Bittensor: Should TAO bulls buy now or wait for a pullback below $300?

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-03-28Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-28

Анотація

Bittensor (TAO) has demonstrated notable strength by maintaining its position above the critical $300 support level, even as major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum faced selling pressure. The recent move above $302.4 confirmed a bullish structural shift on the 3-day chart, supported by new highs in the On-Balance Volume (OBV) indicator. This resilience is attributed to growing demand for decentralized AI infrastructure. Analysts suggest that a pullback toward the $286–$305 zone could offer a strategic buying opportunity, with potential upward targets at $405–$450. The 4-hour chart reinforces this bullish outlook, showing steady buying pressure and a constructive price structure. However, a drop below $261 would invalidate this optimistic setup. Traders are advised to consider entering within the $286–$319 range, anticipating further gains in the near term.

Bittensor [TAO] continued to trade above the psychological $300 level. While the market leaders Bitcoin [BTC] and Ethereum [ETH] faced strong selling pressure over the past week and were forced to register losses, TAO continued to trend higher.

The $300 was therefore an important support level that swing traders should keep an eye on. Is the sustained uptrend another buying opportunity for TAO traders, or should they take profits and expect a deep retracement next?

The bullish TAO swing structure confirms the trend direction

Source: TAO/USDT on TradingView

The move above $302.4 last week represented a bullish swing structural shift for TAO on the 3-day chart. At the same time, the OBV was making new local highs, and a psychological round number resistance had been overcome.

These developments were remarkable, especially as Bitcoin and many altcoins were forced to go lower or trade sideways. The demand for decentralized AI infrastructure likely explained the AI token’s relative strength.

A pullback toward $300 would be a buying opportunity for Bittensor traders and investors. Their next targets would be $450-$500.

Why traders should buy now

Source: TAO/USDT on TradingView

The 4-hour chart was quite encouraging. In this timeframe, the price structure was firmly bullish. The technical indicators also supported the upward momentum and reflected steady buying pressure on the altcoin.

The Fibonacci retracement levels (cyan) showed that a retracement was underway. The $286-$305 pocket would be the ideal buying zone, but it is unclear if we will get this dip.

Traders can look to buy anywhere within the $286-$319 area, as many traders and analysts also consider the 50% retracement as a key support in an uptrend. In either scenario, the $405 and $449 levels would be the next targets.

A drop below the $261.1 mark will shift the H4 structure bearishly and invalidate the bullish setup laid out above.


Final Summary

  • Bittensor continued to trade above the $300 level despite the crypto market correction over the past two days.
  • This show of relative strength could see another uptrend next week, with $409 and $450 being the next targets.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the key psychological support level for Bittensor (TAO) mentioned in the article?

AThe key psychological support level for Bittensor (TAO) is $300.

QWhat did the move above $302.4 represent for TAO on the 3-day chart?

AThe move above $302.4 represented a bullish swing structural shift for TAO on the 3-day chart.

QAccording to the article, what is the ideal buying zone for TAO on the 4-hour chart?

AThe ideal buying zone for TAO on the 4-hour chart is the $286-$305 price pocket.

QWhat price level would invalidate the bullish setup and shift the H4 structure bearishly?

AA drop below the $261.1 mark would invalidate the bullish setup and shift the H4 structure bearishly.

QWhat are the next major price targets for TAO if the uptrend continues?

AThe next major price targets for TAO are the $405, $409, $449, and $450 levels.

Пов'язані матеріали

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit1 год тому

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit1 год тому

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit1 год тому

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit1 год тому

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit3 год тому

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit3 год тому

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit3 год тому

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit3 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片