BIT Research: If It Followed Nasdaq, Bitcoin Should Be Close to $140,000

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-05-15Востаннє оновлено о 2026-05-15

Анотація

BIT Research: Bitcoin Price Analysis Under Inflation Re-pricing The market is currently undergoing a macro adjustment phase dominated by inflation re-pricing. Analysis suggests that if Bitcoin had continued to follow Nasdaq's trajectory, its theoretical price would be near $140,000. However, a significant divergence between the two assets has emerged since October 2025. The core reason is the resurgence of US inflation, which has led to a reversal in market expectations for the Federal Reserve's rate-cut path. Recent data shows US CPI rising to 3.8% and PPI to 6.0%, prompting markets to scale back expectations for 2026 rate cuts. For Bitcoin, the previous supportive narrative of anticipated loose liquidity is weakening. Concurrently, escalating tensions involving Iran have driven oil prices up approximately 40% since late February 2026, heightening inflation concerns through rising energy costs. While the market currently views this inflation surge as a temporary pressure point, the interplay between energy, interest rates, and risk appetite is prompting a reassessment of the potential for a prolonged high-rate environment. In this context, Bitcoin has begun to underperform tech stocks, which can benefit from nominal inflation. The divergence stems from a key distinction: Bitcoin's past rallies were driven by loose liquidity and rate-cut expectations, not inflation itself. As a long-duration asset, Bitcoin is highly sensitive to interest rate paths. When expectations for ...

The market is currently in a macro adjustment stage dominated by inflation repricing. If Bitcoin had continued to follow the Nasdaq's trajectory, its current theoretical price should be close to $140,000. However, since October 2025, the divergence between the two has begun to widen significantly. The core reason behind this lies in the resurgence of US inflation, prompting a reversal in market expectations regarding the path of interest rate cuts.

Latest data shows that US CPI has risen from the previous 2.4% to 3.8%, while PPI has increased from 2.9% to 6.0%. Simultaneously, the interest rate market is gradually withdrawing some of its pricing for rate cuts in 2026. For Bitcoin, the expectation of loose liquidity that previously supported its rally is beginning to weaken. Meanwhile, escalating tensions in Iran have driven oil prices up by approximately 40% since late February 2026, with rising energy costs further intensifying market concerns about inflation.

Based on current pricing, the market still tends to view this round of inflation as a temporary pressure disturbance. However, as the interplay between energy, interest rates, and risk appetite strengthens, the market is also beginning to reassess the risk of a prolonged high-interest-rate environment. During this process, Bitcoin's performance has started to noticeably underperform that of tech stocks, which can benefit from nominal inflation.

Inflation Repricing: Why Bitcoin Struggles to Benefit from a High-Inflation Environment

Most investors often equate "monetary expansion" with "inflation," but they actually correspond to entirely different market phases. Over the past few years, a key driver for Bitcoin's rise has essentially been loose liquidity and expectations of rate cuts, rather than inflation itself. In December 2022, the BIT model already pointed to a significant easing of price pressures and signaled that central bank policies might subsequently turn toward releasing rate cut signals. This also became a crucial starting point for the rally in tech stocks and Bitcoin from 2023 to 2025.

The problem, however, is that when inflation genuinely begins to resurface, market logic changes. Even before actual rate hikes materialize, mere expectations that "interest rates will remain higher for longer" are enough to trigger a repricing of Bitcoin. As a typical long-duration asset, Bitcoin is highly sensitive to the interest rate path; once rate cut expectations are withdrawn, its valuation tends to come under pressure.

At the same time, Bitcoin is not like stocks, which can gain structural benefits in a certain inflationary environment. Stocks may benefit not only from rising nominal corporate revenues but also potentially from a reduction in the real burden of debt. Bitcoin, on the other hand, has neither debt that can be diluted by inflation nor cash flows that can expand with inflation, making it difficult to benefit directly from this round of rising inflation. This also explains the recent pronounced divergence between the Nasdaq and Bitcoin.

From Energy Shock to Rate Constraints: The Market Begins Reassessing the Liquidity Path

The issue the market is truly concerned about now is not just "whether inflation is rising," but whether high inflation will force the Federal Reserve to keep interest rates elevated for an extended period. The BIT model forecasts that US CPI could potentially rise further to 6.0%. If this scenario materializes, Bitcoin may experience periodic pullbacks around the release of each CPI and PPI data point.

Meanwhile, while the crude oil futures curve indicates that oil prices will gradually decline in the future, they are unlikely to return to the pre-conflict level of around $63 in the short term. The market has already priced in a long-term premium of approximately 15% in oil prices, reflecting genuine supply bottlenecks. Starting from the current price of around $101 per barrel, the market expects oil prices to fall to $89 by September 2026, to $80 by January 2027, and further to $73 by January 2028.

Beyond geopolitical and energy factors, the expansion of AI infrastructure may also be altering the inflation path the market had previously grown accustomed to. Data center construction, power demand, and infrastructure capital expenditures are continuously pushing up energy pressures. This suggests that inflation may remain above target levels for longer than previously anticipated by the market. In such an environment, tech stocks can benefit from order growth and improved earnings expectations, while Bitcoin is more susceptible to pressure from high-interest-rate conditions.

Overall, the core of this market shift is not a breakdown of Bitcoin's long-term logic but rather a reassessment of the interest rate and liquidity path as inflation resurfaces. In the short term, the high-inflation environment may continue to suppress Bitcoin's performance, causing it to underperform the Nasdaq periodically. However, this does not signal a market shift towards bearishness; more accurately, it merely slows Bitcoin's upward momentum. As the market begins to price in expectations of renewed liquidity easing in the future, Bitcoin may still regain support.

Some of the above viewpoints are from BIT on Target. Contact us to obtain the full BIT on Target report.

Disclaimer: Markets involve risks, and investments require caution. This article does not constitute investment advice. Trading digital assets can be extremely risky and volatile. Investment decisions should be made after careful consideration of personal circumstances and consultation with financial professionals. BIT is not responsible for any investment decisions based on the information provided in this content.

Пов'язані питання

QAccording to the article, what would Bitcoin's price theoretically be if it had continued to follow the Nasdaq's performance?

AIf Bitcoin had continued to follow the Nasdaq's performance, its price should theoretically be close to $140,000.

QWhat are the two main economic data points cited as indicators of rising inflation in the US?

AThe two main economic data points cited are the US CPI rising from 2.4% to 3.8% and the PPI rising from 2.9% to 6.0%.

QWhy does the article argue that Bitcoin has difficulty benefiting from a high inflation environment compared to stocks?

ABitcoin has difficulty benefiting because it is a long-duration asset highly sensitive to interest rate expectations, and it lacks corporate earnings or debt that can be nominally inflated, unlike stocks which can benefit from rising nominal revenues and reduced real debt burdens.

QWhat future CPI level does the BIT model predict, and what is the potential impact on Bitcoin according to the article?

AThe BIT model predicts that US CPI may further rise to 6.0%. If this happens, Bitcoin could experience periodic pullbacks around the release of each new CPI and PPI data.

QBesides geopolitical tensions, what other factor is mentioned as potentially prolonging inflation above target levels?

AThe expansion of AI infrastructure, including data center construction, power demand, and related capital expenditures, is mentioned as a factor that may sustain energy pressures and keep inflation above target levels longer than previously expected.

Пов'язані матеріали

Generating Profits for Seven Consecutive Quarters, Emerging Markets Carry Trade Outperforms Everything

For the seventh consecutive quarter, dollar-funded emerging market carry trades have delivered positive returns, marking the longest winning streak since 2008. According to Bloomberg's index, this strategy has gained approximately 22% since late 2024, outperforming U.S. Treasuries, emerging market sovereign, and corporate dollar debt. The core of the trade involves borrowing low-interest currencies like the U.S. dollar, euro, or yen to invest in high-yielding emerging market assets, such as Turkish lira bonds offering over 40% returns. Returns were amplified by favorable currency moves, with the dollar weakening against most emerging market currencies and other traditional funding currencies. For instance, the trade gained 48% on the Colombian peso in the past year. A key test came in August 2024 with a historic joint U.S.-Japan currency intervention, which caused only a modest 1% dip in the carry trade risk premium as investors shifted funding from the yen to the euro and Swiss franc. Looking ahead, the primary risk is the timing of Federal Reserve policy changes. While persistent inflation allows the Fed to hold rates, a rapid rise in long-term U.S. yields could threaten the trade. Another concern is crowding, as massive inflows increase vulnerability to a sudden reversal. High interest rates in regions like Latin America and Eastern Europe, supported by external factors like Middle East tensions and energy prices, continue to sustain the opportunity. Major investors remain engaged, favoring currencies like the Mexican peso, South African rand, and Turkish lira.

marsbit11 хв тому

Generating Profits for Seven Consecutive Quarters, Emerging Markets Carry Trade Outperforms Everything

marsbit11 хв тому

Unpacking the Truth Behind On-chain Assets: Leverage, Liquidity, and Risk

The article analyzes the concept of "real-world asset" (RWA) tokenization, arguing that while tokenizing assets on-chain is a useful step, it is far from transformative on its own. The author compares it to placing a barcode on a shipping container—it enables identification but does not build the necessary market infrastructure. The core argument is that true value emerges not from tokenization, but from integrating these tokens into DeFi systems where they can be valued, financed, hedged, traded, and liquidated under stress. Key challenges identified include: 1. **Multiple Time Clocks**: A fundamental tension exists between blockchain's 24/7 settlement and the slower, business-hour-dependent processes of traditional markets, custody, and redemption. This "duration mismatch" can create dangerous liquidity gaps during crises. 2. **Liquidity Misconceptions**: True liquidity is not measured by Total Value Locked (TVL) or trading pairs, but by the ability to exit a position within a required timeframe at an acceptable price. It requires analyzing multiple exit paths and stress-testing scenarios. 3. **Leverage and Risk**: Leverage unlocks economic utility (e.g., using tokenized assets as collateral) but also introduces fragility. Risk models must account for more than asset volatility, incorporating factors like legal enforceability, oracle freshness, and market structure. Paradoxically, a "safer" asset like tokenized Treasury bonds could require a higher collateral discount than ETH due to slower, less-proven liquidation mechanisms. 4. **A Risk Graph**: RWA risk should be modeled as a network of interconnected dependencies (e.g., issuers, custodians, oracles, stablecoin pools), not a single score. Failures can propagate through this graph, turning operational issues into systemic liquidity crises. The article states that tokenized government bonds are merely an entry point, while more complex frontiers like computing power and energy assets present greater challenges and opportunities. It also examines the interplay and risks between tokenized stocks and perpetual futures contracts. The conclusion is that the future lies not in "tokenizing everything," but in building robust market layers where tokenized rights become resilient financial primitives within a programmable capital system. The token is just the barcode; the market is the machine.

marsbit36 хв тому

Unpacking the Truth Behind On-chain Assets: Leverage, Liquidity, and Risk

marsbit36 хв тому

The End of Mathematics: 40 Top Mathematicians Gather at Secret OpenAI Meeting

In August 2026, OpenAI hosted a closed-door summit with approximately 40 leading mathematicians, including recent Fields Medalist Jacob Tsimerman and OpenAI researcher Sébastien Bubeck. The meeting, spurred by a series of recent AI breakthroughs in mathematics, grappled with the potential existential threat AI poses to the field. The backdrop includes several high-profile AI achievements: OpenAI models disproving long-standing conjectures like the unit distance problem, generating 10 new mathematical discoveries, and Anthropic's Claude aiding in constructing complex multidimensional objects. These results often bypass traditional academic pipelines, appearing directly on social media. The mathematical community is divided. Over 3000 researchers signed the "Leiden Statement," advocating for responsible AI use and verification. Others resist AI entirely to preserve human-centric mathematics. A key concern is AI's current inability to *explain* proofs, particularly the difficult steps, which is central to mathematical understanding. At the summit, Bubeck outlined four potential futures: mathematics becoming like collaborative software engineering, a compute-driven field like physics, a curatorial exercise where humans interpret AI output, or a mass transition of mathematicians into AI safety. While emphasizing that "mathematics only makes sense when mathematicians learn from it," no consensus was reached. The event highlights a profound moment of reflection. As AI demonstrates increasing competence in solving complex problems, mathematicians are forced to question their future role and the very meaning of their discipline.

marsbit41 хв тому

The End of Mathematics: 40 Top Mathematicians Gather at Secret OpenAI Meeting

marsbit41 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片