Banks Prepare To Spend $100 Million+ To Stop Crypto Bills, Expert Warns

bitcoinistОпубліковано о 2026-03-11Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-11

Анотація

The fight over US crypto legislation is intensifying into a direct clash between the digital asset industry and the established banking sector. According to Dennis Porter, CEO of the Satoshi Action Fund, the banking industry is preparing a massive lobbying push, potentially exceeding $100 million, to counteract efforts to advance crypto market structure and stablecoin legislation. Porter warns that this creates a significant counterbalance to crypto lobbying groups and could lead lawmakers to withdraw support. He states that crypto industry faces political challenges, including low public trust and ethical concerns linked to Trump family involvement. Furthermore, market structure legislation is politically difficult as it covers a wide range of complex issues. The banking industry holds an advantage due to its entrenched local influence, including physical branches and jobs in lawmakers' districts. Porter cautions that if the dispute escalates into an open lobbying war, it could jeopardize the already tight Senate vote. He also notes that the legislative window is narrowing as midterm elections approach, with electoral incentives increasingly shaping the calendar.

The fight over US crypto legislation is turning into a direct clash between digital-asset firms and one of Washington’s oldest power centers. In an interview with Pete Rizzo, Satoshi Action Fund founder and CEO Dennis Porter said the banking industry is preparing a nine-figure lobbying push that could complicate efforts to advance both market structure legislation and stablecoin rules.

Crypto’s D.C. Outlook Just Got Darker

Porter said the core dispute is no longer just about whether Congress wants to regulate crypto, but on whose terms. President Donald Trump has publicly backed keeping the GENIUS Act intact, Porter noted, which he described as a positive sign for crypto firms. But he argued that support from the White House does not resolve the deeper standoff with banks, especially around stablecoins and the issue of rewards programs that banks view as a threat to deposits.

“The bank lobby has come out and said that they do plan to spend to counteract the crypto industry,” Porter said. “They said they’re raising nine figures, which is right up there with the Fairshake number. So that does create that counterbalance where they can essentially assert themselves into the ecosystem and start to peel some of these lawmakers off.”

That matters because, in Porter’s telling, crypto is entering the fight without a clean political backdrop. He said Democrats have grown more cautious around digital-asset legislation as Trump family involvement in the sector has raised ethics concerns among both lawmakers and voters.

At the same time, he described market structure as a far more expansive and politically difficult package than stablecoin legislation, since it touches not only securities-versus-commodities questions but also DeFi, illicit finance, ethics provisions and the makeup of the CFTC.

Porter argued that this leaves the legislation exposed to a wider set of objections and delays. He said there is still a path forward if key Democrats become comfortable with revisions, but added that the bill currently lacks a decisive forcing mechanism and has been pushed aside while lawmakers focus on a housing package.

The bank-crypto standoff, he suggested, could become especially dangerous if it turns into an open lobbying war. “If we end up in a situation where they’re directly lobbying against each other, you could see a lot of not just Democrats peel off this bill, but even possibly Republicans peel off this bill as well,” Porter said. “The vote is already tight in the Senate, very tight.”

His reasoning was straightforward: banks bring not just money, but entrenched local influence. Unlike much of crypto, Porter said, banks can point to branches, jobs and long-standing relationships in lawmakers’ districts. That advantage becomes even more important at a time when, by his own account, the industry is struggling politically.

“And also, crypto really is not popular right now,” Porter said. “Public trust in the crypto space is at an all-time low. Something that we’re deeply concerned about at Satoshi Action. Something that definitely needs some work.”

Porter framed that weakness as both a political problem and a policy argument. In his view, one purpose of market structure legislation is precisely to clean out the “crap” and scams that have damaged the sector’s reputation. But until lawmakers see a clearer consumer and political upside, he suggested, crypto firms may have trouble overcoming resistance from incumbents that view stablecoins as an existential threat to their business model.

He was notably cautious on timing. While some analysts have argued the window effectively closes by summer, Porter said the odds decline as the midterms approach but do not disappear entirely. His broader point was that the legislative calendar is being shaped as much by electoral incentives as by the text of the bills themselves.

At press time, the total crypto market cap stood at $2.34 trillion.

Total crypto market cap, 1-week chart | Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Пов'язані питання

QAccording to Dennis Porter, how much money is the banking industry preparing to spend to counteract crypto legislation efforts?

AThe banking industry is preparing to spend a nine-figure sum, which is over $100 million, to lobby against crypto bills.

QWhat are the two main types of US crypto legislation mentioned that are being complicated by this banking push?

AThe two main types of US crypto legislation mentioned are market structure legislation and stablecoin rules.

QWhat reason does Porter give for why banks have a significant advantage in a lobbying war against crypto?

APorter states that banks have an advantage because they bring not just money, but entrenched local influence, including physical branches, jobs, and long-standing relationships in lawmakers' districts.

QWhat does Dennis Porter cite as a major political weakness for the crypto industry in this fight?

AHe cites that 'crypto is not popular right now' and that 'public trust in the crypto space is at an all-time low.'

QBeyond the bank opposition, what other reason is given for why the market structure bill is politically difficult to pass?

AThe market structure bill is described as politically difficult because it is a far more expansive package that touches on securities-vs-commodities questions, DeFi, illicit finance, ethics provisions, and the makeup of the CFTC, leaving it exposed to a wider set of objections.

Пов'язані матеріали

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit16 хв тому

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit16 хв тому

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

Japan's cabinet has introduced the 2026 Basic Policy on Economic and Fiscal Management and Reform, shifting its primary fiscal target. The new framework moves away from the traditional annual primary balance goal and instead prioritizes a stable reduction of the debt-to-GDP ratio. This change is tied to a strategy of increased "responsible proactive fiscal" spending, aiming to boost long-term growth through investments in strategic sectors like AI, semiconductors, energy, and robotics. The government estimates total public and private investment in 62 key technologies could exceed 370 trillion yen by 2040. The market reaction has been mixed and cautious. While equity markets may respond to policy signals, bond markets are focused on fiscal credibility. Concerns center on whether the weakening of the clear primary balance anchor could lead to looser fiscal discipline. If investors doubt that these strategic investments will generate sufficient productivity gains, tax revenue, and nominal growth to outpace rising interest costs, they may demand higher yields on Japanese Government Bonds (JGBs). Recent volatility in the yen and JGB yields, with the 10-year yield briefly reaching 2.9%, reflects this skepticism. The success of this new framework hinges on two factors: whether Japan can achieve a nominal growth rate consistently higher than its long-term interest rates, and whether future budgets demonstrate disciplined control over bond issuance. The government's narrative is that strategic investment is essential to break Japan's cycle of low growth, aging, and labor shortages. However, the bond market will continuously assess the credibility of this plan, pricing the risk that it may represent fiscal expansion rather than a viable growth strategy.

marsbit54 хв тому

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

marsbit54 хв тому

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit1 год тому

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片