chain network was built.

Part of the stolen tokens was sent by the hacker to cryptocurrency exchanges: approximately 254 million BB was transferred to an unnamed major platform, nearly 10 million BB to another exchange, and the remaining 18.5 million BB remains on one address. The BounceBit team has already contacted exchanges requesting the freezing of specific addresses.

The developers decided not to restore the network but to completely shut down BounceBit Chain, as the blockchain was built on the now non-functional Evmos infrastructure. The developers explained: migrating a fork to a new codebase would require a complete rebuild of the platform, as well as re-auditing and validation, before the network could securely transfer assets again.

BB tokens will be reissued as BEP-20 tokens on the $BNB Chain. A snapshot of the block before the attack—number 20,697,260—will be used to determine the amount of BEP-20 tokens customers should receive. The stolen 286.5 million BB are not included in the new issuance. Users do not need to take any action to receive the new tokens—they will be automatically distributed to addresses on the $BNB Chain, the project team promises.

We have identified an issue affecting BounceBit Chain and have paused nodes out of caution while we deploy a fix. BB transactions are temporarily unavailable.

This is limited to the chain itself, the CeDeFi app is not affected, and neither are smart contracts or vaults.

No...

— BounceBit (@bouncebit) August 20, 2026

In 2024, the BounceBit project raised $6 million in investments from companies Blockchain Capital and Breyer Capital. YZi Labs invested in BounceBit at the end of April that same year.

Last week, Maya Protocol suffered from a hack, losing $1.7 million in crypto assets, predominantly Bitcoin. Earlier, the crypto service Coinsbuy was subjected to a hacker attack—$7.9 million was withdrawn from it.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the main reason behind the BounceBit Chain hack that led to the loss of approximately $3.1 million?

AThe exploit was caused by an authorization flaw in the vesting and account locking module of the Evmos stack upon which the BounceBit Chain was built.

QHow is the BounceBit project planning to compensate users who held BB tokens on the compromised chain?

ABB tokens will be reissued as BEP-20 tokens on BNB Chain. The distribution will be based on a snapshot of the block before the attack (block number 20,697,260). The stolen 286.5 million BB tokens are excluded from the new issuance.

QWhy did the BounceBit team decide to permanently shut down the BounceBit Chain instead of trying to restore it?

AThe team decided to shut down the chain because it was built on the now non-functional Evmos infrastructure. Migrating to a new codebase would require a complete platform rebuild, along with new audits and validation before assets could be safely transferred again.

QWhat did the BounceBit team do in response to the hackers moving stolen tokens to cryptocurrency exchanges?

AThe BounceBit team has contacted exchanges, requesting them to freeze the specific addresses to which the stolen tokens were sent.

QAccording to the article, what other major cryptocurrency services have recently suffered from hacks?

ARecently, Maya Protocol lost crypto assets worth $1.7 million (mostly Bitcoin), and the crypto service Coinsbuy was hacked for $7.9 million.

Пов'язані матеріали

Hardware Wallet Owners Lose Money: The Nuances of Cold Bitcoin Storage in 2026

The article discusses a wave of distrust towards hardware wallets by the summer of 2026, primarily triggered by security incidents. The most significant involved Coldcard wallets from Coinkite, where a firmware bug dating back to 2021 drastically reduced the cryptographic entropy for seed phrase generation. This allowed attackers to brute-force private keys, leading to losses estimated between $115-$153 million in Bitcoin. While Coldcard issued a fixed firmware, the incident damaged the reputation of all hardware wallets. Other manufacturers like Trezor and Ledger issued statements assuring their devices' security, citing their use of secure hardware elements for true random number generation. However, separate data breaches affected SafePal (exposing personal data of ~40,000 users) and Trezor (via a logistics partner, compromising data for ~14,000 users), though no private keys or crypto assets were stolen in these cases. The article clarifies that hardware wallets themselves don't "hold" crypto but store the keys to access it on the blockchain. It argues against abandoning hardware wallets entirely, pointing out that alternatives like paper, memory, or custodial exchange storage have their own significant risks. It concludes that these incidents should be viewed as specific failures, not a condemnation of the entire category. A key underlying challenge highlighted is the dual role of advancing AI, which empowers both defenders to enhance security and attackers to find vulnerabilities more efficiently.

cryptonews.ru33 хв тому

Hardware Wallet Owners Lose Money: The Nuances of Cold Bitcoin Storage in 2026

cryptonews.ru33 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片