BitMart Research Institute Weekly Highlights: A Comprehensive Market Analysis Amidst the Stalemate in the Middle East and Stagflation Expectations

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-03-24Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-24

I. Macro Level (Macro)

1. Geopolitics and the Middle East Conflict

Negotiations between Trump and Iran have seen repeated progress and setbacks, with a significant gap remaining between the demands of both sides. It is expected that the situation in the Middle East will likely remain in a state of "fighting while talking" for the next 2 to 4 weeks. From a political motivation perspective, Trump intends to push for a de-escalation of the conflict in the first half of the year to avoid facing both high oil prices and a pressured stock market as the election cycle enters its second half.

2. Federal Reserve Monetary Policy and FOMC Meeting (Hawkish)

Recently, the overall stance of major central banks, including the Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, and the Bank of Japan, has turned more hawkish. The market has even begun to price in the possibility of the Fed "not cutting rates" or even "raising rates again" this year. The latest FOMC meeting was generally hawkish in tone: the dot plot showed an increase in the number of officials supporting only one rate cut this year; meanwhile, the Fed raised its inflation expectations, and Powell downplayed signals of a weakening labor market. Additionally, the previously dovish official Waller also shifted to support holding rates steady, further strengthening market expectations of a hawkish stance.

3. Diverging Risks of Stagflation and Recession

Risk Underestimation Camp: Some argue that the authenticity of the current non-farm payroll data is questionable, and inflation has been consistently above the 2% target for several years. If a significant external shock occurs, the U.S. economy could easily slide into stagflation or even recession, and the market is still not fully pricing in this risk.

Opposing View: Others believe that the U.S. is now a net exporter of energy, with far less dependence on oil imports compared to the 1970s and 1980s. Therefore, high oil prices alone are not enough to drag the U.S. into typical stagflation. The deeper risk of stagflation may instead come from long-term fiscal expansion and the erosion of the Federal Reserve's independence. However, if key Middle Eastern straits are blockaded for an extended period, and the Fed maintains a hawkish stance to suppress inflation, or even raises rates again, the market's main trading logic could shift from "stagflation trade" to "recession trade."

4. Performance of Traditional Financial Assets and Trading Strategies

Gold Plummets: Gold has not recently demonstrated its typical safe-haven attributes; instead, it has seen a significant decline against the backdrop of rising expectations for central bank tightening and liquidity pressure.

Hedging Suggestions: In the face of short-term uncertainty, it is advisable to hold risk assets while appropriately allocating positions related to the VIX (Volatility Index), as well as fertilizer and natural gas stocks that benefit from the logic of natural gas shortages, as defensive hedging tools. If the market can navigate through the volatility of the next 1 to 3 months, risk assets may still present good performance opportunities in the second half of the year.

II. Cryptocurrency Level (Crypto)

1. Market Trends and Sentiment

Amid intensified macro volatility, Bitcoin (BTC) has shown stronger resilience compared to gold, generally maintaining relative stability around $70,000. Recently, BTC rebounded from $76,000 before falling back and entering a consolidation phase. Current spot and futures market trading volumes are relatively low, while the options market is more active. The rise in put option (Put) skew and prices reflects increased market避险 (risk-off) and panic sentiment.

2. Institutional Moves and ETFs

Institutional capital allocation is showing divergence. MicroStrategy's Bitcoin buying intensity has noticeably cooled, dropping from weekly additions of ten to twenty thousand coins in the past to about 1,000 coins. However, other institutions continue to buy Ethereum on a large scale, with weekly purchases of around 60,000 coins. Overall, Bitcoin spot ETFs are still maintaining slight net inflows.

3. On-Chain Data and Bottom Assessment

From on-chain data, the profit level of long-term holders has fallen back to the consolidation range (green zone) corresponding to the bottom of the last bull-bear cycle. This suggests that the most intense phase of the decline may be over, and the market is in a process of gradual bottoming. At the same time, short-term holders exhibited significant profit-taking behavior around $76,000, creating阶段性 (phase-specific) selling pressure.

4. Regulatory Positive (Clarity Act)

On the regulatory front, resistance to further consensus on the Cryptocurrency Clarity Act in the Senate has decreased. The market assesses its probability of passage has increased to 80%-90%. Concurrently, the banking system may gradually relax restrictions, allowing users to participate in yield-bearing products related to stablecoins through indirect means. This is seen as a clear policy positive, potentially opening channels for larger-scale capital from traditional finance to enter the crypto market.

Пов'язані матеріали

Goldman Sachs Bows Down, Bitcoin Finally Breaks Through the Gates of Wall Street

Wall Street giants, including Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Charles Schwab, and the New York Stock Exchange, have reversed their long-standing opposition to Bitcoin and are now actively embracing it. After years of dismissing Bitcoin as a scam, a bubble, or a tool for illicit activities, these institutions are launching Bitcoin ETFs, enabling spot trading, and building dedicated crypto infrastructure. Goldman Sachs, which once called Bitcoin a "fraud tool," is now offering Bitcoin ETFs. Morgan Stanley, which internally banned the term "cryptocurrency," has launched its largest-ever ETF backed by Bitcoin. Charles Schwab has opened spot crypto trading for its retail clients, integrating Bitcoin alongside traditional assets. The NYSE is building robust infrastructure to support digital assets, signaling a long-term commitment. This dramatic shift is driven not by a change in ideology but by economic necessity. As Bitcoin repeatedly survived market crashes and grew into a multi-trillion-dollar asset class, ignoring it became too costly. Wall Street’s business model relies on capturing fees, and Bitcoin’s rise represented a massive wealth transfer occurring outside their ecosystem. The fear of missing out (FOMO) and client demand forced these institutions to capitulate. The article frames this as a historic surrender to Bitcoin’s mathematical inevitability. Unlike the trust-based traditional financial system, Bitcoin operates on decentralized, transparent, and unchangeable rules. Its scarcity and resilience make it a hedge against fiat currency devaluation and systemic risk. The narrative has flipped: not holding Bitcoin is now seen as the greater risk. The author concludes that Bitcoin has not been co-opted by Wall Street; instead, it has co-opted Wall Street, marking a fundamental shift in the global financial architecture.

marsbit11 хв тому

Goldman Sachs Bows Down, Bitcoin Finally Breaks Through the Gates of Wall Street

marsbit11 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片