After Yushu Got Hot, a 68-Year-Old Auto Parts Boss Bet 1.85 Billion

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-08-12Востаннє оновлено о 2026-08-12

Анотація

After staying relatively low-profile for years, Shanghai Bate Technology, a traditional auto parts supplier, has recently been thrust into the spotlight as a leading humanoid robotics concept stock. This shift is largely tied to the impending IPO of robotics company Unitree, with which Bate collaborates on prototype development. Bate's founder, 68-year-old Jin Kun, is making a bold bet on this new frontier. The company is investing 1.85 billion yuan to build a major R&D and production base in Kunshan for planetary roller screws—a key component in robot joints. With an annual capacity of 2.6 million sets planned, plus overseas expansion, this represents a massive, forward-looking commitment from a firm whose 2025 revenue of 2.3 billion yuan still relies almost entirely on its traditional automotive business (over 98%). The investment highlights a strategic pivot. Bate aims to leverage decades of expertise in metal processing, precision manufacturing, and heat treatment from the automotive sector and apply it to the burgeoning robotics industry. However, this move carries significant risk. The company has not yet secured formal supplier contracts or begun mass deliveries for its roller screws. It is essentially betting on future demand in a market that remains nascent. The broader industry context adds to the uncertainty. While multiple Chinese manufacturers are racing to invest in similar robotics component capacity (totaling over 6 billion yuan), the downstream humanoid ro...

Summary:

The factory construction speed and capital investment speed of upstream component companies far outpace the commercialization and landing speed of downstream robot systems.

Produced by Phoenix Net Technology's "Fengyan Observation"

Without Yushu Technology, probably few people would have noticed Beite Technology.

This is a typical Chinese manufacturing company: it has been making automotive parts for over 20 years, its clients and products are hidden deep within the automotive supply chain, with annual revenues exceeding 2 billion RMB, yet it rarely enters the view of ordinary consumers.

But Yushu's upcoming IPO changed that. In the past two days, Beite Technology's stock has surged continuously, and it has been pushed to the forefront in the market-compiled list of Yushu robot concept stocks.

What's even more intriguing is that behind these consecutive surges: this company, which seems to have nothing to do with robots, has quietly made a massive 1.85 billion RMB bet on robots.

What exactly did it see?

Yushu Pushed an Old Company Back into the Spotlight

On the eve of Yushu Technology's IPO, the humanoid robot sector heated up again. On August 11th, Beite Technology hit the daily limit up; in the market-compiled list of Yushu robot concept stocks, Beite Technology was once again pushed to the very front.

But it might be the strangest robot concept stock recently.

Because for over twenty years, it has been doing something completely unrelated to robots: making parts for cars. So why did an auto parts company suddenly become the 'face' of humanoid robot concept stocks?

Image|From company official website

The reason isn't complicated. In the past, when the robot track was still in its infancy, system integrators were the industry's hallmark, so everyone only saw companies like Yushu, Zhiyuan, Ubtech, Figure, Tesla, etc. As humanoid robots gained popularity, the market started tracing downstream: who is making the robot joints?

Because what really determines whether robots can be mass-produced is not just the 'brain,' but also the body. Beite is precisely such an old manufacturing company rediscovered by the robot wave.

In the past, it long produced steering rack bars, shock absorber piston rods, automotive chassis components—things that seem to be from a completely different world than robots. But there is a common capability behind them: metal materials + precision machining + heat treatment + precision control + mass manufacturing.

After robots arrived, Beite suddenly realized that its decades of accumulated expertise could also find application in robots.

However, Phoenix Net Technology noted that Beite's total revenue for 2025 was 2.3 billion RMB, with a net profit of only 120 million RMB, yet it allocated 1.85 billion RMB to bet on planetary roller screws.

In 2024, it invested 1.85 billion RMB to build a planetary roller screw R&D and production base in Kunshan, completed by the end of 2025, with mass production expected in 2026, reaching an annual capacity of 2.6 million sets. Combined with its overseas layout in Thailand of 800,000 sets, the total capacity upon completion will reach 3.4 million sets.

But the problem is, it is currently only collaborating with industry chain clients like Yushu on sample R&D; it hasn't been formally designated or formed batch deliveries. Simply put, right now, it hasn't sold a single screw.

This is almost equivalent to betting an entire year's net profit, plus the family savings of the past few years, all on a new track that currently shows no immediate returns.

This is a huge gamble.

68-Year-Old Jin Kun, Betting Once Again

What's truly interesting about this 1.85 billion RMB is not just the money, but the person who decided to make this bet—Jin Kun, 68 years old this year.

If you were 68 years old, already had a listed company, and had proven over the past 20+ years that you could stand firm in the automotive supply chain, would you still have the courage to bet on a not-yet-mature industry again?

Most people's answer would probably be no. But Jin Kun chose to gamble once more. This time, he's betting on robots.

Beite Technology founder Jin Kun, Image|From the internet

Early on, Jin Kun worked at a steel enterprise in Anda, Heilongjiang, rising from Purchasing Department Head to Factory Director, and later entered enterprise management.

It wasn't until 2002 that 44-year-old Jin Kun, with 4.5 million RMB in hand, co-founded Shanghai Beite Metal Products Co., Ltd. In its initial stage, Beite bet on the automotive industry, making metal components like automotive steering rack bars and shock absorber piston rods.

Over the next decade-plus, China's automotive industry experienced rapid growth. In 2002, car sales were less than 4 million units, but by 2015, annual car sales in China had exceeded 24 million units, making it the world's largest automotive market for many consecutive years.

Beite also expanded continuously during this industrial expansion. By its 2014 listing on the Shanghai Stock Exchange, Beite's revenue had exceeded 630 million RMB. In the niche markets of steering rack bars and shock absorber piston rods, Beite captured over 30% market share, becoming a core supplier for giants like FAW and Bosch.

By this time, Jin Kun held an absolute controlling stake of 52.82% in the company. During the 2015 bull market wave, his paper wealth also rose with the stock price.

If the automobile was one of the most important manufacturing increments in China over the past two decades, then will it be the robot's turn in the next ten years?

And the screw just happens to be a type of component connecting these two industries.

During the automotive era, Beite accumulated capabilities in manufacturing precision metal components; in the robot era, it also hopes to extend this capability to higher-precision transmission components, to reap the benefits of the new robot era.

That's why Jin Kun dared to invest 1.85 billion RMB to build the planetary roller screw R&D and production base.

Simultaneously, a second-generation figure began to appear in Beite's management. Jin Kun's son, Jin Xiaotang, entered the company's core management as early as the year of its IPO, serving successively as Deputy General Manager, General Manager of a subsidiary, and currently holds the positions of Director and General Manager.

Father and son are currently also the actual controllers and concerted actors of Beite. As of the end of Q1 this year, Jin Kun holds 30.86% of Beite's shares, Jin Xiaotang holds 8.01%, with the father-son duo holding a combined 38.87%.

This represents a very interesting intergenerational change. The older generation, Jin Kun, chased the automobile; during China's automotive industry growth from several million to tens of millions of units, he built a metal parts company into a listed firm.

And the question for the new generation taking over is: can he create another story for Beite by betting on emerging industries like robots?

The Market Sees the Second Growth Curve, the Financial Report Does Not

Although the market has already started talking about Beite's second growth curve, putting aside the noise, how far has Beite itself actually come?

An undeniable fact is that Beite has indeed entered the discussion scope of the robot industry chain and has publicly disclosed collaborating with clients like Yushu on related product development. But so far, the robot business is far from becoming a major revenue source for the company.

In Q1 this year, Beite Technology achieved a net profit attributable to shareholders of 27.1781 million RMB. Looking at the revenue structure, the company still heavily relies on traditional automotive businesses like chassis components and air conditioning compressors. According to 2025 annual report data, these three businesses account for over 98% of revenue.

At the same time, the company frankly stated in an institutional research meeting on June 23rd: So far, the screw products have not yet had a significant impact on the company's performance.

That is to say, Yushu merely illuminated Beite, but robots have not yet truly sustained it.

This leads to a somewhat critical suspense: can the Kunshan base, for which Jin Kun invested 1.85 billion RMB, actually turn into real orders, and when?

It's important to know that in the planetary roller screw track, Beite is not the only one placing bets. A host of A-share players like Hengli Hydraulics, Wuzhou Xinchun, Baist, Shuanglin Co., Ltd. are also rushing in. According to statistics, the combined screw investment plans of just a few leading companies already exceed 6 billion RMB, and capital investment across the industry continues to increase at a visible pace.

More importantly, the end market that Beite Technology faces is not yet mature. According to data from third-party market research firm IDC, the global shipment volume of humanoid robots in 2025 was approximately 18,000 units, defining that year as the 'starting point of scale';

Furthermore, from the shipment structure, the application scenarios for humanoid robots in 2025 were mainly concentrated in entertainment/commercial performances, education/research, data collection, tour guiding/shopping, etc.; large-scale applications for industrial scenarios like manufacturing, warehousing, and logistics are still in the early stages.

This leads to a rather surreal misalignment: the factory construction speed and capital investment speed of upstream component companies far outpace the commercialization and landing speed of downstream robot systems.

While factories with hundreds of thousands of screw capacity spring up, there might only be tens of thousands of robots downstream that can actually absorb this capacity. In this extreme game of 'capacity waiting for orders,' Beite Technology's 1.85 billion RMB gamble is destined to be a perilous leap accompanied by enormous uncertainty.

"Fengyan Observation" pierces through the storm's eye of trends and IPOs, locking onto the next capital detonation point in advance.

(The title image of this article is AI-generated)

This article is from the WeChat public account: Phoenix Net Technology , Author: Phoenix Net Technology, Editor: Dong Yuqing

Пов'язані питання

QWhy did Beite Technology, a traditional auto parts company, suddenly become a frontrunner in the humanoid robot concept stock list?

AThe rise of the humanoid robot sector has led the market to look downstream for component suppliers. Beite Technology, with over 20 years of experience in metal material processing, precision machining, heat treatment, and batch manufacturing for automotive parts (like steering rack bars and shock absorber piston rods), possesses core competencies transferable to manufacturing key robot components like joints and actuators. This connection was highlighted as companies like Yushu Technology prepare for IPO, drawing investor attention to Beite's potential role in the robot supply chain.

QWhat major investment did Beite Technology make to bet on the robotics industry, and what are the associated risks?

ABeite Technology invested 1.85 billion RMB to build a planetary roller screw R&D and production base in Kunshan, with a planned annual capacity of 2.6 million units. The main risk is the significant mismatch between this massive upstream capacity build-out and the current immature state of the downstream humanoid robot market. Global shipments in 2025 are estimated at only around 18,000 units, primarily for non-industrial uses. The company currently has no confirmed bulk orders, making this a high-stakes gamble where capacity is waiting for uncertain future demand.

QWho is Jin Kun, and what does his decision to invest heavily in robotics signify?

AJin Kun, 68, is the founder and controlling shareholder of Beite Technology. He started the company in 2002, capitalizing on China's automotive boom, and led it to an IPO in 2014. His decision to bet 1.85 billion RMB on planetary roller screws for robots at this stage of his career signifies a bold, second major gamble on a new industrial wave. It represents a strategic pivot from the mature automotive industry to the emerging robotics sector, aiming to replicate past success by leveraging the company's manufacturing expertise in a new high-growth field.

QWhat is the current contribution of Beite Technology's robotics business to its overall financial performance?

AAs of the latest disclosures, Beite Technology's robotics business has not yet made a significant impact on its financial performance. The company's revenue remains overwhelmingly dependent (over 98%) on its traditional automotive businesses like chassis components and air conditioning compressors. Management has stated in institutional research that the screw products have not yet formed a noticeable influence on the company's performance. While involved in sample development with clients like Yushu, the business has not generated substantial sales or profits.

QWhat is the broader industry context of Beite Technology's investment in planetary roller screws?

ABeite Technology is entering a highly competitive and capital-intensive field. Multiple A-share listed companies like Hengli Hydraulics, Wuzhou Xinchun, Best, and Shuanglin are also making significant investments in planetary roller screw production. Combined planned investments from key players exceed 6 billion RMB. This creates a scenario where upstream component manufacturers are racing to build capacity at a pace far exceeding the current commercialization speed and scale of downstream humanoid robot makers, leading to a potential oversupply situation in the future.

Пов'язані матеріали

"Ontology Faction" vs. "Supplier Faction": In-depth Observation of Dexterous Hand Track Financing in 2026

The article analyzes the robotics "dexterous hand" sector in 2026, revealing intense investment activity. Key insights include: The sector is divided into two camps: "Body Manufacturers" (15 companies like Zhuji Power, Xingdong Era, Xingchen Intelligence) that integrate self-developed dexterous hands into their humanoid robots, and "Third-Party Suppliers" (32 companies) that independently sell complete dexterous hands or core components like tactile sensors and micro-motors. Body Manufacturers secured significantly larger average funding rounds (over ¥8B vs. under ¥2B for suppliers), reflecting bets on the broader humanoid robot market. While body makers now view in-house hand R&D as essential for differentiation, they still heavily rely on external suppliers for key underlying components like sensors and actuators. The supplier landscape is further segmented. "Complete Hand" suppliers (e.g., Critical Point AGILINK, Lingxin Qiaoshou, Xynova) face fierce consolidation as scale becomes critical. "Tactile Perception" specialists (e.g., Paxini, Daimeng, Qianjue) possess high technical barriers and early-mover advantages. "Core Component" makers (e.g., Wuji Tech, Zhijian Zhiqing, Nuoshi Robotics) are "hidden champions" with deep expertise in motors and drive systems, benefiting from import substitution. The analysis concludes the industry is structurally diverging. A hybrid model of body-maker integration plus specialist outsourcing will likely dominate. Suppliers will undergo significant consolidation, particularly among complete hand makers, while component specialists with deep technical moats are poised for sustained growth.

marsbit3 хв тому

"Ontology Faction" vs. "Supplier Faction": In-depth Observation of Dexterous Hand Track Financing in 2026

marsbit3 хв тому

Is 'Light In, Memory Out' Becoming the New Trading Narrative in the U.S. Stock Market?

Is "Light in, Memory out" Becoming the New Narrative in U.S. Stock Trading? Following the growing market consensus that AI chip valuations may have peaked, capital is seeking the next AI-related theme. In this context, the "Light in, Memory out" narrative is emerging – signaling a shift where optical communication stocks are taking the baton from memory. Optical communication, utilizing light signals (primarily via fiber optics) for data transmission, is critical for AI. AI model training and inference rely on massive GPU clusters that require frequent exchange of vast data, generating immense east-west traffic. Traditional copper interconnects face physical limits at high speeds (short distances, high power, interference). Optical interconnects solve this with higher bandwidth density, longer reach, and better energy efficiency, becoming crucial for scaling AI clusters. The narrative is validated by diverging stock performance. While memory stocks (like Micron, SK Hynix) have corrected amid crowded positioning and growth concerns, optical communication stocks (AAOI, COHR, LITE) have surged roughly 40-50% since August, driven by strong earnings and accelerating demand from AI cluster expansion and the transition to 800G/1.6T technology. LITE’s recent earnings solidified the story, beating estimates with impressive margins (gross margin above 50%, operating margin 36.4%). Its guidance projected an operating margin near 40% next quarter, faster than expected. Management noted laser capacity remains insufficient to meet strong demand and confirmed its key CPO (Co-Packaged Optics) client is accelerating plans. COHR's upcoming earnings are highly anticipated for further confirmation. However, risks are evident after the sector's sharp rally. The current dilemma is believing the narrative while avoiding buying at a peak. In a thematic rotation market, survival is key – prepare your tools before deciding how to position. Disclaimer: This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.

marsbit3 хв тому

Is 'Light In, Memory Out' Becoming the New Trading Narrative in the U.S. Stock Market?

marsbit3 хв тому

OpenClaw Founder Peter Steinberg's Latest Speech: The Life and Death Revelation of an Open Source Project, How OpenClaw Emerged from the Eye of the Storm

Peter Steinberg, founder of the wildly popular open-source AI agent project OpenClaw, reflects on its turbulent journey from creation to near-collapse and resurgence. It began in late 2024 from his personal frustration with sending prompts from phone to computer. He built a WhatsApp relay that felt "magical," but initial excitement was limited to friends. After adding Discord support and launching a public server, the project exploded virally overnight, attracting massive attention, rebranding requests (from "Claudis" to OpenClaw), and even praise from NVIDIA's CEO. The intense scrutiny and pressure nearly broke Steinberg. The biggest technical crisis came from over-optimizing for a specific AI model provider, which suddenly canceled subscriptions, forcing a rushed shift to open-weight models. OpenClaw's weekly downloads plummeted before surging to a record high after being "declared dead." Steinberg realized he had stopped enjoying the build process and using his own product, making it a duty rather than a passion. His key lesson: "Fun is speed." Recovery came by refocusing on building for himself, forming a non-profit, and receiving crucial support (e.g., from NVIDIA for security). The team is now using OpenClaw to build OpenClaw itself, emphasizing its core value: a private, open alternative where "your agent, your machine, your life." He shares insights: the first user should be yourself; balance bug fixes with new features to maintain interest; the current bottleneck is reliable toolchains, especially for Mac testing. His story underscores that creation thrives on personal need, endures through storms when the joy of building returns, and persists by "living in the future and building what's missing."

marsbit43 хв тому

OpenClaw Founder Peter Steinberg's Latest Speech: The Life and Death Revelation of an Open Source Project, How OpenClaw Emerged from the Eye of the Storm

marsbit43 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片